Neoadjuvant pyrotinib plus trastuzumab and nab-paclitaxel for HER2-positive early or locally advanced breast cancer: an exploratory phase II trial

The efficacy and safety of trastuzumab and albumin-bound paclitaxel with or without pyrotinib as neoadjuvant therapy for HER2-positive breast cancer: a prospective observational cohort study

Background

In the past few years, the combination of trastuzumab and paclitaxel has become an important option for human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer. Small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) can bring clinical benefit to HER2-positive breast cancer patients. However, the efficacy and safety of these two regimens have not been compared. This study explored the efficacy and safety of pyrotinib combined with trastuzumab and albumin-bound paclitaxel (nab-paclitaxel).

Methods

Patients with newly diagnosed HER2-positive early or locally advanced breast cancer treated at The Tumor Hospital of Mudanjiang City from November 2020 to June 2022 were included. The control group received pertuzumab in combination with nab-paclitaxel, whereas the pyrotinib group received pyrotinib in combination with pertuzumab and nab-paclitaxel as treatment, in a 3-week cycle for 4 cycles. The primary endpoints of this study were total pathological complete response (tpCR) rate, breast pathological complete response (bpCR) rate, and the secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and the occurrence of adverse events (AEs).

Results

A total of 72 patients were enrolled in the study and completed the study treatment. Baseline characteristics were well balanced between these two arms. In the control group, the tPCR rate was 23.68%, and the bpCR rate was 47.36%. In the pyrotinib group, the tPCR rate was 47.06%, and the bpCR rate was 64.71%. The tPCR rate in the pyrotinib group was significantly higher than that in the control group (P=0.049). The ORR in the pyrotinib group (67.65%) was significantly higher than that in the control group (42.11%, P=0.04 ). The median PFS (mPFS) for the control group was 9.24 months, with a mean PFS of 10.01±0.44 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 9.14-10.88 months]. In the pyrotinib group, mPFS was 9.74 months, with a mean PFS of 11.25±0.29 months (95% CI: 10.67-11.82 months). The PFS in the pyrotinib group was significantly longer than that in the control group (P=0.045). Safety results showed that the overall incidence of AEs in the control group was 68.42%, with a 3-grade adverse reaction rate of 21.05%. In the pyrotinib group, the overall incidence of AEs was 79.41%, with a 3-grade adverse reaction rate of 29.41%. The difference between the two groups was not statistically significant (P>0.05).

Conclusions

Pyrotinib group in neoadjuvant treatment for HER2 positive breast cancer has obvious short-term efficacy advantages over control group. This treatment regimen can prolong PFS for 1 year, and the safety during medication is controllable. This study still has some limitations, with the relatively small sample size and relatively short follow-up period, and a further large-scale, multicenter, randomized controlled trial is necessary to verify the clinical value of this dual-target treatment regimen.

Safety and efficacy of pyrotinib for HER‑2‑positive breast cancer in the neoadjuvant setting: A systematic review and meta‑analysis

As a novel tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), pyrotinib can irreversibly block dual pan-ErbB receptors and has been used in the treatment of advanced or metastatic human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer. However, there are limited data on the use of pyrotinib in early breast cancer. Therefore, the present meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of pyrotinib in the neoadjuvant setting for patients with early-stage or locally advanced HER2-positive breast cancer. Online databases (Pubmed, Web of Science, Embase and Cochrane Library) were comprehensively searched for eligible prospective clinical trials on August 17, 2023. The primary endpoint was the treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs), and the secondary endpoint was pathological complete response (pCR) rate. In total, seven trials with a total enrolment of 407 patients were included. A total of seven studies evaluated pyrotinib in combination with trastuzumab and chemotherapy in the neoadjuvant setting. The median age ranged from 47-50 years. The most common TRAEs were diarrhea [98% of patients; 95% confidence interval (CI): 92-100%], followed by anemia (71%; 95% CI: 55-89%), vomiting (69%; 95% CI: 55-82%), and leucopenia (66%; 95% CI: 35-91%). No treatment-related deaths occurred. The pooled pCR rate was 57% (95% CI: 47-68%). It was concluded that pyrotinib-containing neoadjuvant therapy could be an effective treatment strategy in patients with early-stage or locally advanced HER2-positive breast cancer; however, the management of adverse events should be a key consideration. The management of adverse events should be paid great attention to, during pyrotinib therapy, although pyrotinib-contained neoadjuvant therapy could be an effective treatment for patients with early-stage or locally advanced HER2-positive breast cancer. Head-to-head randomized clinical trials are warranted to further confirm the benefits and risks associated with pyrotinib therapy in patients with breast cancer.

