Comparison between surgery plus radiotherapy and radiotherapy alone in treating breast cancer patients with ipsilateral supraclavicular lymph node metastasis

Role of aggressive locoregional surgery in treatment strategies for ipsilateral supraclavicular lymph node metastasis of breast cancer: a real-world cohort study

Background: Breast cancer patients with synchronous ipsilateral supraclavicular lymph node metastases (ISLNM) have unfavorable prognoses. The role of supraclavicular lymph node dissection (SLND) as a surgical intervention in the treatment of this condition remains controversial. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the prognostic factors associated with breast cancer with ISLNM and to assess the potential impact of aggressive locoregional surgical management on patient outcomes. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 250 breast cancer patients with ISLNM who were treated with curative intent at our institution between 2000 and 2020. The cohort was stratified into groups based on the extent of axillary surgery. The first group, comprising 185 patients, underwent level I/II axillary dissection. The second group, consisting of 65 patients, underwent aggressive locoregional surgery, including levels I/II/III (infraclavicular) dissection in 37 patients and levels I/II/III + SLND in 28 patients. Our study evaluated overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) as primary endpoints, and locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRRFS) and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) as secondary endpoints. Results: The median follow-up time among all patients was 5.92 years (1.05-15.36 years). The 5-year OS rate was 71.89%, while the DFS rate, LRRFS rate, and DMFS rates were 59.25%, 66.38%, and 64.98%, respectively. A significant difference in OS, DFS, LRRFS, and DMFS was observed between the second group and the first group (p < 0.01). No beneficial impact on recurrence, metastasis, or survival outcomes was observed in the levels I/II/III + SLND group compared to the levels I/II/III dissection group. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that levels I/II/III ± SLND surgery and T stage were associated with OS (p = 0.006 and p = 0.026), while levels I/II/III ± SLND surgery, ER+/HER2-, and histologic grade were associated with DFS (p = 0.032, p = 0.001, p = 0.032). Conclusion: Breast cancer with ISLNM may be considered a locoregional disease, requiring a combination of systemic and local therapies. Aggressive locoregional surgery has been shown to positively impact recurrence, metastasis, and survival outcomes. This approach may provide improved management of the ISLNM for breast cancer patients.

Multi-center study on predicting breast cancer lymph node status from core needle biopsy specimens using multi-modal and multi-instance deep learning

The objective of our study is to develop a deep learning model based on clinicopathological data and digital pathological image of core needle biopsy specimens for predicting breast cancer lymph node metastasis. We collected 3701 patients from the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University and 190 patients from four medical centers in Hebei Province. Integrating clinicopathological data and image features build multi-modal and multi-instance (MMMI) deep learning model to obtain the final prediction. For predicting with or without lymph node metastasis, the AUC was 0.770, 0.709, 0.809 based on the clinicopathological features, WSI and MMMI, respectively. For predicting four classification of lymph node status (no metastasis, isolated tumor cells (ITCs), micrometastasis, and macrometastasis), the prediction based on clinicopathological features, WSI and MMMI were compared. The AUC for no metastasis was 0.770, 0.709, 0.809, respectively; ITCs were 0.619, 0.531, 0.634, respectively; micrometastasis were 0.636, 0.617, 0.691, respectively; and macrometastasis were 0.748, 0.691, 0.758, respectively. The MMMI model achieved the highest prediction accuracy. For prediction of different molecular types of breast cancer, MMMI demonstrated a better prediction accuracy for any type of lymph node status, especially in the molecular type of triple negative breast cancer (TNBC). In the external validation sets, MMMI also showed better prediction accuracy in the four classification, with AUC of 0.725, 0.757, 0.525, and 0.708, respectively. Finally, we developed a breast cancer lymph node metastasis prediction model based on a MMMI model. Through all cases tests, the results showed that the overall prediction ability was high.

Comparison of supraclavicular surgery plus radiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone in breast cancer patients with synchronous ipsilateral supraclavicular lymph node metastasis: a multicenter retrospective study

PURPOSE

To evaluate and compare the outcomes of supraclavicular lymph node dissection plus radiotherapy (RT) and RT alone for patients with synchronous ipsilateral supraclavicular lymph node metastasis.

