Apatinib as first-line treatment in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a phase II clinical trial

Efficacy and safety of TACE combined with tyrosine kinase inhibitors and camrelizumab for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic review and meta‑analysis

Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and camrelizumab (collectively: T-T-C) is a novel treatment strategy for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The present systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of T-T-C compared with TACE combined with TKIs only (T-T) in the treatment of patients with unresectable HCC. A systematic literature search was conducted on T-T and T-T-C using PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library. Data regarding the clinical outcome, including overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), tumor response and adverse events (AEs), were independently extracted and analyzed by two researchers using standardized protocols. In total, 7 cohort studies, including 1,798 patients (T-T-C, 838; T-T, 960), were included in the meta-analysis. The results of the present study demonstrated that the T-T-C group had significantly prolonged OS [hazard ratio (HR), 0.38; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.29-0.50; I2=61.5%; P=0.016)] and PFS (HR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.30-0.46; I2=44.5%; P=0.109), and showed significantly higher objective response rates [risk ratio (RR), 0.82; 95% CI, 0.69-0.96; I2=25.1%; P=0.237)] and slightly higher disease control rates without a significant difference (RR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.89-1.03; I2=0.0%; P=0.969). In addition, grade 3/4 AEs were more common in the T-T group, including hypertension (RR, 1.15; 95% CI, 0.85-1.56), vomiting or nausea (RR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.44-1.76) and pain (RR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.45-1.21); however, these results were not statistically significant. In conclusion, compared with T-T combination therapy, T-T-C demonstrated a notable advantage in terms of OS, PFS, ORR and DCR in patients with unresectable HCC. For manageable AEs, although the results were not statistically significant, the incidence of AEs in the T-T group was higher than that in the T-T-C group in terms of event probability.

Small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors approved for systemic therapy of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: recent advances and future perspectives

Liver cancer is the sixth most commonly diagnosed cancer and the third leading cause of cancer death in the world, and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common form of liver cancer. More than half of the HCC patients are diagnosed at an advanced stage and often require systemic therapy. Dysregulation of the activity of receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) is involved in the development and progress of HCC, RTKs are therefore the potential targets for systemic therapy of advanced HCC (aHCC). Currently, a total of six small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have been approved for aHCC, including first-line sorafenib, lenvatinib, and donafenib, and second-line regorafenib, cabozantinib, and apatinib. These TKIs improved patients survival, which are associated with disease stage, etiology, liver function, tumor burden, baseline levels of alpha-fetoprotein, and treatment history. This review focuses on the clinical outcomes of these TKIs in key clinical trials, retrospective and real-world studies and discusses the future perspectives of TKIs for aHCC, with an aim to provide up-to-date evidence for decision-making in the treatment of aHCC.

Hepatocellular carcinoma: signaling pathways, targeted therapy, and immunotherapy

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common primary liver cancer with a high mortality rate. It is regarded as a significant public health issue because of its complicated pathophysiology, high metastasis, and recurrence rates. There are no obvious symptoms in the early stage of HCC, which often leads to delays in diagnosis. Traditional treatment methods such as surgical resection, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and interventional therapies have limited therapeutic effects for HCC patients with recurrence or metastasis. With the development of molecular biology and immunology, molecular signaling pathways and immune checkpoint were identified as the main mechanism of HCC progression. Targeting these molecules has become a new direction for the treatment of HCC. At present, the combination of targeted drugs and immune checkpoint inhibitors is the first choice for advanced HCC patients. In this review, we mainly focus on the cutting-edge research of signaling pathways and corresponding targeted therapy and immunotherapy in HCC. It is of great significance to comprehensively understand the pathogenesis of HCC, search for potential therapeutic targets, and optimize the treatment strategies of HCC.

Tumor Targeting with Apatinib-loaded Nanoparticles and Sonodynamic Combined Therapy

INTRODUCTION

This study implies the enhancement of apatinib killing effect in 4T1 tumor cells through constructing drug-loaded nanoparticles apatinib/Ce6@ZIF- 8@Membranes (aCZM) to enhance tumor therapeutic targeting and reduce toxic side following sonodynamic therapy (SDT).

