1
|
Zhang J, Zhang Q, Zhao B, Shi G. Deep learning nomogram for predicting neoadjuvant chemotherapy response in locally advanced gastric cancer patients. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2024; 49:3780-3796. [PMID: 38796795 PMCID: PMC11519172 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-024-04331-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2024] [Revised: 04/02/2024] [Accepted: 04/03/2024] [Indexed: 05/29/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Developed and validated a deep learning radiomics nomogram using multi-phase contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) images to predict neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) response in locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC) patients. METHODS This multi-center study retrospectively included 322 patients diagnosed with gastric cancer from January 2013 to June 2023 at two hospitals. Handcrafted radiomics technique and the EfficientNet V2 neural network were applied to arterial, portal venous, and delayed phase CT images to extract two-dimensional handcrafted and deep learning features. A nomogram model was built by integrating the handcrafted signature, the deep learning signature, with clinical features. Discriminative ability was assessed using the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve and the precision-recall (P-R) curve. Model fitting was evaluated using calibration curves, and clinical utility was assessed through decision curve analysis (DCA). RESULTS The nomogram exhibited excellent performance. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) was 0.848 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.793-0.893)], 0.802 (95% CI 0.688-0.889), and 0.751 (95% CI 0.652-0.833) for the training, internal validation, and external validation sets, respectively. The AUCs of the P-R curves were 0.838 (95% CI 0.756-0.895), 0.541 (95% CI 0.329-0.740), and 0.556 (95% CI 0.376-0.722) for the corresponding sets. The nomogram outperformed the clinical model and handcrafted signature across all sets (all P < 0.05). The nomogram model demonstrated good calibration and provided greater net benefit within the relevant threshold range compared to other models. CONCLUSION This study created a deep learning nomogram using CECT images and clinical data to predict NAC response in LAGC patients undergoing surgical resection, offering personalized treatment insights.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jingjing Zhang
- Department of Radiology, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, People's Republic of China
| | - Qiang Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Hospital of Qinhuangdao, Qinhuangdao, People's Republic of China
| | - Bo Zhao
- Department of Medical Imaging, The First Hospital of Qinhuangdao, Qinhuangdao, People's Republic of China
| | - Gaofeng Shi
- Department of Radiology, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, People's Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lai H, Zheng J, Li Y. Comparison of Four Lymph Node Staging Systems in Gastric Adenocarcinoma after Neoadjuvant Therapy – A Population-Based Study. Front Surg 2022; 9:918198. [PMID: 35756471 PMCID: PMC9215688 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.918198] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2022] [Accepted: 05/05/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Neoadjuvant treatment leads in a reduction in positive lymph nodes and examined lymph nodes (ELN), which may affect assessment of lymph node staging and postoperative treatment. We aimed to compare the staging systems of lymph node ratio (LNR), the positive logarithm ratio of lymph nodes (LODDS), negative lymph nodes (NLN), and the 8th AJCC ypN stage for patients with gastric adenocarcinoma after neoadjuvant therapy. Materials and Methods Data was collected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database and 1,551 patients with gastric adenocarcinoma who underwent neoadjuvant therapy and radical surgery were enrolled. Harrell’s concordance index, the Receiver Operative Curve, the likelihood ratio test, and the Akaike information criterion were used to compare the predictive abilities of the different staging systems. Results Among the 1,551 patients, 689 (44.4%) had ELN < 16 and node-negative patients accounted for 395 (25.5%). When regarded as the categorical variable, LNR had better discrimination power, higher homogeneity, and better model fitness for CSS and OS compared to other stage systems, regardless of the status of ELN. When regarded as the continuos variable, LODDS outperformed others for CSS. Furthermore, the NLN staging system performed superior to others in node-negative patients. Conclusions LNR had a better predictive performance than ypN, LODDS and NLN staging systems regardless of the status of ELN when regarded as the categorical variable, whereas LOODS became the better predictive factor for CSS when regarded as the continuos variable. In node-negative patients, NLN might be a feasible option for evaluating prognosis. A combination of LNR and NLN should be considered as user-friendly method in the clinical prognostic assessment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hongkun Lai
- The Second School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Guangdong Provincial People’s Hospital; Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jiabin Zheng
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Guangdong Provincial People’s Hospital; Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yong Li
- The Second School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Guangdong Provincial People’s Hospital; Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China
- Correspondence: Yong Li
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Yu D, Wang Z, He T, Yang L. Neoadjuvant Bevacizumab Plus Docetaxel/Cisplatin/Capecitabine Chemotherapy in Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer Patients: A Pilot Study. Front Surg 2022; 9:842828. [PMID: 35647008 PMCID: PMC9130594 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.842828] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/24/2021] [Accepted: 01/26/2022] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