Comparison of the prognostic effect of pyrotinib plus trastuzumab and chemotherapy different lines therapy in HER2-positive advanced breast cancer

This study aimed to compare the efficacy of pyrotinib, trastuzumab combined with chemotherapy with different lines therapy in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2- (HER2-) positive advanced breast cancer (ABC) and analyze the factors affecting the prognosis. A total of 84 patients with median age of 49 year-old. The mPFS of patients receiving first-line pyrotinib plus trastuzumab and chemotherapy was the longest (11 months) compared with second- and third line patients (p = 0.106). The objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) of the total population were 33.3% and 82.1% respectively. Subgroup analysis suggested that using pyrotinib plus trastuzumab and Albumin-bound paclitaxel was not inferior to combine with Vinorelbine in regards of PFS. Histological grade (OR: 0.233[0.069 ∼ 0.781], p = 0.018) and tumor location (OR: 0.286[0.087 ∼ 0.942], p = 0.040) were independent factors influencing the ORR. Multivariate cox analysis showed that Ki-67 was independently associated with increased risk of progression (HR: 1.843[1.044-3.254], p = 0.035). The most common adverse events were diarrhea (17.9%) and neutropenia (11.9%). In the first-, second- and third-line treatment, pyrotinib plus trastuzumab and chemotherapy is effective and safe. Pyrotinib and trastuzumab combined with Albumin-bound paclitaxel may be a potential ideal treatment plan for HER2-positive advanced breast cancer.

Short-term efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant pyrotinib plus taxanes for early HER2-positive breast cancer: a single-arm exploratory phase II trial

Background

The effectiveness and safety of pyrotinib have been substantiated in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive advanced breast cancer (BC). However, the role of pyrotinib as a single HER2 blockade in neoadjuvant setting among BC patients has not been studied. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of pyrotinib plus taxanes as a novel neoadjuvant regimen in patients with HER2-positive early or locally advanced BC.

Methods

In this single-arm exploratory phase II trial, patients with treatment-naïve HER2-positive BC (stage IIA-IIIC) received pyrotinib 400 mg once daily and taxanes [docetaxel 75 mg/m2 or nanoparticle albumin-bound (nab)-paclitaxel 260 mg/m2 every 3 weeks, or paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 weekly] for a total of four 21-day cycles before surgery. Efficacy assessment was based on pathological and clinical measurements. The primary endpoint of this study was the total pathological complete response (tpCR) rate. The secondary endpoints included breast pCR (bpCR) rate, investigator-assessed objective response rate (ORR) and adverse events (AEs) profiles.

Results

From 1 September 2021 to 30 December 2022, a total of 31 patients were enrolled. One patient was withdrawn due to unbearable skin rash after the second cycle of neoadjuvant therapy. The majority of the intention-to-treat (ITT) population was premenopausal (54.8%), had large tumors (90.3%) and metastatic nodes (58.1%) at diagnosis and hormone-receptor positive tumors (64.5%). Most participants used nab-paclitaxel (74.2%) and received mastectomy (67.7%) after neoadjuvant treatment. The tpCR and bpCR rates were 48.4% [95% confidence interval (CI): 30.8-66%] and 51.6% (95% CI: 34-69.2%), respectively. Grade ≥3 treatment-related AEs were observed in 16.1% (5/31) of the ITT population, including diarrhea (n=2, 6.5%), hand and foot numbness (n=1, 3.2%), loss of appetite (n=1, 3.2%), and skin rash (n=1, 3.2%). AE related dose reduction or pyrotinib interruption was not required.

Conclusions

In female patients with HER2-positive non-metastatic BC, neoadjuvant pyrotinib monotherapy plus taxanes appears to show promising clinical benefit and controllable AEs [Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2100050870)]. The long-term efficacy and safety of this regime warrant further verification.

Neoadjuvant pyrotinib plus trastuzumab and chemotherapy for HER2-positive breast cancer: a prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

This prospective study aims to investigate the efficacy and safety of pyrotinib (P) combined with 4 cycles of epirubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by 4 cycles of taxane and trastuzumab (P + EC-TH) regimen as neoadjuvant therapy for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) positive breast cancer and to investigate the predictive value of p53, p63, and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) status for neoadjuvant efficacy.