METHODS

apatinib/Ce6@ZIF-8 (aCZ) were synthesized by in situ encapsulation, and aCZM were constructed by encapsulating the nanoparticles with extracted breast cancer 4T1 cell membranes. aCZM were characterized and tested for the stability by electron microscopy, and the membrane proteins on the nanoparticles' surface were assessed using SDS-PAGE gel electrophoresis. The cell viability of 4T1 cells following treatment with aCZM was tested using cell counting kit-8 (CCK-8). The uptake of nanoparticles was detected by laser confocal microscopy and flow cytometry, and the SDT-mediated production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) was verified by singlet oxygen sensor green (SOSG), electron spin resonance (ESR), and DCFH-DA fluorescent probes. The CCK-8 assay and flow cytometry using Calcein/PI were used to assess the antitumoral effect of aCZM nanoparticles under SDT. The biosafety of aCZM was further verified in vitro and in vivo using the hemolysis assay, routine blood test and H&E staining of vital organs in Balb/c mice.

RESULTS

aCZM with an average particle size of about 210.26 nm were successfully synthesized. The results of the SDS-PAGE gel electrophoresis experiment showed that aCZM have a band similar to that of pure cell membrane proteins. The CCK-8 assay demonstrated the absence of effects on cell viability at a low concentration range, and the relative cell survival rate reached more than 95%. Laser confocal microscopy and flow cytometry analysis showed that aCZM treated group has the strongest fluorescence and the highest cellular uptake of nanoparticles. SOSG, ESR, and DCFH-DA fluorescent probes all indicated that the aCZM + SDT treated group has the highest ROS production. The CCK-8 assay also showed that when the ultrasound intensity was fixed at 0.5 W/cm2, the relative cell survival rates in the medium concentration group (10 μg/ml) (5.54 ± 1.26%) and the high concentration group (20 μg/ml) (2.14 ± 1.63%) were significantly lower than those in the low concentration group (5 μg/ml) (53.40 ± 4.25%). Moreover, there was a concentration and intensity dependence associated with the cellkilling effect. The mortality rate of the aCZM in the ultrasound group (44.95 ± 3.03%) was significantly higher than that of the non-ultrasound (17.00 ± 2.26%) group and aCZ + SDT group (24.85 ± 3.08%) (P<0.0001). The live and dead cells' staining (Calcein/PI) also supported this result. Finally, in vitro hemolysis test at 4 and 24 hours showed that the hemolysis rate of the highest concentration group was less than 1%. The blood routine, biochemistry, and H&E staining results of major organs in Balb/c mice undergoing nano-treatments showed no obvious functional abnormalities and tissue damage in 30 days.

CONCLUSION

In this study, a multifunctional bionic drug delivery nanoparticles (aCZM) system with good biosafety and compatibility in response to acoustic dynamics was successfully constructed and characterized. This system enhanced apatinib killing effect on tumor cells and reduced toxic side effects under SDT.

Clinical efficacy and safety evaluation of camrelizumab plus lenvatinib in adjuvant therapy after hepatocellular carcinoma surgery

Objective

To assess the efficacy and safety of camrelizumab plus different targeted drugs in adjuvant therapy after hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) surgery.

Patients and methods

This retrospective cohort study included HCC patients who, after undergoing failed postoperative adjuvant lenvatinib therapy, received intravenous camrelizumab 200 mg every 3 weeks (C group, n = 97), camrelizumab plus oral apatinib 250 mg daily (C+A group, n = 125), camrelizumab plus oral lenvatinib 12 mg daily (for bodyweight ≥60 kg)/lenvatinib 8 mg daily (for bodyweight <60 kg) (C+L group, n = 120), or camrelizumab plus oral sorafenib 400 mg bi-daily (C+S group, n = 114) between October 2020 and October 2021. The outcomes including the objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were evaluated by RECIST 1.1 and iRECIST. The median progression-free survival (mPFS), median overall survival (mOS), 6-month OS rate, 12-month OS rate, and adverse events were evaluated.

