Essentials for aerosol delivery to term and pre-term infants

Aerosol Delivery Efficiency With High-Flow Nasal Cannula Therapy in Neonatal, Pediatric, and Adult Nasal Upper-Airway and Lung Models

BACKGROUND

High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) systems employ different methods to provide aerosol to patients. This study compared delivery efficiency, particle size, and regional deposition of aerosolized bronchodilators during HFNC in neonatal, pediatric, and adult upper-airway and lung models between a proximal aerosol adapter and distal aerosol circuit chamber.

METHODS

A filter was connected to the upper airway to a spontaneously breathing lung model. Albuterol was nebulized using the aerosol adapter and circuit at different clinical flow settings. The aerosol mass deposited in the upper airway and lung was quantified. Particle size was measured with a laser diffractometer. Regional deposition was assessed with a gamma camera at each nebulizer location and patient model with minimum flow settings.

RESULTS

Inhaled lung doses ranged from 0.2-0.8% for neonates, 0.2-2.2% for the small child, and 0.5-5.2% for the adult models. Neonatal inhaled lung doses were not different between the aerosol circuit and adapter, but the aerosol circuit showed marginally greater lung doses in the pediatric and adult patient models. Impacted aerosols and condensation in the non-heated HFNC and aerosol delivery components contributed to the dispersion of coarse liquid droplets, high deposition (11-44%), and occlusion of the supine neonatal upper airway. In contrast, the upright pediatric and adult upper-airway models had minimal deposition (0.3-7.0%) and high fugitive losses (∼24%) from liquid droplets leaking out of the nose. The high impactive losses in the aerosol adapter (56%) were better contained than in the aerosol circuit, resulting in less cannula sputter (5% vs 22%), fewer fugitive losses (18% vs 24%), and smaller inhaled aerosols (5 µm vs 13 µm).

CONCLUSIONS

The inhaled lung dose was low (1-5%) during HFNC. Approaches that streamline aerosol delivery are needed to provide safe and effective therapy to patients receiving aerosolized medications with this HFNC system.

Dos and don'ts to optimize transnasal aerosol drug delivery in clinical practice

INTRODUCTION

Transnasal aerosol drug delivery has become widely accepted for treating acutely ill infants, children, and adults. More recently aerosol administration to wider populations receiving high and low-flow nasal oxygen has become common practice.

AREAS COVERED

Skepticism of insufficient aerosol delivery to the lungs has been tempered by multiple in vitro explorations of variables to optimize delivery efficiency. Additionally, clinical studies demonstrated comparable clinical responses to orally inhaled aerosols. This paper provides essential clinical guidance on how to improve transnasal aerosol delivery based on device-, settings-, and drug-related optimization to serve as a resource for educational initiatives and quality enhancement endeavors at healthcare institutions.

EXPERT OPINION

Transnasal aerosol delivery is proliferating worldwide, but indiscriminate use of excessive-high flows, poor selection and placement of aerosol devices and circuits can greatly reduce aerosol delivery and efficacy, potentially compromising treatment to acute and critically ill patients. Attention to these details can improve inhaled dose by an order of magnitude, making the difference between effective treatment and the progression to more invasive ventilatory support, with greater inherent risk and cost. These revelations have prompted specific recommendations for optimal delivery, driving advancements in aerosol generators, formulations, and future device designs to administer aerosols and maximize treatment effectiveness.

Evaluation of a Novel Dry Powder Surfactant Aerosol Delivery System for Use in Premature Infants Supported with Bubble CPAP

Aerosolized lung surfactant therapy during nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) support avoids intubation but is highly complex, with reported poor nebulizer efficiency and low pulmonary deposition. The study objective was to evaluate particle size, operational compatibility, and drug delivery efficiency with various nasal CPAP interfaces and gas humidity levels of a synthetic dry powder (DP) surfactant aerosol delivered by a low-flow aerosol chamber (LFAC) inhaler combined with bubble nasal CPAP (bCPAP). A particle impactor characterized DP surfactant aerosol particle size. Lung pressures and volumes were measured in a preterm infant nasal airway and lung model using LFAC flow injection into the bCPAP system with different nasal prongs. The LFAC was combined with bCPAP and a non-heated passover humidifier. DP surfactant mass deposition within the nasal airway and lung was quantified for different interfaces. Finally, surfactant aerosol therapy was investigated using select interfaces and bCPAP gas humidification by active heating. Surfactant aerosol particle size was 3.68 µm. Lung pressures and volumes were within an acceptable range for lung protection with LFAC actuation and bCPAP. Aerosol delivery of DP surfactant resulted in variable nasal airway (0-20%) and lung (0-40%) deposition. DP lung surfactant aerosols agglomerated in the prongs and nasal airways with significant reductions in lung delivery during active humidification of bCPAP gas. Our findings show high-efficiency delivery of small, synthetic DP surfactant particles without increasing the potential risk for lung injury during concurrent aerosol delivery and bCPAP with passive humidification. Specialized prongs adapted to minimize extrapulmonary aerosol losses and nasal deposition showed the greatest lung deposition. The use of heated, humidified bCPAP gases compromised drug delivery and safety. Safety and efficacy of DP aerosol delivery in preterm infants supported with bCPAP requires more research.

