1
|
Trinh K, Shamim MH, Ghasemi-Rad M. Less contrast, more clarity, innovative visualization technique for management of multiple colorectal liver metastases using microwave ablation through a portal venous access. Radiol Case Rep 2024; 19:1638-1641. [PMID: 38327554 PMCID: PMC10847831 DOI: 10.1016/j.radcr.2024.01.038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2023] [Revised: 01/11/2024] [Accepted: 01/16/2024] [Indexed: 02/09/2024] Open
Abstract
Colorectal cancer, a leading cause of cancer-related deaths, often results in liver metastases, with about half of patients affected. For those ineligibles for surgery, percutaneous microwave ablation (MWA) offers a viable alternative. Conventionally, visualizing liver lesions prior to MWA demands significant IV contrast, often needing repeated sessions. We introduce a technique using minimal IV contrast to treat multiple metastatic lesions simultaneously. A case of a 47-year-old male with stage 4 colorectal adenocarcinoma and multiple liver metastases is presented. Instead of the typical 100-150 cc of IV contrast, our method used just 25 cc, successfully ablating 6 hepatic metastases in 1 session. This approach not only reduces contrast volume but also optimizes treatment efficiency.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kelly Trinh
- School of Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, TX, USA
| | | | - Mohammad Ghasemi-Rad
- Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Itenberg ER, Lozano AM. Surgical and Interventional Management of Liver Metastasis. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 2024; 37:80-84. [PMID: 38322597 PMCID: PMC10843883 DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1758822] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Colorectal cancer is one of the most common cancers diagnosed worldwide. While the incidence of colorectal cancer has been declining since the adoption of screening colonoscopy, the findings of liver metastasis are still found in up to 25% of patients at diagnosis. The management of liver metastasis has evolved over the past two to three decades, and survival rates have improved secondary to improved systemic therapy, surgical options, and local therapies. In this article, we aim to review the available surgical and ablative options for management of colorectal liver metastasis, as well as appropriate imaging and patient selection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edwin R. Itenberg
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan
| | - Ana M. Lozano
- Department of General Surgery, Henry Ford Macomb Hospital, Clinton Township, Michigan
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Rossebo AE, Zlevor AM, Knott EA, Mao L, Couillard AB, Ziemlewicz TJ, Hinshaw JL, Abel EJ, Lubner MG, Knavel Koepsel EM, Wells SA, Stratchko LM, Laeseke PF, Lee FT. Percutaneous Microwave Ablation for Treatment of Retroperitoneal Tumors. Radiol Imaging Cancer 2024; 6:e230080. [PMID: 38334471 PMCID: PMC10988338 DOI: 10.1148/rycan.230080] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2023] [Revised: 11/05/2023] [Accepted: 12/15/2023] [Indexed: 02/10/2024]
Abstract
Purpose To determine if microwave ablation (MWA) of retroperitoneal tumors can safely provide high rates of local tumor control. Materials and Methods This retrospective study included 19 patients (median age, 65 years [range = 46-78 years]; 13 [68.4%] men and six [31.6%] women) with 29 retroperitoneal tumors treated over 22 MWA procedures. Hydrodissection (0.9% saline with 2% iohexol) was injected in 17 of 22 (77.3%) procedures to protect nontarget anatomy. The primary outcomes evaluated were local tumor progression (LTP) and complication rates. Oncologic outcomes, including overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and treatment-free interval (TFI), were examined as secondary outcome measures. Results Median follow-up was 18 months (range = 0.5-113). Hydrodissection was successful in displacing nontarget anatomy in 16 of 17 (94.1%) procedures. The LTP rate was 3.4% (one of 29; 95% CI: 0.1, 17.8) per tumor and 5.3% (one of 19; 95% CI: 0.1, 26.0) per patient. The overall complication rate per patient was 15.8% (three of 19), including two minor complications and one major complication. The OS rate at 1, 2, and 3 years was 81.8%, 81.8%, and 72.7%, respectively, with a median OS estimated at greater than 7 years. There was no evidence of a difference in OS (P = .34) and PFS (P = .56) between patients with renal cell carcinoma (six of 19 [31.6%]) versus other tumors (13 of 19 [68.4%]) and patients treated with no evidence of disease (15 of 22 [68.2%]) versus patients with residual tumors (seven of 22 [31.8%]). Median TFI was 18 months (range = 0.5-108). Conclusion Treatment of retroperitoneal tumors with MWA combined with hydrodissection provided high rates of local control, prolonged systemic therapy-free intervals, and few serious complications. Keywords: Ablation Techniques (ie, Radiofrequency, Thermal, Chemical), Retroperitoneum, Microwave Ablation, Hydrodissection © RSNA, 2024.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annika E. Rossebo
- From the Departments of Radiology (A.E.R., A.M.Z., A.B.C., T.J.Z.,
J.L.H., E.J.A., M.G.L., E.M.K.K., S.A.W., L.M.S., P.F.L., F.T.L.), Biomedical
Engineering (A.E.R., F.T.L.), Biostatistics and Medical Informatics (L.M.), and
Urology (J.L.H., E.J.A., F.T.L.), University of Wisconsin–Madison School
of Medicine and Public Health, 600 Highland Ave, E3/378 Clinical Science Center,
Madison, WI 53792-3252; and Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine,
Cleveland, Ohio (E.A.K.)
