DNA damage repair deficiency as a predictive biomarker for FOLFIRINOX efficacy in metastatic pancreatic cancer

Prevalence of germline variants in Brazilian pancreatic carcinoma patients

We evaluated the prevalence of pathogenic/likely pathogenic germline variants (PGV) in Brazilian pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PC) patients, that represent a multiethnic population, in a cross-sectional study. We included 192 PC patients unselected for family history of cancer. We evaluated a panel of 113 cancer genes, through genomic DNA sequencing and 46 ancestry-informative markers, through multiplex PCR. The median age was 61 years; 63.5% of the patients presented disease clinical stages III or IV; 8.3% reported personal history of cancer; 4.7% and 16.1% reported first-degree relatives with PC or breast and/or prostate cancer, respectively. Although the main ancestry was European, there was considerable genetic composition admixture. Twelve patients (6.25%) were PGV carriers in PC predisposition genes (ATM, BRCA1, BRCA2, CDKN2A, MSH2, PALB2) and another 25 (13.0%) were PGV carriers in genes with a limited association or not previously associated with PC (ACD, BLM, BRIP1, CHEK2, ERCC4, FANCA, FANCE, FANCM, GALNT12, MITF, MRE11, MUTYH, POLE, RAD51B, RAD51C, RECQL4, SDHA, TERF2IP). The most frequently affected genes were CHEK2, ATM and FANC. In tumor samples from PGV carriers in ACD, BRIP1, MRE11, POLE, SDHA, TERF2IP, which were examined through exome sequencing, the main single base substitutions (SBS) mutational signature was SBS1+5+18, probably associated with age, tobacco smoking and reactive oxygen species. SBS3 associated with homologous repair deficiency was also represented, but on a lower scale. There was no difference in the frequency of PGV carriers between: (a) patients with or without first-degree relatives with cancer; and (b) patients with admixed ancestry versus those with predominantly European ancestry. Furthermore, there was no difference in overall survival between PGV carriers and non-carriers. Therefore, genetic testing should be offered to all Brazilian pancreatic cancer patients, regardless of their ancestry. Genes with limited or previously unrecognized associations with pancreatic cancer should be further investigated to clarify their role in cancer risk.

Understanding the Genetic Landscape of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma to Support Personalized Medicine: A Systematic Review

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is one of the most fatal malignancies worldwide. While population-wide screening recommendations for PDAC in asymptomatic individuals are not achievable due to its relatively low incidence, pancreatic cancer surveillance programs are recommended for patients with germline causative variants in PDAC susceptibility genes or a strong family history. In this study, we sought to determine the prevalence and significance of germline alterations in major genes (ATM, BRCA1, BRCA2, CDKN2A, EPCAM, MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, PALB2, PMS2, STK11, TP53) involved in PDAC susceptibility. We performed a systematic review of PubMed publications reporting germline variants identified in these genes in PDAC patients. Overall, the retrieved articles included 1493 PDAC patients. A high proportion of these patients (n = 1225/1493, 82%) were found to harbor alterations in genes (ATM, BRCA1, BRCA2, PALB2) involved in the homologous recombination repair (HRR) pathway. Specifically, the remaining PDAC patients were reported to carry alterations in genes playing a role in other cancer pathways (CDKN2A, STK11, TP53; n = 181/1493, 12.1%) or in the mismatch repair (MMR) pathway (MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, PMS2; n = 87/1493, 5.8%). Our findings highlight the importance of germline genetic characterization in PDAC patients for better personalized targeted therapies, clinical management, and surveillance.

DNA damage response and repair gene mutations are associated with tumor mutational burden and outcomes to platinum-based chemotherapy/immunotherapy in advanced NSCLC patients

BACKGROUND

DNA damage response and repair (DDR) genes are crucial for maintaining the integrity of the genome. This study aims to explore the correlation of DDR gene mutations with TMB, clinical characteristics, and outcomes to platinum-based chemotherapy and platinum-based chemotherapy/immunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) without EGFR and ALK alterations.

