Detection of MET amplification in gastroesophageal tumor specimens using IQFISH

Research progress on exosomal proteins as diagnostic markers of gastric cancer (review article)

Gastric cancer (GC) is one of the most common types of tumors and the most common cause of cancer mortality worldwide. The diagnosis of GC is critical to its prevention and treatment. Available tumor markers are the crucial step for GC diagnosis. Recent studies have shown that proteins in exosomes are potential diagnostic and prognostic markers for GC. Exosomes, secreted by cells, are cup-shaped with a diameter of 30–150 nm under the electron microscope. They are also surrounded by lipid bilayers and are widely found in various body fluids. Exosomes contain proteins, lipids and nucleic acid. The examination of exosomal proteins has the advantages of quickness, easy sampling, and low pain and cost, as compared with the routine inspection method of GC, which may lead to marked developments in GC diagnosis. This article summarized the exosomal proteins with a diagnostic and prognostic potential in GC, as well as exosomal proteins involved in GC progression.

MET deletion is a frequent event in gastric/gastroesophageal junction/esophageal cancer: a cross-sectional analysis of gene status and signal distribution in 1,580 patients

Background

MET gene aberrations are found in several human cancers including gastric, ovarian and lung. In a large multinational cohort of patients with gastric/gastroesophageal junction/esophageal (G/GEJ/E) adenocarcinoma we assessed the MET status with respect to amplification and deletion and correlate the results with the phenotypical gene signal distribution pattern.

Methods

Tissue specimens from 1,580 patients were analyzed using a novel fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) assay employing a MET/CEN-7 IQFISH Probe Mix. MET amplification and deletions were defined as a MET/CEN-7 ratio ≥2.0 and a MET/CEN-7 ratio <0.8, respectively. Furthermore, the link between the MET gene status and the phenotypical signal distribution was investigated.

Results

The prevalence of MET amplification and deletions was found to be 7.2% and 8.7%, respectively. Significant differences were observed with regard to geographic regions and sex. The Asian population had the highest percentage of MET amplification (9.4%) and the lowest percentage of deletions (3.2%). MET deletions was found more frequently among males (10.1%) compared to females (5.3%) and in esophagus (17.6%) compared to the stomach (5.7%). More than 50% of the patients who harbored MET gene amplification had a heterogeneous distribution of the FISH signals. Patients with a focal signal distribution were solely to be found among the MET amplified population. MET deletion were mainly observed in the group of patients with a homogenous signal distribution.

Conclusions

The screening data from this cross-sectional study showed that MET deletion and amplification are frequent events in G/GEJ/E cancer, which are linked to different phenotypical signal distribution patterns. The role of MET deletion in relation to tumor development is not fully understood but it is likely to play a role in the oncogenic transformation of the cells.

Site-agnostic biomarker-guided oncology drug development

INTRODUCTION

Advances within molecular diagnostics have enabled us to identify a number of oncogenic drivers across different cancers. Many cancers can now be divided into subgroups based on molecular characteristics, and an increasing number of targeted anticancer drugs have been developed together with a predictive biomarker assay using the drug-diagnostic codevelopment model. With the recent approval of entrectinib, larotrectinib, and pembrolizumab for site-agnostic indications, biomarker-guided drug development has entered into a new phase.

AREAS COVERED

The review focuses on the general principles of drug-diagnostic codevelopment, especially basket trials and site-agnostic drug development. Special attention is paid to entrectinib, larotrectinib, and pembrolizumab.

EXPERT OPINION

The recent approval of entrectinib, larotrectinib, and pembrolizumab must be regarded as a paradigm shift in biomarker-guided oncology drug development. For a site-agnostic indication, it is important to have in mind the central role of the companion diagnostic (CDx), as the assay defines the 'disease' and the patient population to be treated. A number of site-agnostic drugs are currently in development and here, it is important that CDx assay development is given high priority, so an analytical and clinical validated assay is available at the time of drug approval.

Fast fluorescence in situ hybridisation for the enhanced detection of MET in non-small cell lung cancer

The c-Met/hepatocyte growth factor receptor pathway is frequently dysregulated in multiple cancer types, including non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). MET amplification has been shown to develop as a resistance mechanism to treatment in NSCLC. The identification of increased MET copy number within tumour cells is increasingly important to stratify those tumours and patients which are susceptible to treatment targetting MET kinase inhibition. Fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) has been successfully employed to identify patients with abnormal MET gene copy number with numerous probes available for use. Here we report a FISH protocol that reduces probe hybridisation time in NSCLC tissue to 1 hour and compare the results with other protocols. MET gene copy number was determined in 20 NSCLC cases using 3 FISH probes: 1. Kreatech FISH, MET (7q31) SE 7 ready to use probes, hybridised using an overnight protocol; 2. Dako MET IQFISH probe with CEP7 ready to use probe, hybridised for 2 hours; 3. Kreatech MET (7q31) SE 7 XL FISH probe, prepared in SwiftFISH buffer and hybridised for 1 hour. The MET gene copy number and MET: centromere 7 gene ratio were determined for each tissue and cases categorised as having MET high or MET low status. All three FISH probes were shown to demonstrate good agreement with each other. Overall percentage agreement between probes was ≥90%. Intraclass correlation showed good agreement (ICC ≥0.80) between all three assays for MET gene copy number and MET: centromere 7 gene ratio. These FISH protocols provide evidence that rapid laboratory developed FISH assays with short turnaround time perform consistently with standard protocols, potentially enabling faster treatment decisions.

Comparison of in situ and extraction-based methods for the detection of MET amplifications in solid tumors

In EGFR-treatment naive NSCLC patients, high-level MET amplification is detected in approximately 2-3% and is considered as adverse prognostic factor. Currently, clinical trials with two different inhibitors, capmatinib and tepotinib, are under way both defining different inclusion criteria regarding MET amplification from proven amplification only to defining an exact MET copy number. Here, 45 patient samples, including 10 samples without MET amplification, 5 samples showing a low-level MET amplification, 10 samples with an intermediate-level MET amplification, 10 samples having a high-level MET amplification by a MET/CEN7 ratio ≥2.0 and 10 samples showing a high-level MET amplification with GCN ≥6, were evaluated by MET FISH, MET IHC, a ddPCR copy number assay, a NanoString nCounter copy number assay and an amplicon-based parallel sequencing. The MET IHC had the best concordance with MET FISH followed by the NanoString copy number assay, the ddPCR copy number assay and the custom amplicon-based parallel sequencing assays. The concordance was higher in the high-level amplified cohorts than in the low- and intermediate-level amplified cohorts. In summary, currently extraction-based methods cannot replace the MET FISH for the detection of low-level, intermediate-level and high-level MET amplifications, as the number of false negative results is very high. Only for the detection of high-level amplified samples with a gene copy number ≥6 extraction-based methods are a reliable alternative.