| | - Annie M. Zlevor
- From the Departments of Radiology (A.E.R., A.M.Z., A.B.C., T.J.Z.,
J.L.H., E.J.A., M.G.L., E.M.K.K., S.A.W., L.M.S., P.F.L., F.T.L.), Biomedical
Engineering (A.E.R., F.T.L.), Biostatistics and Medical Informatics (L.M.), and
Urology (J.L.H., E.J.A., F.T.L.), University of Wisconsin–Madison School
of Medicine and Public Health, 600 Highland Ave, E3/378 Clinical Science Center,
Madison, WI 53792-3252; and Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine,
Cleveland, Ohio (E.A.K.)
| | - Emily A. Knott
- From the Departments of Radiology (A.E.R., A.M.Z., A.B.C., T.J.Z.,
J.L.H., E.J.A., M.G.L., E.M.K.K., S.A.W., L.M.S., P.F.L., F.T.L.), Biomedical
Engineering (A.E.R., F.T.L.), Biostatistics and Medical Informatics (L.M.), and
Urology (J.L.H., E.J.A., F.T.L.), University of Wisconsin–Madison School
of Medicine and Public Health, 600 Highland Ave, E3/378 Clinical Science Center,
Madison, WI 53792-3252; and Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine,
Cleveland, Ohio (E.A.K.)
| | - Lu Mao
- From the Departments of Radiology (A.E.R., A.M.Z., A.B.C., T.J.Z.,
J.L.H., E.J.A., M.G.L., E.M.K.K., S.A.W., L.M.S., P.F.L., F.T.L.), Biomedical
Engineering (A.E.R., F.T.L.), Biostatistics and Medical Informatics (L.M.), and
Urology (J.L.H., E.J.A., F.T.L.), University of Wisconsin–Madison School
of Medicine and Public Health, 600 Highland Ave, E3/378 Clinical Science Center,
Madison, WI 53792-3252; and Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine,
Cleveland, Ohio (E.A.K.)
| | - Allison B. Couillard
- From the Departments of Radiology (A.E.R., A.M.Z., A.B.C., T.J.Z.,
J.L.H., E.J.A., M.G.L., E.M.K.K., S.A.W., L.M.S., P.F.L., F.T.L.), Biomedical
Engineering (A.E.R., F.T.L.), Biostatistics and Medical Informatics (L.M.), and
Urology (J.L.H., E.J.A., F.T.L.), University of Wisconsin–Madison School
of Medicine and Public Health, 600 Highland Ave, E3/378 Clinical Science Center,
Madison, WI 53792-3252; and Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine,
Cleveland, Ohio (E.A.K.)
| | - Timothy J. Ziemlewicz
- From the Departments of Radiology (A.E.R., A.M.Z., A.B.C., T.J.Z.,
J.L.H., E.J.A., M.G.L., E.M.K.K., S.A.W., L.M.S., P.F.L., F.T.L.), Biomedical
Engineering (A.E.R., F.T.L.), Biostatistics and Medical Informatics (L.M.), and
Urology (J.L.H., E.J.A., F.T.L.), University of Wisconsin–Madison School
of Medicine and Public Health, 600 Highland Ave, E3/378 Clinical Science Center,
Madison, WI 53792-3252; and Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine,
Cleveland, Ohio (E.A.K.)
| | - J. Louis Hinshaw
- From the Departments of Radiology (A.E.R., A.M.Z., A.B.C., T.J.Z.,
J.L.H., E.J.A., M.G.L., E.M.K.K., S.A.W., L.M.S., P.F.L., F.T.L.), Biomedical
Engineering (A.E.R., F.T.L.), Biostatistics and Medical Informatics (L.M.), and
Urology (J.L.H., E.J.A., F.T.L.), University of Wisconsin–Madison School
of Medicine and Public Health, 600 Highland Ave, E3/378 Clinical Science Center,
Madison, WI 53792-3252; and Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine,
Cleveland, Ohio (E.A.K.)
| | - E. Jason Abel
- From the Departments of Radiology (A.E.R., A.M.Z., A.B.C., T.J.Z.,
J.L.H., E.J.A., M.G.L., E.M.K.K., S.A.W., L.M.S., P.F.L., F.T.L.), Biomedical
Engineering (A.E.R., F.T.L.), Biostatistics and Medical Informatics (L.M.), and
Urology (J.L.H., E.J.A., F.T.L.), University of Wisconsin–Madison School
of Medicine and Public Health, 600 Highland Ave, E3/378 Clinical Science Center,
Madison, WI 53792-3252; and Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine,
Cleveland, Ohio (E.A.K.)
