Prognostic implications of mucinous histology in stage III colon cancer with the receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy

Clinicopathological and prognostic features of colorectal mucinous adenocarcinomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Many studies have explored the clinicopathological features and prognosis between colorectal mucinous adenocarcinoma (MAC) and adenocarcinoma (AC) and have given different results. This meta-analysis summarizes previous evidence and evaluates the clinicopathological and prognostic features of MAC relative to AC in colorectal cancers (CRCs).

METHODS

The meta-analysis was conducted by searching the databases of PubMed, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), WANFANG data, Embase, and Web of Science. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) and hazard ratios (HRs) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to assess the clinicopathological and prognostic differences between MAC and AC.

RESULTS

Fifty-six studies involving 803157 patients met the inclusion criteria and were included in this meta-analysis. The clinicopathological features of MAC were greatly different from AC, except for lymphatic invasion (OR = 1.07, 95% CI: 0.99-1.15, P = 0.09) and perineural invasion (OR = 0.92, 95% CI: 0.79-1.06, P = 0.09). Further investigation found that MAC predicted poor OS (HR = 1.04, 95% CI: 1.03-1.04, P < 0.01), but not DFS in CRCs (HR = 1.01,95% CI: 0.88- 1.17, P = 0.85). Subgroup analysis found that MAC was obviously correlated with OS in patients with different recruitment time, with tumor located in rectum, from different regions, with different sample sizes and with TNM stage in II, and calculated by different data types(P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that MAC displays obviously different clinicopathological features compared with AC. And MAC has a poor OS relative to AC but the DFS was comparable.

Clinicopathological characteristics and outcomes of colorectal mucinous adenocarcinoma: a retrospective analysis from China

Background

Mucinous adenocarcinoma (MAC) is a unique subtype of colorectal cancer and its prognostic value remains controversial. This study aimed to compare the clinicopathological characteristics and prognostic differences between patients with MAC and non-mucinous adenocarcinoma (NMAC).

Methods

674 patients with NMAC, 110 patients with adenocarcinoma with mucinous component (ACWM) and 77 patients with MAC between 2016-2019 were enrolled in the study. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression were performed to analyze the factors associated with prognosis. Predictive nomograms of overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) for patients with colorectal adenocarcinoma were constructed. Confounding factors were eliminated by propensity score matching (PSM).

Results

Compared with patients with NMAC, patients with MAC were more likely to have a tumor located at the proximal colon, present with a larger tumor diameter, more advanced T stage, higher frequency of metastasis, deficiency of mismatch repair, and elevated preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen. Patients with MAC were related to worse OS (HR=2.53, 95%CI 1.73-3.68, p<0.01) and CSS (HR=3.09, 95%CI 2.10-4.57, p<0.01), which persisted after PSM. Subgroup analysis demonstrated that patients with left-sided or stage III/IV MAC exhibited a comparatively worse OS and CSS than those with NMAC. Furthermore, in patients with stage II with a high-risk factor and stage III MAC, adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with an improved OS, CSS, and RFS.

Conclusion

Compared with the NMAC phenotype, the MAC phenotype was an independent risk factor for poor prognosis in colorectal adenocarcinoma with worse OS and CSS, particularly patients with left-sided colorectal cancer and stage III/IV. However, patients with MAC can still benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy.

Prognostic Impact of Mucinous Adenocarcinoma in Stage II and III Colon Cancer

BACKGROUND

Mucinous adenocarcinoma is a rare histologic feature of colorectal cancer and is characterized by oncologic features that are different from those of adenocarcinoma. However, there are conflicting views regarding the prognostic impact of mucinous adenocarcinoma on colon cancer.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic impact of mucinous adenocarcinoma in stage II and III colon cancer.

DESIGN

This was a retrospective cohort study.

SETTINGS

This study was conducted between January 2010 and December 2015. Patients were divided into the mucinous adenocarcinoma and nonmucinous adenocarcinoma groups. Disease-free survival and overall survival were assessed using propensity score matching.

PATIENTS

Overall, 2532 patients who underwent radical surgery for stage II and III colon cancer were included in the study.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The main outcome measures were disease-free survival and overall survival.

RESULTS

The median follow-up duration was 86 months. The disease-free survival and overall survival were significantly lower in the mucinous adenocarcinoma group than in the nonmucinous adenocarcinoma group. In subgroup analysis, there was no significant difference in the disease-free survival and overall survival between patients with and without mucinous adenocarcinoma with stage II colon cancer. In stage III colon cancer, the disease-free survival and overall survival were significantly lower in patients with mucinous adenocarcinoma than in those without mucinous adenocarcinoma. Multivariable analysis showed that mucinous adenocarcinoma was a poor prognostic factor for disease-free survival and overall survival.

