Impact and clinical usefulness of genetic data in the surgical management of colorectal cancer liver metastasis: a narrative review

Immune landscape in APC and TP53 related tumor microenvironment in colon adenocarcinoma: A bioinformatic analysis

Introduction

APC and TP53 are the two most regularly mutated genes in colon adenocarcinoma (COAD), especially in progressive malignancies and antitumoral immune response. The current bioinformatics analysis investigates the APC and TP53 gene expression profile in colon adenocarcinoma as a prognostic characteristic for survival, particularly concentrating on the correlated immune microenvironment.

Methods

Clinical and genetic data of colon cancer and normal tissue samples were obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA)-COAD and Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) online databases, respectively. The genetic differential expressions were analyzed in both groups via the one-way ANOVA test. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were applied to estimate the overall survival (OS). P < 0.05 was fixed as statistically significant. On Tumor Immune Estimation Resource and Gene Expression Profiling Interactive Analysis databases, the linkage between immune cell recruitment and APC and TP53 status was assessed through Spearman's correlation analysis.

Results

APC and TP53 were found mutated in 66.74% and 85.71% of the 454 and 7 TCGA-COAD patients in colon and rectosigmoid junction primary sites, respectively with a higher log2-transcriptome per million reads compared to the GTEx group (318 samples in sigmoid and 368 samples in transverse). Survival curves revealed a worse significant OS for the high-APC and TP53 profile colon. Spearman's analysis of immune cells demonstrated a strong positive correlation between the APC status and infiltration of T cell CD4+, T cell CD8+, NK cell, and macrophages and also a positive correlation between status and infiltration of T cell CD4+, T cell CD8+.

Conclusions

APC and TP53 gene mutations prevail in colon cancer and are extremely associated with poor prognosis and shortest survival. The infiltrating T cell CD4+, T cell CD8+, NK cell, and macrophages populate the colon microenvironment and regulate the mechanisms of tumor advancement, immune evasion, and sensitivity to standard chemotherapy. More comprehensive research is needed to demonstrate these results and turn them into new therapeutic outlooks.

The pathological role of C-X-C chemokine receptor type 4 (CXCR4) in colorectal cancer (CRC) progression; special focus on molecular mechanisms and possible therapeutics

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is comprised of transformed cells and non-malignant cells including cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAF), endothelial vasculature cells, and tumor-infiltrating cells. These nonmalignant cells, as well as soluble factors (e.g., cytokines), and the extracellular matrix (ECM), form the tumor microenvironment (TME). In general, the cancer cells and their surrounding TME can crosstalk by direct cell-to-cell contact and via soluble factors, such as cytokines (e.g., chemokines). TME not only promotes cancer progression through growth-promoting cytokines but also provides resistance to chemotherapy. Understanding the mechanisms of tumor growth and progression and the roles of chemokines in CRC will likely suggest new therapeutic targets. In this line, a plethora of reports has evidenced the critical role of chemokine receptor type 4 (CXCR4)/C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 12 (CXCL12 or SDF-1) axis in CRC pathogenesis. In the current review, we take a glimpse into the role of the CXCR4/CXCL12 axis in CRC growth, metastasis, angiogenesis, drug resistance, and immune escape. Also, a summary of recent reports concerning targeting CXCR4/CXCL12 axis for CRC management and therapy has been delivered.

Tumor attachment to Major intrahepatic vascular for Colorectal liver metastases

BACKGROUND

Colorectal liver metastases attached major intrahepatic vessels has been considered to be a risk factor for survival outcome after liver resection. The present study aimed to clarify the outcomes of R1 surgery (margin < 1 mm) in CRLM patients, distinguishing parenchymal margin R1 and attached to major intrahepatic vessels R1.

METHODS

In present study, 283 CRLM patients who were evaluated to be attached to major intrahepatic vessels initially and underwent liver resection following preoperative chemotherapy. They were assigned to two following groups: R0 (n = 167), R1 parenchymal (n = 58) and R1 vascular (n = 58). The survival outcomes and local recurrence rates were analyzed in each group.

