Evaluation of the diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced ultrasound combined with BRAF V600E gene detection in nodules of unclear significance by thyroid fine-needle aspiration

Application of Ultrasound Shear Wave Elastography Combined With BRAFV600E Mutation for the Diagnosis of Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma

ABSTRACT

This prospective study aimed to investigate the combination of shear wave elastography (SWE) and BRAFV600E mutation testing for the diagnosis of papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC). One hundred thyroid nodules with an American College of Radiology thyroid imaging reporting and data system classification of 4 or 5 were subjected to SWE measurement, BRAFV600E genotyping, fine-needle aspiration, and surgery. Nonparametric statistical tests were used to compare the differences in the elastic parameters and BRAF genotypes between benign and malignant thyroid nodules of PTC, and receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was conducted to compare the diagnostic efficacy. In addition, the correlations between elastic parameters and BRAFV600E mutation in PTC were analyzed using binary logistic regression. The SWE, BRAFV600E, and their combination exhibited sensitivities of 72.9%, 81.3%, and 85.4%, respectively, and specificities of 66.7%, 90.3%, and 86.5%, respectively, in the diagnosis of PTC ( P < 0.05). The SWE, BRAFV600E, and their combination exhibited sensitivities of 50.0%, 24.1% and 56.3%, respectively, and specificities of 89.7%, 87.5% and 82.8%, respectively, in the diagnosis of central cervical lymph node metastasis ( P < 0.05). The combined use of SWE and BRAFV600E detection had the largest area under the curve, indicating that this combination is more effective in diagnosing PTC and lymph node metastasis in the central region than either method alone. Furthermore, Emax was positively associated with the BRAFV600E genotype. In conclusion, the combination of SWE and BRAFV600E genotype detection can improve the diagnostic efficacy for PTC. Emax can predict the BRAFV600E mutation status.

Could Oxidative Stress Play a Role in the Development and Clinical Management of Differentiated Thyroid Cancer?

Increased oxidative stress (OS) has been implicated as a relevant risk factor for cancer progression. Furthermore, patients diagnosed with differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) have been characterized by an increased OS status. Therefore, assessing OS status could potentially be considered a useful tool in DTC clinical management. This measurement could be particularly valuable in personalizing treatment protocols and determining new potential medical targets to improve commonly used therapies. A literature review was conducted to gather new information on DTC clinical management, with a particular focus on evaluating the clinical utility of OS. These meta-analyses concentrate on novel approaches that employ the measurement of oxidative-antioxidant status, which could represent the most promising area for implementing clinical management.

The combination of BRAFV600E mutation and Chinese Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System is helpful in the management of AUS/FLUS thyroid nodules

PURPOSE

To explore the utility of the BRAF^V600E mutation in combination with the Chinese Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (C-TIRADS) in the management of atypia of undetermined significance/follicular lesion of undetermined significance (AUS/FLUS) thyroid nodule (TN).

METHODS

138 AUS/FLUS TNs in 129 patients were included. Each TN underwent preoperative BRAF^V600E mutation analysis and was classified using the C-TIRADS. Histopathologic diagnosis served as reference standard.

RESULTS

46 benign TNs and 92 malignant TNs were identified. The C-TIRADS 4C and 5 (OR = 10.409, P = 0.000), BRAF^V600E mutation (OR = 36.493, P = 0.000) were independent predictors of malignant nodules. There were significant differences in malignancy rate among the different C-TIRADS TNs (P = 0.000), and these TNs with higher C-TIRADS were associated with increased malignancy rate (P for trend = 0.000). The rate of the nodule with BRAF^V600E mutation increased with the increase of C-TIRADS (P for trend = 0.001). For AUS/FLUS TNs without BRAF^V600E mutation, the malignancy rates of the C-TIRADS 3, 4A, 4B, 4C, and 5 were 0%, 21.4%, 20.8%, 70.8%, and 100%, respectively (P = 0.000), and the malignancy rate increased from C-TIRADS 3 to C-TIRADS 5 (P for trend = 0.000). C-TIRADS and BRAF^V600E mutation had similar diagnostic efficacy (P > 0.05), and the sensitivity, negative predictive value, and accuracy of the combination were significantly higher than BRAF^V600E gene or C-TIRADS alone (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

C-TIRADS can effectively provide risk stratification for AUS/FLUS nodules. The combination is helpful in selecting appropriate management for AUS/FLUS patients.