LIMITATION

The study's limitations include those that are inherently associated with retrospective single-center studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Mucinous adenocarcinoma is a poor prognostic factor in stage III but not in stage II colon cancer. Therefore, mucinous adenocarcinoma might not be regarded as an independent risk factor requiring chemotherapy for favorable oncologic outcomes. However, for stage III colon cancer, patients with mucinous adenocarcinoma require close observation.

IMPACTO PRONSTICO DEL ADENOCARCINOMA MUCINOSO EN LAS ETAPAS II Y III DE CNCER DE CLON

ANTECEDENTES:El adenocarcinoma mucinoso es una característica histológica rara del cáncer colorrectal, se caracteriza por propiedades oncológicas que son diferentes a las del adenocarcinoma. Sin embargo, existen puntos de vista contradictorios con respecto al impacto pronóstico del adenocarcinoma mucinoso en el cáncer de colon.OBJETIVO:Este estudio tuvo como objetivo evaluar el impacto pronóstico del adenocarcinoma mucinoso en las etapas II y III de cáncer de cólon.DISEÑO Y CONFIGURACIONES:Este estudio de cohorte retrospectivo se realizó entre enero de 2010 y diciembre de 2015. Los pacientes se dividieron entre grupos de adenocarcinoma mucinoso y adenocarcinoma no mucinoso. La supervivencia libre de enfermedad y la supervivencia global se evaluaron utilizando emparejamiento por puntuación de propensión.PACIENTES:En general, 2,532 pacientes que se sometieron a cirugía radical para etapa II y III de cáncer de colon se incluyeron en el estudio.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:Las principales medidas de resultado fueron la supervivencia libre de enfermedad y la supervivencia general.RESULTADOS:La mediana de duración del seguimiento fue de 86 meses. La supervivencia libre de enfermedad y la supervivencia global fueron significativamente menores en el grupo de adenocarcinoma mucinoso que en el grupo de adenocarcinoma no mucinoso. En el análisis de subgrupos, no hubo diferencias significativas en la supervivencia libre de enfermedad y la supervivencia global entre los pacientes con o sin adenocarcinoma mucinoso con cáncer de cólon etapa II. En el cáncer de colon etapa III, la supervivencia libre de enfermedad y la supervivencia global fueron significativamente más bajas en pacientes con adenocarcinoma mucinoso que en aquellos sin adenocarcinoma mucinoso. El análisis multivariable mostró que el adenocarcinoma mucinoso era un factor de mal pronóstico para la supervivencia libre de enfermedad y la supervivencia global.LIMITACIONES:Las limitaciones del estudio incluyen aquellas que están inherentemente asociadas con estudios retrospectivos de un solo centro.CONCLUSIONES:El adenocarcinoma mucinoso es un factor de mal pronóstico en el cáncer de colon etapa III pero no en etapa II. Por lo tanto, el adenocarcinoma mucinoso podría no considerarse un factor de riesgo independiente que requiera quimioterapia para obtener resultados oncológicos favorables. Sin embargo, para el cáncer de colon etapa III, los pacientes con adenocarcinoma mucinoso requieren observación cercana. (Traducción-Dr. Aurian Garcia Gonzalez ).

Identification of a prognostic signature and ENTR1 as a prognostic biomarker for colorectal mucinous adenocarcinoma

Background

Mucinous adenocarcinoma (MAC) is a unique clinicopathological colorectal cancer (CRC) type that has been recognized as a separate entity from non-mucinous adenocarcinoma (NMAC), with distinct clinical, pathologic, and molecular characteristics. We aimed to construct prognostic signatures and identifying candidate biomarkers for patients with MAC.

Methods

Differential expression analysis, weighted correlation network analysis (WGCNA), and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO)-Cox regression model were used to identify hub genes and construct a prognostic signature based on RNA sequencing data from TCGA datasets. The Kaplan-Meier survival curve, gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA), cell stemness, and immune infiltration were analyzed. Biomarker expression in MAC and corresponding normal tissues from patients operated in 2020 was validated using immunohistochemistry.

Results

We constructed a prognostic signature based on ten hub genes. Patients in the high-risk group had significantly worse overall survival (OS) than patients in the low-risk group (p < 0.0001). We also found that ENTR1 was closely associated with OS (p = 0.016). ENTR1 expression was significantly positively correlated with cell stemness of MAC (p < 0.0001) and CD8+ T cell infiltration (p = 0.01), whereas it was negatively associated with stromal scores (p = 0.03). Finally, the higher expression of ENTR1 in MAC tissues than in normal tissues was validated.

Conclusion

We established the first MAC prognostic signature, and determined that ENTR1 could serve as a prognostic marker for MAC.

