Outcomes following transcatheter aortic valve replacement in patients with native aortic valve regurgitation

A novel anatomic classification to guide transcatheter aortic valve replacement for pure aortic regurgitation

BACKGROUND

The success of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in native aortic regurgitation (AR) is limited by the absence of calcified anchoring structures. We sought to evaluate transfemoral TAVR in patients with native AR using a novel aortic root imaging classification.

METHODS

From March to November 2021, 81 patients with severe AR were prospectively enrolled in 2 cardiac centers in China. All were evaluated using multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) and classified into 4 anatomic types in reference to transcatheter heart valve (THV) anchoring: Type 1: anchoring at the left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT), annulus, and ascending aorta (AA); Type 2: anchoring at the annulus and AA; Type 3: anchoring at the annulus and LVOT; and Type 4: anchoring at only 1 level or none at all. Based on the dual-anchoring strategy, patients with Types 1-3 were considered TAVR candidates. Procedural and 30-day outcomes were assessed according to Valve Academic Research Consortium-3 definitions.

RESULTS

TAVR was performed in 32 (39.5%) patients (71.9 ± 8.0 years of age, 71.9% were male) using 2 self-expanding THVs. Types 1, 2, and 3 comprised 13 (40.6%), 11 (34.4%), and 8 (25.0%) cases, respectively. The procedural and device success rates were 100% and 93.8%, respectively, with 2 THV migration. Eight patients (25.0%) required a permanent pacemaker, and 2 (6.3%) developed moderate paravalvular leaks. No deaths or other major complications occurred during the study.

CONCLUSIONS

The novel anatomic classification and dual-anchoring strategy were associated with a high procedural success rate with favorable short-term safety and clinical outcomes.

Aortic regurgitation management: a systematic review of clinical practice guidelines and recommendations

Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of aortic regurgitation (AR) contain recommendations that do not always match. We systematically reviewed clinical practice guidelines and summarized similarities and differences in the recommendations as well as gaps in evidence on the management of AR. We searched MEDLINE and Embase (1 January 2011 to 1 September 2021), Google Scholar, and websites of relevant organizations for contemporary guidelines that were rigorously developed as assessed by the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II tool. Three guidelines met our inclusion criteria. There was consensus on the definition of severe AR and use of echocardiography and of multimodality imaging for diagnosis, with emphasis on comprehensive assessment by the heart valve team to assess suitability and choice of intervention. Surgery is indicated in all symptomatic patients and aortic valve replacement is the cornerstone of treatment. There is consistency in the frequency of follow-up of patients, and safety of non-cardiac surgery in patients without indications for surgery. Discrepancies exist in recommendations for 3D imaging and the use of global longitudinal strain and biomarkers. Cut-offs for left ventricular ejection fraction and size for recommending surgery in severe asymptomatic AR also vary. There are no specific AR cut-offs for high-risk surgery and the role of percutaneous intervention is yet undefined. Recommendations on the treatment of mixed valvular disease are sparse and lack robust prospective data.

How to Image and Manage Prosthesis-Related Complications After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

In this review, we provide an overview of potential prosthesis - related complications after transcatheter aortic valve replacement, their incidences, the imaging modalities best suited for detection, and possible strategies to manage these complications.

RECENT FINDINGS

Therapy for severe aortic valve stenosis requiring intervention has increasingly evolved toward transcatheter aortic valve replacement over the past decade, and the number of procedures performed has increased steadily in recent years. As more and more centers favor a minimalistic approach and largely dispense with general anesthesia and intra-procedural imaging by transesophageal echocardiography, post-procedural imaging is becoming increasingly important to promptly detect dysfunction of the transcatheter valve and potential complications. Complications after transcatheter aortic valve replacement must be detected immediately in order to initiate adequate therapeutic measures, which require a profound knowledge of possible complications that may occur after transcatheter aortic valve replacement, the imaging modalities best suited for detection, and available treatment options.

Meta-Analysis and Meta-Regression of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation for Pure Native Aortic Regurgitation

AIM

To assess outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) for pure native aortic regurgitation (AR) and to evaluate whether 30-day all-cause mortality is modulated by patient characteristics, we performed a meta-analysis and meta-regression of currently available studies.

METHOD

Studies enrolling ≥20 patients undergoing TAVI for AR were considered for inclusion. Study-specific estimates (incidence rates of outcomes) were combined using one-group meta-analysis in a random-effects model. Subgroup meta-analysis of studies exclusively using early-generation devices (EGD) and new-generation devices (NGD) and stepwise random-effects multivariate meta-regression were also performed.

RESULTS

The search identified 11 eligible studies including a total of 911 patients undergoing TAVI for AR. Pooled analysis demonstrated an incidence of device success of 80.4% (NGD 90.2%, EGD 67.2%; p < 0.001), moderate or higher paravalvular aortic regurgitation (PAR) of 7.4% (NGD 3.4%, EGD 17.3%; p < 0.001), 30-day all-cause mortality of 9.5% (NGD 6.1%, EGD 14.7%; p < 0.001), mid-term (4 mo - 1 yr) all-cause mortality of 18.8% (NGD 11.8%, EGD 32.2%; p < 0.001), life-threatening/major bleeding complications (BC) 5.7% (NGD 3.5%, EGD 12.4%; p = 0.015), and major vascular complications (MVC) of 3.9% (NGD 3.0%, EGD 6.2%; p = 0.041). All coefficients in the multivariate meta-regression adjusting simultaneously for the proportion of diabetes mellitus, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, peripheral arterial disease, concomitant moderate or higher mitral regurgitation, and mean left ventricular ejection fraction (with significant coefficients in the univariate meta-regression) were not statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

Thirty (30)-day all-cause mortality after TAVI for AR was high (9.5%) with a high incidence of moderate or higher PAR (7.4%). Compared with EGD, NGD was associated with significantly higher device success rates and significantly lower rates of second-valve deployment, moderate or higher PAR, 30-day/mid-term all-cause mortality, serious BC, and MVC.