Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging for inflammatory heart diseases

Left ventricular hypertrophy: do not forget Fabry disease. Diagnostic work-up and differential diagnosis

BACKGROUND

Left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy is a common clinical finding. Differential diagnosis includes Fabry disease, a rare and progressive, but treatable storage disease caused by deficiency of α-galactosidase A. However, diagnosis of Fabry is often hampered by its clinical heterogeneity, LV hypertrophy phenocopies and unawareness of the clinician.

METHODS

This review summarises clinical data, family history, electrocardiogram (ECG) and imaging (echocardiogram and cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR)) characteristics to differentiate aetiologies of LV hypertrophy including clues for the diagnosis of Fabry.

RESULTS

LV hypertrophy is a consequence of pressure overload mostly, but differential diagnosis includes hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and infiltrative diseases. Clinical data, ECG, type and degree of LV hypertrophy, functional and tissue characteristics differ among aetiologies. LV hypertrophy in Fabry is progressive and mostly concentric but may copy any hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Dependent on residual alfa-galactosidase A enzyme activity, degree of LV hypertrophy in Fabry may vary. Initially, low myocardial CMR T1-map values are calculated. At a later stage, midwall late gadolinium enhancement of the inferolateral LV wall may occur. Global longitudinal strain may be depressed in the inferolateral wall. Voltage criteria for LV hypertrophy and short PQ interval are common. Right ventricular (RV) hypertrophy is frequent. In addition, multisystemic symptoms including neuropathic pain, hypohidrosis, proteinuria, renal insufficiency and familial young stroke are pointing to Fabry.

CONCLUSIONS

LV hypertrophy should raise suspicion of Fabry disease, especially if LV hypertrophy is unexplained and/or associated with RV hypertrophy. In Fabry, LV hypertrophy may be heterogeneous and mimic any hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. ECG, multisystemic symptoms and imaging may provide clues for Fabry.

Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Evaluation of LV Remodeling Post-Myocardial Infarction: Prognosis, Monitoring and Trial Endpoints

Adverse left ventricular remodeling (ALVR) and subsequent heart failure after myocardial infarction (MI) remain a major cause of patient morbidity and mortality worldwide. Overt inflammation has been identified as the common pathway underlying myocardial fibrosis and development of ALVR post-MI. With its ability to simultaneously provide information about cardiac structure, function, perfusion, and tissue characteristics, cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) is well poised to inform prognosis and guide early surveillance and therapeutics in high-risk cohorts. Further, established and evolving CMR-derived biomarkers may serve as clinical endpoints in prospective trials evaluating the efficacy of novel anti-inflammatory and antifibrotic therapies. This review provides an overview of post-MI ALVR and illustrates how CMR may help clinical adoption of novel therapies via mechanistic or prognostic imaging markers.

Multimodal Imaging of Cancer Therapy-Related Cardiac Dysfunction in Breast Cancer-A State-of-the-Art Review

BACKGROUND

This review focuses on multimodality imaging of cardiotoxicity in cancer patients, with the aim of evaluating the effectiveness of different techniques in detecting and monitoring cardiac changes associated with cancer therapy.

METHODS

Eight studies were included in the review, covering various imaging modalities such as cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, echocardiography, and multigated acquisition scanning.

RESULTS

Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging emerged as the most definitive modality, offering real-time detection, comprehensive assessment of cardiac function, the ability to detect early myocardial changes, and superior detection of cardiotoxicity when compared to the other imaging modalities. The studies also emphasize the importance of parameters such as left ventricular ejection fraction and global longitudinal strain in assessing cardiac function and predicting cardiotoxicity.

CONCLUSION

Due to the common use of HER2 agents and anthracyclines within the breast cancer population, the LVEF as a critical prognostic measurement for assessing heart health and estimating the severity of left-sided cardiac malfunction is a commonly used endpoint. CTRCD rates differed between imaging modalities, with cardiac MRI the most sensitive. The use of multimodal cardiac imaging remains a nuanced area, influenced by local availability, the clinical question at hand, body habits, and medical comorbidities. All of the imaging modalities listed have a role to play in current care; however, focus should be given to increasing the provision of cardiac MRI for breast cancer patients in the future to optimize the detection of CTRCD and patient outcomes thereafter.

