Day case parathyroidectomy: is this the right way for the patients?

Primary hyperparathyroidism in adults-(Part II) surgical management and postoperative follow-up: Position statement of the Endocrine Society of Australia, The Australian & New Zealand Endocrine Surgeons, and The Australian & New Zealand Bone and Mineral Society

OBJECTIVE

To develop evidence-based recommendations to guide the surgical management and postoperative follow-up of adults with primary hyperparathyroidism.

METHODS

Representatives from relevant Australian and New Zealand Societies used a systematic approach for adaptation of guidelines (ADAPTE) to derive an evidence-informed position statement addressing eight key questions.

RESULTS

Diagnostic imaging does not determine suitability for surgery but can guide the planning of surgery in suitable candidates. First-line imaging includes ultrasound and either parathyroid 4DCT or scintigraphy, depending on local availability and expertise. Minimally invasive parathyroidectomy is appropriate in most patients with concordant imaging. Bilateral neck exploration should be considered in those with discordant/negative imaging findings, multi-gland disease and genetic/familial risk factors. Parathyroid surgery, especially re-operative surgery, has better outcomes in the hands of higher volume surgeons. Neuromonitoring is generally not required for initial surgery but should be considered for re-operative surgery. Following parathyroidectomy, calcium and parathyroid hormone levels should be re-checked in the first 24 h and repeated early if there are risk factors for hypocalcaemia. Eucalcaemia at 6 months is consistent with surgical cure; parathyroid hormone levels do not need to be re-checked in the absence of other clinical indications. Longer-term surveillance of skeletal health is recommended.

CONCLUSIONS

This position statement provides up-to-date guidance on evidence-based best practice surgical and postoperative management of adults with primary hyperparathyroidism.

Surgical management of MILD hyperparathyroidism

INTRODUCTION

There is no consensus for management of Mild primary hyperparathyroidism (MILD-pHP). Specific management has been suggested by some authors. We have compared the surgical management of the patients with MILD-pHP to those with Classic primary hyperparathyroidism (C-pHP) treated by surgery according to The Fourth International Workshop on pHP.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data of 173 patients who underwent a parathyroidectomy were reviewed and retrospectively analysed. Management of 32 patients with MILD-pHPT (18.5%) patients were compared to that of 141 (81.5%) patients with C-pHPT.

RESULTS

MILD-pHP group was more often discovered after non-fractured osteoporosis (21.9% vs 7.1%, p = 0.02) and surgery for chondrocalcinosis was more often carried out (6.3% vs 0%, p = 0.03) in the MILD-pHP group. A Mini-Invasive Parathyroidectomy (MIP) was carried out in 81.3% of cases, and 87.5% of patients had a single adenoma. The rate of multiglandular pathology was not different. Same day discharge was significantly higher in MILD-pHP group (37.5% vs 17.7%, p = 0.01). Success was obtained in 87.5% in the MILD-pHP group, there was no significant difference with the C-pHP group (92.9%, p = 0.48). There was no significant difference in the imaging performances. Imaging discordance was observed in 18.8% of cases in MILD-pHP and 33.6% in C-pHP (p = 0.38) without correlation with surgical failure.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that, by selecting patients on the basis of concordant imaging and international recommendations, there is no difference in outcome between MILD-pHP and C-pHP treated surgically.