Aerosol delivery in models of pediatric high flow nasal oxygen and mechanical ventilation

BACKGROUND

Aerosol drug delivery during high flow nasal oxygen (HFNO) and invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) are key respiratory care strategies available for the treatment of pediatric patients. We aimed to quantify the impact of different HFNO and IMV set-ups on tracheal drug delivery via a vibrating mesh nebuliser (VMN).

METHODS

Percent tracheal dose via VMN was quantified during HFNO therapy and IMV in a benchtop model of a 9-month-old infant. Under HFNO, 3 cannula sizes were used at 3 flow rate settings with the VMN placed at the dry side of the humidifier. Under IMV, tracheal dose when VMN was placed at the dry side of the humidifier, 15 cm from the wye and between the wye and endotracheal tube (ETT) was assessed. Salbutamol at 2.5 mg/2.5 ml (1 mg/ml) was used for each test (N = 5). The impact of VMN refill on circuit pressure under HFNO and IMV was also assessed.

RESULTS

Tracheal dose was highest during HFNO with the largest cannula size (OPT318) set to the lowest flow rate setting of 2 L/min (liter per minute) (5.80 ± 0.17%). Increasing flow rate reduced tracheal drug delivery for all cannulas. For IMV, VMN on the dry side of the humidifier and between the wye and ETT gave optimal drug delivery (4.49 ± 0.14% vs. 4.43 ± 0.26% respectively). VMN refill did not impact circuit pressure for either HFNO therapy or IMV.

CONCLUSIONS

Gas flow rate and cannula size during HFNO and VMN position during IMV has a significant effect on tracheal drug delivery in a pediatric setting.

New developments in neonatal respiratory management

Respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) is the major cause of respiratory failure in preterm infants due to immature lung development and surfactant deficiency. Although the concepts and methods of managing respiratory problems in neonates have changed continuously, determining appropriate respiratory treatment with minimal ventilation-induced lung injury and complications is crucially important. This review summarizes neonatal respiratory therapy's advances and available strategies (i.e., exogenous surfactant therapy, noninvasive ventilation, and different ventilation modes), focusing on RDS management.

Inhaled Medicines: Past, Present, and Future

The purpose of this review is to summarize essential pharmacological, pharmaceutical, and clinical aspects in the field of orally inhaled therapies that may help scientists seeking to develop new products. After general comments on the rationale for inhaled therapies for respiratory disease, the focus is on products approved approximately over the last half a century. The organization of these sections reflects the key pharmacological categories. Products for asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease include β -2 receptor agonists, muscarinic acetylcholine receptor antagonists, glucocorticosteroids, and cromones as well as their combinations. The antiviral and antibacterial inhaled products to treat respiratory tract infections are then presented. Two "mucoactive" products-dornase α and mannitol, which are both approved for patients with cystic fibrosis-are reviewed. These are followed by sections on inhaled prostacyclins for pulmonary arterial hypertension and the challenging field of aerosol surfactant inhalation delivery, especially for prematurely born infants on ventilation support. The approved products for systemic delivery via the lungs for diseases of the central nervous system and insulin for diabetes are also discussed. New technologies for drug delivery by inhalation are analyzed, with the emphasis on those that would likely yield significant improvements over the technologies in current use or would expand the range of drugs and diseases treatable by this route of administration. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: This review of the key aspects of approved orally inhaled drug products for a variety of respiratory diseases and for systemic administration should be helpful in making judicious decisions about the development of new or improved inhaled drugs. These aspects include the choices of the active ingredients, formulations, delivery systems suitable for the target patient populations, and, to some extent, meaningful safety and efficacy endpoints in clinical trials.

Trial of aerosolised surfactant for preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the safety of an aerosolised surfactant, SF-RI 1, administered via nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) and a prototype breath synchronisation device (AeroFact), to preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS).

DESIGN

Multicentre, open-label, dose-escalation study with historical controls.

SETTING

Newborn intensive care units at Mater Mothers' Hospital, Brisbane, and Royal Hospital for Women, Sydney, Australia.

PATIENTS

Infants 26 weeks through 30 weeks gestation who required nCPAP 6-8 cmH₂O and fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO₂) <0.30 at <2 hours of age.

INTERVENTIONS

In part 1, infants received a single dose of 216 mg/kg of aerosolised surfactant. In part 2, infants could receive up to four doses of aerosolised surfactant. Three historical control infants were matched for each enrolled infant.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Treatment failure was defined as Respiratory Severity Score (FiO₂×cmH₂O nCPAP) >2.4, nCPAP >8 cmH₂O, arterial carbon dioxide >65 mm Hg, pH <7.20 or three severe apnoeas within 6 hours during the first 72 hours of life. Other outcomes included tolerance of the AeroFact treatment and complications of prematurity.

RESULTS

10 infants were enrolled in part 1 and 21 in part 2 and were compared with 93 historical controls. No safety issues were identified. In part 2, 6 of 21 (29%) AeroFact-treated infants compared with 30 of 63 (48%) control infants met failure criteria. Kaplan-Meier analysis of patients in part 2 showed a trend towards decreased rate of study failure in the AeroFact-treated infants compared with historical controls (p=0.10).

CONCLUSION

The AeroFact system can safely deliver aerosolised surfactant to preterm infants with RDS who are on nCPAP.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ACTRN12617001458325.