Hybrid transcatheter left ventricular reconstruction for the treatment of ischemic cardiomyopathy

Midterm Outcome of Hybrid Transcatheter and Minimally Invasive Left Ventricular Reconstruction for the Treatment of Ischemic Heart Failure

Background

Left ventricular (LV) remodeling after anterior myocardial infarction (AMI) can cause a pathological increase in LV volume, reduction in LV ejection fraction (EF), and symptomatic heart failure (HF). This study evaluates the midterm results of a hybrid transcatheter and minimally invasive surgical technique to reconstruct the negatively remodeled LV by myocardial scar plication and exclusion with microanchoring technology.

Methods

Retrospective single-center analysis of patients who underwent hybrid LV reconstruction (LVR) with the Revivent TransCatheter System. Patients were accepted for the procedure when they presented with symptomatic HF (New York Heart Association class ≥ II, EF < 40%) after AMI, in the presence of a dilated LV with either akinetic or dyskinetic scar in the anteroseptal wall and/or apex of ≥50% transmurality.

Results

Between October 2016 and November 2021, 30 consecutive patients were operated. Procedural success was 100%. Comparing echocardiographic data preoperatively and directly postoperatively, LVEF increased from 33 ± 8% to 44 ± 10% (p < 0.0001). LV end-systolic volume index decreased from 58 ± 24 mL/m2 to 34 ± 19 mL/m2 (p < 0.0001) and LV end-diastolic volume index decreased from 84 ± 32 mL/m2 to 58 ± 25 mL/m2 (p < 0.0001). Hospital mortality was 0%. After a mean follow-up of 3.4 ± 1.3 years, there was a significant improvement of New York Heart Association class (p = 0.001) with 76% of surviving patients in class I-II.

Conclusions

Hybrid LVR for symptomatic HF after AMI is safe and results in significant improvement in EF, reduction in LV volumes, and sustained improvement in symptoms.

State-of-the-Art Review: Technical and Imaging Considerations in Hybrid Transcatheter and Minimally Invasive Left Ventricular Reconstruction for Ischemic Heart Failure

Negative left ventricular (LV) remodeling consequent to acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is characterized by an increase in LV volumes in the presence of a depressed LVEF. In order to restore the shape, size, and function of the LV, operative treatment options to achieve volume reduction and shape reconstruction should be considered. In the past decade, conventional surgical LV reconstruction through a full median sternotomy has evolved towards a hybrid transcatheter and less invasive LV reconstruction. In order to perform a safe and effective hybrid LV reconstruction, thorough knowledge of the technical considerations and adequate use of multimodality imaging both pre- and intraoperatively are fundamental. In addition, a comprehensive understanding of the individual procedural steps from both a cardiological and surgical point of view is required.

Left Ventricular Remodeling after Myocardial Infarction: From Physiopathology to Treatment

Myocardial infarction (MI) is the leading cause of death and morbidity worldwide, with an incidence relatively high in developed countries and rapidly growing in developing countries. The most common cause of MI is the rupture of an atherosclerotic plaque with subsequent thrombotic occlusion in the coronary circulation. This causes cardiomyocyte death and myocardial necrosis, with subsequent inflammation and fibrosis. Current therapies aim to restore coronary flow by thrombus dissolution with pharmaceutical treatment and/or intravascular stent implantation and to counteract neurohormonal activation. Despite these therapies, the injury caused by myocardial ischemia leads to left ventricular remodeling; this process involves changes in cardiac geometry, dimension and function and eventually progression to heart failure (HF). This review describes the pathophysiological mechanism that leads to cardiac remodeling and the therapeutic strategies with a role in slowing the progression of remodeling and improving cardiac structure and function.

Left ventricular remodelling post-myocardial infarction: pathophysiology, imaging, and novel therapies

Most patients survive acute myocardial infarction (MI). Yet this encouraging development has certain drawbacks: heart failure (HF) prevalence is increasing and patients affected tend to have more comorbidities worsening economic strain on healthcare systems and impeding effective medical management. The heart’s pathological changes in structure and/or function, termed myocardial remodelling, significantly impact on patient outcomes. Risk factors like diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, female sex, and others distinctly shape disease progression on the ‘road to HF’. Despite the availability of HF drugs that interact with general pathways involved in myocardial remodelling, targeted drugs remain absent, and patient risk stratification is poor. Hence, in this review, we highlight the pathophysiological basis, current diagnostic methods and available treatments for cardiac remodelling following MI. We further aim to provide a roadmap for developing improved risk stratification and novel medical and interventional therapies.

Contemporary contribution of cardiac surgery for the treatment of cardiomyopathies and pericardial diseases

Cardiomyopathy refers to a spectrum of heterogeneous myocardial disorders characterized by morphological and structural alterations leading eventually to heart failure, by affecting cardiac filling and/or the cardiac systolic function. Heart transplantation is currently the gold standard surgical treatment for patients with heart failure, with a median survival in adults of 12 years according to international registries. However, the limited available donor pool does not allow its extensive employment. For this reason, mechanical circulatory supports are increasingly used, and in the short term are becoming as possible alternatives to heart transplantation, owing to improved technologies and increased biocompatibility. However, long-term outcomes of mechanical assist devices are still burdened with a high rate of adverse events. Conventional surgical treatments could be still considered as alternatives to heart replacement treatment when tailored both on patient clinical conditions and etiology of cardiac diseases. In particular, among patients affected by ischemic cardiomyopathy, coronary artery bypass grafting has proven to improve survival when associated to optimal medical treatment, and surgical ventricular restoration might be considered as a valid treatment in particular cases. Correction of functional mitral valve regurgitation by mitral annuloplasty, which aims to restore left ventricular geometry, has not demonstrated unambiguous results, and outcomes of this procedure are still controversial. Pericardial pathology becomes of surgical interest when it is responsible for a reduced filling capacity of the heart chambers, which can develop acutely (cardiac tamponade) or chronically (as in the case of constrictive pericarditis). This review focuses on the different surgical approaches that could be adopted to treat patients with heart failure and pericardial diseases.