1
|
Baù MG, Borella F, Mano MP, Giordano L, Carosso M, Surace A, Mondino A, Gallio N, Benedetto C. Adherence to Quality Indicators for Breast Cancer Management in a Multidisciplinary Training Program. J Pers Med 2023; 13:1693. [PMID: 38138920 PMCID: PMC10744846 DOI: 10.3390/jpm13121693] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2023] [Revised: 11/26/2023] [Accepted: 12/05/2023] [Indexed: 12/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: The management of early breast cancer (BC) needs supervision and skill maintenance, and should be performed by specialists working as a team in multidisciplinary breast units. This approach aims to improve the long-term survival and quality of life of patients with BC. Methods: This was a prospective observational study including patients newly diagnosed with operable BC. The study encompassed the pre-surgical phase, throughout the diagnostic and surgical workout, and included post-therapeutic master multidisciplinary team meetings (MTMs) sessions, between 2019 and 2022. Results: We enrolled 280 patients with BC from eight breast units. The Senonetwork indicators regarding diagnosis, waiting time, loco-regional treatment, and adjuvant therapy were collected for each patient discussed. Conclusions: Overall, the majority of quality indicators were respected among breast units. The most critical issue referred to timing indicators: more than 30 days from MTM to surgery, more than 42 days from diagnosis to surgery, and more than 60 days from the first screening mammogram to surgery for many patients. Some aspects of the histopathological diagnosis of intraductal BC also need to be improved. Furthermore, other critical issues in our study regarded some aesthetical indicators, demonstrating low interest in these essential quality indicators.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Grazia Baù
- Gynecology and Obstetrics Unit, Maria Vittoria Hospital, 10144 Turin, Italy;
| | - Fulvio Borella
- Gynecology and Obstetrics Unit 1, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Sant’Anna Hospital, 10126 Turin, Italy; (M.C.); (C.B.)
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Via Ventimiglia 1, 10126 Turin, Italy (A.M.)
| | - Maria Piera Mano
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Via Ventimiglia 1, 10126 Turin, Italy (A.M.)
| | - Livia Giordano
- Unit of Epidemiology, CPO Piemonte, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, San Giovanni Antica Sede, 10123 Turin, Italy
| | - Marco Carosso
- Gynecology and Obstetrics Unit 1, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Sant’Anna Hospital, 10126 Turin, Italy; (M.C.); (C.B.)
| | - Alessandra Surace
- Gynecology and Obstetrics Unit, Michele e Pietro Ferrero Hospital, 12060 Verduno, Italy;
| | - Aurelia Mondino
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Via Ventimiglia 1, 10126 Turin, Italy (A.M.)
| | - Niccolò Gallio
- Gynecology and Obstetrics Unit 2, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Sant’Anna Hospital, 10126 Turin, Italy;
| | - Chiara Benedetto
- Gynecology and Obstetrics Unit 1, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Sant’Anna Hospital, 10126 Turin, Italy; (M.C.); (C.B.)
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Via Ventimiglia 1, 10126 Turin, Italy (A.M.)
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
El-Helou E, Eddy C, Picchia S, Van de Merckt C, Radermeker M, Moreau M, De Neubourg F, Larsimont D, Veys I, Pop CF. Effectiveness of Carbon Localization for Invasive Breast Cancer: An Institutional Experience. Breast J 2023; 2023:4082501. [PMID: 37496746 PMCID: PMC10368511 DOI: 10.1155/2023/4082501] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2022] [Revised: 05/21/2023] [Accepted: 07/08/2023] [Indexed: 07/28/2023]
Abstract
Introduction The final oncological and aesthetic results of breast-conserving surgery (BCS) are influenced by the precise localization of breast cancer (BC) tumors and by the quality of the intraoperative margin assessment technique. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of the carbon localization (CL) technique by determining the success rate of BC identification and the proportion of adequate complete resection of BC lesions. Methods We conducted a cross-sectional retrospective study of patients treated with primary BCS for invasive BC who underwent CL of their BC lesion at the Jules Bordet Institute between January 2015 and December 2017. Descriptive statistics with categorical and continuous variables were used. The success rate of tumor identification and the rate of adequate excision were calculated using the test of percentages for independent dichotomous data. Results This study included 542 patients with 564 nonpalpable BC lesions. The median pathological tumor size was 12 mm. Of these, 460 were invasive ductal carcinomas. Most of the tumors were of the luminal subtype. CL was performed using ultrasound guidance in 98.5% of cases. The median delay between CL and surgery was 5 days, with 46% of the patients having CL one day before surgery. The lumpectomy weighed 38 g on average, with a median diameter of the surgical sample at 6 cm and a median volume of 44 cm3 (6-369). One-stage complete resection was successfully performed in 93.4% of cases. In 36% of cases, an intraoperative re-excision was performed, based on intraoperative macroscopic pathological margin evaluation. The tumor was identified in 98.9% of cases in the breast surgical specimen. Conclusion This study demonstrated high success rates for BC tumor identification (99%) and one-stage complete resection (93.4%) after BCS and CL. These results show that CL is an effective, simple, and inexpensive localization technique for successful excision of BC lesions during BCS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Etienne El-Helou
- Department of Surgery, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Christine Eddy
- Department of Surgery, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Simona Picchia
- Department of Radiology, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Carine Van de Merckt
- Department of Radiology, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Magali Radermeker
- Department of Radiology, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Michel Moreau
- Data Centre and Statistic Department, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Filip De Neubourg
- Department of Surgery, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Denis Larsimont
- Department of Pathology, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Isabelle Veys
- Department of Surgery, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - C. Florin Pop
- Department of Surgery, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Specimen mammography for intraoperative margin assessment in breast conserving surgery: a meta-analysis. Sci Rep 2022; 12:18440. [PMID: 36323863 PMCID: PMC9630505 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-23234-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2021] [Accepted: 10/27/2022] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
In breast conserving surgery (BCS), specimen mammography is one of the most widely used intraoperative methods of assessing margin status. We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of specimen mammography. Literature databases including PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and EMBASE were searched prior to Jun 2022. A total of 1967 patients were included from 20 studies. A pooled analysis, heterogeneity testing, threshold effect testing, publication bias analysis, and subgroup analyses were performed from extracted data. The pooled weighted values were a sensitivity of 0.55 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.47-0.63), a specificity of 0.85 (95% CI, 0.78-0.90), a diagnostic odds ratio of 7 (95% CI, 4-12), and a pooled positive likelihood ratio of 3.7 (95% CI 2.6-5.5). The area under the receiver operator characteristic curve was 0.75 (95% CI 0.71-0.78). In the subgroup analysis, the pooled specificity in the positive margin defined as tumor at margin subgroup was lower than the other positive margin definition subgroup (0.82 [95% CI: 0.71, 0.92] vs. 0.87 [95% CI: 0.80, 0.94], p = 0.01). Our findings indicated that specimen mammography was an accurate intraoperative imaging technique for margin assessment in BCS.
Collapse
|