Checkpoint inhibitors and myeloma: promises, deadlocks and new directions

Inappropriate Expression of PD-1 and CTLA-4 Checkpoints in Myeloma Patients Is More Pronounced at Diagnosis: Implications for Time to Progression and Response to Therapeutic Checkpoint Inhibitors

Multiple myeloma (MM) is a hematologic malignancy characterized by severely profound immune dysfunction. Therefore, the efficacy of drugs targeting the immune environments, such as immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), is of high clinical importance. However, several clinical trials evaluating ICIs in MM in different therapeutic combinations revealed underwhelming results showing a lack of clinical efficacy and excessive side effects. The underlying mechanisms of resistance to ICIs observed in the majority of MM patients are still under investigation. Recently, we demonstrated that inappropriate expression of PD-1 and CTLA-4 on CD4 T cells in active MM is associated with adverse clinical outcomes and treatment status. The aim of the current study was to determine the usefulness of immune checkpoint expression assessment as a predictive biomarker of the response to therapeutic inhibitors. For this purpose, along with checkpoint expression estimated by flow cytometry, we evaluated the time to progression (TTP) of MM patients at different clinical stages (disease diagnosis and relapse) depending on the checkpoint expression level; the cut-off point (dividing patients into low and high expressors) was selected based on the median value. Herein, we confirmed the defective levels of regulatory PD-1, CTLA-4 receptors, and the CD69 marker activation in newly diagnosed (ND) patients, whereas relapsed/refractory patients (RR) exhibited their recovered values and reactivity. Additionally, substantially higher populations of senescent CD4+CD28− T cells were found in MM, primarily in NDMM subjects. These observations suggest the existence of two dysfunctional states in MM CD4 T cells with the predominance of immunosenescence at disease diagnosis and exhaustion at relapse, thus implying different responsiveness to the external receptor blockade depending on the disease stage. Furthermore, we found that lower CTLA-4 levels in NDMM patients or higher PD-1 expression in RRMM patients may predict early relapse. In conclusion, our study clearly showed that the checkpoint level in CD4 T cells may significantly affect the time to MM progression concerning the treatment status. Therefore, when considering novel therapies and potent combinations, it should be taken into account that blocking PD-1 rather than CTLA-4 might be a beneficial form of immunotherapy for only a proportion of RRMM patients.

Current Status of Novel Agents for the Treatment of B Cell Malignancies: What's Coming Next?

Resistance to death is one of the hallmarks of human B cell malignancies and often contributes to the lack of a lasting response to today's commonly used treatments. Drug discovery approaches designed to activate the death machinery have generated a large number of inhibitors of anti-apoptotic proteins from the B-cell lymphoma/leukemia 2 family and the B-cell receptor (BCR) signaling pathway. Orally administered small-molecule inhibitors of Bcl-2 protein and BCR partners (e.g., Bruton's tyrosine kinase and phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase) have already been included (as monotherapies or combination therapies) in the standard of care for selected B cell malignancies. Agonistic monoclonal antibodies and their derivatives (antibody-drug conjugates, antibody-radioisotope conjugates, bispecific T cell engagers, and chimeric antigen receptor-modified T cells) targeting tumor-associated antigens (TAAs, such as CD19, CD20, CD22, and CD38) are indicated for treatment (as monotherapies or combination therapies) of patients with B cell tumors. However, given that some patients are either refractory to current therapies or relapse after treatment, novel therapeutic strategies are needed. Here, we review current strategies for managing B cell malignancies, with a focus on the ongoing clinical development of more effective, selective drugs targeting these molecules, as well as other TAAs and signaling proteins. The observed impact of metabolic reprogramming on B cell pathophysiology highlights the promise of targeting metabolic checkpoints in the treatment of these disorders.

Advances in immune therapies in hematological malignancies

Immunotherapy in cancer takes advantage of the exquisite specificity, potency, and flexibility of the immune system to eliminate alien tumor cells. It involves strategies to activate the entire immune defense, by unlocking mechanisms developed by tumor cells to escape from surrounding immune cells, as well as engineered antibody and cellular therapies. What is important to note is that these are therapeutics with curative potential. The earliest example of immune therapy is allogeneic stem cell transplantation, introduced in 1957, which is still an important modality in hematology, most notably in myeloid malignancies. In this review, we discuss developmental trends of immunotherapy in hematological malignancies, focusing on some of the strategies that we believe will have the most impact on future clinical practice in this field. In particular, we delineate novel developments for therapies that have already been introduced into the clinic, such as immune checkpoint inhibition and chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapies. Finally, we discuss the therapeutic potential of emerging strategies based on T-cell receptors and adoptive transfer of allogeneic natural killer cells.