1
|
Brahma B, Yamamoto T, Panigoro SS, Haryono SJ, Yusuf PA, Priambodo PS, Harimurti K, Taher A. Supermicrosurgery lymphaticovenous and lymphaticolymphatic anastomosis: Technical detail and short-term follow-up for immediate lymphatic reconstruction in breast cancer treatment-related lymphedema prevention. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord 2024; 12:101863. [PMID: 38428499 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2024.101863] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2023] [Revised: 02/05/2024] [Accepted: 02/12/2024] [Indexed: 03/03/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We describe the feasibility and short-term outcome of our surgical technique to repair the lymph vessel disruption directly after axillary lymph node dissection during breast cancer surgery. This procedure is called immediate lymphatic reconstruction to prevent breast cancer treatment-related lymphedema (BCRL), which frequently occurs after axillary lymph node dissection. The surgical technique consisted of lymphaticovenous anastomosis (LVA) or lymphaticolymphatic anastomosis. We named the procedure lymphatic bypass supermicrosurgery (LBS). METHODS This study used a retrospective cohort design of patients with breast cancer between May 2020 and February 2023. LBS was performed by making an intima-to-intima coaptation between afferent lymph vessels and the recipient's veins (LVA) or efferent lymph vessels lymphaticolymphatic anastomosis. RESULTS A total of 82 patients underwent lymphatic bypass. The mean age of patients was 50 ± 12 years, and most had stage III breast cancer (n = 59 [72%]). LVA was the most common type of lymphatic bypass (94.6%). The median number of LVA was 1 (range, 1-4) and 1 (range, 1-3) for lymphaticolymphatic anastomosis. The median follow-up time was 12.5 months (range, 1-33 months). The 50 patients who had postoperative indocyanine green lymphography described arm dermal backflow stage 0 in 20 (40%), stage 1 in 19 (38%), stage 2 in 2 (4%), and stage 3 in 9 (18%) cases. The proportion of BCRL was 11 (22%), and subclinical lymphedema was 19 (38%) in this period. Most cases were in stable subclinical lymphedema (10, 58.8%). The 1-year and 2-year BCRL rates were 14% (95% confidence interval, 4%-23.9%) and 22% (95% confidence interval, 10.1%-33.9%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS Along with the emerging immediate lymphatic reconstruction, LBS is a feasible supermicrosurgery technique that may have a potential role in BCRL prevention. A randomized controlled study would confirm the effectiveness of the technique.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bayu Brahma
- Doctoral Program in Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia; Department of Surgical Oncology, Dharmais Cancer Hospital-National Cancer Center, Jakarta, Indonesia
| | - Takumi Yamamoto
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
| | - Sonar Soni Panigoro
- Oncology Division, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia - Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo General Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia
| | - Samuel Johny Haryono
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Dharmais Cancer Hospital-National Cancer Center, Jakarta, Indonesia
| | - Prasandhya Astagiri Yusuf
- Department of Medical Physiology and Biophysics/Medical Technology IMERI, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia
| | - Purnomo Sidi Priambodo
- Department of Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia
| | - Kuntjoro Harimurti
- Division of Geriatrics/Clinical Epidemiological Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, Universitas Indonesia - Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo General Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia
| | - Akmal Taher
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia - Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo General Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
What do we know about treating breast-cancer-related lymphedema? Review of the current knowledge about therapeutic options. Breast Cancer 2023; 30:187-199. [PMID: 36571707 PMCID: PMC9950281 DOI: 10.1007/s12282-022-01428-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2022] [Accepted: 12/16/2022] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
Breast-cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) is a common consequence of oncological treatment. Its management is a complicated, chronic, and arduous process. Therapeutic options can be divided on non-surgical and surgical methods, although there is still no clear consensus about their effectiveness in preventing or stopping the disease. That brings problems in everyday practice, as there are no guidelines about proper time for starting therapy and no agreement about which management will be beneficial for each patient. The aim of this review is to summarize current knowledge about possible treatment choices, non-surgical so as surgical, indicate knowledge gaps, and try to direct pathways for future studies.
