The role of the robot-assisted procedure during total pancreatectomy: a viewpoint

Video-Based Indocyanine Green Fluorescence Applied to Robotic Duodenum-Preserving Pancreatic Head Resection

BACKGROUND

Duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection (DPPHR) serves as a surgical intervention for managing benign and low-grade malignant neoplasms located in the head of the pancreas. This surgical approach enables the thorough excision of pancreatic head lesions, reducing the necessity for digestive tract reconstruction and enhancing the patient's quality of life.1 Performing a minimally invasive DPPHR is a complex surgical procedure, particularly when safeguarding the bile duct and the pancreaticoduodenal arterial arch. Robotic surgery is among the latest innovations in minimally invasive surgery and is widely used in many surgical specialties. It offers advantages such as rotatable surgical instruments, muscle tremor filters and up to 10-15 times three dimensional (3D) visual field,2 and achieves high flexibility and accuracy in surgical operations. Indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence imaging technology is also applied to provide real-time intraoperative assessment of the biliary system and blood supply, which helps maintain the biliary system's integrity.3,4 We first report the complete procedure of ICG applied to the da Vinci robotic Xi system for preserving the DPPHR.

METHODS

A 48-year-old female patient was diagnosed with pancreatic duct stones, chronic pancreatitis, and pancreatogenic diabetes. Enhanced computed tomography (CT) scans revealed pancreatic head stones, pancreatic atrophy, scattered calcifications, and a dilated pancreatic duct. An attempt at endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) treatment was abandoned during hospitalization due to unsuccessful catheterization. Following informed consent from the patient and her family, a robotic DPPHR was conducted utilizing ICG fluorescence imaging technology. Approximately 60 min before the surgery, 2 mg of ICG was injected via the peripheral vein. The individual was positioned in a reclined posture with the upper part of the bed raised to an angle of 30° and a leftward tilt of 15°. Upon entering the abdominal cavity, existing adhesions were meticulously separated and the gastrocolic ligament was opened to expose the pancreas. The lower part of the pancreas was separated and the superior mesenteric vein (SMV) was identified at the inferior boundary of the pancreatic neck. The pancreas was cut upward and the pancreatic duct was severed using scissors. Dissection of the lateral wall of the portal vein-SMV in the pancreatic head segment was performed. Meticulous dissection was carried out along the pancreatic tissue, retracting the uncinate process of the pancreas in an upward and rightward direction. During the dissection, caution was exercised to protect the anterior and posterior pancreaticoduodenal arterial arch. By using ICG fluorescence imaging, the path of the common bile duct was identified and verified. Caution was exercised to avoid injuring the bile duct. After isolating the CBD, the head and uncinate process of the pancreas was entirely excised. Under the fluorescence imaging mode, the wholeness of the CBD was scrutinized for any potential seepage of the contrast agent. Ultimately, a Roux-en-Y end-to-side pancreaticojejunostomy (duct to mucosa) was executed.

RESULTS

The surgery took 265 min and the estimated blood loss was about 150 mL. Without any postoperative complications, the patient was released from the hospital 13 days following the surgery. Postoperative pathology confirmed pancreatic duct stones and chronic pancreatitis. We have successfully performed four cases of robotic DPPHR using this technique, with only one patient experiencing a postoperative complication of pulmonary embolism. All patients were discharged successfully without any further complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Employing ICG fluorescence imaging in a robotic DPPHR has been demonstrated to be both secure and achievable. This technique potentially provides novel therapeutic perspectives, particularly for patients with ambiguous delineation between pancreatic and biliary ductal structures.

Minimally invasive surgery versus open surgery for total pancreatectomy: a bibliometric review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Minimally invasive total pancreatectomy (MITP) is considered safe and feasible with limited evidence on this procedure. The aim of this study was to systematically analyze the current literature on MITP compared to open TP (OTP).

METHOD

Randomized controlled trials and prospective non-randomized comparative studies were sought systematically in MEDLINE, Web of Science and CENTRAL from their inception until December 2021. Outcome measures included operative time, length of hospital stay (LOH), spleen-preservation rate, estimated blood loss (EBL), need for transfusion, venous resection rate, delayed gastric emptying (DGE), biliary leakage, postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH), reoperation rate, overall 30-day morbidity (Clavien-Dindo > IIIa), 90-day mortality, 90-day readmission, examined lymph nodes (ELN). Pooled results are presented as odds ratios (OR) or mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence interval (CI).

RESULTS

7 observational studies with a total of 4212 patients were included. MITP had a decreased EBL and transfusion rate, lower 30-day morbidity and 90-day mortality with a longer LOH compared to OTP. There were no significant differences regarding operative time, spleen preservation rate, DGE, biliary leakage, venous resection rate, PPH, reoperation, 90-day readmission and ELN.

DISCUSSION

Based on the available studies, MITP is safe and feasible compared to OTP in highly experienced hands from high-volume centers. Further high-quality studies are needed to verify the conclusion.