Tumor deposit indicates worse prognosis than metastatic lymph node in gastric cancer: a propensity score matching study

Correlation Analysis Between Tumor Deposit and Clinicopathologic Characteristics and Prognosis of Gastric Cancer: A Multicenter Retrospective Study

BACKGROUND

The mechanism underlying the formation of gastric tumor deposits (TDs) is unclear. We aimed to explore the risk factors for the formation and prognostic value of TDs.

METHODS

This retrospective analysis included 781 locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC) patients from four medical institutions in China, from June 2014 to June 2018. The risk factors for TD formation and prognostic value were determined through univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

Univariate analysis revealed that TD positivity was closely related to tumor diameter, Borrmann classification, differentiation degree, pT stage, pN stage, pTNM stage, and nerve and vascular invasion (p < 0.05). Multivariate logistic regression revealed that tumor diameter ≥ 5 cm (odds ratio [OR] 1.836, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.165-2.894, p = 0.009) and vascular invasion (OR 2.152, 95% CI 1.349-3.433, p = 0.001) were independent risk factors for TD positivity. Multivariate Cox analysis revealed that TD positivity (OR 1.533, 95% CI 1.101-2.134, p = 0.011), tumor diameter ≥ 5 cm (OR 1.831, 95% CI 1.319-2.541, p < 0.001), pT4a stage (OR 1.652, 95% CI 1.144-2.386, p = 0.007), and vascular invasion (OR 1.458, 95% CI 1.059-2.008, p = 0.021) were independent risk factors for GC prognosis. The 5-year overall and disease-free survival of the TD-positive group showed significant effects among patients in the pT4a and pN3b stages (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

TDs are closely related to tumor diameter and vascular invasion in LAGC patients, and TD positivity is an independent prognostic factor for LAGC patients, especially those at pT4a and pN3b stages.

Construction and validation of a prognostic model for gastric cancer patients with tumor deposits

Background

Tumor deposits (TD) was a significant risk factor impacting the prognosis of patients diagnosed with gastric cancer (GC), yet it was not currently incorporated into TNM staging systems. The objective of this research was to develop a predictive model for assessing the prognosis of patients with TD-positive GC.

Methods

Retrospective analysis was performed on the data of 4,972 patients treated for GC with D2 radical gastrectomy at Wannan Medical College's Yijishan Hospital between January 2012 and December 2021. The patients were categorized based on the number of TD (L1: 1, L2: 2-3, L3: ≥4) and the anatomical location of TD (Q1: single area, Q2: multiple areas). In a 3:1 ratio, patients were randomly assigned to one of two groups: training or validation.

Results

The study included a total of 575 patients who were divided into the training group (n = 432) and validation group (n = 143). Survival analysis showed that the number and anatomical location of TD had a significant impact on the prognosis of patients with TD-positive GC. Univariate analysis of the training group data revealed that tumor size, T-stage, N-stage, histological grade, number and distribution of TD, neural invasion, and postoperative chemotherapy were associated with prognosis. Multivariate Cox regression analysis identified poor histological grade, T4 stage, N3 stage, number of TD, neural invasion, and postoperative chemotherapy as independent prognostic factors for GC patients with TD. A nomogram was developed using these variables, demonstrating well predictive ability for 1, 3, and 5-year overall survival (OS) in the validation set. The DCA curve shows that the constructed model shows a large positive net gain compared to the eighth edition Tumour, Node, Metastasis (TNM) staging system.

Conclusion

The prognostic model developed for patients with TD-positive GC has a higher clinical utility compared to the eighth edition of TNM staging.

Prognostic effect of categorized tumor deposits in gastric cancer: A single-center retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Tumor deposits are defined as all types of isolated cancer lesions without lymphocyte aggregates considered part of the lymph node. Tumor deposits have been reported as a negative prognostic factor. However, the survival significance of categorized tumor deposits is uncertain, particularly in gastric cancer. This study aimed to investigate the prognostic difference among categorized tumor deposits.

METHODS

Patients who underwent gastrectomy for gastric cancer were enrolled. All tumor deposits were categorized into irregular nodule, irregular nodule star, smooth nodule, and vascular/neural invasion. There are some cases with more than 2 categorized tumor deposits. These cases were categorized as tumor deposit complex in the following analysis. We performed survival analysis between the patients with and without tumor deposits, and compared the survival among each categorized tumor deposit.

