Is hepatic resection better than transarterial chemoembolization in hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombosis?

Liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma beyond the BCLC: are multinodular disease, portal hypertension, and portal system invasion real contraindications?

Background

Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) is a recognized guideline to standardize treatment allocation for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC); however, many centers criticize its restrictive liver resection recommendations and have published good results after more liberal hepatectomy indications. The objective is to evaluate the results of HCC resection in a single center, with a more liberal indication for resection than proposed by the BCLC guideline. It was performed a retrospective cohort study including all patients who underwent liver resection for HCC in a single center between April 2008 and November 2018.

Methods

The results of 150 patients who underwent hepatectomy were evaluated and compared facing both 2010 and 2018 BCLC guidelines. Overall and disease-free survival after resection in patients with none, one, two, or three of the risk factors, as proposed by the BCLC, as contraindications to resection (portal hypertension, portal invasion, and more than one nodule) were analyzed.

Results

Nodule size and presence of portal invasion alone did not affect prognosis. If the BCLC 2010 and 2018 guidelines were followed, 46.7% and 26.7% of the patients, respectively, would not have received potentially curative treatment. The median overall and disease-free survival for patients with one BCLC contraindication factor were 43.3 and 15.1 months, respectively. The presence of two risk factors had a negative impact on overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS), although some patients had long-term survival. The only patient with the three risk factors had a poor outcome.

Conclusions

Selected patients with one BCLC contraindication factor may undergo resection with good results, whereas those with two factors should be allocated for hepatectomy only in favorable scenarios. Patients with the three risk factors do not appear to benefit from resection.

Should associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy be applied to hepatitis B virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma patients with cirrhosis? A multi-center study

BACKGROUND

It is unclear whether associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) can be performed in hepatitis B virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients with cirrhosis. We explored the efficacy of ALPPS in HCC patients.

METHODS

Data of 54 patients who underwent ALPPS between August 2014 and July 2020 at three centers were collected. Adverse factors affecting their prognosis were analyzed and subsequently compared with 184 patients who underwent transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE).

RESULTS

Overall survival rates of the ALPPS group at 1, 3, and 5 years were 70.6%, 38.4%, and 31.7%, respectively; corresponding disease-free survival rates were 50.5%, 22.4%, and 19.2%, respectively. The ALPPS group had a significantly greater long-term survival rate than the TACE group (before propensity score matching, P < 0.001; after propensity score matching, P = 0.002). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that multifocal lesions (P = 0.018) and macroscopic vascular invasion (P = 0.001) were prognostic factors for HCC patients who underwent ALPPS. After the propensity score matching, the multifocal lesions (P = 0.031), macroscopic vascular invasion (P = 0.003), and treatment type (ALPPS/TACE) (P = 0.026) were the factors adversely affecting the prognosis of HCC patients.

CONCLUSION

ALPPS was feasible in hepatitis B virus-related HCC patients with cirrhosis and resulted in better survival than TACE.

Ethyl Acetate Fraction of Hedyotis diffusa Willd Induces Apoptosis via JNK/Nur77 Pathway in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Cells

Background

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is characterized by poor diagnosis and high mortality. Novel and efficient therapeutic agents are urgently needed for the treatment. Hedyotis diffusa Willd (HDW) is used to treat cancers, especially HCC in China.

Purpose

The study aimed to identify the main anti-HCC extract in HDW and to explore the mechanism of the active extract.

Materials and Methods

The high-performance liquid chromatography-quadrupole-time of flight mass spectrometry (HPLC-QTOF-MS) method was used for the simultaneous determination of main compounds in the ethyl acetate fraction of HDW (EHDW). The toxicity test of different HDW fractions was carried out on larvae at 2 day-post-fertilization (dpf) for 72 h. The in vivo anti-HCC effect of different HDW fractions was evaluated on a zebrafish tumor model by immersion administration. The antiproliferative effect of HDW fractions was determined with MTT assay, as well as hematoxylin and eosin (HE) staining assay. Hoechst 33258 staining was used to observe changes in nucleus morphology. Flow cytometry analysis was used to investigate apoptosis induction. Western blot analysis was used to examine apoptosis-related proteins, and key proteins in JNK/Nur77 signaling pathway. SP600125 was served to validate the apoptotic mechanism.

Results

EHDW showed the strongest tumor cell growth inhibitory effect on zebrafish tumor model. Further study revealed that EHDW induced apoptosis in zebrafish tumor model and in cultured Hep3B cells. Meanwhile, it has been shown that the levels of BCL2-associated X (Bax), cytochrome c (cyto c), cleaved-caspase 3, and poly-ADP-ribose polymerase (PARP) cells were upregulated. In contrast, the level of antiapoptotic B cell lymphoma-2 (Bcl-2) was downregulated in Hep3B cells. Additionally, EHDW activated JNK/Nur77 pathway by increasing the levels of p-JNK(Thr183/Tyr185) and p-Nur77(Ser351). Further study showed that blockage of JNK by SP600125 reversed EHDW-induced JNK/Nur77 pathway and the downstream apoptotic proteins.

Conclusion

In conclusion, EHDW exerted the anti-HCC effect, which may be attributed to the activation of JNK/Nur77 pathway. This study supported the rationale of HDW as an HCC therapeutic agent.

Prognosis of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and portal vein tumor thrombus treated with combination of transarterial chemoembolization and palliative thermal ablation

PURPOSE

Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) was obtained acceptable benefit for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Here in this study, we compared the benefit of TACE combined palliative thermal ablation with TACE alone for HCC with portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT).

METHODS

Patients with HCC and PVTT were retrospectively analyzed from January 2012 to December 2017, who accepted treatment of TACE alone (TACE group) or TACE plus palliative thermal ablation (TACE + P-ablation group). Propensity score matching (PSM) was applied to balance differences between the two groups. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) rates were compared between groups.

RESULTS

Median follow-up time was 7.4 (3.0-60.0) months. In the cohort, 142 patients were enrolled in TACE group and 86 patients were enrolled in TACE + P-ablation group. The pre-PSM estimated 6-, 12-, and 18-month OS rates for the TACE + P-ablation group were 70.9, 46.5, and 31%, respectively, whereas rates for the TACE group were 57, 23.1, and 10%, respectively. After PSM, OS and PFS rates remained coincident with the pre-PSM. Risk factors for poor OS included PVTT type III and type II relative to type I (HR = 1.76; 95% CI, 1.13-2.74; p = .01) and (HR = 1.86; 95% CI, 1.2-2.88; p = .006), TACE alone (HR = 1.40; 95% CI, 1.01-1.96; p = .04), a single TACE treatment (HR = 2.69; 95% CI, 1.79-4.03; p < .001), 2 or 3 TACE treatments (HR = 2.02; 95% CI, 1.32-3.09; p = .001).

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of TACE and palliative thermal ablation for HCC with PVTT could obtain delayed progression and longer survival.