Results

As of 31 May 2022 with last follow-up time, the ORR was 17.2% for the C group, 44.6% for the C+A group, 47.9% for the C+L group, and 36.3% for the C+S group. The DCR was 72.0% for the C group, 81.8% for the C+A group, 85.5% for the C+L group, and 77.9% for the C+S group. The mPFS was 11.0 months (10.1-12.8) for the C group, 14.0 months (12.7-16.5) for the C+A group, 18.0 months (16.9-20.1) for the C+L group, and 12.0 months (9.7-14.4) for the C+S group. The mOS was 13.0 months (11.6-15.3) for the C group, 17.0 months (15.8-19.4) for the C+A group, 19.0 months (17.7-20.2) for the C+L group, and 15.0 months (14.1-17.3) for the C+S group. Grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 14 patients (14.4%) for the C group, 10 patients (8.0%) for the C+A group, 5 patients (4.2%) for the C+L group, and 11 patients (9.6%) for the C+S group. The most common adverse events were fatigue and transaminitis.

Conclusion

Camrelizumab combined with lenvatinib as adjuvant therapy showed promising efficacy and manageable safety in HCC patients. It might be a potential adjuvant therapy or second-line treatment for these patients.

Apatinib plus drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization as bridging therapy to surgical resection displays an acceptable efficacy and safety profile in hepatocellular carcinoma patients

BACKGROUND

Apatinib exhibits a synergistic effect with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) by inhibiting TACE-induced neoangiogenic reaction in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients. But apatinib plus drug-eluting bead TACE (DEB-TACE) is rarely reported as a bridging therapy to surgery. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of apatinib plus DEB-TACE as a bridge to surgical resection in intermediate-stage HCC patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty-one intermediate-stage HCC patients who received apatinib plus DEB-TACE as a bridging therapy to surgery were enrolled. After the bridging therapy, complete response (CR), partial response (PR), stable disease (SD), progressive disease (PD), and objective response rate (ORR) were evaluated; meanwhile, relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were determined.

RESULTS

After the bridging therapy, three (9.7%), twenty one (67.7%), seven (22.6%), and twenty four (77.4%) patients achieved CR, PR, SD, and ORR, respectively; besides, PD did not occur. The successful downstaging rate was 18 (58.1%). The median (95% confidence interval [CI]) accumulating RFS was 33.0 (19.6 - 46.6) months. Besides, the median (95% CI) accumulating OS was 37.0 (24.8 - 49.2) months. HCC patients with successful downstaging showed a higher accumulating RFS rate ( P = 0.038) and similar accumulating OS rate ( P = 0.073) compared to those without successful downstaging. The overall incidence of adverse events was relatively low. Besides, all the adverse events were mild and controllable. The most frequent adverse events included pain (14 [45.2%]) and fever (9 [29.0%]).

CONCLUSION

Apatinib plus DEB-TACE as a bridging therapy to surgical resection displays good efficacy and safety profile in intermediate-stage HCC patients.

Comparing the effectiveness and safety of Sorafenib plus TACE with Apatinib plus TACE for treating patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a multicentre propensity score matching study

OBJECTIVE

Local combined systemic therapy has been an important method for the treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness and safety of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) plus Sorafenib versus TACE plus Apatinib for treating patients with unresectable HCC.

METHODS

The clinical data of patients with unresectable HCC who were treated with TACE plus Sorafenib or TACE plus Apatinib at 5 Chinese medical centers between January 2016 and December 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. Propensity score matching (PSM) was applied to reduce the bias from confounding factors.

RESULTS

A total of 380 patients were enrolled, of whom 129 cases were treated with TACE plus Sorafenib and 251 cases with TACE plus Apatinib. After the 1:1 PSM, 116 pairs of patients were involved in this study. The results showed that the PFS and OS in the TACE-Sorafenib group were significantly longer than those in the TACE-Apatinib group (PFS: 16.79 ± 6.45 vs. 14.76 ± 6.98 months, P = 0.049; OS: 20.66 ± 6.98 vs. 17.69 ± 6.72 months, P = 0.013). However, the ORR in the TACE-Apatinib group was markedly higher than that in the TACE-Sorafenib group (70.69% vs. 56.03%, P = 0.021). There were more patients with adverse events (AEs) in the TACE-Apatinib group than those in the TACE-Sorafenib group before dose adjustment (87 vs. 63, P = 0.001); however, the number of patients who suffered from AEs was not significantly different between the two groups after the dose adjustment (62 vs. 55, P = 0.148). No treatment-related death was found in the two groups. Subgroup analysis revealed that patients with unresectable HCC could better benefit from regular doses than reduced doses (Sorafenib, 22.59 vs. 18.02, P < 0.001; Apatinib, 19.75 vs. 16.86, P = 0.005).