Collapse
|
3
|
Abbas Y, Hamdy O. Axillary reverse mapping in breast cancer: An overview. Breast Dis 2023; 42:137-146. [PMID: 37154174 DOI: 10.3233/bd-220040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/10/2023]
Abstract
Standard operative management for breast carcinoma has significantly shifted from extensive procedures to minor interventions.Although axillary dissection was a fundamental component of operative management, sentinel biopsy is an actual process for axillary staging. Axillary dissection may be postponed for cases that have negative SLNs or 1 or 2 infiltrated lymph nodes undergoing breast or axillary radiation. Contrarily, axillary dissection is still the conventional management for patients with clinically positive nodes.Arm lymphedema is a frequent and overwhelming complication of axillary dissection, with a worse impact on the patient's life.Axillary reverse mapping was recently introduced to map and conserve the lymph drain of the upper limb throughout axillary dissection or sentinel biopsy. A technique based on the theory that the breast's lymphatic drainage differs from those that drain the arm, so preserving lymphatic drainage of the upper limb can prevent lymphedema, thereby not raising the risk of axillary recurrence.Therefore, this technique is the reverse of sentinel biopsy, which remove the lymph nodes that drain the breast.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yara Abbas
- Mansoura Manchester Medical Program, Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt
| | - Omar Hamdy
- Surgical Oncology Unit, Oncology Center, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
McEvoy MP, Gomberawalla A, Smith M, Boccardo FM, Holmes D, Djohan R, Thiruchelvam P, Klimberg S, Dietz J, Feldman S. The prevention and treatment of breast cancer- related lymphedema: A review. Front Oncol 2022; 12:1062472. [PMID: 36561522 PMCID: PMC9763870 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1062472] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2022] [Accepted: 11/07/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Breast cancer- related lymphedema (BCRL) affects about 3 to 5 million patients worldwide, with about 20,000 per year in the United States. As breast cancer mortality is declining due to improved diagnostics and treatments, the long-term effects of treatment for BCRL need to be addressed. Methods The American Society of Breast Surgeons Lymphatic Surgery Working Group conducted a large review of the literature in order to develop guidelines on BCRL prevention and treatment. This was a comprehensive but not systematic review of the literature. This was inclusive of recent randomized controlled trials, meta-analyses, and reviews evaluating the prevention and treatment of BCRL. There were 25 randomized clinical trials, 13 systemic reviews and meta-analyses, and 87 observational studies included. Results The findings of our review are detailed in the paper, with each guideline being analyzed with the most recent data that the group found evidence of to suggest these recommendations. Conclusions Prevention and treatment of BCRL involve a multidisciplinary team. Early detection, before clinically apparent, is crucial to prevent irreversible lymphedema. Awareness of risk factors and appropriate practice adjustments to reduce the risk aids are crucial to decrease the progression of lymphedema. The treatment can be costly, time- consuming, and not always effective, and therefore, the overall goal should be prevention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maureen P. McEvoy
- Breast Surgery Division, Department of Surgery, Montefiore Medical Center, Montefiore Einstein Center for Cancer Care, Bronx, NY, United States,*Correspondence: Maureen P. McEvoy,
| | - Ameer Gomberawalla
- Department of Surgery, Advocate Medical Group, Oak Lawn, IL, United States
| | - Mark Smith
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Northwell Health System, New Hyde Park, NY, United States
| | | | - Dennis Holmes
- Department of Surgery, Los Angeles Center for Women’s Health, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Risal Djohan
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States
| | - Paul Thiruchelvam
- Department of Breast Surgery, Imperial College, London, United Kingdom
| | - Suzanne Klimberg
- Department of Surgery, University of Texas Medical Branch(UTMB) Cancer Center, Galveston, TX, United States
| | - Jill Dietz
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, United States
| | - Sheldon Feldman
- Breast Surgery Division, Department of Surgery, Montefiore Medical Center, Montefiore Einstein Center for Cancer Care, Bronx, NY, United States
