Fragmentation patterns of circulating cell-free DNA demonstrate biomarker potential for human cancers

Identification of potential biomarkers in ovarian carcinoma and an evaluation of their prognostic value

Background

Ovarian cancer is one of the most common malignant tumors in female genital organs, and its incidence rate is high. However, the pathogenesis and prognostic markers of ovarian cancer are unclear. This study sought to screen potential markers of ovarian cancer and to explore their prognostic value.

Methods

The Cancer Genome Atlas, Gene Expression Omnibus, Gene Ontology and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes databases were used in this study. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO), multivariate Cox regression and stepwise regression analysis were chosen to screen genes and construct risk model. Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) and an immune-infiltration analysis were performed.

Results

One hundred thirty two co-expressed genes were found. They involved in metabolism, protein phosphorylation, mitochondria, and immune signaling pathways. Twelve genes significantly related to the survival of ovarian cancer were identified. Eight risk genes (i.e., CACNB1, FAM120B, HOXB2, MED19, PTPN2, SMU1, WAC.AS1, and BCL2L11) were further screened and used to construct the risk model. The risk status might be an independent prognostic factor of ovarian cancer, and most of the biological functions of genes expressed in high-risk ovarian cancer were related to synapse, adhesion, and immune-related functions. The clusters of CD4+ T cells and M2 macrophages were high in high-risk status samples.

Conclusions

In ovarian cancer, the abnormal expression of 8 genes, including CACNB1, FAM120B, HOXB2, MED19, PTPN2, SMU1, WAC.AS1, and BCL2L11, is closely related to ovarian cancer progression, and these genes can serve as independent prognosis markers of ovarian cancer.

Characterization of fragment sizes, copy number aberrations and 4-mer end motifs in cell-free DNA of hepatocellular carcinoma for enhanced liquid biopsy-based cancer detection

Circulating cell‐free DNA (cfDNA) fragmentomics, which encompasses the measurement of cfDNA length and short nucleotide motifs at the ends of cfDNA molecules, is an emerging field for cancer diagnosis. The utilization of cfDNA fragmentomics for the diagnosis of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) caused by hepatitis B virus (HBV) is currently limited. In this study, we utilized whole‐genome sequencing data of cfDNA in samples from patients with HCC (n = 197) and HBV (n = 187) to analyze the association of fragment size selection (< 150 bp) with tumor fraction (TF), copy number variation (CNV) alterations and the change in the proportion of 4‐mer end motifs in HCC and HBV samples. Our analyses identified five typical CNV markers (i.e. loss in chr1p, chr4q and chr8p, and gain in chr1q and chr8q) in cfDNA with a cumulatively positive rate of ˜ 95% in HCC samples. Size selection (< 150 bp) significantly enhanced TF and CNV signals in HCC samples. Additionally, three 4‐mer end motifs (CCCA, CCTG and CCAG) were identified as preferred end motifs in HCC samples. We identified 139 end motifs significantly associated with fragment size that showed similar patterns of associations between patients with HCC and HBV, suggesting that end motifs might be inherently coupled with fragment size by a ubiquitous mechanism. Here we conclude that CNV markers, fragment size selection and end‐motif pattern in cfDNA have potential for effective detection of patients with HCC.

Liquid biopsy with cell free DNA: new horizons for prostate cancer

Although prostate cancer (PCa) is one of the most common tumors in European males, the only minimally invasive diagnostic tool in PCa setup is the determination of PSA in serum. Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) has been demonstrated to be helpful for PCa diagnosis but has not yet been integrated into the clinical setting. This review aims to provide a systematic update of cfDNA and its fragmentation patterns in PCa reported in literature published over the last twenty years. Due to the high variability of the scientific methods adopted and a lack of standardized median cfDNA levels, results fluctuate across different studies. These differences may be due to the cfDNA source, the quantification method, or the fragmentation pattern. Blood plasma is the most frequently analyzed biological fluid, but seminal plasma has been reported to contain higher cfDNA concentration due to its vicinity to the tumor origin. CfDNA has been shown to be composed of single-stranded (ssDNA) and double-stranded DNA (dsDNA), so the total cfDNA concentration should be preferred as it corresponds best to the tumor mass. Fluorometry and capillary electrophoresis (CE) may be quick and cost-effective tools for cfDNA assessment in a clinical setting. The greatest future challenge is the elaboration of common guidelines and standardized procedures for diagnostic laboratories performing cfDNA analysis. A multiparametric approach combining the analysis of total cfDNA (both ssDNA and dsDNA), cfDNA fragment length, and specific genetic mutations (ctDNA assessment) is required for optimal future applications of liquid biopsy.