Outcomes of extended surgical resections for locally advanced thymic malignancies: a narrative review

Diagnostic performance of radiomics model for preoperative risk categorization in thymic epithelial tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Incidental thymus region masses during thoracic examinations are not uncommon. The clinician's decision-making for treatment largely depends on imaging findings. Due to the lack of specific indicators, it may be of great value to explore the role of radiomics in risk categorization of the thymic epithelial tumors (TETs).

METHODS

Four databases (PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library) were screened to identify eligible articles reporting radiomics models of diagnostic performance for risk categorization in TETs patients. The quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies 2 (QUADAS-2) and radiomics quality score (RQS) were used for methodological quality assessment. The pooled area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity and specificity with their 95% confidence intervals were calculated.

RESULTS

A total of 2134 patients in 13 studies were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled AUC of 11 studies reporting high/low-risk histologic subtypes was 0.855 (95% CI, 0.817-0.893), while the pooled AUC of 4 studies differentiating stage classification was 0.826 (95% CI, 0.817-0.893). Meta-regression revealed no source of significant heterogeneity. Subgroup analysis demonstrated that the best diagnostic imaging was contrast enhanced computer tomography (CECT) with largest pooled AUC (0.873, 95% CI 0.832-0.914). Publication bias was found to be no significance by Deeks' funnel plot.

CONCLUSIONS

This present study shows promise for preoperative selection of high-risk TETs patients based on radiomics signatures with current available evidence. However, methodological quality in further studies still needs to be improved for feasibility confirmation and clinical application of radiomics-based models in predicting risk categorization of the thymic epithelial tumors.

Early Postoperative Results after Thymectomy for Thymic Cancer: A Single-Institution Experience

BACKGROUND

Surgery for thymic cancers is considered the key of curative treatment. Preoperative patients' characteristics and intraoperative features might influence postoperative outcome. We aim to verify short-term outcomes and possible risk factors for complications after thymectomy.

METHODS

We retrospectively investigated patients undergoing surgery for thymoma or thymic carcinoma in the period between January 1, 2008, and December 31, 2021, in our department. Preoperative features, surgical technique (open, bilateral VATS, RATS), intraoperative characteristics and incidence of postoperative complications (PC) were analyzed.

RESULTS

We included in the study 138 patients. Open surgery was performed in 76 patients (55.1%), in 36 VATS (26.1%) and in 26 RATS (36.1%). Resection of one or more adjacent organs due to neoplastic infiltration was required in 25 patients. PC appeared in 25 patients (52% Clavien-Dindo grade I, 12% grade IVa). Open surgery had a higher incidence of PC (p < 0.001), longer postoperative in-hospital stay (p = 0.045) and larger neoplasm (p = 0.006). PC were significant related to pulmonary resection (p = 0.006), phrenic nerve resection (p = 0.029), resection of more than one organ (p = 0.009) and open surgery (p = 0.001), but only extended surgery of more organs was confirmed as independent prognostic factor for PC (p = 0.0013). Patients with preoperative myasthenia symptoms have a trend toward stage IVa complications (p = 0.065). No differences were observed between outcomes of VATS and RATS.

CONCLUSIONS

Extended resections are related to a higher incidence of PC, while VATS and RATS guarantee a lower incidence of PC and shorter postoperative stay even in patients that require extended resections. Symptomatic myasthenia patients might have a higher risk toward more severe complications.

Thymic Epithelial Tumors: An Evolving Field

Despite their rarity, thymic epithelial tumors (TETs) have attracted much interest over the years, leading to an impressive number of histological and staging classifications. At present, TETs are divided by the WHO classification into four main subtypes: type A, type AB, and type B thymomas (subdivided into B1, B2, and B3), and thymic carcinomas, going from the more indolent to the most aggressive ones. Among many debated staging proposals, the TNM and the Masaoka-Koga staging systems have been widely accepted and used in routine practice. The four-tiered histological classification is symmetrically mirrored by the molecular subgrouping of TETs, which identifies an A-like and an AB-like cluster, with frequent GTF2I and HRAS mutations; an intermediate B-like cluster, with a T-cell signaling profile; and a carcinoma-like cluster comprising thymic carcinomas with frequent CDKN2A and TP53 alterations and a high tumor molecular burden. Molecular investigations have opened the way to tailored therapies, such as tyrosine kinase inhibitors targeting KIT, mTOR, and VEGFR, and immune-checkpoints that have been adopted as second-line systemic treatments. In this review, we discuss the crucial events that led to the current understanding of TETs, while disclosing the next steps in this intriguing field.