Functional and Metabolic Imaging in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction: Promises, Challenges, and Clinical Utility

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is recognised as an increasingly prevalent, morbid and burdensome condition with a poor outlook. Recent advances in both the understanding of HFpEF and the technological ability to image cardiac function and metabolism in humans have simultaneously shone a light on the molecular basis of this complex condition of diastolic dysfunction, and the inflammatory and metabolic changes that are associated with it, typically in the context of a complex patient. This review both makes the case for an integrated assessment of the condition, and highlights that metabolic alteration may be a measurable outcome for novel targeted forms of medical therapy. It furthermore highlights how recent technological advancements and advanced medical imaging techniques have enabled the characterisation of the metabolism and function of HFpEF within patients, at rest and during exercise.

Emerging molecular imaging targets and tools for myocardial fibrosis detection

Myocardial fibrosis is the heart's common healing response to injury. While initially seeking to optimize the strength of diseased tissue, fibrosis can become maladaptive, producing stiff poorly functioning and pro-arrhythmic myocardium. Different patterns of fibrosis are associated with different myocardial disease states, but the presence and quantity of fibrosis largely confer adverse prognosis. Current imaging techniques can assess the extent and pattern of myocardial scarring, but lack specificity and detect the presence of established fibrosis when the window to modify this process may have ended. For the first time, novel molecular imaging methods, including gallium-68 (68Ga)-fibroblast activation protein inhibitor positron emission tomography (68Ga-FAPI PET), may permit highly specific imaging of fibrosis activity. These approaches may facilitate earlier fibrosis detection, differentiation of active vs. end-stage disease, and assessment of both disease progression and treatment-response thereby improving patient care and clinical outcomes.

Multimodality imaging in acute myocarditis

The diagnosis of acute myocarditis often involves several noninvasive techniques that can provide information regarding volumes, ejection fraction, and tissue characterization. In particular, echocardiography is extremely helpful for the evaluation of biventricular volumes, strain and ejection fraction. Cardiac magnetic resonance, beyond biventricular volumes, strain, and ejection fraction allows to characterize myocardial tissue providing information regarding edema, hyperemia, and fibrosis. Contemporary cardiac computed tomography angiography (CCTA) can not only be extremely important for the assessment of coronary arteries, pulmonary arteries and aorta but also tissue characterization using CCTA can be an additional tool that can explain chest pain with a diagnosis of myocarditis.

Case report: the role of multimodal imaging to optimize the timing of return to sports in an elite athlete with persistent COVID-19 myocardial inflammation

Background

COVID-19 has been associated with myocardial abnormalities on cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR). We report a case of COVID-19 myocarditis in an elite athlete.

Case summary

A male, 21-year-old elite football player had tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 on a polymerase-chain-reaction test and was referred for cardiac evaluation after experiencing palpitations after returning to sports (RTS). Biochemical evaluation demonstrated elevated N-terminal pro b-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and high-sensitive Troponin T. Echocardiography demonstrated left ventricular function within normal ranges for athletes but with diminished basal, posterolateral, and septal strain. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) showed increased T1 values and late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) in the basolateral and mid-ventricular posterior segments. Focal COVID-19 myocarditis was diagnosed and the patient remained restricted from sports, in line with the 2020 ESC sports cardiology guidelines. Two months later, his electrocardiogram (ECG) showed inferoposterolateral T-wave inversion (TWI). Serial imaging studies were performed to optimize RTS timing. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging showed persistently increased T1/T2 values and persistent LGE at 5 and 7 months. At 9 months, 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-positron emission tomography (PET)-computerized tomography (CT) demonstrated no pathologically increased cardiac FDG-uptake. Subsequent exercise ECG and Holters demonstrated no complex ventricular arrhythmias. The patient made a complete return to elite competitive sports, without any adverse events at 15 months of follow-up.

Discussion

Cardiac symptoms in athletes post-COVID-19 should prompt cardiac evaluation. As COVID-19 myocarditis inflammation can persist beyond the 3–6 months of recommended sports restriction, a more personalized approach to RTS timing can be warranted. In cases with myocardial oedema without other signs of inflammation, FDG-PET-CT can be of added value to assess active myocardial inflammation.