CONCLUSION

TACE plus either Sorafenib or Apatinib could effectively treat patients with unresectable HCC, the safety of TACE plus Sorafenib was better. and the ORR of TACE plus Apatinib was higher.

Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Current Therapeutic Algorithm for Localized and Advanced Disease

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common primary liver cancer in patients with liver cirrhosis of various etiologies. In recent years, there has been an advance in the knowledge of molecular mechanisms and a better staging definition of patients which has allowed the development of new therapies that have entered the therapeutic workup of these patients. Deep information on molecular drivers of HCC contributed to the development of targeted therapies with remarkable benefits. The novel strategies of targeting immune evasion using immune checkpoint inhibitors and CAR-T and TCR-T therapeutics have also shown promising results. For advanced diseases, the therapeutic algorithm has been recently updated, thanks to the efficacy of combining immunotherapy and antiangiogenic therapy in the first-line setting, and new drugs, both as single-agents or combinations, are currently under investigation.

Small Molecule Inhibitors for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Advances and Challenges

According to data provided by World Health Organization, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the sixth most common cause of deaths due to cancer worldwide. Tremendous progress has been achieved over the last 10 years developing novel agents for HCC treatment, including small-molecule kinase inhibitors. Several small molecule inhibitors currently form the core of HCC treatment due to their versatility since they would be more easily absorbed and have higher oral bioavailability, thus easier to formulate and administer to patients. In addition, they can be altered structurally to have greater volumes of distribution, allowing them to block extravascular molecular targets and to accumulate in a high concentration in the tumor microenvironment. Moreover, they can be designed to have shortened half-lives to control for immune-related adverse events. Most importantly, they would spare patients, healthcare institutions, and society as a whole from the burden of high drug costs. The present review provides an overview of the pharmaceutical compounds that are licensed for HCC treatment and other emerging compounds that are still investigated in preclinical and clinical trials. These molecules are targeting different molecular targets and pathways that are proven to be involved in the pathogenesis of the disease.

Efficacy of Transarterial Chemoembolization Combined with Molecular Targeted Agents for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Network Meta-Analysis

Simple Summary

Liver cancer is the second most common cause of cancer-related death, with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) being the most prevalent subtype. Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) in combination with different tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) has recently been widely used for unresectable HCC (uHCC). However, studies investigating different combinations of agents have shown inconsistent results. Thus, we conducted a network meta-analysis to assess and compare the response of different agents in an uHCC setting. According to our results, TACE plus lenvatinib provides optimal treatment for uHCC, with the highest ranking based on OS, PFS, and DCR rates and the second-best ranking based on ORR rates.

Abstract

Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) is the mainstay treatment for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC). However, studies investigating different combinations of agents have shown inconsistent results. Here, we used network meta-analysis (NMA) to compare different agents across 41 studies (36 cohort studies and five RCTs) in 11,540 patients. Multiple RCTs and cohort studies were searched to evaluate TACE combined with different TKIs. Outcomes of interest included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and tumor response. NMA used a random-effects consistency model to pool evidence from direct and indirect comparisons. Hazard ratio (HR) and relative risks (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were analyzed. Further, heterogeneity and publication bias analyses were performed and agents were ranked. TACE plus lenvatinib provided the maximal OS (Rank probability: 0.7559), PFS (Rank probability: 0.8595), CR (Rank probability: 0.4179), and DCR (Rank probability: 0.3857). TACE plus anlotinib demonstrated the highest PR (p = 0.62649) and ORR (p = 0.51158). SD was more often associated with TACE plus sorafenib (Rank probability: 0.601685). TACE plus lenvatinib provides optimal treatment for uHCC based on the highest ranking of OS, PFS, and DCR rates. However, given the lack of statistically significant OS benefit, shared decision making should include other TKIs as acceptable alternatives.

Immunotherapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: From clinical trials to real-world data and future advances

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a leading cause of cancer-associated mortality worldwide. HCC is an inflammation-associated immunogenic cancer that frequently arises in chronically inflamed livers. Advanced HCC is managed with systemic therapies; the tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) sorafenib has been used in 1st-line setting since 2007. Immunotherapies have emerged as promising treatments across solid tumors including HCC for which immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are licensed in 1st- and 2nd-line treatment setting. The treatment field of advanced HCC is continuously evolving. Several clinical trials are investigating novel ICI candidates as well as new ICI regimens in combination with other therapeutic modalities including systemic agents, such as other ICIs, TKIs, and anti-angiogenics. Novel immunotherapies including adoptive cell transfer, vaccine-based approaches, and virotherapy are also being brought to the fore. Yet, despite advances, several challenges persist. Lack of real-world data on the use of immunotherapy for advanced HCC in patients outside of clinical trials constitutes a main limitation hindering the breadth of application and generalizability of data to this larger and more diverse patient cohort. Consequently, issues encountered in real-world practice include patient ineligibly for immunotherapy because of contraindications, comorbidities, or poor performance status; lack of response, efficacy, and safety data; and cost-effectiveness. Further real-world data from high-quality large prospective cohort studies of immunotherapy in patients with advanced HCC is mandated to aid evidence-based clinical decision-making. This review provides a critical and comprehensive overview of clinical trials and real-world data of immunotherapy for HCC, with a focus on ICIs, as well as novel immunotherapy strategies underway.

Experimental drug treatments for hepatocellular carcinoma: Clinical trial failures 2015 to 2021

INTRODUCTION

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a major health problem worldwide with limited systemic therapy options. Since the approval of sorafenib in 2008, no systemic therapy has provided a sustained/robust/survival benefit for patients with advanced HCC until recently. Many initially promising therapies have been trialed, but survival outcomes remained stagnant. As such, knowledge concerning previous treatment failures may help guide further areas of study, as well inform future therapeutic approaches.

AREA COVERED

This article reviews recent advances in the treatment of HCC. Despite some recent success, many systemic and locoregional therapies have failed to produce significant improvements in outcome. These treatment failures are examined and insight into pathways for future success are discussed.

EXPERT OPINION

Combination atezolizumab and bevacizumab has changed the landscape of systemic treatment for patients with HCC when it became the first therapy after demonstrating improve outcomes over sorafenib. Clinical trials in patients with advanced HCC have inherent difficulty with challenges to determine if a patient's declining liver function is secondary to disease progression, worsening cirrhosis, or drug toxicity, which may skew results. As we gain more knowledge of underlying genetic alterations behind the pathophysiology of the development of HCC, molecular markers may be identified to assist in predicting which patients would respond to a specific therapy.

A Comparative Analysis of Efficacy of Apatinib Combined with Transarterial Chemoembolization and Transarterial Chemoembolization Alone in the Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Portal Vein Tumor Thrombus

Background

The treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients with portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT) remains controversial due to the limited effect of sorafenib. The aim of the study was to investigate whether apatinib could improve the efficacy of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) for patients with HCC complicated by PVTT.

Methods

The study included 109 patients with HCC and PVTT who received TACE combined with apatinib (TACE + apatinib) (53 patients) or TACE alone (56 patients) between June 2015 and January 2019. Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was used to reduce the potential selection bias. Overall survival time (OS) and time to progression (TTP) were used to evaluate the efficacy of TACE + apatinib and TACE alone.

Results

Before PSM, TACE + apatinib significantly improved median TTP (7.0 vs. 3.0 months, P < 0.001) and median OS (15.0 vs. 7.0 months, P < 0.001) when compared with TACE alone. After PSM, the median TTP was significantly longer in the TACE + apatinib group, 6.0 months, than in the TACE alone group, 3.0 months (P < 0.001), and the median OS was significantly longer in the TACE + apatinib group, 14.0 months, than in the TACE alone group, 7.0 months (P < 0.001). Subgroup analysis revealed that, except for patients with Child–Pugh class B, the patients with or without extrahepatic metastases and with Child–Pugh class A had longer TTP and OS after the combined TACE + apatinib treatment than after TACE alone.

Conclusion

The combination of TACE + apatinib might be an effective and safe treatment for HCC patients with PVTT.

Mechanisms of Pharmacoresistance in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: New Drugs but Old Problems

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a malignancy with poor prognosis when diagnosed at advanced stages in which curative treatments are no longer applicable. A small group of these patients may still benefit from transarterial chemoembolization. The only therapeutic option for most patients with advanced HCC is systemic pharmacological treatments based on tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and immunotherapy. Available drugs only slightly increase survival, as tumor cells possess additive and synergistic mechanisms of pharmacoresistance (MPRs) prior to or enhanced during treatment. Understanding the molecular basis of MPRs is crucial to elucidate the genetic signature underlying HCC resistome. This will permit the selection of biomarkers to predict drug treatment response and identify tumor weaknesses in a personalized and dynamic way. In this article, we have reviewed the role of MPRs in current first-line drugs and the combinations of immunotherapeutic agents with novel TKIs being tested in the treatment of advanced HCC.

