A methylation-based prognostic model predicts survival in patients with colorectal cancer

Machine learning in the identification of prognostic DNA methylation biomarkers among patients with cancer: A systematic review of epigenome-wide studies

BACKGROUND

DNA methylation biomarkers have great potential in improving prognostic classification systems for patients with cancer. Machine learning (ML)-based analytic techniques might help overcome the challenges of analyzing high-dimensional data in relatively small sample sizes. This systematic review summarizes the current use of ML-based methods in epigenome-wide studies for the identification of DNA methylation signatures associated with cancer prognosis.

METHODS

We searched three electronic databases including PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science for articles published until 2 January 2023. ML-based methods and workflows used to identify DNA methylation signatures associated with cancer prognosis were extracted and summarized. Two authors independently assessed the methodological quality of included studies by a seven-item checklist adapted from 'A Tool to Assess Risk of Bias and Applicability of Prediction Model Studies (PROBAST)' and from the 'Reporting Recommendations for Tumor Marker Prognostic Studies (REMARK). Different ML methods and workflows used in included studies were summarized and visualized by a sunburst chart, a bubble chart, and Sankey diagrams, respectively.

RESULTS

Eighty-three studies were included in this review. Three major types of ML-based workflows were identified. 1) unsupervised clustering, 2) supervised feature selection, and 3) deep learning-based feature transformation. For the three workflows, the most frequently used ML techniques were consensus clustering, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO), and autoencoder, respectively. The systematic review revealed that the performance of these approaches has not been adequately evaluated yet and that methodological and reporting flaws were common in the identified studies using ML techniques.

CONCLUSIONS

There is great heterogeneity in ML-based methodological strategies used by epigenome-wide studies to identify DNA methylation markers associated with cancer prognosis. In theory, most existing workflows could not handle the high multi-collinearity and potentially non-linearity interactions in epigenome-wide DNA methylation data. Benchmarking studies are needed to compare the relative performance of various approaches for specific cancer types. Adherence to relevant methodological and reporting guidelines are urgently needed.

Genomic Effect of DNA Methylation on Gene Expression in Colorectal Cancer

The aberrant expression of cancer-related genes can lead to colorectal cancer (CRC) carcinogenesis, and DNA methylation is one of the causes of abnormal expression. Although many studies have been conducted to reveal how DNA methylation affects transcription regulation, the ways in which it modulates gene expression and the regions that significantly affect DNA methylation-mediated gene regulation remain unclear. In this study, we investigated how DNA methylation in specific genomic areas can influence gene expression. Several regression models were constructed for gene expression prediction based on DNA methylation. Among these models, ElasticNet, which had the best performance, was chosen for further analysis. DNA methylation near transcription start sites (TSS), especially from 2 kb upstream to 7 kb downstream of TSS, had an essential regulatory role in gene expression. Moreover, methylation-affected and survival-associated genes were compiled and found to be mainly enriched in immune-related pathways. This study investigated genomic regions in which methylation changes can affect gene expression. In addition, this study proposed that aberrantly expressed genes due to DNA methylation can lead to CRC pathogenesis by the immune system.