METHODS

Tumor tissue from 49 patients with stage III or IV NSCLC who were without EGFR and ALK alterations were analyzed using targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS). Among them, 13 patients received first-line platinum-based chemotherapy, 32 patients received first-line platinum-based chemotherapy/immunotherapy.

RESULTS

In these NSCLC patients without EGFR and ALK alterations, the frequently mutated genes included TP53, KMT2D and KRAS, the most frequently mutated DDR gene was FANCG, DDR gene mutations were detected in 20 patients. The mutation frequency of homologous recombination (HR) pathway was significantly higher in lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC) than that in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) (30.8% vs. 5.7%). Among DDR positive patients, a lower percentage exhibited metastasis. Patients with DDR gene mutations, cell-cycle checkpoint pathway mutations, and BER pathway mutations had significantly higher TMB compared to those without corresponding mutations. In the patients receiving platinum-based chemotherapy/immunotherapy, the disease control rate was significantly lower in the DDR-positive group compared with that in the DDR-negative group (55.6% vs. 100.0%). Among LUAD patients receiving platinum-based chemotherapy/immunotherapy, we observed a worse overall survival (OS) in DDR-positive group, as well as poorer progression-free survival(PFS)and OS in BER-positive and FANCG mutated group.

CONCLUSIONS

DDR gene mutations are associated with tumor metastasis, TMB, and outcomes to platinum-based chemotherapy/immunotherapy in advanced NSCLC patients.

Detection and therapeutic implications of homologous recombination repair deficiency in pancreatic cancer: a narrative review

Background and Objective

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains one of the most lethal cancers. A major recent advance has been the identification of a subset of patients with PDAC who harbor inherited or somatic genetic alterations that result in homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) in tumor cells. These patients often respond favorably to drugs that can exploit this vulnerability. This review outlines the biomarkers that have been developed to predict HRD and their performance related specifically to PDAC, as well as novel HRD-targeted therapies for PDAC.

Methods

We conducted a narrative review of the HRD in PDAC based on PubMed, Google Scholar, website and citation searches.

Key Content and Findings

Germline mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 remains the only validated biomarker for the HRD state but various platforms are now available to define HRD beyond BRCA1/2 alterations. Currently, the available evidence supports the use of platinum-based chemotherapy as well as PARP inhibitors, and there is also emerging data that immune checkpoint inhibitors can produce some durable responses in these patients.

Conclusions

Consistently detecting clinically significant the HRD status in PDAC has remained challenging with current commercially available platforms. Multiple novel HRD-targeted therapies for PDAC are currently in development and clinical trials, offering new opportunities for these patients.

DNA damage repair mutations in pancreatic cancer- prognostic or predictive?

Objective

The efficacy of platinum-based chemotherapy (PtCh) for pancreatic cancer (PC) patients with DNA damage repair gene mutations (DDRm) compared to those without DDRm remains uncertain.

Methods

After a thorough database searching in PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science, a total of 19 studies that met all the inclusion criteria were identified. The primary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) for PC patients with DDRm versus those without DDRm after PtCh.

Results

Patients with advanced-stage PC who have DDRm tend to have longer OS compared to patients without DDRm, regardless of their exposure to PtCh (HR=0.63; I2 = 66%). Further analyses indicated that the effectiveness of PtCh for OS was modified by DDRm (HR=0.48; I2 = 59%). After the first- line PtCh (1L-PtCh), the PFS of advanced-stage PC with DDRm was also significantly improved (HR=0.41; I2 = 0%). For patients with resected PC, regardless of their exposure to PtCh, the OS for patients with DDRm was comparable to those without DDRm (HR=0.82; I2 = 71%). Specifically, for patients with resected PC harboring DDRm who received PtCh (HR=0.85; I2 = 65%) and for those after non-PtCh (HR=0.87; I2 = 0%), the presence of DDRm did not show a significant association with longer OS.