| | - Meghan G. Lubner
- From the Departments of Radiology (A.E.R., A.M.Z., A.B.C., T.J.Z.,
J.L.H., E.J.A., M.G.L., E.M.K.K., S.A.W., L.M.S., P.F.L., F.T.L.), Biomedical
Engineering (A.E.R., F.T.L.), Biostatistics and Medical Informatics (L.M.), and
Urology (J.L.H., E.J.A., F.T.L.), University of Wisconsin–Madison School
of Medicine and Public Health, 600 Highland Ave, E3/378 Clinical Science Center,
Madison, WI 53792-3252; and Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine,
Cleveland, Ohio (E.A.K.)
| | - Erica M. Knavel Koepsel
- From the Departments of Radiology (A.E.R., A.M.Z., A.B.C., T.J.Z.,
J.L.H., E.J.A., M.G.L., E.M.K.K., S.A.W., L.M.S., P.F.L., F.T.L.), Biomedical
Engineering (A.E.R., F.T.L.), Biostatistics and Medical Informatics (L.M.), and
Urology (J.L.H., E.J.A., F.T.L.), University of Wisconsin–Madison School
of Medicine and Public Health, 600 Highland Ave, E3/378 Clinical Science Center,
Madison, WI 53792-3252; and Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine,
Cleveland, Ohio (E.A.K.)
| | - Shane A. Wells
- From the Departments of Radiology (A.E.R., A.M.Z., A.B.C., T.J.Z.,
J.L.H., E.J.A., M.G.L., E.M.K.K., S.A.W., L.M.S., P.F.L., F.T.L.), Biomedical
Engineering (A.E.R., F.T.L.), Biostatistics and Medical Informatics (L.M.), and
Urology (J.L.H., E.J.A., F.T.L.), University of Wisconsin–Madison School
of Medicine and Public Health, 600 Highland Ave, E3/378 Clinical Science Center,
Madison, WI 53792-3252; and Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine,
Cleveland, Ohio (E.A.K.)
| | - Lindsay M. Stratchko
- From the Departments of Radiology (A.E.R., A.M.Z., A.B.C., T.J.Z.,
J.L.H., E.J.A., M.G.L., E.M.K.K., S.A.W., L.M.S., P.F.L., F.T.L.), Biomedical
Engineering (A.E.R., F.T.L.), Biostatistics and Medical Informatics (L.M.), and
Urology (J.L.H., E.J.A., F.T.L.), University of Wisconsin–Madison School
of Medicine and Public Health, 600 Highland Ave, E3/378 Clinical Science Center,
Madison, WI 53792-3252; and Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine,
Cleveland, Ohio (E.A.K.)
| | - Paul F. Laeseke
- From the Departments of Radiology (A.E.R., A.M.Z., A.B.C., T.J.Z.,
J.L.H., E.J.A., M.G.L., E.M.K.K., S.A.W., L.M.S., P.F.L., F.T.L.), Biomedical
Engineering (A.E.R., F.T.L.), Biostatistics and Medical Informatics (L.M.), and
Urology (J.L.H., E.J.A., F.T.L.), University of Wisconsin–Madison School
of Medicine and Public Health, 600 Highland Ave, E3/378 Clinical Science Center,
Madison, WI 53792-3252; and Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine,
Cleveland, Ohio (E.A.K.)
| | - Fred T. Lee
- From the Departments of Radiology (A.E.R., A.M.Z., A.B.C., T.J.Z.,
J.L.H., E.J.A., M.G.L., E.M.K.K., S.A.W., L.M.S., P.F.L., F.T.L.), Biomedical
Engineering (A.E.R., F.T.L.), Biostatistics and Medical Informatics (L.M.), and
Urology (J.L.H., E.J.A., F.T.L.), University of Wisconsin–Madison School
of Medicine and Public Health, 600 Highland Ave, E3/378 Clinical Science Center,
Madison, WI 53792-3252; and Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine,
Cleveland, Ohio (E.A.K.)
