Spread through air spaces-positive T1 lung adenocarcinoma: is lobectomy associated with better outcomes than sublobar resection?

Meta-analysis of Lobectomy and Sublobar Resection for Stage I Non-small Cell Lung Cancer With Spread Through Air Spaces

Surgery is the preferred treatment for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Numerous studies have shown that spread through air spaces (STAS) can predict the survival of patients with stage I NSCLC. However, for stage I NSCLC, it is not known whether sublobar resection or lobectomy should be performed if STAS is present. In the present study, we compared the survival outcomes of patients with STAS who underwent lobectomy versus those who underwent sublobar resection. A search was performed on the PubMed, Cochrane Library and EMBASE on March 6, 2021 to identify relevant studies. Predetermined criteria were utilized to screen studies. A meta-analysis was performed using hazard ratio (HR). In total, 13 studies involving 5947 patients were included in the meta-analysis. It was found that STAS was significantly correlated with worse RFS (HR = 2.58, 95% CI: 2.16-3.07) and OS (HR = 2.41, 95% CI: 1.97-2.95) in patients with stage I NSCLC. Lobectomy resulted in a longer RFS (HR = 2.59, 95% CI: 1.99-3.37) and OS (HR = 2.78, 95% CI: 1.92-4.02) than sublobar resection in stage I NSCLC patients with STAS. STAS is an independent prognostic factor in NSCLC. Lobectomy may be more effective for stage I NSCLC patients who underwent sublobar resection previously if STAS is present.

Lobectomy versus sublobar resection in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review

Surgery is the gold standard treatment of lung cancer. The minimally invasive technique does not only concern access to the chest but also the limits of parenchymal resection. The study debates on the safety and oncological adequacy of sublobar resections in bronchogenic carcinoma patients. A systematic analysis of the data in the literature was carried out, comparing the outcomes of patients with resectable non-small lung cancer (NSCLC) who underwent lobectomy or sublobar resection. These last interventions include both segmentectomies and wedge resections taking into consideration the following parameters: complications, relapse rate and overall survival. The complication rate is higher in patients underwent lobectomy compared to sublobar resection, especially in presence of high comorbidity index or octogenarian patients (overall values respectively between 0 and 48% and 0 and 46.6%). Contrarily, the relapse rate (6.2% to 32% vs. 3.6% to 53.4%) and overall survival (50.2% to 93.8% vs. 38.6% to 100%) are more favorable in patients undergoing lobectomy. Sublobar resections are particularly indicated in elderly patients and in patients with high comorbidity index or reduced respiratory functional reserve. However, pulmonary lobectomy still remains the safest and oncologically correct method in patients with good performance status or higher risk of recurrence.