RESULTS

Of 868 patients, there were 96 (11.1%) and 772 (88.9%) patients with and without tumor deposits. Vascular/neural invasion, smooth nodule, irregular nodule, irregular nodule star, and the tumor deposits complex was observed in 6 (6.3%), 15 (15.6%), 43 (44.8%), 1 (1.0%), and 31 (32.3%) patients. Patients with tumor deposits displayed poorer survival than those without; the 3-year overall survival: tumor deposits negative = 87.0%, tumor deposits positive = 53.2% (P < .001). Survival analysis revealed tumor deposits can be a prognostic risk factor (hazard ratio: 1.9854, 95% confidence interval: 1.393-2.830, P < .01). Irregular nodule and the tumor deposits complex demonstrated the worst prognosis (irregular nodule 3-year overall survival: 51.2%, tumor deposits complex 3-year overall survival: 41.9%, P = .001), whereas smooth nodule demonstrated better prognosis (smooth nodule 3-year overall survival: 80%).

CONCLUSION

Tumor deposits exerted a negative survival effect in gastric cancer. Irregular nodule and the tumor deposits complex displayed a strong prognostic effect.

Clinical significance of tumor deposits in gastric cancer after radical gastrectomy: a propensity score matching study

OBJECTIVE

The value of tumor deposits (TDs) in the prognosis and staging of gastric cancer (GC) is still under debate. This study aims to evaluate the prognostic value of TDs and the best ways to incorporate TDs in the TNM classification of GC.

METHODS

Patients (n = 3460) undergoing curative gastrectomy for GC in the West China Hospital from 2005 to 2017 were retrospectively reviewed and divided into two groups according to the TD status (positive vs. negative). Later, clinicopathological features and overall survival (OS) between the two groups were compared. Thereafter, the associations between the presence of TD and other clinicopathological factors were evaluated through logistic regression. In addition, univariate and multivariate Cox regression were conducted for determining prognostic factors. The possibility of selection bias was reduced through conducting the 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) analysis. The modified classification systems proposed previously that incorporated TDs into the TNM staging system were assessed.

RESULTS

There were 10.5% of patients (362/3460) diagnosed with TDs. TDs were significantly related to unfavorable factors such as advanced T stage and N stage and independently associated with poor prognosis. The 5-year OS of patients with TDs was significantly lower than that of patients without TDs (31.0% vs. 60.9%, P < 0.001), whereas higher than that of patients with peritoneal metastasis (31.0% vs. 5.0%, P < 0.001). In patients receiving chemotherapy, the 5-year OS of patients with TDs was also significantly lower than that of patients without TDs (42.0% vs. 50.9%, P = 0.026). Moreover, the system incorporating TDs in the TNM classification as metastatic lymph nodes outperformed others.

CONCLUSIONS

TDs are related to the aggressive characteristics and are an independent prognostic factor for GC. Incorporating TDs in the TNM classification as the metastatic lymph nodes increases the accuracy in predicting prognosis.

Tumor Deposit Is an Independent Factor Predicting Early Recurrence and Poor Prognosis in Gastric Cancer

BACKGROUND

Accurate prognostic estimation is crucial; however, the prognostic value of tumor deposits in gastric cancer remains controversial. This study aimed to investigate their prognostic significance.

METHODS

Clinicopathological and prognostic data of 1012 gastric cancer patients who underwent R0 or R1 surgery from 2010 to 2017 at the Osaka International Cancer Institute were retrospectively reviewed.

