Can local ablative techniques replace surgery for locally advanced pancreatic cancer?

REDISCOVER guidelines for borderline-resectable and locally advanced pancreatic cancer: management algorithm, unanswered questions, and future perspectives

The REDISCOVER guidelines present 34 recommendations for the selection and perioperative care of borderline-resectable (BR-PDAC) and locally advanced ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas (LA-PDAC). These guidelines represent a significant shift from previous approaches, prioritizing tumor biology over anatomical features as the primary indication for resection. Condensed herein, they provide a practical management algorithm for clinical practice. However, the guidelines also highlight the need to redefine LA-PDAC to align with modern treatment strategies and to solve some contradictions within the current definition, such as grouping "difficult" and "impossible" to resect tumors together. Furthermore, the REDISCOVER guidelines highlight several areas requiring urgent research. These include the resection of the superior mesenteric artery, the management strategies for patients with LA-PDAC who are fit for surgery but unable to receive multi-agent neoadjuvant chemotherapy, the approach to patients with LA-PDAC who are fit for surgery but demonstrate high serum Ca 19.9 levels even after neoadjuvant treatment, and the optimal timing and number of chemotherapy cycles prior to surgery. Additionally, the role of primary chemoradiotherapy versus chemotherapy alone in LA-PDAC, the timing of surgical resection post-neoadjuvant/primary chemoradiotherapy, the efficacy of ablation therapies, and the management of oligometastasis in patients with LA-PDAC warrant investigation. Given the limited evidence for many issues, refining existing management strategies is imperative. The establishment of the REDISCOVER registry ( https://rediscover.unipi.it/ ) offers promise of a unified research platform to advance understanding and improve the management of BR-PDAC and LA-PDAC.

Preoperative chemotherapy, radiotherapy and surgical decision-making in patients with borderline resectable and locally advanced pancreatic cancer

Surgical resection combined with systemic chemotherapy is the cornerstone of treatment for patients with localized pancreatic cancer. Upfront surgery is considered suboptimal in cases with extensive vascular involvement, which can be classified as either borderline resectable pancreatic cancer or locally advanced pancreatic cancer. In these patients, FOLFIRINOX or gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel chemotherapy is currently used as preoperative chemotherapy and is eventually combined with radiotherapy. Thus, more patients might reach 5-year overall survival. Patient selection for chemotherapy, radiotherapy and subsequent surgery is based on anatomical, biological and conditional parameters. Current guidelines and clinical practices vary considerably regarding preoperative chemotherapy and radiotherapy, response evaluation, and indications for surgery. In this Review, we provide an overview of the clinical evidence regarding disease staging, preoperative therapy, response evaluation and surgery in patients with borderline resectable pancreatic cancer or locally advanced pancreatic cancer. In addition, a clinical work-up is proposed based on the available evidence and guidelines. We identify knowledge gaps and outline a proposed research agenda.

"Conversion surgery" for locally advanced pancreatic cancer: A position paper by the study group at the joint meeting of the International Association of Pancreatology (IAP) & Japan Pancreas Society (JPS) 2022

Locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC), which progresses locally and surrounds major vessels, has historically been deemed unresectable. Surgery alone failed to provide curative resection and improve overall survival. With the advancements in treatment, reports have shown favorable results in LAPC after undergoing successful chemotherapy therapy or chemoradiation therapy followed by surgical resection, so-called "conversion surgery", at experienced high-volume centers. However, recognizing significant regional and institutional disparities in the management of LAPC, an international consensus meeting on conversion surgery for LAPC was held during the Joint Congress of the 26th Meeting of the International Association of Pancreatology (IAP) and the 53rd Annual Meeting of Japan Pancreas Society (JPS) in Kyoto in July 2022. During the meeting, presenters reported the current best multidisciplinary practices for LAPC, including preoperative modalities, best systemic treatment regimens and durations, procedures of conversion surgery with or without vascular resections, biomarkers, and genetic studies. It was unanimously agreed among the experts in this meeting that "cancer biology is surpassing locoregional anatomical resectability" in the era of effective multiagent treatment. The biology of pancreatic cancer has yet to be further elucidated, and we believe it is essential to improve the treatment outcomes of LAPC patients through continued efforts from each institution and more international collaboration. This article summarizes the agreement during the discussion amongst the experts in the meeting. We hope that this will serve as a foundation for future international collaboration and recommendations for future guidelines.

Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Laser Ablation Using a Diffusing Applicator for Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer Treatment

Simple Summary

Pancreatic cancer (PC) is one of the most lethal cancers; caused by family history, obesity, diabetes, and smoking, it has a 2–9% five-year survival rate. However, patients diagnosed by endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) already have an advanced stage of PC, indicating the difficulty of surgical resection. Recently, laser ablative treatment with a diffusing applicator has been proven to be feasible for treating advanced PC. Despite the potential application for treating PC, further evaluation of acute and chronic tissue responses are essential to determine the efficacy and safety of diffusing applicator under EUS guidance. In this study, EUS-guided diffusing applicator-assisted laser ablation was evaluated to quantify the extent of the tissue response after the delivery of various energy levels.

Abstract

Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided cylindrical interstitial laser ablation (CILA) procedures can be used to treat unresectable pancreatic cancer (PC). The aim of this study was to investigate the acute responses of pancreatic tissue after EUS-guided CILA in vivo in porcine models. Eight pigs were tested to compare the effects of different energy levels on pancreatic tissue ablation. A 1064 nm laser system was used to deliver 5 W through a diffusing applicator. The EUS-guided CILA was performed under four different energies: 200, 400, 600, and 800 J. Three days after the experiments, histological analysis was performed. The CILA consistently generated circular coagulated necrosis (CN) in the cross-sectioned pancreatic tissue. The ablation diameter was linearly dependent on the total energy delivery. The area of the CN initially increased with total energy delivery but became saturated at 600 J. The width of the degenerative parenchyma (DP) in the native tissue beyond the CN region increased with the total energy up to 600 J, and then decreased afterward. EUS-guided CILA can be a feasible approach for treating PC. Further animal studies will investigate the chronic responses of the pancreatic tissue to examine the efficacy and safety of the proposed method for clinical translation.

Open irreversible electroporation for isolated local recurrence of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma after primary surgery

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

Irreversible electroporation (IRE) is an emerging treatment for locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) which in some cohorts has been associated with severe complications. Additionally, re-resection of isolated local recurrence (ILR) after pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) can improve survival. We investigated safety, feasibility and oncologic outcomes in the first report on open IRE for unresectable ILR of PDAC in a staged surgical approach.

METHODS

Records of the prospectively documented institutional database were screened for patients undergoing laparotomy in IRE-standby due to questionable resectability. Endpoints were morbidity, mortality and overall (OS) and progression free survival (PFS). Data of LAPC and ILR were compared statistically for safety and feasibility analysis.

RESULTS

Intraoperative IRE was performed in 11 ILR and 14 LAPC. Six (54.5%) ILR and 10 (71.4%) LAPC patients had postoperative complications, type and frequency did not differ significantly. Major complications occurred in one ILR and two LAPC patients. Median OS was 20.0 months (95% CI: 2.7-37.3) after IRE for ILR and 28 (17.4-38.6) for LAPC. Median PFS after IRE was seven months for both ILR (4.1-9.9; n = 9) and LAPC (2.3-11.7; n = 13).

CONCLUSION

Open IRE for unresectable ILR was associated with acceptable perioperative risk. In this small, highly selected subset of patients with limited therapeutic options ancillary treatment with IRE might improve survival. Randomized treatment studies are required to establish the definitive role of IRE as compared to palliative standards of care in unresectable recurrence of PDAC and inconvertible LAPC.