The "UFO" procedure

Thirty-three-year follow-up of pseudoaneurysm of the mitral-aortic intervalvular fibrosa without surgical treatment: a case report and literature review

BACKGROUND

Pseudoaneurysm of the mitral-aortic intervalvular fibrosa (PMAIF) is a rare complication of infective endocarditis or aortic valve surgery. Surgical treatment is suggested, but the long-term follow-up of conservative management remains unclear.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 33-year follow-up of a patient who developed PMAIF six years after aortic valve replacement is reported. The patient presented to our center with dyspnea, and the echocardiography revealed an ejection fraction of 20% and a PMAIF measuring 7 × 10 mm. Despite being advised to undergo surgery, the patient declined due to fear of surgical outcomes. Consequently, conservative treatment with close observation but without surgery was initiated. During the 33-year follow-up period, the patient did not experience any adverse health effects.

CONCLUSION

Surgical intervention should be considered whenever the PMAIF is diagnosed. However, in any case that the surgery was not applicable, conservative management might lead to long-term survival, based on this and similar case reports in the literature.

Partial heart transplantation for destructive infective endocarditis

Infective endocarditis frequently spreads beyond the valve tissue, especially in the aortic location. Invasive endocarditis may lead to abscess formation or fistula, with substantial tissue loss. Here, the case of a 31-year-old male patient with destructive aortic and pulmonary valve endocarditis and a subaortic mural defect who underwent patch closure of the ventricular septal defect and aortic and pulmonary root replacement and right coronary artery bypass graft is presented. This is an uncommon condition and stress is placed on imaging of the technical aspects of the case.

Outcomes of Aortomitral Continuity Reconstruction During Concomitant Aortic and Mitral Valve Replacement

OBJECTIVES

To describe outcomes of reconstruction of the aortomitral continuity (AMC) during concomitant aortic and mitral valve replacement (ie, the "Commando" procedure).

DESIGN

A retrospective study of consecutive cardiac surgeries from 2010 to 2022.

SETTING

At a single institution.

PARTICIPANTS

All patients undergoing double aortic and mitral valve replacement.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were dichotomized by the performance (or not) of AMC reconstruction.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

A total of 331 patients underwent double-valve replacement, of whom 21 patients (6.3%) had a Commando procedure. The Commando group was more likely to have had a previous aortic valve replacement (AVR) or mitral valve replacement (MVR) (66.7% v 27.4%, p < 0.001), redo cardiac surgery (71.4% v 31.3%, p < 0.001), and emergent/salvage surgery (14.3% v 1.61%, p = 0.001), whereas surgery was more often performed for endocarditis in the Commando group (52.4% v 22.9%, p = 0.003). The Commando group had higher operative mortality (28.6% v 10.7%, p = 0.014), more prolonged ventilation (61.9% v 31.9%, p = 0.005), longer cardiopulmonary bypass time (312 ± 118 v 218 ± 85 minutes, p < 0.001), and longer ischemic time (252 ± 90 v 176 ± 66 minutes, p < 0.001). Despite increased short-term morbidity in the Commando group, Kaplan-Meier survival estimation showed no difference in long-term survival between each group (p = 0.386, log-rank). On multivariate Cox analysis, the Commando procedure was not associated with an increased hazard of death, compared to MVR + AVR (hazard ratio 1.29, 95% CI: 0.65-2.59, p = 0.496).

CONCLUSIONS

Although short-term postoperative morbidity and mortality were found to be higher for patients undergoing the Commando procedure, AMC reconstruction may be equally durable in the long term.

New Insights into Mortality-Related Risk Factors in Infective Endocarditis: Results from the Brandenburg State Endocarditis Register

OBJECTIVE

 Endocarditis as a potentially life-threatening disease with high complication and mortality rates. In recent years, an increase in the incident of endocarditis has been reported throughout Europe. In the aging society, successful treatment is complex and challenging owing to the high rate of multimorbidity.

METHODS

 We initiated a statewide prospective multicenter endocarditis registry in 2020. Perioperative risk factors, comorbidities, microbiological, laboratory and imaging diagnostics, complications, and mortality including 1-year follow-up were collected. The present midterm analysis includes factors influencing mortality in the first 313 patients.