The Effect of the Mucinous Component Presence on the Clinical Outcomes of Colorectal Cancer

Background. The effect of colorectal cancer (CRC) histological subtypes on the prognosis is still a controversial issue. We aimed to compare clinical findings, histopathologic data, and survival outcomes in CRC patients with classical and mucinous subtypes. Methods. Patients who were operated on for CRC between 2010 and 2017 were included in the study. Patients were classified into two groups according to the presence of a mucinous component: mucinous adenocarcinoma (MAC) - mucinous component > 50% and classical adenocarcinoma (CAC). Clinical and histopathologic findings, recurrence, metastasis, and survival rates were compared. Results. Data of the 484 CRC patients were documented. Sixty-nine patients (14.3%) were in the MAC group and 415 (85.7%) patients were in the CAC group. The mean age of patients with MAC and CAC was 63.4 ± 13.5 and 68.5 ± 12.7 years, respectively (p = 0.002). Proximal colon localization was found in 30 (43.5%) MAC patients and 123 (29.6%) CAC patients (p = 0.029). The number of patients with metastatic lymph nodes was higher in the MAC group (58% vs. 41.2%, p = 0.03). Nevertheless, there was no significant difference between the CAC and MAC groups in terms of disease-free survival (63.1% vs. 69.6%, p = 0.37) and disease-related mortality (23.6% vs. 23.2%, p = 0.94) over the follow-up period. Multivariate analysis showed that the presence of perineural invasion, patient’s age, and disease stage were associated with mortality in CRC patients. Conclusions. MACs occurred at a younger age than CACs and were more likely localized in the proximal colon as compared to CACs. Despite increased lymph node metastasis in MAC patients, no statistical significance was detected in overall survival or disease-free survival. Multivariate analysis revealed that age, perineural invasion, and disease stage were relevant to mortality in CRC patients.

Mucinous histology is associated with poor prognosis in locally advanced colorectal adenocarcinoma treated with postoperative first-line adjuvant chemotherapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy followed surgery is the standard management for localized advanced colorectal carcinoma (CRC). Mucinous adenocarcinoma (MAC) is a peculiar histological subtype of CRC, but the prognosis of MAC patients is controversial. The objective of this study is to assess the implication of MAC in survival of patients treated with surgery and firs-line adjuvant chemotherapy.

METHODS

Studies describing outcomes for advanced MAC and non-specific adenocarcinoma (AC) of CRC patients treated with first-line postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy followed surgery were searched in PubMed, Embase, Medline, EBSCO, Wiley, and Cochrane Library (January 1963-August 2021). Hazard ratios (HRs) of overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) for MAC to AC were extracted. Random-effects model was used for calculating the pooled HRs and 95% confidence interval (CI).

RESULTS

This meta-analysis is comprised of 8 studies involving a total of 124,303 CRC patients treated with first-line adjuvant chemotherapy followed surgery. The pooled HR for MAC was 1.23 (95% CI, 1.07-1.41, p < 0.01, I² = 80%), and the DFS (HR, 2.95, 95% CI, 1.22-7.14) of MAC patients were significantly poorer than AC patients. Similar results were also observed in stage III and FOLFOX regimen subgroups.

CONCLUSION

MAC was a risk factor for prognosis of localized advanced CRC patients treated with postoperative first-line adjuvant chemotherapy. Thus, the role of first-line adjuvant chemotherapy regimens should be further studied in these MAC patients.

Prognosis and Sensitivity of Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Mucinous Colorectal Adenocarcinoma without Distant Metastasis

In colorectal cancer, whereas mucinous adenocarcinoma (MAC) has several poor clinical prognostic factors compared to adenocarcinoma (AC), the prognosis of MAC remains controversial. We evaluated the prognosis of MAC without distant metastasis and the effects of adjuvant chemotherapy using health insurance registry data managed by South Korea. Patients with colorectal cancer between January 2014 and December 2016 were included (AC, 22,050 [96.8%]; MAC, 729 [3.2%]). We observed no difference in overall survival (OS) between AC and MAC in stages I and II. However, MAC showed a worse OS than AC in stage III disease, especially in patients administered chemotherapy (p < 0.001). These findings persisted after propensity score matching of clinical characteristics between AC and MAC. In addition, transcriptome analysis of The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) data showed increased chemoresistance-associated pathways in MAC compared to AC. In consensus molecular subtypes (CMS) classification, unlike in AC, CMSs 1, 3, and 4 comprised most of MAC and the proportions of CMSs 3 and 4 increased with stage progression. These results suggest clues to overcome resistance to chemotherapy and develop targeted treatments in MAC.

