Long-term follow-up study of loose combined cutting seton surgery for patients with high anal fistula

Evaluation surgical strategies in perianal fistulas treatment: Efficacy draining seton compared to other surgical approaches; a case-control study

Background and Aims

Perianal fistula is a prevalent anorectal condition originating from an infectious crypt extending to the external opening. Multiple surgical methods exist for treating perianal fistulas; however, selecting the appropriate options is still controversial. Our study aims to evaluate seton replacement versus other surgical methods in treating perianal fistula.

Methods

This study recruited 72 patients presenting with perianal discharge and diagnosed with perianal fistula through intra-sphincteric, trans-sphincteric, and supra-sphincteric examinations at Imam Reza and Besat Hospitals from July 2022 up to March 2023. Regarding case-control design, patients were divided into two groups: the first group (n = 36) underwent seton insertion, while the control group (n = 36) received alternative surgical methods. Follow-up was conducted for 1 month post-discharge, with monthly visits for 6 months. Patients were evaluated for fistula tract healing, seton loosening, and daily secretion rate (based on infected pads) during each visit. Finally, the two groups were compared in terms of improvement rates.

Results

In the seton group, approximately 94.4% of patients showed improvement. However, the difference between the groups was insignificant (p = 0.494). Seton replacement was performed in 52% of patients, with the majority requiring replacement twice (61%). Improvement rates were highest among cases with two seton replacements, although the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.073). Following seton replacement, the most common treatment methods were endoanal flap and fistulotomy, with observed improvement in 10 cases for each procedure.

Conclusion

This study highlights that draining seton remains a primary choice for intermediate treatment due to its satisfactory improvement rate and lower requirement for replacement, especially up to two times.

Evaluation of the Cutting Seton Technique in Treating High Anal Fistula

Objectives Fistula-in-ano is a common condition that negatively affects the quality of life of its sufferers. A high anal fistula poses a significant challenge for surgeons due to its proximity to the anorectal ring and the potential risk of incontinence rather than recurrence. Many modalities have been used in a justified search for a satisfactory cure for the condition, but the seton remains a mainstay of surgical treatment. Therefore, the rationale of this study is to assess the outcome of treating a high anal fistula using the cutting seton technique in a hospital in Al Madinah, Saudi Arabia. The evaluation is intended through a retrospective analysis of patients' outcomes, comparing its effectiveness to similar articles. Methods This is a retrospective study that includes 50 patients with high anal fistulas who were treated with a cutting seton at the National Guard Hospital over a four-year period (2019-2022). Information obtained from medical records included clinical and demographic data. The data collected during the study was compiled and statistically analyzed using the SPSS Statistics version 26.0 (IBM Corp. Released 2019. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 26.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.). A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results A total of 50 patients with high anal fistula treated with a cutting seton were included: 82% were males and 18% were females, with 66% below 45 years of age. Approximately 92% had inter-sphincteric fistulas, and only 28% had a recurrent fistula. Almost all patients (98%) had an MRI done before surgery. Around 70% of patients were completely cured, 26% had minor complications, 8% of the operated patients experienced mild incontinence, and only one recurrence (2%). Conclusion The cutting seton is still a valid modality in treating patients with a high anal fistula, as it is considerably safe, effective, and yields good outcomes. Standard preoperative assessment and thorough surgical techniques are cornerstones for achieving a satisfactory outcome.