RESULT

 In-hospital mortality and 1-year mortality were 28.4 and 40.9%, respectively. Preoperative risk factors include age (p < 0.001), EuroSCORE II (p < 0.001), coronary artery disease (p = 0.022), pacemaker probe infection (p = 0.033), preoperative left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS), pulmonary edema, heart failure, septic emboli, acute renal failure, impaired coagulation, hypalbuminemia (p < 0.001), and N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide (NTproBNP) (p = 0.001). The presence of peri-annular abscess, perforation, and shunt were associated with increased mortality (p = 0.004, 0.001, and 0.004, respectively). In addition, cardiopulmonary bypass time influenced mortality (p = 0.002). The main postoperative causes of death were multi-organ failure, renal failure, vasoplegia, and low-output syndrome (p < 0.001). Previous endocarditis was 7.7%, while 35.5% were prosthetic valve recipients and 33.6% were redo surgeries.

CONCLUSION

 Our first registry data show the complexity of endocarditis patients and the challenging treatment. Some risk factors can be treated preoperatively. For instance, hypalbuminemia and the duration of the procedure can be controlled with adequate albumin substitution and carefully planned procedures restricted to the essential requirements, that is, hybrid approaches with consecutive interventions.

Early outcomes of the "Chimney" commando procedure in the small aortic and mitral annuli

BACKGROUND

Commando procedure, the surgical replacement of the mitral and aortic valves combined with reconstruction of the fibrosa fibrous body, is a technical challenge in patients with small aortic and mitral annuli. In this study, we evaluated the safety and early outcomes of the "Chimney" modality of the Commando procedure, in patients with small aortic and mitral annuli, after prior valve surgery, using a self-assembled valved conduit.

METHODS

From April 2021 to April 2022, 30 consecutive cases of the "Chimney" Commando procedure, with a self-assembled valved conduit and other combined cardiac procedures, were fully performed for re-operative patients with small aortic roots. Data were obtained through a medical record review, at the Asian Heart Hospital in Wuhan, China.

RESULTS

The patient's mean age was 52.7 ± 13.53 years, with 93.3% females. All patients had a previous heart valve surgery, 90% of which had double valve replacement (DVR). Hospital death occurred in 3.3% (n = 1) of the patients, due to malignant arrhythmias and multiorgan failure. Postoperative echocardiogram exams showed that the sizes of the aortic and mitral valve prostheses were 24.23 ± 1.60 mm and 28.33 ± 1.21 mm, respectively. All patients had intact intervalvular fibrosa (IVF) repair and no patient had any aberration in the left heart chamber communication. With the exception of one postoperative sick sinus syndrome and one re-sternotomy for bleeding, there were no significant postoperative complications, such as mortality, renal failure requiring ongoing dialysis, or mediastinitis. Echocardiography exams in the sixth postoperative month showed that the mean gradients of the aortic and mitral valves were 16.26 ± 6.44 mmHg and 11.24 ± 4.90 mmHg, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In comparison with the standard Commando operation, the early outcomes and safety of the "Chimney" Commando procedure proved to be a feasible therapeutic option for patients with small aortic and mitral annuli, after prior valve operations. This approach enables the enlargement of the aortic and mitral annuli and the implantation of the necessary valve prosthesis.

"UFO procedure" for massive aortic and mitral annular calcification involving left atrial and ventricular myocardium: a potential radical solution

BACKGROUND

The "UFO procedure" was initially developed as a surgical option to enlarge the aortic annulus in patients requiring valve replacement. This technique can be employed to treat extensive endocarditis located in the intervalvular fibrous body (IVFB). One of the indications for a "UFO procedure" is massive aortic and mitral valve calcification. It is a challenging surgical procedure with a high risk of intraoperative complications. We present a 76-year-old male patient with massive aortic and mitral valve calcification involving the left atrium, the left ventricle and the left ventricular outflow tract. Both valves exhibited severe stenosis and moderate to severe regurgitation. The left ventricle was hypertrophic and the left ventricular ejection fraction was > 55%. The patient was prediagnosed with persistent atrial fibrillation. The risk of death following heart surgery (EuroSCORE II) was calculated as 9.21%. We successfully performed a so-called "UFO procedure" including replacement of both valves without annular decalcification to avoid atrioventricular dehiscence. We enlarged the IVFB and replaced the non-coronary sinus of Valsalva with doubled bovine pericardium. The left ventricular outflow tract was decalcified. The patient was transferred to a local hospital on the 13th postoperative day.

