Prognostic significance of the primary tumor site and immune indexes in patients with estrogen receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor-2-negative breast cancer

Oncoplastic Breast Conservation for Central Tumors: Definition, Classification, and the Analysis of Single Institution Experience

Background

Tumors in the central part of the breast are usually considered more aggressive and technically difficult, which limits breast conservation. The definition of central tumors from a surgical point of view, classification of the techniques for partial breast reconstruction, and conceptual algorithm of choice based on tumor and breast characteristics are proposed, along with the estimation of surgical and oncological safety.

Methods

This is a retrospective analysis of the single-institution experience, with a focus on the decision-making process for choosing the oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery technique. To evaluate the safety of breast conservation for central tumors, a comparative analysis of early surgical complications and oncological long-term results of treatment in patients with central breast tumor location and other breast tumor locations was performed.

Results

A total of 940 lumpectomies were performed in 926 patients during 15 years. The central breast tumor location group included 128 patients with 130 lumpectomies (13.8%), and the other breast tumor locations group included 798 patients with 810 lumpectomies (86.2%). We did not find any significant differences in the rate of early surgical complications and involved margins, local and systemic recurrence rates, time to progression, or overall survival between the groups.

Conclusions

Oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery is a safe procedure for the treatment of central tumors. In our opinion, the proposed classification of partial breast reconstruction techniques and an algorithm of their choice allow for effective restoration of the breast shape and volume according to the parameters of the tumor, breast, surgeon, and patient preferences.

Assessing angiogenesis factors as prognostic biomarkers in breast cancer patients and their association with clinicopathological factors

INTRODUCTION

Angiogenesis is fundamental for tumor growth and metastasis across many solid malignancies. Considerable interest has focused on the molecular regulation of tumor angiogenesis as a means to predict disease outcomes and guide therapeutic decisions.

METHODS

In the present study, we investigated the prognostic value of transforming growth factor beta (TGF-β), epidermal growth factor (EGF), fibroblast growth factor (FGF), delta-like ligand 4 (DLL4), and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in the serum of 120 women diagnosed with breast cancer using ELISA as well as examined their associations with clinical parameters and the outcome of the disease.

RESULTS

Our results demonstrated that the serum concentration of TGF-β and EGF were remarkably higher in patients with higher tumor size, end stages of the disease, and positive lymph node involvement compared to patients with lower tumor size, early stages of the disease, and negative lymph node involvement. In addition, we found a significant correlation between the serum concentration of VEGF and the level of EGF, FGF, and DLL4 in patients with breast cancer. Furthermore, both univariate and multivariate analyses showed that TGF-β and EGF can be used as end-stage predictors.

DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION

Based on our findings, increasing the level of angiogenesis factors is significantly associated with higher tumor size and late stages of the disease in patients with breast cancer. Moreover, measuring the level of angiogenesis factors could lead to better prediction of disease outcomes and choosing the best treatments for patients.