PAQR4 promotes the development of hepatocellular carcinoma by activating PI3K/AKT pathway

Progestin and adipoQ receptor 4 (PAQR4) is a novel tumorigenic factor that promotes cell proliferation and metastasis in lung and breast cancer, but its role in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is unknown. The aim of our study was to explore its role and underlying mechanism in the development of HCC. Analysis of GEPIA database indicated that PAQR4 was highly expressed in HCC samples, and the mRNA level of PAQR4 was negatively correlated with the overall survival of HCC patients. Knockdown of PAQR4 in Hep3B cells suppressed cell proliferation by hindering G1/S transition of cell cycle as shown by the flow cytometry analysis. PAQR4 knockdown also expedited the cell apoptosis. Knockdown of PAQR4 repressed the migratory and invasive potential of Hep3B cells. PAQR4 knockdown sensitized Hep3B cells to apatinib-based chemotherapy. PAQR4 knockdown blocked the activation of PI3K/AKT pathway, as reflected by the reduced phosphorylation of AKT and p85. Conversely, overexpression of PAQR4 exerted opposite effects in Huh-7 cells. PI3K inhibitor LY294002 could eliminate the effects of PAQR4 on cell proliferation, apoptosis, chemoresistance, and invasion. In tumor xenograft model, knockdown of PAQR4 suppressed tumor growth in vivo, while PAQR4 overexpression promoted tumor growth. Collectively, our data suggest that PAQR4 has a tumorigenic effect on HCC progression by activating PI3K/AKT pathway.

Anti-Tumor Effect of Apatinib and Relevant Mechanisms in Liposarcoma

Background

Primary retroperitoneal liposarcomas (RLPSs) are rare heterogeneous tumors for which there are few effective therapies. Certain anti-angiogenic tyrosine kinase inhibitors have demonstrated efficacy against various solid tumors. The aims of this study were to investigate the effect of Apatinib against retroperitoneal liposarcoma cells and its underlying mechanism and to explore the anti-tumor efficacy of a combination of Apatinib and Epirubicin.

Methods

CD34 immunohistochemical staining was used to measure microvessel density (MVD) in 89 retroperitoneal liposarcoma tissues. We used CCK-8 cell proliferation, clone formation, Transwell migration, invasion assays and flow cytometry to evaluate the effects of Apatinib alone and the combination of Apatinib and Epirubicin on liposarcoma cells. High-throughput RNA sequencing and western-blotting was used to identify key differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in SW872 cell line after application of Apatinib. Murine patient-derived tumor xenograft (PDX) was established to assess the efficacy and safety of Apatinib monotherapy and the combination of Apatinib and Epirubicin in RLPS.

Results

The microvessel density (MVD) varied widely among retroperitoneal liposarcoma tissues. Compared with the low-MVD group, the high-MVD group had poorer overall survival. Apatinib inhibited the liposarcoma cell proliferation, invasion and migration, increased the proportion of apoptosis, and induced G1 phase arrest. In addition, the combination of Apatinib and Epirubicin enhanced the foregoing inhibitory effects. High-throughput RNA sequencing showed that Apatinib downregulated the expression of TYMS and RRM2. Western blotting verified that Apatinib downregulated the TYMS/STAT3/PD-L1 pathway and inhibited liposarcoma proliferation by suppressing the RRM2/PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway. In the murine PDX model of retroperitoneal liposarcoma, Apatinib and its combination with Epirubicin significantly inhibited microvessel formation and repressed tumor growth safely and effectively.

Conclusions

Apatinib and its combination with Epirubicin showed strong efficacy against liposarcoma both in vitro and in vivo. Apatinib might inhibit liposarcoma cell proliferation through the RRM2/PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling pathway and downregulate PD-L1 via the TYMS/STAT3 signaling pathway.