Mucinous adenocarcinoma: A unique clinicopathological subtype in colorectal cancer

Mucinous adenocarcinoma (MAC) is a unique clinicopathological subtype of colorectal cancer, which is characterized by extracellular mucinous components that comprise at least 50% of the tumor tissue. The clinical characteristics, molecular features, response to chemo-/radiotherapy, and prognosis of MAC are different from that of non-MAC (NMAC). MAC is more common in the proximal colon, with larger volume, higher T-stage, a higher proportion of positive lymph nodes, poorer tumor differentiation, and a higher proportion of peritoneal implants compared to NMAC. Although biopsy is the main diagnostic method for MAC, magnetic resonance imaging is superior in accuracy, especially for rectal carcinoma. The aberrant expression of mucins, including MUC1, MUC2 and MUC5AC, is a notable feature of MAC, which may be related to tumor invasion, metastasis, inhibition of apoptosis, and chemo-/radiotherapy resistance. The genetic origin of MAC is mainly related to BRAF mutation, microsatellite instability, and the CpG island methylator phenotype pathway. In addition, the poor prognosis of rectal MAC has been confirmed by various studies, and that of colonic MAC is still controversial. In this review, we summarize the epidemiology, clinicopathological characteristics, molecular features, methods of diagnosis, and treatments of MAC in order to provide references for further fundamental and clinical research.

Risk Factors for Recurrence of Radically Resected Mucinous Colorectal Adenocarcinoma

Background

Mucinous adenocarcinoma (MA) is a subtype of colorectal cancer (CRC) associated with a higher incidence of local extension and worse survival compared to non-mucinous adenocarcinoma, but few studies have investigated surgery-related predictors for recurrence of MA. Therefore, we aimed to elucidate the predictors for local recurrence and remote metastasis of MA after surgery.

Patients and Methods

This study retrospectively analyzed 162 patients with mucinous colorectal adenocarcinoma (MAC) after radical resection. Analysis variables included demographics, clinical indicators, pathologic stage, surgical procedure, adjuvant therapy, and recurrence. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to investigate the risk factors for local and distant tumor relapse.

Results

A total of 162 patients (86 male) with a mean age of 58.26 years were included; 70.37% of patients had colonic tumors, and 29.63% had rectal tumors. The 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) rates for these patients were as follows: 100% for TNM stage I, 71.2% for stage II, and 47.8% for stage III. Five-year DFS rates of MAC, colonic and rectal MA were 62.0%, 65.8%, and 51.7%, respectively. Local recurrence occurred in 38 patients and distant metastasis in 33 patients. In univariate analysis, predictors for local recurrence of MAC were intraoperative blood loss, intraoperative transfusion, and N2 stage; and predictors for distant metastasis were male sex, CA199, CEA, intraoperative blood loss, T4 stage, and N2 stage. In multivariate analysis, predictors for local recurrence of MAC were intraoperative transfusion (P=0.04, OR=4.175) and N2 stage (P=0.000, OR=5.291), and predictors for distant metastasis were male sex (P=0.049, OR=2.410), CA199 (P=0.02, OR=1.003), and T4 stage (P=0.007, OR=4.006).

Conclusion

Intraoperative transfusion and N2 stage were significant predictors for local recurrence. Male sex, CA199, and T4 stage were significant predictors for distant metastasis. Knowledge of the risk factors for postoperative recurrence provides a basis for logical approaches to treatment and follow-up of MAC.

Role of Chronic Inflammatory Ratios in Predicting Recurrence of Resected Patients with Stage I-III Mucinous Colorectal Adenocarcinoma

Background

Cancer-related inflammation is the main cause of the progression of mucinous colorectal adenocarcinoma (MCA). Circulating fibrinogen-to-pre-albumin ratio (FPR) is associated with the clinical outcome in colorectal cancer (CRC). However, the prognostic role of FPR and which is the best inflammatory prognostic biomarker within MCA remain unknown.

Methods

We enrolled 157 patients with stage I–III MCA in this study. Kaplan-Meier curve, Cox regression, and time-dependent receiver operation characteristic curve analysis were performed to assess the prognostic value and efficacy of the neutrophil-to-albumin ratio (NAR), neutrophil-to-pre-albumin ratio (NPAR), albumin-to-alkaline phosphatase ratio (AAPR), albumin-to-globulin ratio (AGR), albumin-to-fibrinogen ratio (AFR), and FPR in these patients.

Results

We found that NAR, NPAR, and FPR were significantly associated with unsatisfactory recurrence-free survival (RFS) in patients with stage I–III MCA, and the predicted efficacy of FPR was superior to that of the other two inflammatory biomarkers. Moreover, patients with a high combined TNM-CA199-FPR score had worse outcomes, with a high predicted efficacy of up to 0.779 (0.703–0.856). Using FPR, the patient was monitored for the recurrence up to two months earlier than that achieved using the common imaging techniques (4 vs 6 median months) in stage I–III MCA patients undergoing radical resection.

Conclusion

FPR is the preferred inflammatory biomarker and commonly used for predicting and monitoring recurrence in stage I–III MCA patients. The combined TNM-CA199-FPR score is an economical, simple, effective, and independent prognostic factor for localized disease.