RESULTS

Overall, 6.3% patients had tumor deposits, which were associated with Borrmann type, surgical procedure, type of gastrectomy, extent of lymphadenectomy, tumor size, histology, pT, pN, pM, pStage, lymphatic invasion, vascular invasion, preoperative chemotherapy, and postoperative chemotherapy. Tumor deposit-positive patients had worse 5-year disease-free survival (32.60% vs. 92.45%) and overall survival (41.22% vs. 89.37%) than tumor deposit-negative patients. Subgroup analysis regarding pStage II-III also showed significant differences between patients with and without tumor deposits for 5-year disease-free survival (34.15% vs. 80.98%) and overall survival (43.17% vs. 75.78%). Multivariable analysis showed that older age, undifferentiated histology, deeper tumor invasion, lymph node metastasis, distant metastasis, and presence of tumor deposits were significantly correlated with early tumor recurrence and shorter survival time; these factors were identified as independent prognostic factors. The 5-year disease-free survival of tumor deposit-positive patients was significantly worse than that of patients in the pStage III group and comparable to that of patients in the pT4, pN3, and pM1 groups. The 5-year overall survival of tumor deposit-positive patients was comparable to that of the pT4, pN3, pM1, and pStage III groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Tumor deposits are strong and independent predictors of tumor recurrence and poor survival.

Prognostic value of tumor deposits in lymph node-negative gastric cancer: A propensity score matching study

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to assess the prognostic value of TD in lymph node-negative GC.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted to collect the clinicopathological data from 1224 patients with lymph node-negative GC. According to their TD status, patients were categorized into TD-positive and TD-negative groups. Patients in both groups underwent a 1:1 propensity score matching analysis. Survival analysis was performed by the Kaplan-Meier method, and the differences between survival curves were measured by log-rank test. The cox proportional hazards model was used for univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

The TD-negative group had higher 5-year overall survival(OS) rate than TD-positive group(69.4%VS.36.4%,P < 0.05). Further subgroup analysis indicated that patients in the TD-negative group had higher 5-year OS rates than those in the TD-positive group in the T1-2, T3, and T4 subgroups(all with P < 0.05).The OS rates were decreased with the increase of the number of TD.The univariate Cox regression analysis demonstrated that tumor location in antrum, distal gastrectomy, perineural invasion, T4-stage,lymphovascular invasion and the number of TD were all associated with prognosis in patients undergoing curative gastric resection (P < 0.05).The multivariable analysis revealed that the number of TD, perineural invasion, lymphovascular invasion and T4 stage were independently associated with OS.

CONCLUSION

In lymph node-negative GC, TD is an independent risk factor for prognosis, regardless of T-stage, and patients with ≥3 TD have a worse prognosis.

Prognostic significance of tumor deposits in radically resected gastric cancer: a retrospective study of a cohort of 1915 Chinese individuals

BACKGROUND

Tumor deposits (TDs) have been identified as an independent prognostic factor in gastric cancer (GC). However, the associated clinicopathological factors and how to simply and reasonably incorporate TD into the TNM staging system remain undetermined. The aim of the current study was therefore to assess the significance of TD among radically resected GC patients.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 1915 patients undergoing radical resection between 2007 and 2012. The patients were classified into two groups according to TD status (absent vs. present), and the clinicopathologic characteristics, DFS, and OS were compared. Associations of TD presence with other clinicopathologic factors were evaluated by logistic regression analysis. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed to determine the prognostic factors for DFS and OS in the primary cohort. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to reduce the possibility of selection bias according to the presence of TD. External validation of previously proposed modified staging systems incorporating TD was conducted.

RESULTS

The detection rate of TD was 10.5% (201/1915). The presence of TD was significantly related to unfavorable clinicopathologic variables, including advanced T and N categories. According to the multivariate Cox regression analysis, the presence of TD was identified as an independent prognostic factor for DFS and OS in the primary cohort (both P < 0.001). In the after-PSM cohort, TD presence also significantly shortened DFS and OS. In the external validation, one system that incorporated TD into the pTNM stage had the best performance.

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of TD was significantly associated with poor survival in radically resected GC patients. The incorporation of TD into the TNM staging system can further improve the predictive capability. A multicenter cohort with a large sample size is needed to determine the appropriate method of incorporation.