A Review of the Role of Imaging Modalities in the Evaluation of Viral Myocarditis with a Special Focus on COVID-19-Related Myocarditis

Viral myocarditis is inflammation of the myocardium secondary to viral infection. The clinical presentation of viral myocarditis is very heterogeneous and can range from nonspecific symptoms of malaise and fatigue in subclinical disease to a more florid presentation, such as acute cardiogenic shock and sudden cardiac death in severe cases. The accurate and prompt diagnosis of viral myocarditis is very challenging. Endomyocardial biopsy is considered to be the gold standard test to confirm viral myocarditis; however, it is an invasive procedure, and the sensitivity is low when myocardial involvement is focal. Cardiac imaging hence plays an essential role in the noninvasive evaluation of viral myocarditis. The current coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has generated considerable interest in the use of imaging in the early detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)-related myocarditis. This article reviews the role of various cardiac imaging modalities used in the diagnosis and assessment of viral myocarditis, including COVID-19-related myocarditis.

Fast myocardial T1ρ mapping in mice using k-space weighted image contrast and a Bloch simulation-optimized radial sampling pattern

Purpose

T_1ρ dispersion quantification can potentially be used as a cardiac magnetic resonance index for sensitive detection of myocardial fibrosis without the need of contrast agents. However, dispersion quantification is still a major challenge, because T_1ρ mapping for different spin lock amplitudes is a very time consuming process. This study aims to develop a fast and accurate T_1ρ mapping sequence, which paves the way to cardiac T_1ρ dispersion quantification within the limited measurement time of an in vivo study in small animals.

Methods

A radial spin lock sequence was developed using a Bloch simulation-optimized sampling pattern and a view-sharing method for image reconstruction. For validation, phantom measurements with a conventional sampling pattern and a gold standard sequence were compared to examine T_1ρ quantification accuracy. The in vivo validation of T_1ρ mapping was performed in N = 10 mice and in a reproduction study in a single animal, in which ten maps were acquired in direct succession. Finally, the feasibility of myocardial dispersion quantification was tested in one animal.

Results

The Bloch simulation-based sampling shows considerably higher image quality as well as improved T_1ρ quantification accuracy (+ 56%) and precision (+ 49%) compared to conventional sampling. Compared to the gold standard sequence, a mean deviation of − 0.46 ± 1.84% was observed. The in vivo measurements proved high reproducibility of myocardial T_1ρ mapping. The mean T_1ρ in the left ventricle was 39.5 ± 1.2 ms for different animals and the maximum deviation was 2.1% in the successive measurements. The myocardial T_1ρ dispersion slope, which was measured for the first time in one animal, could be determined to be 4.76 ± 0.23 ms/kHz.

Conclusion

This new and fast T_1ρ quantification technique enables high-resolution myocardial T_1ρ mapping and even dispersion quantification within the limited time of an in vivo study and could, therefore, be a reliable tool for improved tissue characterization.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10334-021-00951-y.

Cardiorespiratory considerations for return-to-play in elite athletes after COVID-19 infection: a practical guide for sport and exercise medicine physicians

SARS-CoV-2 is the causative virus responsible for the COVID-19 pandemic. This pandemic has necessitated that all professional and elite sport is either suspended, postponed or cancelled altogether to minimise the risk of viral spread. As infection rates drop and quarantine restrictions are lifted, the question how athletes can safely resume competitive sport is being asked. Given the rapidly evolving knowledge base about the virus and changing governmental and public health recommendations, a precise answer to this question is fraught with complexity and nuance. Without robust data to inform policy, return-to-play (RTP) decisions are especially difficult for elite athletes on the suspicion that the COVID-19 virus could result in significant cardiorespiratory compromise in a minority of afflicted athletes. There are now consistent reports of athletes reporting persistent and residual symptoms many weeks to months after initial COVID-19 infection. These symptoms include cough, tachycardia and extreme fatigue. To support safe RTP, we provide sport and exercise medicine physicians with practical recommendations on how to exclude cardiorespiratory complications of COVID-19 in elite athletes who place high demand on their cardiorespiratory system. As new evidence emerges, guidance for a safe RTP should be updated.