Unstable angina: trends and characteristics associated with length of hospitalization in the face of diminishing frequency-an evidence of a paradigm shift

Variation in ACS patient hospital resource utilization: Is it time for advanced NSTEMI risk stratification in the ED?

OBJECTIVES

A majority of patients who experience acute coronary syndrome (ACS) initially receive care in the emergency department (ED). Guidelines for care of patients experiencing ACS, specifically ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) are well defined. We examine the utilization of hospital resources between patients with NSTEMI as compared to STEMI and unstable angina (UA). We then make the case that as NSTEMI patients are the majority of ACS cases, there is a great opportunity to risk stratify these patients in the emergency department.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We examined hospital resource utilization measure between those with STEMI, NSTEMI, and UA. These included hospital length of stay (LOS), any intensive care unit (ICU) care time, and in-hospital mortality.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

The sample included 284,945 adult ED patients, of whom 1195 experienced ACS. Among the latter, 978 (70%) were diagnosed with NSTEMI, 225 (16%) with STEMI, and 194 with UA (14%). We observed 79.1% of STEMI patients receiving ICU care. 14.4% among NSTEMI patients, and 9.3% among UA patients. NSTEMI patients' mean hospital LOS was 3.7 days. This was shorter than that of non-ACS patients 4.75 days and UA patients 2.99. In-hospital mortality for NSTEMI was 1.6%, compared to, 4.4% for those with STEMI patients and 0% for UA. There are recommendations for risk stratification among NSTEMI patients to evaluate risk for major adverse cardiac events (MACE) that can be used in the ED to guide admission decisions and use of ICU care, thus optimizing care for a majority of ACS patients.

Has Unstable Angina Become a Vestigial of the Past in Clinical Trial Primary Endpoints?

none.

Efficacy of Shexiang Baoxin Pills for the treatment of unstable angina pectoris: Protocol of systemic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Shexiang Baoxin Pills (SBP) is widely used for the treatment of unstable angina pectoris (UAP) in China. However, the clinical evidence on the efficacy of SBP for the treatment of UAP is not well concluded.

METHODS

Seven electronic databases will be searched for eligible studies: MEDLINE, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library, Wanfang database, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure database, VIP database, and Chinese Biological and Medicine database. Data of included studies will be extracted, and quality will be evaluated. Data synthesis will be performed using RevMan software. Subgroup analysis and sensitivity analysis will also be carried out. Publication bias will be evaluated using funnel plot if included studies are sufficient.

RESULTS

This systemic review and meta-analysis will provide synthesized result of clinical efficacy of SBP for the treatment of UAP.

CONCLUSIONS

This systemic review and meta-analysis will provide high-quality evidence on the clinical efficacy of SBP for the treatment of UAP.

REGISTRATION

PEROSPERO CRD42019124668.