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hitchcock KE, Miller ED, Shi Q, Dixon JG, Gholami S, White SB, Wu C, Goulet CC, George M, Jee KW, Wright CL, Yaeger R, Shergill A, Hong TS, George TJ, O'Reilly EM, Meyerhardt JA, Romesser PB. Alliance for clinical trials in Oncology (Alliance) trial A022101/NRG-GI009: a pragmatic randomized phase III trial evaluating total ablative therapy for patients with limited metastatic colorectal cancer: evaluating radiation, ablation, and surgery (ERASur). BMC Cancer 2024; 24:201. [PMID: 38350888 PMCID: PMC10863118 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-024-11899-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2023] [Accepted: 01/19/2024] [Indexed: 02/15/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND For patients with liver-confined metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), local therapy of isolated metastases has been associated with long-term progression-free and overall survival (OS). However, for patients with more advanced mCRC, including those with extrahepatic disease, the efficacy of local therapy is less clear although increasingly being used in clinical practice. Prospective studies to clarify the role of metastatic-directed therapies in patients with mCRC are needed. METHODS The Evaluating Radiation, Ablation, and Surgery (ERASur) A022101/NRG-GI009 trial is a randomized, National Cancer Institute-sponsored phase III study evaluating if the addition of metastatic-directed therapy to standard of care systemic therapy improves OS in patients with newly diagnosed limited mCRC. Eligible patients require a pathologic diagnosis of CRC, have BRAF wild-type and microsatellite stable disease, and have 4 or fewer sites of metastatic disease identified on baseline imaging. Liver-only metastatic disease is not permitted. All metastatic lesions must be amenable to total ablative therapy (TAT), which includes surgical resection, microwave ablation, and/or stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) with SABR required for at least one lesion. Patients without overt disease progression after 16-26 weeks of first-line systemic therapy will be randomized 1:1 to continuation of systemic therapy with or without TAT. The trial activated through the Cancer Trials Support Unit on January 10, 2023. The primary endpoint is OS. Secondary endpoints include event-free survival, adverse events profile, and time to local recurrence with exploratory biomarker analyses. This study requires a total of 346 evaluable patients to provide 80% power with a one-sided alpha of 0.05 to detect an improvement in OS from a median of 26 months in the control arm to 37 months in the experimental arm with a hazard ratio of 0.7. The trial uses a group sequential design with two interim analyses for futility. DISCUSSION The ERASur trial employs a pragmatic interventional design to test the efficacy and safety of adding multimodality TAT to standard of care systemic therapy in patients with limited mCRC. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05673148, registered December 21, 2022.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Qian Shi
- Alliance Statistics and Data Management Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Jesse G Dixon
- Alliance Statistics and Data Management Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Manju George
- COLONTOWN/PALTOWN Development Foundation, Crownsville, MD, USA
| | | | | | - Rona Yaeger
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, Box #22, 10065, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ardaman Shergill
- Alliance Protocol Operations Office, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | | | | | - Eileen M O'Reilly
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, Box #22, 10065, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Paul B Romesser
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, Box #22, 10065, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Marcinak CT, Schwartz PB, Basree MM, Hurst N, Bassetti M, Kratz JD, Uboha NV. Treatment of Oligometastatic GI Cancers. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book 2024; 44:e430152. [PMID: 38190577 DOI: 10.1200/edbk_430152] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2024]
Abstract
Oligometastatic state is believed to potentially represent a transitional stage between early, locoregional state disease and widely metastatic disease. Historically, locoregional approaches, particularly in advanced colorectal cancers, have demonstrated efficacy in select patients with limited burden of metastatic disease. Recent strides in systemic therapies, including biomarker-based treatments and immunotherapy, alongside innovations in surgical techniques and novel locoregional approaches such as stereotactic radiotherapy and ablation, have ushered in a new era of therapeutic possibilities across all oligometastatic GI cancers. Despite these advancements, there remains a significant gap in high-quality prospective evidence guiding patient selection and treatment decisions across various disease types. Ongoing clinical trials are anticipated to provide crucial insights into oligometastatic states, fostering the refinement of disease-specific oligometastatic state definitions and treatment algorithms. This article reviews existing data on the management of oligometastatic GI cancer, summarizes current state of knowledge for each disease state, and provides updates on ongoing studies in this space.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clayton T Marcinak
- Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI
| | - Patrick B Schwartz
- Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI
| | - Mustafa M Basree
- Department of Human Oncology, University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, Madison, WI
| | - Newton Hurst
- Department of Human Oncology, University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, Madison, WI
| | - Michael Bassetti
- Department of Human Oncology, University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, Madison, WI
| | - Jeremy D Kratz
- University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI
- University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI
- Center for Human Genomics and Precision Medicine, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI
- William S. Middleton Memorial Veterans Hospital, Madison, WI
| | - Nataliya V Uboha
- University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI
- University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Hitchcock KE, Miller ED, Shi Q, Dixon JG, Gholami S, White SB, Wu C, Goulet CC, George M, Jee KW, Wright CL, Yaeger R, Shergill A, Hong TS, George TJ, O'Reilly EM, Meyerhardt JA, Romesser PB. Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology (Alliance) trial A022101/NRG-GI009: A pragmatic randomized phase III trial evaluating total ablative therapy for patients with limited metastatic colorectal cancer: evaluating radiation, ablation, and surgery (ERASur). RESEARCH SQUARE 2023:rs.3.rs-3773522. [PMID: 38196590 PMCID: PMC10775493 DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-3773522/v1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/11/2024]
Abstract
Background For patients with liver-confined metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), local therapy of isolated metastases has been associated with long-term progression-free and overall survival (OS). However, for patients with more advanced mCRC, including those with extrahepatic disease, the efficacy of local therapy is less clear although increasingly being used in clinical practice. Prospective studies to clarify the role of metastatic-directed therapies in patients with mCRC are needed. Methods The Evaluating Radiation, Ablation, and Surgery (ERASur) A022101/NRG-GI009 trial is a randomized, National Cancer Institute-sponsored phase III study evaluating if the addition of metastatic-directed therapy to standard of care systemic therapy improves OS in patients with newly diagnosed limited mCRC. Eligible patients require a pathologic diagnosis of CRC, have BRAF wild-type and microsatellite stable disease, and have 4 or fewer sites of metastatic disease identified on baseline imaging. Liver-only metastatic disease is not permitted. All metastatic lesions must be amenable to total ablative therapy (TAT), which includes surgical resection, microwave ablation, and/or stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) with SABR required for at least one lesion. Patients without overt disease progression after 16-26 weeks of first-line systemic therapy will be randomized 1:1 to continuation of systemic therapy with or without TAT. The trial activated through the Cancer Trials Support Unit on January 10, 2023. The primary endpoint is OS. Secondary endpoints include event-free survival, adverse events profile, and time to local recurrence with exploratory biomarker analyses. This study requires a total of 346 evaluable patients to provide 80% power with a one-sided alpha of 0.05 to detect an improvement in OS from a median of 26 months in the control arm to 37 months in the experimental arm with a hazard ratio of 0.7. The trial uses a group sequential design with two interim analyses for futility. Discussion The ERASur trial employs a pragmatic interventional design to test the efficacy and safety of adding multimodality TAT to standard of care systemic therapy in patients with limited mCRC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Qian Shi
- Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Miller ED, Hitchcock KE, Romesser PB. Oligometastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Review of Definitions and Patient Selection for Local Therapies. J Gastrointest Cancer 2023; 54:1116-1127. [PMID: 36652155 PMCID: PMC10352468 DOI: 10.1007/s12029-022-00900-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/15/2022] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Nearly one-third of patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer (CRC) will ultimately develop metastatic disease. While a small percentage of patients can be considered for curative resection, more patients have limited disease that can be considered for local therapy. Challenges remain in defining oligometastatic CRC as well as developing treatment strategies guided by high level evidence. METHODS In this review, we present the challenges in defining oligometastatic CRC and summarize the current literature on treatment and outcomes of local therapy in patients with metastatic CRC. RESULTS For patients with liver- and/or lung-confined CRC metastases, surgical resection is the standard of care given the potential for long-term progression-free and overall survival. For patients with liver- or lung-confined disease not amenable to surgical resection, non-surgical local therapies, such as thermal ablation, hepatic arterial infusion pump (HAIP), or stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), should be considered. For patients with more advanced disease, such as lymph node or bony metastases, the role of metastasis-directed therapy is controversial. Emerging data suggests that SBRT to ablate all metastases can improve progression-free and overall survival. CONCLUSION Multidisciplinary management is critical for patients with metastatic CRC due to the complexity of their cases and the nuanced patient, tumor, biological, and anatomical factors that must be weighed when considering local therapy. High-quality prospective randomized data in CRC are needed to further clarify the role of local ablative therapy in patients with unresectable oligometastatic CRC with ongoing studies including the RESOLUTE trial (ACTRN12621001198819) and the upcoming NCTN ERASur trial (NCT05673148).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric D Miller
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, 460 W. 10Th Ave., Room A209, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA.
| | - Kathryn E Hitchcock
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida Health, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Paul B Romesser