Conclusion

1L-PtCh treatment is correlated with favorable survival for advanced-stage PC patients with DDRm. For resected-stage PC harboring DDRm, adjuvant PtCh had limited effectiveness. The prognostic value of DDRm needs to be further verified by prospective randomized controlled trials.

Systematic Review Registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42022302275.

Overcoming therapeutic resistance in pancreatic cancer: Emerging opportunities by targeting BRCAs and p53

Pancreatic cancer (PC) is characterized by (epi)genetic and microenvironmental alterations that negatively impact the treatment outcomes. New targeted therapies have been pursued to counteract the therapeutic resistance in PC. Aiming to seek for new therapeutic options for PC, several attempts have been undertaken to exploit BRCA1/2 and TP53 deficiencies as promising actionable targets. The elucidation of the pathogenesis of PC highlighted the high prevalence of p53 mutations and their connection with the aggressiveness and therapeutic resistance of PC. Additionally, PC is associated with dysfunctions in several DNA repair-related genes, including BRCA1/2, which sensitize tumours to DNA-damaging agents. In this context, poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors (PARPi) were approved for mutant BRCA1/2 PC patients. However, acquired drug resistance has become a major drawback of PARPi. This review emphasizes the importance of targeting defective BRCAs and p53 pathways for advancing personalized PC therapy, with particular focus on how this approach may provide an opportunity to tackle PC resistance.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of germline BRCA mutations in pancreatic cancer patients identifies global and racial disparities in access to genetic testing

BACKGROUND

Germline BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations (gBRCAm) can inform pancreatic cancer (PC) risk and treatment but most of the available information is derived from white patients. The ethnic and geographic variability of gBRCAm prevalence and of germline BRCA (gBRCA) testing uptake in PC globally is largely unknown.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We carried out a systematic review and prevalence meta-analysis of gBRCA testing and gBRCAm prevalence in PC patients stratified by ethnicity. The main outcome was the distribution of gBRCA testing uptake across diverse populations worldwide. Secondary outcomes included: geographic distribution of gBRCA testing uptake, temporal analysis of gBRCA testing uptake in ethnic groups, and pooled proportion of gBRCAm stratified by ethnicity. The study is listed under PROSPERO registration number #CRD42022311769.

RESULTS

A total of 51 studies with 16 621 patients were included. Twelve of the studies (23.5%) enrolled white patients only, 10 Asians only (19.6%), and 29 (56.9%) included mixed populations. The pooled prevalence of white, Asian, African American, and Hispanic patients tested per study was 88.7%, 34.8%, 3.6%, and 5.2%, respectively. The majority of included studies were from high-income countries (HICs) (64; 91.2%). Temporal analysis showed a significant increase only in white and Asians patients tested from 2000 to present (P < 0.001). The pooled prevalence of gBRCAm was: 3.3% in white, 1.7% in Asian, and negligible (<0.3%) in African American and Hispanic patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Data on gBRCA testing and gBRCAm in PC derive mostly from white patients and from HICs. This limits the interpretation of gBRCAm for treating PC across diverse populations and implies substantial global and racial disparities in access to BRCA testing in PC.

PGD2 displays distinct effects in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma depending on different concentrations

Prostaglandin D2 (PGD2), an arachidonic acid metabolite, has been implicated in allergic responses, parasitic infection and tumor development. The biological functions and molecular mechanisms of PGD2 in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) are still undefined. In this study, we firstly found the high concentration of serum PGD2 and low expression of PGD2 receptor CRTH2 in DLBCL, which were associated with clinical features and prognosis of DLBCL patients. Interestingly, different concentration of PGD2 displayed divergent effects on DLBCL progression. Low-concentration PGD2 promoted cell growth through binding to CRTH2 while high-concentration PGD2 inhibited it via regulating cell proliferation, apoptosis, cell cycle, and invasion. Besides, high-concentration PGD2 could induce ROS-mediated DNA damage and enhance the cytotoxicity of adriamycin, bendamustine and venetoclax. Furthermore, HDAC inhibitors, vorinostat (SAHA) and panobinostat (LBH589) regulated CRTH2 expression and PGD2 production, and CRTH2 inhibitor AZD1981 and high-concentration PGD2 enhanced their anti-tumor effects in DLBCL. Altogether, our findings demonstrated PGD2 and CRTH2 as novel prognostic biomarkers and therapeutic targets in DLBCL, and highlighted the potency of high-concentration PGD2 as a promising therapeutic strategy for DLBCL patients.

