Concomitant use of 18F-FDG PET-CT SUVmax is useful in the assessment of Ki67 labeling index in core-needle biopsy specimens of breast cancer

Prediction of Clinical Molecular Typing of Breast Invasive Ductal Carcinoma Using 18F-FDG PET/CT Dual-Phase Imaging

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

To investigate the diagnostic value of Fluorine-18-labeled 2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography and computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) dual-phase imaging for the different molecular subtypes of invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Clinical imaging data of 164 women with invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast confirmed by pathology who underwent 18F-FDG PET/CT dual-phase imaging were retrospectively analyzed. The maximum standard uptake values (SUVmax) of the early and delayed phases of the lesion were measured and recorded as SUVmax1 and SUVmax2, respectively, and the retention index (RI) was calculated. We analyzed the change rule of SUVmax1, SUVmax2, and RI for the different molecular subtypes and molecular marker expression groups. The diagnostic threshold of different molecular marker expression status was determined using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis.

RESULTS

SUVmax1 and SUVmax2 were highest in the TNBC group and lowest in the luminal A group (p<0.001). TNBC and HER2 overexpression groups had higher RI than the luminal A and B groups (p<0.001), with no significant difference between the TNBC and HER2 overexpression groups or between the luminal A and B groups (p=0.640 and 0.345, respectively). The ER- and PR-negative groups had significantly higher SUVmax1, SUVmax2, and RI than the PR-positive group (p<0.001). The HER2-positive group had higher SUVmax1 and SUVmax2 than the negative group (p<0.001). The Ki67 overexpression group had higher SUVmax1 and SUVmax2 levels than the low expression group (p<0.001). There was no significant difference in RI between HER2-positive and negative groups or between Ki67 high and low expression groups (p=0.904 and 0.216, respectively). For ER-negative and positive expression status, the maximum area under the curve (AUC) of SUVmax2 was 0.852, diagnostic threshold was 10.87, sensitivity was 79.6%, and specificity was 74.5%. For PR-negative and positive expression status, the AUC of SUVmax2 was 0.858, diagnostic threshold was 10.45, sensitivity was 83.1%, and specificity was 75.3%. For HER2-negative and positive expression status, the AUC of SUVmax1 was 0.714, diagnostic threshold was 9.28, sensitivity was 79.6%, and specificity was 60.9%. For Ki67 high- and low expression status, the AUC of SUVmax2 was 0.915 at maximum, diagnostic threshold was 10.21, sensitivity was 83.4%, and specificity was 93.9%.

CONCLUSION

18F-FDG PET/CT dual-phase imaging facilitates the prediction of the expression of molecular markers and subtypes of invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast and the development of more tailored treatment plans for patients with this disease.

Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging Can Predict Ki67 Discordance Between Core Needle Biopsy and Surgical Samples

BACKGROUND

Disagreement in assessments of Ki67 expression based on core-needle biopsy and matched surgical samples complicates decisions in the treatment of breast cancer.

PURPOSE

To examine whether preoperative breast MRI could be useful in predicting Ki67 discordance between core-needle biopsy and surgical samples.

STUDY TYPE

Retrospective.

POPULATION

Three hundred and sixty-five breast cancer patients with MRI scans and having both core-needle biopsy and surgical samples from 2017 to 2019.

FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE

3.0 T, T2-weighted iterative decomposition of water and fat with echo asymmetry and least squares estimation sequence, diffusion-weighted sequence using b-values 0/1000, dynamic contrast enhanced image by volume imaged breast assessme NT.

ASSESSMENT

We collected clinicopathologic variables and preoperative MRI features (tumor size, lesion type, shape of mass, spiculated margin, internal enhancement, peri-tumoral edema, intra-tumoral necrosis, multifocal/multicentric, apparent diffusion coefficient [ADC] minimum, ADC mean, ADC maximum, ADC difference).

STATISTICAL TESTS

K-means clustering, multivariable logistic regression, receiver operating characteristic curve.

RESULTS

Sixty-one patients showed Ki67 discordance and 304 patients show Ki67 concordance according to our definition using K-means clustering. Multivariable regression analysis showed that the following parameters were independently associated with Ki67 discordance: peri-tumoral edema, odds ratio (OR) 2.662, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.432-4.948; ADCmin ≤ 0.829 × 10^-3  mm² /sec, OR 2.180, 95% CI 1.075-4.418; and ADCdiff > 0.317 × 10^-3  mm² /sec, OR 3.365, 95% CI 1.698-6.669. This multivariable model resulted in an AUC of 0.758 (95% CI 0.711-0.802) with sensitivity and specificity being 0.803 and 0.621, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Presence of peri-tumoral edema, smaller ADCmin and greater ADCdiff in preoperative breast MRI may indicate high risk of Ki67 discordance between core-needle biopsy and surgical samples. For patients with these MRI-based risk factors, clinicians should not rely on Ki67 assessment only from core-needle biopsy.