METHODS

A total of 138 HER2-positive breast cancer patients who received neoadjuvant therapy and underwent surgery were included. Case group: 55 patients received P + EC-TH regimen.

CONTROL GROUP

83 patients received EC-TH regimen. The chi-square test, Fisher's exact test, and logistic regression analysis were applied. The primary endpoint was total pathologic complete response (tpCR), and the secondary endpoints were breast pathologic complete response (bpCR), overall response rate (ORR), and adverse events (AEs).

RESULTS

In the case group, the tpCR rate was 63.64% (35/55), the bpCR rate was 69.09% (38/55), and the ORR was 100.00% (55/55). In the control group, the tpCR rate was 39.76% (33/83), the bpCR rate was 44.58% (37/83), and the ORR was 95.18% (79/83). The case group had significantly higher tpCR and bpCR rates than those of the control group (P < 0.05), but there was no significant difference in ORR (P > 0.05). The tpCR was associated with the status of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and androgen receptor (AR), and the patients with any negative ER, PR, AR, or combined, were more likely to achieve tpCR than those with positive results (P < 0.05). The p53-positive patients were more likely to achieve tpCR and bpCR than p53-negative patients (P < 0.05). The incidence of hypokalemia and diarrhea in the case group was higher than that in the control group (P < 0.05). The AEs developed were all manageable, and no treatment-related death occurred.

CONCLUSION

The efficacy and safety of the P + EC-TH regimen were verified by this study. The HER2-positive breast cancer patients treated with the EC-TH neoadjuvant regimen were more likely to achieve tpCR or bpCR if pyrotinib was administered simultaneously.

Comparing pyrotinib with trastuzumab and pertuzumab with trastuzumab for HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer: a retrospective, multicenter analysis

Objective

Pyrotinib and pertuzumab are effective treatment options for HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (HER2+ MBC). Our study was to directly compare the efficacy and safety of pyrotinib plus trastuzumab (PyroH) and pertuzumab plus trastuzumab (HP) in patients with HER2+ MBC.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective examination of HER2+ MBC patients who received PyroH plus chemotherapy or HP plus chemotherapy between 2017 and 2022 at five institutions in China. Our primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS).

Results

This study involved 333 patients, among which 161 received PyroH and 172 received HP. The utilization of PyroH as a first-line therapy for MBC was more prevalent among older patients, those with a shorter duration of disease-free interval, or those who had previously been treated with trastuzumab. Although in the first-line advanced treatment HP cohort showed numerically longer PFS (median PFS: 14.46 vs. 22.90 months, p=0.057), in the second-line or later treatments, there was no significant difference in PFS between the PyroH and HP groups (median PFS: 8.67 vs. 7.92 months, p=0.286). Despite HP showing a longer PFS in the overall cohort (median PFS: 9.30 vs. 13.01 months, p=0.005), it did not serve as an independent predictor of PFS in the multivariate analysis (HR 1.134, 95% CI 0.710-1.811, p=0.598). Without taxane, PyroH demonstrated a longer PFS than HP (median PFS: 10.12 vs. 8.15 months, p=0.017). PyroH group displayed a numerically longer median PFS in patients with brain metastases compared to the HP group, though not statistically significant (median PFS: 9.03 vs. 8.15 months, p=0.976). PyroH had higher incidence of grade 3/4 diarrhea (34.3% vs. 3.0%) but similar overall adverse events.

Conclusion

In conclusion, PyroH is comparable in second-line or later treatment and during brain metastasis, even having superior efficacy without taxane in real-world setting. Toxicities were tolerable in both groups. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05572645).