Advances in locoregional therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma combined with immunotherapy and targeted therapy

Locoregional therapies (LRTs) of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) represented by ablation and TACE has become the main means for the clinical treatment of unresectable HCC. Among these, TACE is used throughout the stage Ib to IIIb of HCC treatment. In recent years, immunotherapy led by immune checkpoint inhibitors has become a hot direction in clinical research. At the same time, targeted drugs such as Sorafenib and Apatinib have played an important role in the treatment and complementary therapy of advanced HCC, and their clinical application has been quite mature. HCC is the sixth most common malignant tumor in the world. When it comes to its treatment, different therapies have different indications, and their individual efficacies are not satisfactory, which makes the exploration of the use of combination therapy in HCC treatment become a new trend. In this paper, the status of the three therapies and the progress of their combined application are briefly reviewed.

Efficacy and Response Biomarkers of Apatinib in the Treatment of Malignancies in China: A Review

Apatinib is a multitarget tyrosine kinase inhibitor marketed in China for the treatment of advanced gastric cancer (GC) and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). It has also been used off-label for the treatment of many other malignancies. To comprehensively evaluate the efficacy of apatinib as a targeted therapy in the treatment of malignancies, we conducted systematic online and manual searches of the literature on apatinib in the treatment of malignancies. In this review, we first summarized the efficacy of apatinib against various malignancies based on clinical trials where results have been reported. In prospectively registered trials, apatinib has been proven to be effective against GC, HCC, lung cancer, breast cancer, sarcoma, esophageal cancer, colorectal cancer, ovarian cancer, cervical cancer, cholangiocarcinoma, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, nasopharyngeal carcinoma, and differentiated thyroid cancer. The response biomarkers for apatinib were also reviewed. This review will serve as a good reference for the application of apatinib in clinical studies and the design of clinical trials.

The Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR) Predicts the Prognosis of Unresectable Intermediate and Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treated with Apatinib

Purpose

Patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who might benefit most from anti-angiogenesis therapy remain unknown. In recent years, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), an indicator of inflammatory response, has received particular attention in HCC. Herein, we explored the prognostic value of pre-treatment NLR in individuals with unresectable intermediate and advanced hepatocellular carcinoma treated with apatinib, a second-line angiogenesis inhibitor. The findings of this study would assist in precision medicine and provide clinical decision support.

Patients and Methods

This is a retrospective study in which 171 HCC patients attending Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital and treated with apatinib between January 2016 and July 2018 were enrolled. The prognosis of the patients based on NLR signatures was then analyzed.

Results

Patients with a low pre-treatment NLR (NLR < 2.49) presented a significantly longer overall survival (OS) (P < 0.001) and progression-free survival (PFS) (P = 0.043). Furthermore, a low pre-treatment NLR level could be used to predict a longer OS in patients with non-macrovascular invasion (P < 0.001). Independent of serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) levels, a low NLR level in this cohort of patients is associated with a longer OS.

Conclusion

Pre-treatment NLR predicts the prognosis of patients with unresectable intermediate and advanced HCC treated with apatinib.

Sorafenib Versus Apatinib Both Combined Transarterial Chemoembolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma With Portal Vein Tumor Thrombosis: A Comparative Retrospective Study

Objective

To compare the efficacy and safety of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) combining with sorafenib or apatinib for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients with portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT).

Methods

From June 2015 to March 2020, a total of 89 consecutive advanced HCC patients with PVTT who were treated with sorafenib-TACE (S-TACE) or apatinib-TACE (A-TACE) in our center were enrolled. The overall survival (OS), time to progression (TTP), tumor response, and adverse events in the two groups were compared.

Results

There were 32 and 41 patients included in the S-TACE group and A-TACE group, respectively. The median follow-up was 10.0 months (range, 3.0–36.0 months) in the whole study. The median OS (11.0 vs. 10.0 months, P = 0.419), median TTP (5.0 vs. 6.0 months, P = 0.073), and tumor response (P = 0.529) between the S-TACE group and the A-TACE group were not significantly different. The adverse events related to sorafenib or apatinib were tolerable.

Conclusion

S-TACE and A-TACE exhibited comparable prognosis for HCC patients with PVTT, which provide another effective and safe method of A-TACE for these patients except for conventional S-TACE.