METHODS

In all, 293 patients with synchronous ipsilateral supraclavicular lymph node metastasis across three centers were included. Of these, 85 (29.0%) received supraclavicular lymph node dissection plus RT (Surgery + RT) and 208 (71.0%) received RT alone. All patients received preoperative systemic therapy followed by mastectomy or lumpectomy and axillary dissection. Supraclavicular recurrence-free survival (SCRFS), locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRRFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) were evaluated by using the Kaplan-Meier method and multivariate Cox models. Multiple imputation was used for missing data.

RESULTS

The median follow-up duration of the RT and Surgery + RT groups were 53.7 and 63.5 months, respectively. For the RT and Surgery + RT groups, the 5-year SCRFS rates were 91.7% vs. 85.5% (P=0.522), LRRFS rates were 79.1% vs. 73.1% (P=0.412), DMFS rates were 60.4 vs. 58.8% (P=0.708), DFS rates were 57.6% vs. 49.7% (P=0.291), and OS rates were 71.9% vs. 62.2% (P=0.272), respectively. There was no significant effect on any outcome when comparing Surgery +RT versus RT alone in the multivariate analysis. Based on four risk factors of DFS, patients were classified into three risk groups: the intermediate- and high-risk groups had significantly lower survival outcomes than the low-risk group. Surgery +RT did not improve outcomes of any risk group compared with RT alone.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with synchronous ipsilateral supraclavicular lymph node metastasis may not benefit from supraclavicular lymph node dissection. Distant metastasis remained the major failure pattern, especially for intermediate- and high-risk groups.

Supraclavicular and Contralateral Axillary Lymph Node Involvement in Breast Cancer Patients

Ipsilateral supraclavicular disease was reclassified from Stage IV, distant metastatic disease, to Stage IIIC, locally advanced breast cancer 20 years ago. Treatment with curative intent with multimodality therapy has led to improved outcomes over time. In contrast, metastatic disease to contralateral axillary lymph nodes remains as Stage IV distant disease. Despite this, in the absence of other distant metastases, many patients with contralateral axillary disease are treated more aggressively than other Stage IV patients. Outcomes of patients with contralateral axillary disease treated with curative intent are more like patients with ipsilateral supraclavicular disease and other locally advanced breast cancers than patients with de novo distant metastases elsewhere. Therefore, some favor reclassification of contralateral axillary metastases without distant metastasis from Stage IV to Stage III breast cancer similar to ipsilateral supraclavicular metastases.

Long-Term Outcomes of Breast Cancer Patients Who Underwent Selective Neck Dissection for Metachronous Isolated Supraclavicular Nodal Metastasis

We retrospectively enrolled 139 patients who developed metachronous isolated supraclavicular lymph node metastasis (miSLNM) from 8129 consecutive patients who underwent primary surgery between 1990 and 2008 at a single medical center. The median age was 47 years. The median follow-up time from date of primary tumor surgery was 73.1 months, and the median time to the date of neck relapse was 43.9 months in this study. Sixty-one (43.9%) patients underwent selective neck dissection (SND). The 5-year distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), post-recurrence survival, and overall survival (OS) rates in the SND group were 31.1%, 40.3%, and 68.9%, respectively, whereas those of the no-SND group were 9.7%, 32.9%, and 57.7%, respectively (p = 0.001). No SND and time interval from primary tumor surgery to neck relapse ≤24 months were the only significant risk factors in the multivariate analysis of DMFS (hazard ratio (HR), 1.77; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.23-2.56; p = 0.002 and HR, 1.76, 95% CI, 1.23-2.52; p = 0.002, respectively) and OS (HR, 1.77; 95% CI, 1.22-2.55; p = 0.003 and HR, 3.54, 95% CI, 2.44-5.16; p < 0.0001, respectively). Multimodal therapy, including neck dissection, significantly improved the DMFS and OS of miSLNM. Survival improvement after miSLNM control by intensive surgical treatment suggests that miSLNM is not distant metastasis.