Family history of malignant tumor is a predictor of gastric cancer prognosis: Incorporation into a nomogram

The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of a family history of malignant tumor on the prognosis of patients with gastric cancer and develop a nomogram that incorporates a family history of malignant tumor to predict overall survival (OS) in patients with gastric cancer to aid clinicians and patients in decision making. Four hundred eighty-eight patients with gastric cancer undergoing radical gastrectomy in our center were included and randomly split into a training set (n = 350) and a validation set (n = 138) at a ratio of 7:3. Cox univariate regression analysis was used to evaluate the influence of clinicopathological characteristics and family history of malignant tumors on their prognosis, and variables were screened by multivariate Cox regression analysis and consensus on clinical evidence. A nomogram was constructed for OS based on the filtered variables, and the C-index, receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC curve), and calibration curve were used to validate the nomogram and decision curve analysis curve (DCA curve) was used for clinical practicality assessment. Six variables related to OS, including the pathological differentiation degree, Lauren type, infiltration depth, lymph node metastasis, tumor deposit, and family history of malignant tumor, were screened to construct a nomogram. The nomogram developed in this study performed well in the training set and the validation set, with C-index of 0.776 and 0.757, and the area under the ROC curve(AUC) for predicting 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates are 0.838, 0.850, 0.820 and 0.754, 0.789, 0.808, respectively. The calibration curve shows that the estimated death risk of the nomogram in the 2 data sets is very close to the actual death risk. The net benefits of nomogram-guided prediction of patient survival at 1-, 3-, and 5 years were demonstrated by the DCA curves, which showed high clinical practicability. Family history of malignant tumors is an independent risk factor affecting the prognosis of patients with gastric cancer. The nomogram developed in this research can be used as an important tool to predict the prognosis of gastric cancer patients with family history data.

Pathologic Lymph Node Staging of Gastric Cancer

OBJECTIVES

The TNM classification is the main tool for lymph node (LN) staging in gastric cancer (GC). However, alternative LN staging systems have been proposed, and the role of features other than the number of metastatic LNs is being investigated. Our aim is to discuss the main challenges of LN assessment in GC.

METHODS

Comprehensive review of the literature on alternative LN staging systems, examined LNs, sentinel LN (SLN) biopsy, LN micrometastases (LNMIs), extracapsular extension (ECE), and tumor deposits (TDs) in GC.

RESULTS

Many controversies exist regarding LN assessment in GC. The TNM classification shows excellent prognostic performance, but alternative prognostic methods such as the LN ratio or log odds of positive LNs have demonstrated to be better than the TNM system in terms of prognostic accuracy. The value of SLN biopsy and LNMIs in GC is still unclear, and several challenges concerning their clinical impact and pathologic analysis must be overcome before their introduction in clinical practice. Most authors have identified ECE and TDs as independent prognostic factors for survival in GC.

CONCLUSIONS

Further studies should be performed to evaluate the impact of these features on the TNM classification and patient outcomes, as well as to standardize alternative LN staging systems.

Clinicopathological factors associated with the presence of tumor deposits in resected gastric cancer patients

Purpose

The role of tumor deposits (TDs) in the staging of gastric cancer is currently debatable. TDs are defined as tumoral nodules in perigastric adipose tissue with no evidence of lymphatic, vascular, or neural structures. Clinicopathological factors related to the presence of TDs are not well defined. This study aimed to identify the clinicopathological factors associated with the presence of TDs in resected gastric cancer patients.

Materials and methods

This prospective study included patients diagnosed with gastric cancer and treated with D2 radical gastrectomy from January 2019 to January 2020. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine the factors related to the presence of TDs.

Results

A total of 111 patients were eligible and TDs were present in 31 of them (28%). In the univariate analysis, male gender (p = 0.027), tumor size ≥ 5cm (p = ≤0.001), serosa and adjacent organs invasion (pT4a and pT4b) (p = ≤0.001), ≥16 metastatic lymph nodes (pN3b) (p = ≤0.001), and TNM stage III tumors (p = ≤0.001) were significantly associated with the presence of TDs. The multivariate analysis showed that a tumors size ≥5 cm (OR = 3.69, 95% CI: 1.17-11.6), serosa and adjacent organs invasion (pT4a and pT4b) (OR = 3.78, 95% CI: 1.31-10.86) and ≥16 metastatic lymph nodes (pN3b) (OR = 3.21, 95%CI:1.06-9.7) were independent risk factors for the presence of TDs.

Conclusions

Larger tumors (tumor size ≥ 5cm), serosa and adjacent organs invasion (pT4 and pT4b), and ≥16 metastatic lymph nodes (pN3b) were independent risk factors for the presence of TDs.