Efficacy, toxicity and prognostic factors of pyrotinib‑involved neoadjuvant therapy in HER2‑positive breast cancer: A retrospective study

Pyrotinib is a novel irreversible tyrosine kinase inhibitor targeting the human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER), whose efficacy in treating metastatic HER2-positive (HER2⁺) breast cancer has been confirmed. The present study aimed to explore the efficacy, safety and prognostic factors of pyrogenic-involved neoadjuvant therapy in patients with HER2⁺ breast cancer. A total of 49 patients with HER2⁺ breast cancer who received pyrotinib-neoadjuvant therapy were recruited. All patients received pyrotinib plus chemotherapy with or without trastuzumab neoadjuvant treatment for six cycles (21 days/cycle). Concerning the clinical response, 4 (8.2%), 36 (73.4%) and 9 (18.4%) patients achieved complete response, partial response and stable disease after 6-cycle pyrotinib-neoadjuvant treatment, respectively; the objective response rate and disease control rate reached 81.6 and 100.0%, respectively. Concerning the pathological response, 23 (46.9%), 12 (24.5%), 12 (24.5%) and 2 (4.1%) patients were evaluated as Miller-Payne grade 5, 4, 3 and 2, respectively. In addition, 23 (46.9%) patients achieved pathological complete response (pCR) in the breast tissue, 40 (81.6%) patients achieved pCR in lymph nodes, while 22 (44.9%) patients obtained total pCR (tpCR). Further multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated that pyrotinib plus trastuzumab and chemotherapy (vs. pyrotinib plus chemotherapy) was independently correlated with increased tpCR (P=0.048). The most frequent adverse events included diarrhea (81.6%), anemia (69.4%), nausea and vomiting (63.3%), and fatigue (51.0%). The majority of the adverse events were mild and controllable. In conclusion, pyrotinib-neoadjuvant therapy presented optimal efficacy and mild toxicity in patients with HER2⁺ breast cancer, whose efficacy was affected by the combination treatment with trastuzumab.

Neoadjuvant pyrotinib plus trastuzumab and vinorelbine for HER2-positive locally advanced breast cancer patient who was initially resistant to HP therapy: a case report and literature review

Background

Trastuzumab (H) and pertuzumab (P) plus chemotherapy is the standard guideline-recommended neoadjuvant therapy recommended for patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive locally advanced breast cancer (BC), which has dramatically improved patient prognosis. However, over 10% of patients develop primary drug resistance to HP and did not respond to treatment. There is no standard second-line neoadjuvant therapy approach for these individuals at the present. Pyrotinib and vinorelbine have shown promising efficacy in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer, but their usage in neoadjuvant therapy has not been reported so far.

Case Description

Here, we present a case of a 58-year-old female patient with locally advanced HER2-positive BC who was initially resistant to HP neoadjuvant therapy. Following the failure of the treatment, this patient was given pyrotinib plus trastuzumab and vinorelbine as second-line neoadjuvant therapy. The patient tolerated this treatment well, with mild symptoms of diarrhea. After 6 cycles of neoadjuvant therapy, the efficacy was assessed to be partial remission (PR), and a modified radical mastectomy was finally conducted. This patient remained disease-free for 23 months after surgery.

Conclusions

This is the first report to present a case of neoadjuvant pyrotinib plus trastuzumab and vinorelbine in a patient with HER2-positive locally advanced BC, suggesting that the combination could be a new option for patients who have developed resistance to HP neoadjuvant treatment.

Pyrotinib combined with trastuzumab and chemotherapy for the treatment of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive metastatic breast cancer: a single-arm exploratory phase II trial

PURPOSE

A substantial need for effective and safe treatment options is still unmet for patients with heavily pre-treated human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Herein, we assessed the efficacy and safety of pyrotinib plus trastuzumab and chemotherapy in patients with heavily treated HER2-positive MBC.

METHODS

In this single-arm exploratory phase II trial, patients with HER2-positive MBC previously treated with trastuzumab plus lapatinib or pertuzumab, received pyrotinib plus trastuzumab and chemotherapy. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) in the total population (TP). Secondary end points included PFS in the subgroup with brain metastases (Sub-BrM), confirmed objective response rate (ORR), clinical benefit rate (CBR), disease control rate (DCR), exploration of predictive factors of PFS, and safety.

RESULTS

Between November 1, 2018, and March 31, 2021, 40 patients were eligible for this study. The median PFS reached 7.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 4.7 to 9.9 months) and 9.4 months (95% CI 6.6 to 12.1 months) in the TP and Sub-BrM, respectively. ORR was 50.5% (20/40). CBR was 75.5% (30/40) and DCR reached 97.5% (39/40). Cox univariate and multivariate analyses demonstrated that liver or/and lung metastases was the significant adverse prognostic factor for PFS (p = 0.018; p = 0.026; respectively). The most frequent grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events were diarrhea, neutropenia and leukopenia. No new safety signals were observed.