CONCLUSION

Successful surgical treatment to this extent was demonstrated for the first time. Due to the high perioperative mortality, the surgical treatment of patients with this constellation would be refused in most cases. In our patient, the preoperative imaging showed extreme calcification of both valves and the surrounding myocardium. Excellent preoperative planning and a highly experienced surgical team is necessary.

Aorto-mitral curtain reconstruction in invasive double-valve endocarditis: mid-term outcomes

Background

Invasive double-valve endocarditis with structural damage (abscess or perforation) of the aorto-mitral curtain is a relatively rare but fatal diagnosis requiring complex surgical reconstruction. This study presents the short-term and mid-term outcomes from a single center.

Methods

From 2014 to 2021, 20 patients with double-valve endocarditis with structural damage of the aorto-mitral curtain underwent surgical reconstruction (Hemi-Commando procedure n = 16 and Commando procedure n = 4). Data were obtained retrospectively.

Results

In 13 cases, the procedure was a reoperation. The mean cardiopulmonary bypass time was 239 ± 47 min and the mean cross-clamp time was 186 ± 32 min. Concomitant procedures were tricuspid valve repair in two, coronary revascularization in one, closure of a ventricular septal defect in one and hemiarch (using circulatory arrest) in one patient. Eleven patients (55%) required surgical revision for bleeding. Thirty-day mortality was 30% (6 patients)-3 patients from the Hemi-Commando group (19%) and 3 patients from the Commando group (75%). Overall survival at 1, 3 and 5 years was 60%, 50% and 45% respectively. Reoperation was required by 4 patients. Freedom from reoperation at 1, 3 and 5 years was 86%, 71% and 71% respectively.

Conclusion

Despite the high postoperative morbidity and mortality, complex surgical reconstruction of the aorto-mitral continuity of patients with double-valve endocarditis represents the only real chance for survival. Mid-term outcomes are acceptable, but strict follow-up is required due to the risk of valve failure.

Surgical Outcomes After Reconstruction of the Aortomitral Curtain

Repair of concomitant aortic and mitral valvular disease with involvement of the aortomitral curtain requires a technically complex operation colloquially termed the commando procedure. Surgical outcomes of this procedure are not well described. The objective of this study was to examine outcomes of the commando procedure at our center. We identified all patients undergoing concomitant aortic and mitral valve replacements from 2004-2021. Of 363 patients, 41 underwent reconstruction of the aortomitral curtain. Survival analysis and multivariable modeling were used to examine outcomes and risk factors for mortality. The median age was 52 (IQR 44-71) years. Preoperatively, 4 of 41 (9.8%) patients had renal failure, and 10 of 41 (24.4%) had a stroke. The most common surgical indication was endocarditis in 25 of 41 (61.0%) patients. 25 of 41 (61.0%) patients underwent redo sternotomy, and 23 of 41 (56.1%) had previous prosthetic valves. Operative mortality was 14 of 41 (34.1%), and 8 of 41 (9.5%) patients received a permanent pacemaker. Survival at 1, 3, and 5 years was 55.4% (95% confidence interval (CI), 40.6-75.5%), 50.3% (35.0-72.3%), and 37.7% (19.3-73.9%) respectively. Cox proportional hazards regression identified previous sternotomy (HR 4.76, 95% CI 1.21-18.73), and female gender (HR 1.39, 95% CI 1.17-13.82) as risk factors for mortality. Patients undergoing reconstruction of the aortomitral curtain represent a high-risk population with complex surgical indications. Due to high perioperative morbidity and mortality, this procedure should be performed only when necessary. Despite a high up front morbidity burden, outcomes remain favorable for patients who survive the initial hospitalization.

Repair of atrioventricular disruption after mitral valve replacement utilizing commando procedure principles

Atrioventricular rupture is a life-threatening complication of mitral valve replacement. We present how incising the intervalvular fibrosa critically improves exposure. The aortic valve sacrifice allows access to a large atrioventricular dissociation defect and reliable repair of the anterolateral aspect of mitral valve annulus.