Differentiation of Thyroid Nodules (C-TIRADS 4) by Combining Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Diagnosis Model With Chinese Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System

Objectives

To establish a contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) diagnostic schedule by CEUS analysis of thyroid nodules of C-TIRADS 4. To establish a CEUS-TIRADS diagnostic model to differentiate thyroid nodules (C-TIRADS 4) by combining CEUS with Chinese thyroid imaging reporting and data system (C-TIRADS).

Methods

A total of 228 thyroid nodules (C-TIRADS 4) were estimated by CEUS. The arrival time, enhancement degree, enhancement homogeneity, enhancement pattern, enhancement ring, and wash-out time were analyzed in CEUS for all of the nodules. Multivariate factors logistic analysis was performed and a CEUS diagnostic schedule was established. If the nodule had a regular hyper-enhancement ring or got a score of less than 2 in CEUS analysis, CEUS-TIRADS subtracted 1 category. If the nodule got a score of 2 in the CEUS schedule, the CEUS-TIRADS category remained the same as before. If the nodule got a score of more than 2 in the CEUS schedule, CEUS-TIRADS added 1 category. When it reflected an absent enhancement in CEUS, the nodule was judged as CEUS-TIRADS 3. All of the C-TIRADS 4 nodules were re-graded by CEUS-TIRADS. We then compare the diagnosis performance of C-TIRADS, CEUS, and CEUS-TIRADS by sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy.

Results

Among the 228 C-TIRADS 4 nodules, 69 were determined as C-TIRADS 4a, 114 were C-TIRADS 4b, and 45 were C-TIRADS 4c. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of C-TIRADS were 93.1%, 55.3%, and 74.6% respectively. The area under the curve was 0.753. Later arrival time, hypo-enhancement, heterogeneous enhancement, centripetal enhancement, and rapid washout were risk factors of malignancy in multivariate analysis. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of CEUS were 78.7%, 87.5%, and 83.3% respectively. The area under the curve was 0.803. By CEUS-TIRADS diagnostic model combining CEUS with C-TIRADS, a total of 127 cases were determined as malignancy (111 were malignant and 16 were benign) and 101 were diagnosed as benign ones (5 were malignant and 96 were benign). The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of CEUS-TIRADS were 95.7%, 85.7%, and 92.1% respectively. The area under the curve was 0.916. The diagnostic performance of CEUS-TIRADS was significantly better than CEUS and C-TIRADS. The difference was statistically significant (P<0.05).

Conclusions

The diagnostic schedule of CEUS could get better diagnostic performance than US in the differentiation of thyroid nodules. The CEUS-TIRADS combining CEUS analysis with C-TIRADS could make up for the deficient sensibility of C-TIRADS, showing a better diagnostic performance than US and CEUS.

The Role of CEUS in the Evaluation of Thyroid Cancer: From Diagnosis to Local Staging

Ultrasound often represents the first diagnostic step for thyroid nodule evaluation in clinical practice, but baseline US alone is not always effective enough to achieve thyroid nodule characterization. In the last decades new ultrasound techniques, such as CEUS, have been introduced to evaluate thyroid parenchyma as recommended by EFSUMB guidelines, for use in clinical research field, although its role is not yet clear. Several papers show the potential utility of CEUS in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant thyroid nodules and in the analysis of lymph node involvement in neoplastic pathology. Therefore, we carried out an evaluation of the literature concerning the role of CEUS in three specific areas: the characterization of the thyroid nodule, the evaluation of minimally invasive treatment and loco-regional staging of the lymph node in proven thyroid cancer. According to evidence reported, CEUS can also play an operative role in nodular thyroid pathology as it is able to guide ablation procedures on thyroid nodule and metastatic lymph nodes, to assess the radicality of surgery, to evaluate disease relapse at the level of the margins of ablated regions and to monitor the clinical evolution of necrotic areas in immediate post-treatment setting.