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Zhang YD, Zhang X, Wang XY, Han DM, Du JS. Visual analysis of global research output of lymphedema based on bibliometrics. Front Oncol 2022; 12:926237. [PMID: 35992843 PMCID: PMC9389543 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.926237] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2022] [Accepted: 06/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Globally, several generations of doctors in the field of lymphedema have created numerous publications. To date, no bibliometric analysis has been performed specifically on these publications. For the further promotion of research on lymphedema and to align with the international research frontiers, it is essential to understand the current state of Lymphedema research output. Objective This study aims to statistically and visually analyze the characteristics of publications output, distribution of contributions and development process of lymphedema, enriching the knowledge base of Lymphedema, and then seek potential research topics and collaborators. Methods Based on the Web of Science core collection database, we firstly analyzed the quantity and quality of publications in the field of lymphedema, secondly profiled the publishing groups in terms of country, institution, author's publication and cooperation network, and finally sorted out and summarized the hot topics of research. Results A total of 8569 papers were retrieved from 1900-2021. The top4 journals with the most publications were LYMPHOLOGY, LYMPHATIC RESEARCH AND BIOLOGY, PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY and ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY. The top 4 countries with the most publications were USA, Japan, UK, and China. The United States dominates the total number of publications and the international cooperation network. The most productive research institution is Harvard University, and the research institution with the most collaborating institutions is Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center. Mortimer, Peter S contributes the most research in this field. The research achievements of Japanese scholars in this field are of great significance. The top 5 ranked keywords are "Breast Cancer", "Health-Related Quality Of Life", "Lymphscintigraphy", "Lymphovenous Anastomosis", and "Lymphangiogenesis". Conclusion More and more scholars are devoted to the research of cancer-related Lymphedema. It is foreseeable that breast cancer-related lymphedema and lymphangiogenesis will remain a focus of future research. Advances in Lymphatic vessel imaging and the development of lymphatic microsurgery will further play a role in the clinical workup of lymphedema. Meanwhile, This study can help researchers identify potential collaborators and partner institutions and contribute to further research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yun-dong Zhang
- Department of the Lymphatic and Vascular Surgery, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China
- Key Laboratory of Lymphatic Surgery Jilin Province, Engineering Laboratory of Lymphatic Surgery, Changchun, China
| | - Xue Zhang
- Chengdu Library and Information Center, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chengdu, China
- Department of Library, Information and Archives Management, School of Economics and Management, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Xin-yu Wang
- Department of the Lymphatic and Vascular Surgery, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China
- Key Laboratory of Lymphatic Surgery Jilin Province, Engineering Laboratory of Lymphatic Surgery, Changchun, China
| | - Dong-mei Han
- Department of the Lymphatic and Vascular Surgery, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China
- Key Laboratory of Lymphatic Surgery Jilin Province, Engineering Laboratory of Lymphatic Surgery, Changchun, China
| | - Jian-shi Du
- Department of the Lymphatic and Vascular Surgery, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China
- Key Laboratory of Lymphatic Surgery Jilin Province, Engineering Laboratory of Lymphatic Surgery, Changchun, China
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Hirche C. [Autologous Breast Reconstruction in Conjuction with Lymphatic Microsurgery in Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema]. HANDCHIR MIKROCHIR P 2022; 54:326-338. [PMID: 35944536 DOI: 10.1055/a-1868-5527] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Breast cancer-related lymphedema of the upper extremity is the most significant non-oncological complication of tumour therapy, leading to functional impairment and impacting patients' quality of life. Autologous breast reconstruction per se effectively reduces incidence and stage of lymphedema after breast cancer treatment by surgical angiogenesis. In addition, modern surgical techniques for treating lymphedema are effective in reducing limb volume, circumference and functional impairment, and improving patients' quality of life, body image, integrity and local immunocompetence. Reconstructive surgery, including lymphovenous anastomoses (LVA) and vascularised lymph node transfer (VLNT), have been shown to rearrange or restore lymphatic flow and prevent stage progression. For patients with breast cancer-related lymphedema after mastectomy, autologous breast reconstruction in conjunction with lymphatic microsurgery using VLNT, LVA or a combination of these procedures offers the option of holistic and single-stage restoration in modern senology. Extensive scar release in the axilla is a crucial component of the surgical technique, aiming to prepare the recipient bed for the VLN transplant and to allow for the functional recruitment of remaining lymph vessels of the upper extremity. This article presents the indications, preoperative diagnostic evaluation, surgical techniques and precautions, complications and results of combined lymphatic and breast restoration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christoph Hirche
- Abteilung für Plastische, Hand- und Rekonstruktive Mikrochirurgie, Handtrauma- und Replantationszentrum, BG Unfallklinik Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| |
Collapse
|