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Early Drug Development Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Shahveranova A, Balli HT, Aikimbaev K, Piskin FC, Sozutok S, Yucel SP. Prediction of Local Tumor Progression After Microwave Ablation in Colorectal Carcinoma Liver Metastases Patients by MRI Radiomics and Clinical Characteristics-Based Combined Model: Preliminary Results. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2023:10.1007/s00270-023-03454-6. [PMID: 37156944 DOI: 10.1007/s00270-023-03454-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2022] [Accepted: 04/24/2023] [Indexed: 05/10/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate the predictability of local tumor progression (LTP) after microwave ablation (MWA) in colorectal carcinoma liver metastases (CRLM) patients by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) radiomics and clinical characteristics-based combined model. MATERIALS AND METHODS Forty-two consecutive CRLM patients (67 tumors) with post-MWA complete response at 1st month MRI were included in this retrospective study. One hundred and eleven radiomics features were extracted for each tumor and for each phase by manual segmentation from pre-treatment MRI T2 fat-suppressed (Phase 2) and early arterial phase T1 fat-suppressed sequences (Phase 1). A clinical model was constructed using clinical data, two combined models were created with feature reduction and machine learning by combining clinical data and Phase 2 and Phase 1 radiomics features. The predicting performance for LTP development was investigated. RESULTS LTP developed in 7 patients (16.6%) and 11 tumors (16.4%). In the clinical model, the presence of extrahepatic metastases before MWA was associated with a high probability of LTP (p < 0.001). The pre-treatment levels of carbohydrate antigen 19-9 and carcinoembryonic antigen were higher in the LTP group (p = 0.010, p = 0.020, respectively). Patients with LTP had statistically significantly higher radiomics scores in both phases (p < 0.001 for Phase 2 and p = 0.001 for Phase 1). The classification performance of the combined model 2, created by using clinical data and Phase 2-based radiomics features, achieved the highest discriminative performance in predicting LTP (p = 0,014; the area under curve (AUC) value 0.981 (95% CI 0.948-0.990). The combined model 1, created using clinical data and Phase 1-based radiomics features (AUC value 0,927 (95% CI 0.860-0.993, p < 0.001)) and the clinical model alone [AUC value of 0.887 (95% CI 0.807-0.967, p < 0.001)] had similar performance. CONCLUSION Combined models based on clinical data and radiomics features obtained from T2 fat-suppressed and early arterial-phase T1 fat-suppressed MRI are valuable markers in predicting LTP after MWA in CRLM patients. Large-scale studies with internal and external validations are needed to come to a firm conclusion on the predictability of radiomics models in CRLM patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arzu Shahveranova
- Radiology Department, Cukurova University Medical School, Cukurova University Medical Faculty, Balcali Campus, 01330, Saricam, Adana, Turkey
| | - Huseyin Tugsan Balli
- Radiology Department, Cukurova University Medical School, Cukurova University Medical Faculty, Balcali Campus, 01330, Saricam, Adana, Turkey
| | - Kairgeldy Aikimbaev
- Radiology Department, Cukurova University Medical School, Cukurova University Medical Faculty, Balcali Campus, 01330, Saricam, Adana, Turkey.
| | - Ferhat Can Piskin
- Radiology Department, Cukurova University Medical School, Cukurova University Medical Faculty, Balcali Campus, 01330, Saricam, Adana, Turkey
| | - Sinan Sozutok
- Radiology Department, Cukurova University Medical School, Cukurova University Medical Faculty, Balcali Campus, 01330, Saricam, Adana, Turkey
| | - Sevinc Puren Yucel
- Biostatistics Department, Cukurova University Medical School, Adana, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Crespo E, Hermosín A, Villalba Á, Daguer E, Flores J, Periañez J, Martínez-Galdámez M, Santos E. Uncooled TATO microwave system for liver ablation. Hepat Oncol 2023; 9:HEP46. [PMID: 37009421 PMCID: PMC10064260 DOI: 10.2217/hep-2022-0002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2022] [Accepted: 02/15/2023] [Indexed: 03/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Aim: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of uncooled TATO microwave ablation (MWA) for primary and metastatic liver cancer. Materials & methods: This was a retrospective study on percutaneous liver ablations performed with TATO MWA. Twenty-five ablations were performed; 11 (44%) were performed for hepatocellular carcinoma, 14 (56%) for colorectal carcinoma, gastric and pancreatic metastases. Results: Adverse events were reported only in one (4%) ablation: an abscess that was observed in the ablated area and was resolved with a percutaneous drainage and antibiotic therapy. Local tumor control rate was 92% at the 3-month follow-up. Conclusion: TATO MWA was safe and effective with high reproducibility in treating primary and secondary liver cancer with satisfactory technical and clinical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eduardo Crespo
- Vascular & Interventional Radiology at Hospital Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Madrid, Spain
| | - Antonio Hermosín
- Vascular & Interventional Radiology at Hospital Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Madrid, Spain
| | - Álvaro Villalba
- Vascular & Interventional Radiology at Hospital Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Madrid, Spain
| | - Eduardo Daguer
- Vascular & Interventional Radiology at Hospital Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Madrid, Spain
| | - José Flores
- Vascular & Interventional Radiology at Hospital Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Madrid, Spain
| | - Javier Periañez
- Vascular & Interventional Radiology at Hospital Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Madrid, Spain
| | - Mario Martínez-Galdámez
- Department of Vascular & Interventional Radiology, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid, Spain
| | - Ernesto Santos