BackgroundBevacizumab (BEV) plus chemotherapy as a neoadjuvant regimen presents good efficacy in patients with locally advanced cancer. However, its role in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC) is not clear. Thus, the study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant BEV plus chemotherapy in patients with LAGC.MethodsTwenty resectable patients with LAGC who received BEV plus docetaxel/cisplatin/capecitabine (DCC) chemotherapy for 3 cycles with 21 days as one cycle as neoadjuvant regimen were involved. Besides, their treatment response, survival profiles, and adverse events were assessed.ResultsIn total, two (10.0%), 9 (45.0%), 8 (40.0%), and 1 (5.0%) patients achieved complete remission, partial remission, stable disease, and progressive disease (PD) according to imaging evaluation, which resulted in 55.0% of objective response rate and 95.0% of disease control rate, respectively. Moreover, the number of patients with pathological response grades 1, 2, and 3 was 8 (40.0%), 8 (40.0%), and 3 (15.0%); while 1 (5.0%) patient did not receive surgery due to PD, thus the data of this patient was not assessable. Meanwhile, 18 (90.0%) patients achieved R0 resection. Regarding survival profile, the median disease-free survival or overall survival were both not reached. The 1-year, 2-, and 3-year disease-free survival rates were 88.8, 80.7, and 67.3%. Meanwhile, the 1-, 2-, and 3-year overall survival rates were 100.0%, 75.8%, and 75.8%, respectively. Additionally, the main adverse events were anemia (90.0%), alopecia (90.0%), leukopenia (70.0%), and anorexia (65.0%). Indeed, most adverse events were of grade 1 or 2 and were manageable.ConclusionNeoadjuvant BEV plus DCC chemotherapy presents a favorable pathological response and survival profile with acceptable safety in patients with LAGC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deguo Yu
- Department of Emergency Surgery, The Second People's Hospital of Liaocheng, Linqing, China
| | - Zhenfeng Wang
- Department of General Surgery, The Second People's Hospital of Liaocheng, Linqing, China
| | - Tingbang He
- Department of General Surgery, The People's Hospital of XiaJin Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Xiajin, China
- *Correspondence: Tingbang He
| | - Lijun Yang
- Department of Emergency, The Second People's Hospital of Liaocheng, Linqing, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Liu Z, Wang Y, Shan F, Ying X, Zhang Y, Li S, Jia Y, Miao R, Xue K, Li Z, Li Z, Ji J. Combination of tumor markers predicts progression and pathological response in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy treatment. BMC Gastroenterol 2021; 21:283. [PMID: 34246249 PMCID: PMC8272383 DOI: 10.1186/s12876-021-01785-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2020] [Accepted: 03/25/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The prognostic values of preoperative tumor markers (TMs) remain elusive in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy treatment (NACT). This study aimed to assess and establish a novel scoring system incorporating carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9), carbohydrate antigen 72-4 (CA72-4) to enhance prognostic accuracy for progression-free survival (PFS) and pathological response (pCR). METHODS Patients' data were retrospectively analyzed from December 2006 to December 2017 in our center. The cutoff value of TMs was determined using the time-dependent receiver operating test characteristics method. These three TMs were allocated 1 point each for the post neoadjuvant chemotherapy combination of tumor markers (post-NACT CTM) scores. The training group comprised 533 patients, responsible for full analysis, and the validation group comprised 137 patients based on the selection protocol. RESULTS Of 533 enrolled patients, 138, 233, 117, and 45 patients scored 0, 1, 2, 3 respectively. The 3-year PFS rate Multivariate analysis revealed that post-NACT CTM score was an independent predictor of PFS (0 vs. 1, HR: 1.34, 95% CI: 0.92-1.96, P = 0.128; 0 vs. 2, HR: 2.03, 95% CI: 1.35-3.05, P = 0.001; 0 vs. 3, HR: 2.98, 95% CI: 1.83-4.86, P < 0.001). The time-dependent area under curve (AUC) revealed a consistent highest level for post-NACT CTM than other three single TMs. Lower post-NACT CTM score significantly correlated with higher pCR rate based on multivariate logistic regression (2/3 vs. 1, OR: 2.77, 95% CI: 0.90-8.53, P = 0.077; 2/3 vs. 0, OR: 4.33, 95% CI: 1.38-13.61, P = 0.012). A nomogram was formed with both internal and external validation. CONCLUSIONS The post-NACT CTM score system served as a strong independent predictor for PFS and pCR in LAGC patients who received NACT. Further population-based studies are required to confirm our results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zining Liu
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Gastrointestinal Cancer Center, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, 100142, China
| | - Yinkui Wang
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Gastrointestinal Cancer Center, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, 100142, China
| | - Fei Shan
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Gastrointestinal Cancer Center, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, 100142, China
| | - Xiangji Ying
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Gastrointestinal Cancer Center, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, 100142, China
| | - Yan Zhang
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Gastrointestinal Cancer Center, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, 100142, China
| | - Shuangxi Li
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Gastrointestinal Cancer Center, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, 100142, China
| | - Yongning Jia
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Gastrointestinal Cancer Center, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, 100142, China
| | - Rulin Miao
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Gastrointestinal Cancer Center, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, 100142, China
| | - Kan Xue
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Gastrointestinal Cancer Center, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, 100142, China
| | - Zhemin Li
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Gastrointestinal Cancer Center, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, 100142, China
| | - Ziyu Li
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Gastrointestinal Cancer Center, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, 100142, China.
| | - Jiafu Ji
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Gastrointestinal Cancer Center, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, 100142, China
| |
Collapse
|