Inhaled antibiotics during mechanical ventilation-why it will work

Optimizing in vitro phage-ciprofloxacin combination formulation for respiratory therapy of multi-drug resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections

Respiratory infection caused by multi-drug resistant (MDR) Pseudomonas aeruginosa is challenging to treat. In this study, we investigate the optimal dose of anti-pseudomonas phage PEV31 (103, 105, and 108 PFU/mL) combined with ciprofloxacin (ranging from 1/8× MIC to 8× MIC) to treat the MDR P. aeruginosa strain FADD1-PA001 using time-kill studies. We determined the impact of phage growth kinetics in the presence of ciprofloxacin through one-step growth analysis. Single treatments with either phage PEV31 or ciprofloxacin (except at 8× MIC) showed limited bactericidal efficiency, with bacterial regrowth observed at 48 h. The most effective treatments were PEV31 at multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 0.1 and 100 combined with ciprofloxacin at concentrations above 1× MIC, resulting in a >4 log10 reduction in bacterial counts. While the burst size of phage PEV31 was decreased with increasing ciprofloxacin concentration, robust antimicrobial effects were still maintained in the combination treatment. Aerosol samples collected from vibrating mesh nebulization of the combination formulation at phage MOI of 100 with 2× MIC effectively inhibited bacterial density. In summary, our combination treatments eradicated in vitro bacterial growth and sustained antimicrobial effects for 48 h. These results indicated the potential application of nebulization-based strategies for the combination treatment against MDR lung infections.

Not all nebulizers are created equal: Considerations in choosing a nebulizer for aerosol delivery during mechanical ventilation

INTRODUCTION

Aerosol therapy is commonly prescribed in the mechanically ventilated patient. Jet nebulizers (JN) and vibrating mesh nebulizers (VMN) are the most common nebulizer types, however, despite VMN's well established superior performance, JN use remains the most commonly used of the two. In this review, we describe the key differentiators between nebulizer types and how considered selection of nebulizer type may enable successful therapy and the optimization of drug/device combination products.

AREAS COVERED

Following a review of the published literature up to February 2023, the current state of the art in relation to JN and VMN is discussed under the headings of in vitro performance of nebulizers during mechanical ventilation, respective compatibility with formulations for inhalation, clinical trials making use of VMN during mechanical ventilation, distribution of nebulized aerosol throughout the lung, measuring the respective performance of nebulizers in the patient and non-drug delivery considerations in nebulizer choice.

EXPERT OPINION

Whether for standard care, or the development of drug/device combination products, the choice of nebulizer type should not be made without consideration of the unique needs of the combination of each of drug, disease and patient types, as well as target site for deposition, and healthcare professional and patient safety.

Pulmonary Drug Delivery of Antimicrobials and Anticancer Drugs Using Solid Dispersions

It is well established that currently available inhaled drug formulations are associated with extremely low lung deposition. Currently available technologies alleviate this low deposition problem via mixing the drug with inert larger particles, such as lactose monohydrate. Those inert particles are retained in the inhalation device or impacted in the throat and swallowed, allowing the smaller drug particles to continue their journey towards the lungs. While this seems like a practical approach, in some formulations, the ratio between the carrier to drug particles can be as much as 30 to 1. This limitation becomes more critical when treating lung conditions that inherently require large doses of the drug, such as antibiotics and antivirals that treat lung infections and anticancer drugs. The focus of this review article is to review the recent advancements in carrier free technologies that are based on coamorphous solid dispersions and cocrystals that can improve flow properties, and help with delivering larger doses of the drug to the lungs.