Modification of Reconstruction of Left Ventricular Outflow Tract, Aortic Root and the Intervalvular Fibrous Body for Extensive Infective Endocarditis: A Single Center Experience

BACKGROUND

Extensive infective endocarditis stays a serious life-threatening disease with high mortality and morbidity. The aim of this study is to analyze our experience with our modified surgical technique for extensive infective endocarditis during the last 4 years.

METHODS

Between March 2017 and February 2021, all patients with extensive infective endocarditis required our modified technique consisting of a radical surgical resection of all infected cardiac tissues, the replacement of infected valves, and a reconstruction of the intervalvular fibrous body, the aortic root and the left ventricular outflow tract with modified elephant trunk were included in this study.

RESULTS

Our modified technique was performed on 41 patients during the study period. The age median was 74 (IQR: 66.5 - 76.5) and 61.0% (n = 25) were female. 33 patients (80.5%) were in New York Heart Association Class III-IV and 7 patients (17.1%) in cardiogenic shock. The median logistic EuroSCORE II as predicted risk of mortality was 35% (IQR: 28% - 78%). Median cardiopulmonary bypass time and cross-clamping time were 126 (IQR: 86.5-191) min and 78 (IQR: 55.5-108) min, respectively. Intraoperative mortality and 30-day mortality were 4.8% (2 patients) and 19.5% (8 patients), respectively. Low cardiac output with necessity for mechanical support, stroke and new renal dialysis developed in 9.8% (4 patients), 17.1% (7 patients), and 22.0% (9 patients), respectively. New pacemaker implantation was noted in 39.0% (16 patients). Intensive care stay and hospital stay had medians of 6 (IQR: 5-12) and 14 (IQR: 12.5-20.5) days, respectively. One-year mortality and 4-years mortality were 34.1% (14 patients) and 39.0% (16 patients), respectively. Kaplan-Meier survival estimates were 60.3% (95% CI: 46.2 - 78.6%) at 3 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Our modified technique can be performed in patients with extensive infective endocarditis with acceptable early and mid-term morbidity and mortality. We believe that this technique is an available option for this ill-fated group of patients.

Novel Use of the Perceval Valve for Prosthetic Aortic Valve Endocarditis Requiring Root Replacement

The surgical management of aortic valve endocarditis can be challenging. Infection with abscess formation can destroy the root and annulus, making it difficult to anchor a valve conduit. In this article, we present a novel and efficient strategy for proximal aortic reconstruction. We used a Dacron tube graft and anchored it proximally with a running suture line deep in the left ventricular outflow tract. The coronary buttons were attached, and a Perceval valve was then deployed inside the neo-root to create a bio-Bentall.

Outcomes of combined aortic and mitral valve replacement with reconstruction of the fibrous skeleton of the heart

OBJECTIVES

The objectives of this study were to examine operative and long-term results of combined aortic and mitral valve replacement when reconstruction of the fibrous skeleton of the heart is needed because of calcification, abscess, previous operations, or patient-prosthesis mismatch.

METHODS

From 1985 to 2020, 182 consecutive patients underwent combined aortic and mitral valve replacement with reconstruction of the intervalvular fibrous skeleton in all cases and also the posterior mitral annulus in 63 patients. Bovine pericardium or Dacron grafts were used for the reconstructions. Median follow-up was 7.5 (interquartile range, 2.1-12.6) years and 98% complete.

RESULTS

Patient mean age was 62 years; 69% had 1 or more previous valve operations, and 92% were functional class III or IV. The indications for reconstruction were extensive calcification of the fibrous skeleton in 34%, abscess in 13%, tissue damage secondary to previous operations in 39%, and patient-prosthesis mismatch of the mitral valve in 13%. Bovine pericardium was used in two-thirds of cases and Dacron grafts in one-third. Operative mortality was 13.2% and postoperative complications were common. Survival at 1, 10, and 20 years was 81.8%, 51.1%, and 23.7%, respectively. Fourteen patients required reoperation and 3 transcatheter interventions. The cumulative probability of reinterventions at 1, 10, and 20 years were 3.3%, 5.8%, and 9.1%, respectively. Most patients experienced symptomatic improvement postoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

Reconstructions of the fibrous skeleton of the heart are associated with high operative mortality but the long-term results are satisfactory because most patients would not have survived without surgical intervention.

