Liver resection is beneficial for patients with colorectal liver metastases and extrahepatic disease

Have we improved postoperative and long-term outcomes of liver surgery for colorectal cancer metastasis? Analysis of 1736 hepatectomies performed over 3 decades in a single center

INTRODUCTION

Surgery is the only potentially curative treatment for colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRLM) and its indication and results have varied in the last 30 years.

METHODS

All patients operated on for CRLM in our centre from 1990 to 2021 were prospectively collected, establishing 3 subgroups based on the year of the first surgery: group A 1990-1999, group B 2000-2010, group C 2011-2021. Clinical characteristics and the results of survival, recurrence and prognostic factors were compared.

RESULTS

1736 hepatectomies were included (Group A n = 208; Group B n = 770; Group C n = 758). Patients in group C had better survival at 5 and 10 years (A 40.5%/28.2%; B 45.9%/32.2%; C 51.6%/33.1%, p = 0.013), although there were no differences between groups in overall recurrence at 5 and 10 years (A 73%/75.7%; B 67.6%/69.2%, and C 63.9%/66%, p = 0.524), nor in liver recurrence (A 46.4%/48.2%; B 45.8%/48.2%; and C 44.4%/48.4%, p = 0.899). An improvement was observed in median survival after recurrence, being 19 months, 23 months, and 31 months (groups A, B and C respectively). Prognostic factors of long-term survival changed over the 3 study periods. The only ones that remained relevant in the last decade were the presence of >4 liver metastasis, extrahepatic disease at the time of hepatectomy, and intraoperative blood transfusion.

CONCLUSIONS

Survival after surgery for CRLM has improved significantly, although this cannot be explained by a reduction in overall and hepatic recurrence, but rather by an improvement in post-recurrence survival. Involvement of the resection margin has lost prognostic value in the last decade.

Debulking Hepatectomy for Colorectal Liver Metastasis Conveys Survival Benefit

(1) Background: Despite advances in surgical technique and systemic chemotherapy, some patients with multifocal, bilobar colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) remain unresectable. These patients may benefit from surgical debulking of liver tumors in combination with chemotherapy compared to chemotherapy alone. (2) Methods: A retrospective study including patients evaluated for curative intent resection of CRLM was performed. Patients were divided into three groups: those who underwent liver resection with recurrence within 6 months (subtotal debulked, SD), those who had the first stage only of a two-stage hepatectomy (partially debulked, PD), and those never debulked (ND). Kaplan-Meier survival curves and log-rank test were performed to assess the median survival of each group. (3) Results: 174 patients underwent liver resection, and 34 patients recurred within 6 months. Of the patients planned for two-stage hepatectomy, 35 underwent the first stage only. Thirty-two patients were never resected. Median survival of the SD, PD, and ND groups was 31 months, 31 months, and 19.5 months, respectively (p = 0.012); (4) Conclusions: Patients who underwent a debulking of CRLM demonstrated a survival benefit compared to patients who did not undergo any surgical resection. This study provides support for the evaluation of intentional debulking versus palliative chemotherapy alone in a randomized trial.

Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Followed by Radiofrequency Ablation May Be a New Treatment Modality for Colorectal Liver Metastasis: A Propensity Score Matching Comparative Study

Background: Most colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) are not candidates for liver resection. Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) plays a key role in selected CRLM patients. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) followed by liver resection has been widely used for resectable CRLM. Whether NAC followed by radiofrequency ablation (RFA) can achieve a similar prognosis to NAC followed by hepatectomy remains is unclear. The present study aimed to provide a new treatment modality for CRLM patients. Methods: This comparative retrospective research selected CRLM patients from 2009 to 2022. They were divided into NAC + RFA group and NAC + hepatectomy group. The propensity score matching (PSM) was used to reduce bias. We used multivariate cox proportional hazards regression analysis to explore independent factors affecting prognosis. The primary study endpoint was the difference in the progression-free survival (PFS) between the two groups. Results: A total of 190 locally curable CRLM patients were in line with the inclusion criteria. A slight bias was detected in the comparison of basic clinical characteristics between the two groups. RFA showed a significant advantage in the length of hospital stay (median; 2 days vs. 7 days; p < 0.001). The 1- and 3-year PFS in the liver resection and the RFA groups was 57.4% vs. 86.9% (p < 0.001) and 38.8% vs. 55.3% (p = 0.035), respectively. The 1-year and 3-year OS in the liver resection and RFA groups was 100% vs. 96.7% (p = 0.191) and 73.8% vs. 73.6% (p = 0.660), respectively. Conclusions: NAC followed by RFA has rapid postoperative recovery, fewer complications, and better prognosis.

