Continuous monitoring of the liver graft temperature: relationship between bacterial contamination of the perfusion fluid and early outcome

Impact of machine perfusion on transplant infectious diseases: New challenges and opportunities

Preservation techniques that maintain the viability of an organ graft between retrieval from the donor and implantation into the recipient remain a critical aspect of solid organ transplantation. While traditionally preservation is accomplished with static cold storage, advances in ex vivo dynamic machine perfusion, both hypothermic and normothermic, have allowed for prolongation of organ viability and recovery of marginal organs effectively increasing the usable donor pool. However, the use of these novel machine perfusion technologies likely exposes the recipient to additional infectious risk either through clonal expansion of pathogens derived during organ recovery or de novo exogenous acquisition of pathogens while the organ remains on the machine perfusion circuit. There is a paucity of high-quality studies that have attempted to quantify infection risk, although it appears that prolonging the time on the machine perfusion circuit and normothermic parameters increases the risk of infection. Conversely, the use of ex vivo machine perfusion unlocks new opportunities to detect and treat donor-derived infections before implantation into the recipient. This review seeks to reveal how the use of ex vivo machine perfusion strategies may augment the risk of infection in the organ recipient as well as outline ways that this technology could be leveraged to enhance our ability to manage donor-derived infections.

Impact of Extraction Time During Donation After Circulatory Death Organ Procurement on Kidney Function After Transplantation in The Netherlands

Background

In The Netherlands, 60% of deceased-donor kidney offers are after donation after circulatory death. Cold and warm ischemia times are known risk factors for delayed graft function (DGF) and inferior allograft survival. Extraction time is a relatively new ischemia time. During procurement, cooling of the kidneys is suboptimal with ongoing ischemia. However, evidence is lacking on whether extraction time has an impact on DGF if all ischemic periods are included.

Methods

Between 2012 and 2018, 1524 donation after circulatory death kidneys were procured and transplanted in The Netherlands. Donation and transplantation-related data were obtained from the database of the Dutch Transplant Foundation. The primary outcome parameter was the incidence of DGF.

Results

In our cohort, extraction time ranged from 14 to 237 min, with a mean of 62 min (SD 32). In multivariate logistic regression analysis, extraction time was an independent risk factor for incidence of DGF (odds ratio per minute increase 1.008; 95% confidence interval, 1.003-1.013; P = 0.001). The agonal phase, hypoperfusion time, and anastomosis time were not independent risk factors for incidence of DGF.

Conclusions

Considering all known ischemic periods during the donation after the circulatory death process, prolonged kidney extraction time increased the risk of DGF after kidney transplantation.

"Time is tissue"-A minireview on the importance of donor nephrectomy, donor hepatectomy, and implantation times in kidney and liver transplantation

Donor organs are exposed to sequential temperature changes during the transplantation process. The role of donor warm ischemia and cold ischemia times on post-transplant outcomes has been extensively studied. Much less attention has been paid to the transient ischemia occurring during donor organ removal and implantation. Recently, it has become clear that prolonged donor nephrectomy and implantation time are independently associated with delayed graft function after kidney transplantation. In addition, implantation time correlates with post-transplant kidney graft function, histology, and survival. Similar detrimental associations of donor hepatectomy and implantation time with early allograft dysfunction, ischemic cholangiopathy, and graft and patient survival after liver transplantation have been demonstrated. This review details kidney and liver temperature changes occurring during procurement and transplantation. It summarizes the effects of the ischemia the kidney and liver sustain during these phases on short- and long-term post-transplant outcomes, advocating the standardized reporting of donor hepatectomy, donor nephrectomy, and implantation times in (inter)national registries. The review also explores strategies to protect the graft from this ischemic injury.

Severe Sepsis Mimicking Primary Nonfunction Following Liver Transplantation: Normothermic Machine Perfusion Is a Potential Environment for Bacterial Overgrowth and Transmission From Donor to Recipient. A Case Report

Primary nonfunction (PNF) in the early postoperative period following liver transplantation is fatal if not managed appropriately with early retransplantation. Severe early allograft dysfunction can mimic PNF. The identification of treatable causative factors such as sepsis, hepatic artery, or portal vein thrombosis is essential to distinguish it from PNF, and their early management may avoid the need for retransplantation. In this article, we describe a case of sepsis-induced severe liver dysfunction from a contaminated graft perfused with normothermic machine perfusion (NMP), which presented in a manner similar to PNF. The implications of graft contamination are poorly described. To our knowledge, this is the first report of bacterial contamination of a graft that underwent NMP and subsequently caused severe sepsis in the recipient. The conditions created with NMP may be optimal for certain micro-organisms to thrive. The role of the liver in the immune system is complex as it provides an essential barrier to enterically derived portal venous pathogens and produces numerous acute phase proteins that augment the systemic immune response. Additionally, the liver is also known to restrain harmful and excessive systemic immune responses such as those that occur with the sepsis syndrome. The relationship between bacterial graft contamination, sepsis, and graft dysfunction may be multidirectional.