Quantification of sorafenib, lenvatinib, and apatinib in human plasma for therapeutic drug monitoring by UPLC-MS/MS

Sorafenib, lenvatinib, and apatinib, as multi-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors with anti-proliferative and anti-angiogenic effects, are widely used for systemic therapy in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma patients. Nevertheless, insufficient efficacy or adverse effects often appear due to the significant inter-individual variability of plasma concentration for these drugs. In order to carry out therapeutic drug monitoring of these drugs and then ensure the effectiveness and safety of the medical treatment, the first method allowing to quantify sorafenib, lenvatinib, and apatinib simultaneously in human plasma was developed in this study. The analysis was performed by UPLC-MS/MS system and the chromatographic separation was achieved on a C18 column using a gradient elution of water-acetonitrile in 3.5 min. This method presented satisfactory results in terms of specificity, precision (coefficient of variation of intra-day and inter-day:1.4-6.6 %), accuracy (92.6-105.4 %), matrix effects (96.9-107.2 %), extraction recovery (90.5-99.4 %), as well as stability in human plasma and even whole blood under certain conditions. This sensitive, rapid and simple method was successfully applied to the analysis of sorafenib, lenvatinib and apatinib for therapeutic drug monitoring in hepatocellular carcinoma patients, and it was expected to be applied to further study about clarifying the concentration- efficacy and concentration-toxic relationship of sorafenib, lenvatinib, and apatinib in hepatocellular carcinoma patients.

Efficacy and Safety of Apatinib Treatment for Advanced Cholangiocarcinoma After Failed Gemcitabine-Based Chemotherapy: An Open-Label Phase II Prospective Study

Purpose

As a novel small-molecule vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 tyrosine kinase inhibitor (VEGFR2-TKI), Methylsulfonic apatinib (apatinib) exhibits a specific antitumor effect in various solid tumors via inhibition of angiogenesis. The present study was performed to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of apatinib in the treatment of advanced cholangiocarcinoma after failed gemcitabine-based chemotherapy.

Patients and Methods

This was a prospective open-label phase II trial (NCT03521219). A total of 32 patients, in whom gemcitabine-based first-line chemotherapy for advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma had failed, were consecutively enrolled in a prospective, open, exploratory, and single-center clinical trial from November 2017 to November 2018. They were treated with apatinib mesylate second-line monotherapy (orally, 500 mg per day for a cycle of 28 days) until progressive disease or unacceptable toxicity. Using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumor version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) and the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0 (NCI-CTCAE 4.0), the efficacy and adverse were evaluated, respectively. Kaplan-Meier method was used for survival analysis.

Results

Twenty-six patients were enrolled in full analysis set. At the end of follow-up, two patients were lost to follow-up, 24 of 26 patients in FAS were included in efficacy analyses. For the efficacy analysis set, the objective response rate (ORR) was 20.8% [95% confidence interval (CI): 9.24-40.47%] and the disease control rate (DCR) was 62.5% (95% CI: 112.86-387.14 days). One patient (4%) showed complete response (CR), 4 patients (17%) showed partial response (PR), 10 patients (41.7%) stable disease (SD), and 9 patients (37.5%) had progressive disease (PD). Meanwhile, apatinib therapy achieved the median progression-free survival PFS was 95 days (95% CI: 79.70-154.34 days), and the median OS was 250 days (95% CI: 112.86-387.14 days). Furthermore, univariate analysis revealed that age and tumor's anatomic location significantly affected PFS (P < 0.05). The most common clinically adverse events (AEs) included myelosuppression (69.2%), hypertension (57.7%), proteinuria (46.2%). The AEs were mild, mainly in grade 1 or 2, and no toxicity-induced death occurred.

Conclusion

Apatinib monotherapy is an effective and promising regimen for treating patients with advanced cholangiocarcinoma who experienced failure of gemcitabine-based chemotherapy.

Changes in and challenges regarding the surgical treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma in China

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a common malignant tumor with a high morbidity and mortality in China and elsewhere in the world. Due to its tumor heterogeneity and distant metastasis, patients with HCC often have a poor prognosis. A surgical treatment such as a radical hepatectomy is still the treatment of choice for patients with HCC in current clinical practice. However, the high rate of recurrence and rate of metastasis after surgery diminishes the survival of and prognosis for these patients. In an era of targeted therapy and immunotherapy, the surgical treatment of HCC must change. This review focuses on the definition, feasibility, and criteria with which to evaluate neoadjuvant therapy for HCC in order to provide a new perspective on surgical treatment of HCC.