SOULMATE: the Swedish study of liver transplantation for isolated colorectal cancer liver metastases not suitable for operation or ablation, compared to best established treatment-a randomized controlled multicenter trial

Background

Around one fourth of patients with colorectal cancer present themselves with distant metastases at the time of diagnosis, and one additional one fifth of the patients will develop distant metastases during the disease, most commonly in the liver.

Surgical treatment such as liver resection or ablation, often combined with chemotherapy and targeted therapy, is the only treatment option with curative potential, but only about 20% of the patients with liver metastases are candidates for surgical intervention. Standard treatment for unresectable patients is palliative oncological therapy; however, less than 10% of these patients will achieve a 5-year survival.

Non-randomized studies indicate that liver transplantation could be an option for selected patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM), which are not suitable for operation or ablation due to surgical technical reasons such as massive tumor burden and small future liver remnant, or oncological reasons, for example, early relapse after liver surgery. Since there is a shortage of donated liver grafts, it is important to select the patient group that benefit most from the treatment. Although some studies present positive results from liver transplantation of CRLM, the results must be validated in a randomized controlled trial before this new indication for liver transplantation can be introduced as a clinical routine.

Methods

The SOULMATE study is a randomized study evaluating if liver transplantation with liver grafts, primarily from extended criteria donors, increases overall survival in patients with CRLM, not suitable for resection or ablation, in comparison with best established treatment.

Patients will be randomized to liver transplantation (LT)+ best established treatment (BET) or to best established treatment only.

In the SOULMATE trial, we will evaluate the use of livers from extended criteria donors to decrease the risk of prolonging waiting time for patients on the waiting list for LT.

Discussion

The SOULMATE study has the possibility to confirm the positive results of previous studies in a randomized setting. The use of extended criteria donors will make the results transferable globally, as most countries are struggling with organ shortage.

Trial registration

Clinical Trial number: NCT04161092 registered 13 November 2019.

Is Surgical Treatment Effective or Contraindicated in Patients with Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases Exhibiting Extrahepatic Metastasis?

BACKGROUND

Surgical resection for patients with hepatic and extrahepatic colorectal metastases remains controversial. This study aimed to determine the efficacy of curative resection of distant extrahepatic metastatic lesions in patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM).

METHODS

From 2007 to 2019, 377 patients with CRLM were treated; of these, 323 patients underwent hepatectomy, and 54 patients with extrahepatic metastases (EHM) had received only chemotherapy. Survival and recurrence were compared between patients with and without EHM. Variables potentially associated with survival were analyzed in univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

Among patients who underwent hepatectomy, the median, 3-, and 5-year overall survival rates for patients with EHM (n = 60) were 32 months, 47%, and 28%, respectively, while those for patients without EHM (n = 263) were 115 months, 79%, and 66%, respectively (p < 0.001). Furthermore, outcomes were similar in R2 patients with EHM and those with unresectable tumors. However, outcomes were significantly better in the R0/1 group than in the R2 and unresectable groups (p < 0.001). Among patients with EHM, multivariate analysis revealed that higher clinical risk score, incomplete resection of all EHM, extrahepatic disease detected intraoperatively, and previous treatment with neoadjuvant chemotherapy were independently associated with worse survival.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with CRLM with EHM (liver + one organ), gross curative resection is necessary when surgical treatment is contemplated, and resection of liver metastases should be performed in patients with CRLM with smaller and fewer tumors (e.g., H1).

Is precision medicine for colorectal liver metastases still a utopia? New perspectives by modern biomarkers, radiomics, and artificial intelligence

The management of patients with liver metastases from colorectal cancer is still debated. Several therapeutic options and treatment strategies are available for an extremely heterogeneous clinical scenario. Adequate prediction of patients’ outcomes and of the effectiveness of chemotherapy and loco-regional treatments are crucial to reach a precision medicine approach. This has been an unmet need for a long time, but recent studies have opened new perspectives. New morphological biomarkers have been identified. The dynamic evaluation of the metastases across a time interval, with or without chemotherapy, provided a reliable assessment of the tumor biology. Genetics have been explored and, thanks to their strong association with prognosis, have the potential to drive treatment planning. The liver-tumor interface has been identified as one of the main determinants of tumor progression, and its components, in particular the immune infiltrate, are the focus of major research. Image mining and analyses provided new insights on tumor biology and are expected to have a relevant impact on clinical practice. Artificial intelligence is a further step forward. The present paper depicts the evolution of clinical decision-making for patients affected by colorectal liver metastases, facing modern biomarkers and innovative opportunities that will characterize the evolution of clinical research and practice in the next few years.