Surgical Aortic Mitral Curtain Replacement: Systematic Review and Metanalysis of Early and Long-Term Results

The Commando procedure is challenging, and aims to replace the mitral valve, the aortic valve and the aortic mitral curtain, when the latter is severely affected by pathological processes (such as infective endocarditis or massive calcification). Given the high complexity, it is seldomly performed. We aim to review the literature on early (hospitalization and up to 30 days) and long-term (at least 3 years of follow-up) results. Bibliographical research was performed on PubMed and Cochrane with a dedicated string. Papers regarding double valve replacement or repair in the context of aortic mitral curtain disease were included. The metaprop function was used to assess early survival and complications (pacemaker implantation, stroke and bleeding). Nine papers (540 patients, median follow-up 41 (IQR 24.5–51.5) months) were included in the study. Pooled proportion of early mortality, stroke, pacemaker implant and REDO for bleeding were, respectively 16.2%, 7.8%, 25.1% and 13.1%. The long-term survival rate ranged from 50% to 92.2%. Freedom from re-intervention was as high as 90.9% when the endocarditis was not the first etiology and 78.6% in case of valvular infection (one author had 100%). Freedom from IE recurrences reached 85% at 10 years. Despite the high mortality, the rates of re-intervention and infective endocarditis recurrences following the Commando procedure are satisfactory and confirm the need for an aggressive strategy to improve long-term outcomes.

Editorial comment: "Plug-In Hybrid"-Are we ready for this in heart valve surgery?

If we think about plug-in hybrids, the treatment of paravalvular leaks in cardiac surgery may not be the first thing that comes to mind. Yet, there appears to be an attractive analogy between the plug in hybrid car and an interventional device that may be "plugged in" intra-operatively to treat a paravalvular leak. Both technologies provide additional degrees of freedom to the fields, combine different technologies but may also be criticized for their increase in cost, introduction of new problems and their questionable practical need. We address this analogy based on a case series presented in this issue of the Journal of Cardiac Surgery.

Systematic approach to diagnosis and management of infected prosthetic grafts in the proximal aorta

Objectives

Management of infected prosthetic aortic grafts in the ascending and or root is complex and multifaceted. We report our diagnostic pathway, management and outcomes, identifying successful strategies.

Methods

This was a retrospective, single center, observational study. Consecutive patients who underwent management of infected aortic grafts in the ascending and/or root at our institution between October 1998 and December 2019 were included. The main outcome measures were: discharge from hospital alive with at least 1 year survival, operative mortality and success of primary treatment strategy.

Results

Twenty‐six patients presented with infection of proximal aortic grafts and were managed through a number of strategies with an overall hospital‐survival of 81% and 1 year survival of 69%. Twenty of them ultimately underwent redo surgery with 25% operative mortality (within 24 h of surgery). Five patients underwent washout and irrigation of which two were successfully treated and cured with adjunctive antibiotics and two went on to have staged explant and definitive surgery. Interval between surgery and infection was 42.5 ± 35.8 months. All patients had at least one major criterion and three minor criterions with no diagnostic uncertainty. The commonest primary strategy was 3a (definitive surgery), (13/26, 50%).

Conclusions

Adopting a systematic and flexible patient specific approach to the diagnosis and management of patients with proximal aortic graft infections results in reasonable overall 1 year survival. In the majority of patients surgery is ultimately required in an attempt to achieve a curative treatment; however this comes with high operative mortality risk.

Essen-Commando: How we do it

In rare cases of extensive aortic root or mitral valve infective endocarditis (IE), severe calcification of the aortic and mitral valves, or double-valve procedures in patients with small aortic and mitral annuli, surgical reconstruction of the intervalvular fibrous body (IVFB) is required. A high mortality is generally associated with this procedure, and it is frequently avoided by surgeons due to a lack of experience. It is crucial to radically resect all tissues that are severely affected by IE to prevent recurrence in the patient. Our experience with the Commando procedure in patients with extensive double-valve IE involving the IVFB is presented in this article.