CONCLUSION

Pyrotinib plus trastuzumab and chemotherapy offered a promising option with manageable safety profile for heavily pre-treated HER2-positive MBC, especially for those without liver or/and lung metastases.

Advances in neoadjuvant therapy for HER2-positive breast cancers: a narrative review

Background and Objective

Breast cancer (BC) is currently the most frequently diagnosed cancer and the primary cause of cancer-related death among women worldwide. Human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2 (HER2)-positive BC accounts for 14.5-15% of all BCs, with a relatively poor prognosis. Neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) has become a preferred treatment option for HER2+ BCs. With the continuous emergence of various clinical trials and new treatment concepts in BC, the NAT model has changed from chemotherapy alone to the neoadjuvant combination of anti-HER2-targeted therapy with chemotherapy, neoadjuvant endocrine therapy, and so on. Therefore, an up-to-date review is needed to inform the selection of NAT strategies for HER2+ BCs.

Methods

This review was administrated with literature from the PubMed database. Manuscripts were searched using the following keywords: "neoadjuvant" or "preoperative", "breast cancer" or "breast neoplasm", "HER2+" or "HER2-positive", titles and abstracts were screened and evaluated independently by two authors. Information relating to the efficacy and safety profile of NAT for patients with HER2+ BCs were included and analyzed qualitatively. Only English-language articles were included.

Key Content and Findings

This review discusses the neoadjuvant situation for the surgical management of HER2-positive BCs around the world. In this paper, we describe the efficacy assessment of NAT, analyze clinical effect and toxicity of chemotherapy, and targeted therapy, including monoclonal antibody, tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs), and other neoadjuvant treatments in HER2+ BC. The data shows while overall survival is the standard endpoint for efficacy, pathological complete response have been implemented more and more frequently in clinical trials for its convenience. Dual-targeted therapy plus chemotherapy exhibited favorable efficacy in most cases, meanwhile other treatment strategies such as combinations without chemotherapy or including CDK4/6 agents may be applicable in specific situation.

Conclusions

As an important part of BC treatment, NAT is lingering in the stage of continuous development, especially for patients with HER2-positive BC. The challenges we are facing today in this field are dose de-escalation without reducing efficacy and choose suitable combination of agents in clinical practice. Moreover, new biomarkers are warrant for individualize treatment.

Pyrotinib-Containing Neoadjuvant Therapy in Patients With HER2-Positive Breast Cancer: A Multicenter Retrospective Analysis

Background

Pyrotinib, a small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor, has been investigated as a component of neoadjuvant therapy in phase 2 trials of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of pyrotinib-containing neoadjuvant therapy for patients with HER2-positive early or locally advanced breast cancer in the real-world setting.

Methods

Data of 97 patients with HER2-positive breast cancer from 21 centers across China treated with pyrotinib-containing neoadjuvant therapy were reviewed. Neoadjuvant therapy consisted of taxane/carboplatin/trastuzumab plus pyrotinib (TCbH+Py, 30 [30.9%]), anthracycline/cyclophosphamide followed by taxane/trastuzumab plus pyrotinib (AC-TH+Py) or taxane followed by anthracycline/cyclophosphamide/trastuzumab plus pyrotinib (T-ACH+Py, 29 [29.9%]), taxane/trastuzumab plus pyrotinib (TH+Py, 23 [23.7%]), and other pyrotinib-containing neoadjuvant treatment (15 [15.5%]). The primary outcome was breast pathological complete response (bpCR, ypT0/is) rate. Secondary outcomes included total pathological complete response (tpCR, ypT0/is ypN0) rate, objective response rate (ORR), and the incidence of preoperative adverse events.

Results

The ORR of pyrotinib-containing neoadjuvant therapy was 87.6% (85/97). The bpCR and tpCR rates were 54.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 44.2%-64.7%) and 48.5% [95% CI, 38.2%-58.8%], respectively. The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events included diarrhea (15 [15.5%]), decreased hemoglobin (nine [9.3%]), and decreased neutrophil count (eight [8.2%]). No treatment-related deaths occurred.

Conclusion

Pyrotinib-containing neoadjuvant therapy for patients with HER2-positive early or locally advanced breast cancer shows favorable effectiveness with manageable toxicity in the real-world setting. Trastuzumab plus pyrotinib may be a novel option of dual HER2-targeted blockade.