Standardisation of thyroid cytology terminology and practice: are modifications necessary?-a narrative review

Unveiling Variations: A Comprehensive Comparison of Five Globally Used Thyroid Cytology Reporting Systems With Histopathological Correlation

Introduction Accurate cytological assessment is pivotal for managing thyroid lesions and various global reporting systems are in use, such as the globally acclaimed The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology (TBSRTC), alongside other reporting systems namely, the Japanese Reporting System for Thyroid Aspiration Cytology (JRSTAC), Italian Consensus for the Classification and Reporting of Thyroid Cytology (ICCRTC), the UK Royal College of Pathologists System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology (UK RCPath), the Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia and Australian Society of Cytology Classification System (RCPA/ASC). Notably, variations exist among these systems which are influenced by country-specific statistics. Given the lack of large-scale data in India and the difference in prevalence of diagnostic entities compared to the western population, this study aimed to identify reporting systems suitable for the Indian population focusing on distinguishing neoplastic from non-neoplastic lesions. Materials and methods A cross-sectional analysis of 40 thyroid cytology cases with histopathological correlation was conducted. Pathologists independently assessed cytology slides using JRSTAC, ICCRTC, RCPA/ASC, UK RCPath and TBSRTC. Five performance indicators, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) of neoplastic conditions, negative predictive value (NPV) of non-neoplastic conditions, diagnostic accuracy and two quality indicators, percentage of Atypia of undetermined significance (AUS) and AUS/Malignant ratio were analyzed and compared. Results Among 40 cases, 22 cases were neoplastic (16 papillary thyroid carcinoma, six follicular adenoma) and 18 non-neoplastic (14 multinodular goiter, four lymphocytic thyroiditis). Specific patterns emerged in cases labeled "Non-diagnostic", prompted questions about categorizing inadequately cellular cases as "benign" in light of the presence of specific findings. All reporting systems showed 100% specificity in detecting non-neoplastic and neoplastic conditions in Category 1 and Category 6 respectively. Performance and quality indicators varied among reporting systems with TBSRTC (PPV of neoplastic cases 85.71%, NPV of non-neoplastic cases 70.58%, specificity 85.7%, sensitivity 70.58%, diagnostic accuracy 60%, AUS percentage 22.5% and AUS/Malignant ratio 3%) and RCPA/ASC (PPV of neoplastic cases 76.47%, NPV of non-neoplastic cases 70.58%, specificity 75%, sensitivity 72.2%, diagnostic accuracy 62.5%, AUS percentage 15% and AUS/Malignant ratio 3%) showing better results. Conclusion Among the five thyroid cytology reporting systems studied, TBSRTC and RCPA/ASC showed better overall performance results and quality indicators were close to benchmark. Better performance by TBSRTC 2023 could be due to the detailed criterion mentioned per category with subcategorization of AUS and suspicious for malignancy by features of cytological and architectural atypia. Similarly, RCPA/ASC has subcategorized AUS with defined criteria and certain background features were included as an isolated criterion for the suspicious for malignancy category. These defined criteria outlined in TBSRTC and RCPA/ASC played a crucial role in minimizing and reclassifying cases from the indeterminate categories (AUS and suspicious for malignancy) into well-defined categories with established management protocols.

The Asian Thyroid Working Group, from 2017 to 2023

The Asian Thyroid Working Group was founded in 2017 at the 12th Asia Oceania Thyroid Association (AOTA) Congress in Busan, Korea. This group activity aims to characterize Asian thyroid nodule practice and establish strict diagnostic criteria for thyroid carcinomas, a reporting system for thyroid fine needle aspiration cytology without the aid of gene panel tests, and new clinical guidelines appropriate to conservative Asian thyroid nodule practice based on scientific evidence obtained from Asian patient cohorts. Asian thyroid nodule practice is usually designed for patient-centered clinical practice, which is based on the Hippocratic Oath, "First do not harm patients," and an oriental filial piety "Do not harm one's own body because it is a precious gift from parents," which is remote from defensive medical practice in the West where physicians, including pathologists, suffer from severe malpractice climate. Furthermore, Asian practice emphasizes the importance of resource management in navigating the overdiagnosis of low-risk thyroid carcinomas. This article summarizes the Asian Thyroid Working Group activities in the past 7 years, from 2017 to 2023, highlighting the diversity of thyroid nodule practice between Asia and the West and the background reasons why Asian clinicians and pathologists modified Western systems significantly.