- Vascular & Interventional Radiology at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, NY 10065, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Li B, Li XG. Percutaneous microwave ablation‑induced hepatic artery‑pulmonary artery fistula: A rare case report. Mol Clin Oncol 2023; 18:20. [PMID: 36798469 PMCID: PMC9926041 DOI: 10.3892/mco.2023.2616] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2022] [Accepted: 01/23/2023] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Microwave ablation (MWA) is safe and effective for patients with unresectable primary and secondary hepatic tumors, but it also has a series of complications. The present study reported on the case of a 60-year-old male patient with progression of solitary liver metastasis who underwent multiple courses and lines of chemotherapy. Hepatic artery-pulmonary artery fistula due to thermal damage may occur after MWA for hepatic tumor adjacent to the diaphragm. Symptomatic improvement was achieved by trans-arterial embolization and hepatic arteriography indicated complete occlusion of the fistula. The postoperative course was uneventful and the patient was discharged three days later. This rare complication should be taken into consideration in clinical treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bin Li
- Department of Minimally Invasive Tumor Therapies Center, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology; Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100730, P.R. China
| | - Xiao-Guang Li
- Department of Minimally Invasive Tumor Therapies Center, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology; Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100730, P.R. China,Correspondence to: Dr Xiao-Guang Li, Department of Minimally Invasive Tumor Therapies Center, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, 1 Dahua Street, Dongcheng, Beijing 100730, P.R. China
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Finotti M, D’Amico FE, Romano M, Brizzolari M, Scopelliti M, Zanus G. Colorectal Liver Metastases: A Literature Review of Viable Surgical Options with a Special Focus on Microwave Liver Thermal Ablation and Mini-Invasive Approach. J Pers Med 2022; 13:jpm13010033. [PMID: 36675694 PMCID: PMC9866288 DOI: 10.3390/jpm13010033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2022] [Revised: 11/28/2022] [Accepted: 12/20/2022] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common tumor worldwide and it is characterized in 20-30% of cases by liver involvement, which strongly affects the long-term patient outcome. There are many available therapies for liver colorectal metastases (CRLMs); the current standard of care is represented by liver resection, and when feasible, associated with systemic chemotherapy. Microwave thermal ablation (MWA) is a viable option in unresectable patients or to achieve treatment with a parenchymal spearing approach. A literature review was performed for studies published between January 2000 and July 2022 through a database search using PUBMED/Medline and the Cochrane Collaboration Library with the following MeSH search terms and keywords: microwave, ablation, liver metastases, colorectal neoplasm, and colon liver rectal metastases. The recurrence rate and overall patients' survival were evaluated, showing that laparoscopic MWA is safe and effective to treat CRLMs when resection is not feasible, or a major hepatectomy in fragile patients is necessary. Considering the low morbidity of this procedure, it is a viable option to treat patients with recurrent diseases in the era of effective chemotherapy and multimodal treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michele Finotti
- 4th Surgery Unit, Regional Hospital Treviso, University of Padua, DISCOG, 31100 Padua, Italy
- Baylor Scott & White Annette C. and Harold C. Simmons Transplant Institute, Baylor University Medical, Dallas, TX 75204, USA
- Correspondence:
| | | | - Maurizio Romano
- 4th Surgery Unit, Regional Hospital Treviso, University of Padua, DISCOG, 31100 Padua, Italy
| | - Marco Brizzolari
- 4th Surgery Unit, Regional Hospital Treviso, University of Padua, DISCOG, 31100 Padua, Italy
| | - Michele Scopelliti
- 4th Surgery Unit, Regional Hospital Treviso, University of Padua, DISCOG, 31100 Padua, Italy
| | - Giacomo Zanus
- 4th Surgery Unit, Regional Hospital Treviso, University of Padua, DISCOG, 31100 Padua, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Tomita K, Matsui Y, Uka M, Umakoshi N, Kawabata T, Munetomo K, Nagata S, Iguchi T, Hiraki T. Evidence on percutaneous radiofrequency and microwave ablation for liver metastases over the last decade. Jpn J Radiol 2022; 40:1035-1045. [PMID: 36097234 PMCID: PMC9529678 DOI: 10.1007/s11604-022-01335-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2022] [Accepted: 09/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Purpose This review aimed to summarize the treatment outcomes of percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and microwave ablation (MWA) for metastatic liver tumors based on the findings of published studies over the last decade. Materials and methods Literature describing the survival outcomes of ablation therapy for liver metastases was explored using the PubMed database on April 26, 2022, and articles published in 2012 or later were selected. The included studies met the following criteria: (i) English literature, (ii) original clinical studies, and (iii) literature describing overall survival (OS) of thermal ablation for metastatic liver tumors. All case reports and cohort studies with fewer than 20 patients and those that evaluated ablation for palliative purposes were excluded. Results RFA was the most commonly used method for ablation, while MWA was used in several recent studies. RFA and MWA for liver metastases from various primary tumors have been reported; however, majority of the studies focused on colorectal cancer. The local control rate by RFA and MWA varied widely among the studies, ranging approximately 50–90%. Five-year survival rates of 20–60% have been reported following ablation for colorectal liver metastases by a number of studies, and several reports of 10-year survival rates were also noted. Conclusion Comparative studies of local therapies for colorectal liver metastases demonstrated that RFA provides comparable survival outcomes to surgical metastasectomy and stereotactic body radiation therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Koji Tomita
- Department of Radiology, Okayama University Hospital, 2-5-1 Shikata-cho, Kita-ku, Okayama, 700-8558, Japan.