RESULTS

Overall, 3- and 5-year overall survival rates after liver resection were 53.0% and 38.2% (median overall survival 37 months). Five-year overall survival was higher in patients with R0 than parenchymal R1 (44.9%% vs. 26.3%, p = 0.009), whereas there was no significant difference from patients with vascular R1 (34.3%, p = 0.752). In the multivariable analysis, preoperative chemotherapy > 4 cycles, clinical risk score 3-5, RAS mutation, parenchymal R1 and CA199 > 100 IU/ml were identified as independent predictive factors of overall survival (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference for local recurrence among three groups.

CONCLUSION

Parenchymal R1 resection was independent risk factor for CRLM. Vascular R1 surgery achieved survival outcomes equivalent to R0 resection. Non-anatomic liver resection for CRLM attached to intrahepatic vessels might be pursued to increase patient resectability by preoperative chemotherapy.

Fat signal fraction assessed with MRI predicts hepatic recurrence following hepatic resection for colorectal liver metastases

PURPOSE

The effect of hepatic steatosis on the development of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) remains unknown. This study evaluated the usefulness of fat signal fraction assessed with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and the effect of hepatic steatosis on hepatic recurrences following initial hepatectomy for CRLM.

METHODS

Between January 2013 and December 2019, 64 patients underwent initial hepatectomy for CRLM. The medical records of these patients were reviewed to evaluate the recurrence and survival outcomes.

RESULTS

The fat signal fraction was positively correlated with the nonalcoholic fatty liver disease activity score and liver-spleen ratio. Recurrence following the initial hepatectomy was observed in 48/64 patients, and hepatic recurrence was observed in 30/64 patients. The fat signal fraction was significantly higher in patients with hepatic recurrence after initial hepatectomy. The hepatic recurrence rate was 69.2% in patients with fat signal fraction ≥ 0.0258, which was significantly higher than that in patients with fat signal fraction < 0.0258. Hepatic recurrence-free survival rate was significantly higher in patients with fat signal fraction < 0.0258 than in those with fat signal fraction ≥ 0.0258. Multivariate analyses revealed that fat signal fraction ≥ 0.0258 was an independent risk factor for hepatic recurrence.

CONCLUSION

The fat signal fraction assessed with MRI was significantly associated with hepatic recurrence following initial hepatectomy for CRLM.

Nontumor related risk score: A new tool to improve prediction of prognosis after hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases

BACKGROUND

Prognostic stratification of patients with colorectal cancer liver metastasis based solely on tumor-related factors has only moderate discriminatory ability. We hypothesized that the inclusion of nontumor related factors can improve prediction of long-term prognosis of patients with colorectal cancer liver metastasis.

METHODS

Nontumor related laboratory markers were assessed utilizing a training cohort from 2 U.S. institutions (n = 1,205). Factors independently associated with prognosis were used to develop a nontumor related prognostic score. The discriminatory ability, assessed by Harrell's C-statistics (C-index) and net reclassification improvement, was validated and compared with 3 commonly used tumor-related clinical risk scores: Fong clinical risk scores, m-clinical risk scores, and Genetic and Morphological Evaluation (GAME) score in an external validation cohort from 5 Asian (n = 1,307) and 3 European (n = 1,058) institutions. The discriminatory ability of nontumor related prognostic score combined with each of these 3 tumor-related prognostic scores was also estimated.

