Comparison of ultrasound-guided puncture drainage and incision drainage for deep neck abscess

Ultrasonography-guided drainage versus surgical drainage for deep neck space abscesses: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To compare ultrasonography-guided drainage versus conventional surgical incision and drainage in deep neck space abscesses.

METHODS

The study was pre-registered on the National Institute of Health Research Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42023466809) and adhered to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The Medline, Embase and Central databases were searched. Primary outcomes were length of hospital stay and recurrence. Heterogeneity and bias risk were assessed, and a fixed-effects model was applied.

RESULTS

Of 646 screened articles, 7 studies enrolling 384 participants were included. Ultrasonography-guided drainage was associated with a significantly shorter hospital stay (mean difference = -2.31, p < 0.00001), but no statistically significant difference was noted in recurrence rate compared to incision and drainage (odds ratio = 2.02, p = 0.21). Ultrasonography-guided drainage appeared to be associated with cost savings and better cosmetic outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Ultrasonography-guided drainage was associated with a shorter hospital stay, making it a viable and perhaps more cost-effective alternative. More randomised trials with adequate outcomes reporting are recommended to optimise the available evidence.

Ultrasound-guided puncture drainage versus surgical incision drainage for deep neck space abscesses: a protocol for a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis

INTRODUCTION

Deep neck space abscesses (DNAs) are serious surgical emergencies, associated with life-threatening complications. Surgical incision and drainage combined with antibiotics is the main treatment for DNAs, but drawbacks still exist. Ultrasound-guided puncture drainage is an alternative treatment for some DNAs with limited clinical evidence. Hence, the optimal drainage technique for the treatment of DNAs remains unclear. Therefore, we will perform a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis to identify the efficacy of ultrasound-guided puncture drainage for DNAs.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

PubMed, Ovid Medline, Cochrane Library, Embase, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang database, VIP database and trial registry databases will be searched from inception to September 2023 to identify randomised controlled trials of patients diagnosed with DNAs accepting ultrasound-guided puncture drainage. The primary outcome will be the length of hospital stay. The secondary outcomes will be the cure rate, incidence of retreatment, complications and overall cost to the healthcare system. Fixed-effects or random-effects model will be used according to the statistical heterogeneity. Mean differences or standardised mean differences with 95% CIs for continuous data and risk ratio (RR) with 95% CIs for dichotomous data. The Cochrane risk-of-bias tool 2, Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) and trial sequential analysis will be conducted to evaluate the evidence quality and control the random errors. Funnel plots and Egger's regression test will be performed to evaluate publication bias.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethical approval was not required for this systematic review protocol. The results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42023441031.

[Ultrasonography for peritonsillar abscess diagnosis: benefits and drawbacks]

In 2 clinical cases the neck soft tissues ultrasound in the young and old patients allowed to solve the main diagnostic tasks: to determine the presence of peritonsillar abscess cavities, their sizes and localization; to exclude the fit of large vessels near to abscesses and the presence of abnormal vessels; to conduct differential diagnosis of abscesses from a tumor and allergic angioedema. Ultrasound with external access did not require any special preparation, was easily tolerated by the patient, was informative, but it was difficult to determine the puncture place. Intraoral ultrasound was more difficult to conduct, because the transducer should be small in size to enter the patient's mouth. If the patient had a pronounced trismus, intraoral ultrasound couldn't be done. On the one hand in a case of children use the standard transducer cannot fit in the mouth as well and may be damaged by teeth. But on the other hand, the abscess puncture site can be more easily determined by intraoral examination. Compared to multi-slice computed tomography with contrast, the ultrasound method is cheaper, more accessible, faster, more informative and there is no radiation exposure associated with this method.

CONCLUSION

Ultrasound of the peritonsillar region by external and intraoral methods is informative for detecting peritonsillar abscess, especially in difficult diagnostic cases.

Ultrasound-Guided Needle Aspiration vs. Surgical Incision of Parotid Abscesses

OBJECTIVE

Standard treatment of parotideal abscesses consists of surgical drainage. This often has to be carried out in general anesthesia and carries the risk of iatrogenic injury of the facial nerve. Ultrasound-guided needle aspiration is an alternative therapy. Up until now a lack of systematic data concerning this subject exists. The study at hand aims to answer the question whether needle aspiration is a viable alternative for surgical drainage.

METHODS

All patients who had been treated surgically (n = 39) or via ultrasound-guided needle aspiration (n = 18) at our clinic were included into this monocentric retrospective analysis.

RESULTS

There was no statistically significant difference (p = 0.142) regarding the mean abscess volume in both groups (5.7 vs. 10.1 mL). Therapy of the abscesses on average required 1.88 (1-5) ultrasound-guided needle aspirations or 1.10 (1-4) surgical interventions. There was a trend to a shorter inpatient treatment period (5.88 vs. 7.33 days) after ultrasound-guided needle aspiration. This trend did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.301). Facial nerve alterations did not occur in any of the patients. Postoperative bleeding did never occur after needle aspirations but in 2% of the patients after surgical abscess revision.

CONCLUSION

Ultrasound-guided needle aspiration is safe and effective in the treatment of parotid abscesses.