The impact of intense nursing care in improving anxiety, depression, and quality of life in patients with liver cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Liver resection is a major, serious, and very delicate operation that should be done only by specialized, well-skilled, and experienced surgeons. However, the role of nurses, which has often been under-estimated, is also crucial for the success of the intervention or surgery. Intensive nursing care involves high quality nursing modes to achieve the expected goals of treatment smoothly and with less complications. In this analysis, we aimed to show the impact of intense nursing care in improving anxiety, depression, and quality of life in patients with intervention for liver cancers.

METHODS

Data sources included EMBASE, MEDLINE, Web of Science, the Cochrane central, Google scholar, and http://www.ClinicalTrials.gov. Three authors independently extracted data from the selected original studies. The statistical analysis was carried out by the Cochrane based RevMan software. For dichotomous data, the number of events and the total number of participants were required and for the continuous data, mean, standard deviation as well as the total number of participants were required in the input for analysis. Odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used to represent the data following assessment.

RESULTS

A total of 1205 participants with liver cancer enrolled between the years 2010 to 2018 were included in this analysis whereby 667 participants were assigned to an intensive nursing care. Our current analysis showed that most of the patients who were assigned to an intense nursing intervention were significantly very satisfied with their quality of life (OR: 4.07, 95% CI: 1.45 - 11.45; P = .008). However, a minor number of patients with liver cancer who were not assigned to intense nursing care were significantly dissatisfied with their quality of life with OR: 0.18, 95% CI: 0.04 - 0.77; P = .02. This analysis also showed that self-rating anxiety score (SAS) and self-rating depression score (SDS) were significantly in favor of the participants with intense nursing care with OR: - 7.66, 95% CI: [(-9.66) - (-5.66)]; P = .00001 and OR: -7.87, 95% CI: [(-8.43) - (-7.26)]; P = .00001 respectively. In addition, physical function (OR: 13.56, 95% CI: 12.39 - 14.74; P = .00001), and total activity score (OR: 16.58, 95% CI: 13.51 - 19.65; P = .00001) were also significantly in favor of an intense nursing care.

CONCLUSIONS

Our current analysis showed that intense nursing care significantly improved anxiety, depression, and quality of life following interventions in patients with liver cancers. Most of the patients with liver cancers who were assigned to an intense nursing care were very satisfied with their quality of life. However, this hypothesis should further be confirmed in larger nursing related studies based on patients with liver cancers.

Long-term outcome of liver resection for colorectal metastases in the presence of extrahepatic disease: A multi-institutional Japanese study

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

The purpose of the present study was to assess long-term outcomes following liver resection for colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) with concurrent extrahepatic disease and to identify the preoperative prognostic factors for selection of operative candidates.

METHODS

In this retrospective, multi-institutional study, 3820 patients diagnosed with CRLM during 2005-2007 were identified using nationwide survey data. Data of identified patients with concurrent extrahepatic lesions were analyzed to estimate the impact of liver resection on overall survival (OS) and to identify preoperative, prognostic indicators.

RESULTS

Three- and 5-year OS rates after liver resection in 251 CRLM patients with extrahepatic disease (lung, n = 116; lymph node, n = 51; peritoneal, n = 37; multiple sites, n = 23) were 50.2% and 32.0%, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that a primary tumor in the right colon, lymph node metastasis from the primary tumor, serum carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19-9 level >37 UI/mL, the site of extrahepatic disease, and residual liver tumor after hepatectomy were associated with higher mortality. We proposed a preoperative risk scoring system based on these factors that adequately discriminated 5-year OS after liver resection in training and validation datasets.

CONCLUSIONS

Performing R0 liver resection for colorectal liver metastases with treatable extrahepatic disease may prolong survival. Our proposed scoring system may help select appropriate candidates for liver resection.