RESULTS

Alkaline phosphatase (hazard ratio 1.43; 95% confidence interval, 1.11-1.84), albumin (hazard ratio 0.71; 95% confidence interval, 0.57-0.89), and mean corpuscular volume (hazard ratio 19.0, per log unit; 95% confidence interval, 4.79-75.0) were each independently associated with increased risk of death after resection of colorectal cancer liver metastasis (all P < .05). In turn, alkaline phosphatase, albumin, and mean corpuscular volume were combined to form a nontumor related prognostic score (2.942 × mean corpuscular volume + 0.399 × alkaline phosphatase-0.339 × albumin-12) × 10 (median, 16; range, 1-30). The nontumor related prognostic score had good-to-modest discriminatory ability in the external cohort (C-index = 0.58), which was comparable to the 3 established tumor-related prognostic scores (C-index: Fong clinical risk scores, 0.53, m-clinical risk scores, 0.55, GAME, 0.58). The addition of the nontumor related prognostic score to the tumor-related prognostic scores enhanced the discriminatory ability in the entire study cohort (C-index: nontumor related score+Fong, 0.60, nontumor related score+m-clinical risk scores, 0.61, nontumor related score+GAME, 0.64), as well reclassification improvement (42.5, 42.7%, and 21.2%, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Nontumor related prognostic information may help improve the prognostic stratification of patients after resection of colorectal cancer liver metastasis. The nontumor related prognostic score may be combined with tumor-related prognostic tools to enhance prognostic stratification of patients with colorectal cancer liver metastasis.

Shifting concepts in the management of colorectal liver metastases

Management of patients with colorectal liver metastases has evolved considerably due to a better understanding of the biology of the disease with concurrent improvements in surgical techniques, oncological strategies and radiological interventions. This review article examines the factors that have contributed to this radical change. Management will be discussed in relation to chemotherapy, surgery and interventional radiology. The addition of chemotherapy and biological agents has greatly extended the reach and scope of surgery. Parenchymal sparing resections, repeat resections, two stage hepatectomy and Associating Liver Partition and Portal Vein ligation are all available to the hepatobiliary surgeon who deals with colorectal liver metastases. Interventional radiology techniques like liver venous deprivation may also replace established surgical practice. Whilst traditionally it was thought that only a few liver metastases could be treated effectively, nowadays tumour number is no longer a limiting factor provided enough functioning liver can be spared and the patient can tolerate the operation.

Reevaluating the prognostic role of BRAF mutation in colorectal cancer liver metastases

INTRODUCTION

Mutations in the BRAF proto-oncogene have been shown to predict poor patient survival following curative-intent liver surgery for metastatic colorectal cancer. The aim of the present systematic review and meta-analysis is to evaluate the effect of mutated BRAF status (mutBRAF) on the overall (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) in these patients.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was performed for studies reporting outcomes of patients undergoing curative-intent surgery stratified by BRAF mutation status. Subgroup analysis was performed to evaluate whether inclusion of KRAS mutation status significantly influenced the results.

RESULTS

Six studies incorporating 1857 patients with known BRAF status were identified. Pooled results revealed significantly worse OS (Hazard Ratio 2.8, 95% C.I. 2.09 to 3.77) and DFS (Hazard Ratio 2.29, 95% C.I. 2.09 to 3.77) in mutBRAF patients. Subgroup analysis revealed no statistically significant impact of including KRAS status testing on the obtained results.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with metastatic colorectal cancer carrying BRAF mutations have significantly worse oncologic outcomes following surgery and more aggressive disease phenotype overall.

Evaluating mismatch repair deficiency for solid tumor immunotherapy eligibility: immunohistochemistry versus microsatellite molecular testing

While many landmark solid tumor immunotherapy studies show clinical benefits for solid tumors with high microsatellite instability (MSI-H) and mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR), the methodologies focus only on confirmatory polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing for MSI-H. Because some tumors are either dMMR or MSI-H but not the other, clinicians must choose between two testing methods for a broad patient population. We investigated the level of correlation between MMR protein immunohistochemistry (IHC) and microsatellite PCR testing results in 62 cancer patients. Thirty-five of the 62 cases (56.5%) were MSI-H by PCR, whereas 35 (56.5%) were dMMR by IHC. MMR IHC results correlated well with MSI PCR in 32 co-positive cases (91.4%) and 24 co-negative cases (88.9%). Six discrepant cases (9.7%) were identified, among which three were MSI-H and MMR intact, and three were dMMR and microsatellite stable. The results of this study highlight the implications of dMMR/MSI testing strategies on precision oncology. Co-testing with both MMR IHC and MSI PCR may be an effective screening strategy for evaluating immunotherapy eligibility status for solid tumors.