| | - Yusuke Matsui
- Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University, 2-5-1 Shikata-cho, Kita-ku, Okayama, 700-8558, Japan
| | - Mayu Uka
- Department of Radiology, Okayama University Hospital, 2-5-1 Shikata-cho, Kita-ku, Okayama, 700-8558, Japan
| | - Noriyuki Umakoshi
- Department of Radiology, Okayama University Hospital, 2-5-1 Shikata-cho, Kita-ku, Okayama, 700-8558, Japan
| | - Takahiro Kawabata
- Department of Radiology, Okayama University Hospital, 2-5-1 Shikata-cho, Kita-ku, Okayama, 700-8558, Japan
| | - Kazuaki Munetomo
- Department of Radiology, Okayama University Hospital, 2-5-1 Shikata-cho, Kita-ku, Okayama, 700-8558, Japan
| | - Shoma Nagata
- Department of Radiology, Okayama University Hospital, 2-5-1 Shikata-cho, Kita-ku, Okayama, 700-8558, Japan
| | - Toshihiro Iguchi
- Department of Radiological Technology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Okayama University, 2-5-1 Shikata-cho, Kita-ku, Okayama, 700-8558, Japan
| | - Takao Hiraki
- Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University, 2-5-1 Shikata-cho, Kita-ku, Okayama, 700-8558, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Reynolds IS, Cromwell PM, Ryan ÉJ, McGrath E, Kennelly R, Ryan R, Swan N, Sheahan K, Winter DC, Hoti E. An Analysis of Clinicopathological Outcomes and the Utility of Preoperative MRI for Patients Undergoing Resection of Mucinous and Non-Mucinous Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases. Front Oncol 2022; 12:821159. [PMID: 35265523 PMCID: PMC8899023 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.821159] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2021] [Accepted: 01/31/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and Aims Mucinous colorectal cancer has traditionally been associated with high rates of recurrence and poor long-term survival. There is limited published data on outcomes for patients undergoing liver resection for metastatic mucinous colorectal cancer. The aim of this study was to compare the clinicopathological outcomes for patients with mucinous colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRCLM) undergoing liver resection to a matched group of patients with adenocarcinoma not otherwise specified (NOS) and to evaluate the accurary of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at detecting the presence of mucin in liver metastases. Materials and Methods Patients with mucinous CRCLM undergoing liver resection were matched 1:3 to patients with adenocarcinoma NOS CRCLM. Clinicopathological data from the primary tumour and metastatic lesion were collected and compared between the groups. Hepatic recurrence-free, disease-free and overall survival were compared between the groups. The ability of preoperative MRI to detect mucin in CRCLM was also evaluated. Results A total of 25 patients with mucinous CRCLM underwent surgery over the 12-year period and were matched to 75 patients with adenocarcinoma NOS. Clinicopathological findings were similar between the groups. Resection of mucinous CRCLM was feasible and safe with similar levels of morbidity to adenocarcinoma NOS. There were no differences identified in hepatic recurrence-free (p=0.85), disease-free (p=0.25) and overall survival (p=0.98) between the groups. MRI had a sensitivity of 31.3% in detecting the presence of mucin in CRCLM. Conclusion Patients with mucinous CRCLM in this study had similar outcomes to patients with adenocarcinoma NOS. Based on our findings, histological subtype should not be taken into account when deciding on resectability of CRCLM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ian S Reynolds
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Liver Transplant Surgery, St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.,Department of Colorectal Surgery, St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Paul M Cromwell
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Liver Transplant Surgery, St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Éanna J Ryan
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Erinn McGrath
- Department of Histopathology, St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Rory Kennelly
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Ronan Ryan
- Department of Radiology, St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Niall Swan
- Department of Histopathology, St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Kieran Sheahan
- Department of Histopathology, St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Des C Winter
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Emir Hoti
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Liver Transplant Surgery, St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Variability in personal protective equipment in cross-sectional interventional abdominal radiology practices. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2022; 47:1167-1176. [PMID: 35013750 PMCID: PMC8744567 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-021-03406-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2021] [Revised: 12/28/2021] [Accepted: 12/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
Purpose To determine institutional practice requirements for personal protective equipment (PPE) in cross-sectional interventional radiology (CSIR) procedures among a variety of radiology practices in the USA and Canada. Methods Members of the Society of Abdominal Radiology (SAR) CSIR Emerging Technology Commission (ETC) were sent an eight-question survey about what PPE they were required to use during common CSIR procedures: paracentesis, thoracentesis, thyroid fine needle aspiration (FNA), superficial lymph node biopsy, deep lymph node biopsy, solid organ biopsy, and ablation. Types of PPE evaluated were sterile gloves, surgical masks, gowns, surgical hats, eye shields, foot covers, and scrubs. Results 26/38 surveys were completed by respondents at 20/22 (91%) institutions. The most common PPE was sterile gloves, required by 20/20 (100%) institutions for every procedure. The second most common PPE was masks, required by 14/20 (70%) institutions for superficial and deep procedures and 12/12 (100%) institutions for ablation. Scrubs, sterile gowns, eye shields, and surgical hats were required at nearly all institutions for ablation, whereas approximately half of institutions required their use for deep lymph node and solid organ biopsy. Compared with other types of PPE, required mask and eye shield use showed the greatest increase during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Conclusion PPE use during common cross-sectional procedures is widely variable. Given the environmental and financial impact and lack of consensus practice, further studies examining the appropriate level of PPE are needed. Graphical abstract ![]()
Collapse
|