Image guided portal vein access techniques in TIPS creation and considerations regarding their use

Percutaneous transhepatic intrahepatic portosystemic shunt for variceal bleeding: A series of six cases and literature review

Objectives

To present a case series of modified transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (TIPS) and percutaneous transhepatic intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (PTIPS) in cirrhotic patients with variceal bleeding (VB). In addition, the scientific literature pertaining to PTIPS was reviewed.

Methods

This retrospective clinical case series included six cirrhotic patients with VB who were treated with PTIPS after the failure of endoscopic band ligation or endoscopic injection sclerotherapy combined with vasoactive drugs. The treatment was conducted between January 2017 and June 2019 at a single institution. Three patients suffered from severe atrophy of the right or left lobar of the liver as well as the main right or left branch of the portal vein. The remaining three patients showed severe atrophy of the whole liver and portal vein, resulting in widening of the liver fissure. A paired t-test was used to compare the changes in portal pressure gradient between before and after the PTIPS operation. The rebleeding rate, treatment efficacy, complications, and technical success rate were all assessed during follow-up.

Results

All six PTIPS procedures were performed successfully, with no severe procedural-related complications observed. None of the patients experienced VB during a mean follow-up of 22.8 (range, 18.0–28.0) months. The mean portosystemic pressure gradient decreased from 28.3 ​± ​4.3 ​mmHg pre-procedure to 12.3 ​± ​2.6 ​mmHg immediately post-procedure (P ​< ​0.001). At follow-up, one patient was found to have developed grade 2 hepatic encephalopathy thrice during the first year, according to the West Haven criteria. However, this was resolved following medical treatment.

Conclusions

When the patient’s portal venous anatomy is unconducive to the performance of TIPS using the transjugular approach, PTIPS can be considered as a safe, effective complementary surgical approach for patients with VB.

Portal vein puncture-related complications during transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt creation: Colapinto needle set vs Rösch-Uchida needle set

Transjugular portal vein puncture is considered the riskiest step in TIPS creation with possible incidence of portal vein puncture-related complications (PVPC). The Colapinto and the Rösch-Uchida needle sets are two different needle sets currently available. To date, there have been no randomized control trials or systematic reviews which compare the incidence of PVPC when using the two different needle sets. The aim of this literature review is to assess the rate of PVPC associated with the different needle sets used in the creation of TIPS. From the described search, 1500 articles were identified and 34 met the inclusion criteria. Outcome measured was the prevalence of PVPC using the different needle sets. Overall 212 (3.6%) PVPC were reported in 5865 patients; 142 (3.5%) reported in 4000 cases using the Rösch-Uchida set and 70 (3.7%) in 1865 patients using the Colapinto set (p = 0.69). PVPC in TIPS creation are not related to the choice of needle set used in the procedure. To our knowledge, this is the first review of its kind, the results of which support the theory that while the rate of PVPC is influenced by many factors, choice of needle set does not seem to be one of them.

Transjugular local thrombolysis with/without TIPS in patients with acute non-cirrhotic, non-malignant portal vein thrombosis

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Therapeutic anticoagulation is the standard treatment in patients with acute non-cirrhotic portal vein thrombosis (PVT). In critically ill patients, anticoagulation only may not suffice to achive rapid and stable recanalization. This study evaluates efficacy and safety of transjugular interventional therapy in acute non-cirrhotic PVT.

METHODS

This retrospective study includes 17 consecutive patients with acute noncirrhotic, non-malignant PVT. Main indication for interventional therapy was imminent intestinal infarction (n=10). Treatment consisted of a combination of transjugular thrombectomy, local fibrinolysis and - depending on thrombus resolution - transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt.

RESULTS

Recanalization was successful in 94.1%. One- and two-year secondary PV patency rates were 88.2%. Major complications (n=3) resolved spontaneously in all but one patient (heparin induced thrombocytopenia type 2 with intestinal infarction). Symptoms improved in all patients. However, segmental bowel resection had to be performed in two (11.8%). During a median follow-up of 28.6 months, no patient experienced portal hypertensive complications. Presence of JAK2 V617F mutation predicted both short-term and long-term technical success.

CONCLUSIONS

Transjugular recanalization is safe and effective in patients with acute non-cirrhotic, non-malignant PVT. It should be considered especially in patients with imminent bowel infarction and low likelihood of recanalization following therapeutic anticoagulation. Patients with JAK2 mutation ought to be followed meticulously.