Facts and Hopes in Immunotherapy of Pancreatic Cancer

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains one of the most challenging cancers to treat. For patients with advanced and metastatic disease, chemotherapy has yielded only modest incremental benefits, which are not durable. Immunotherapy has revolutionized the treatment of other solid tumors by leading to cures where none existed only a decade ago, yet it has made few inroads with PDAC. A host of trials with promising preclinical data have failed, except for in a small minority of patients with selected biomarkers. There is, however, a glimmer of hope, which we seek to cultivate. In this review, we discuss recent advances in the understanding of the uniquely immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME) in PDAC, learnings from completed trials of checkpoint inhibitors, TME modifiers, cellular and vaccine therapies, oncolytic viruses, and other novel approaches. We go on to discuss our expectations for improved preclinical models of immunotherapy in PDAC, new approaches to modifying the TME including the myeloid compartment, and emerging biomarkers to better select patients who may benefit from immunotherapy. We also discuss improvements in clinical trial design specific to immunotherapy that will help us better measure success when we find it. Finally, we discuss the urgent imperative to better design and execute bold, but rational, combination trials of novel agents designed to cure patients with PDAC.

Is Cell-Free DNA Testing in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Ready for Prime Time?

Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) testing currently does not have a significant role in PDA management: it is insufficient to diagnose PDA, and its use is primarily restricted to identifying targetable mutations (if tissue is insufficient or unavailable). cfDNA testing has the potential to address critical needs in PDA management, such as pre-operative risk stratification (POR), prognostication, and predicting (and monitoring) treatment response. Prior studies have focused primarily on somatic mutations, specifically KRAS variants, and have shown limited success in addressing prognosis and POR. Recent studies have demonstrated the importance of other less prevalent mutations (ERBB2 and TP53), but no studies have provided reliable mutation panels for clinical use. Methylation aberrations in cfDNA (epigenetic markers) in PDA have been relatively less explored. However, early evidence has suggested they offer diagnostic and, to some extent, prognostic value. The inclusion of epigenetic markers of cfDNA adds another dimension to genomic testing and may open new therapeutic avenues beyond addressing critical areas of need in PDA treatment. For cfDNA to substantially influence PDA management, concerted efforts are required to include less frequent mutations and epigenetic markers. Furthermore, relying on KRAS mutations for PDA management will always be inadequate.

Evaluation of stromal cell infiltration in the tumor microenvironment enable prediction of treatment sensitivity and prognosis in colon cancer

Current clinical factors for screening candidates that might benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy in colon cancer are inadequate. Tumor microenvironment, especially the stromal components, has the potential to determine treatment response. However, clinical translation of the tumor-associated stromal characterization into a practical biomarker for helping treatment decision has not been established. Using machine learning, we established a novel 31-gene signature, called stromal cell infiltration intensity score (SIIS), to distinguish patients characterized by the enrichment of abundant stromal cells in five colon cancer datasets from GEO (N = 990). Patients with high-SIIS were at higher risk for recurrence and mortality, and could not benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy due to their intrinsic drug resistance; however, the opposite was reported for patients with low-SIIS. The role of SIIS in detection of patients with high stromal cell infiltration and reduced drug efficiency was consistently validated in the TCGA-COAD cohort (N = 382), Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center cohort (N = 30), and could also be observed in TCGA pan-cancer settings (N = 4898) and four independent immunotherapy cohorts (N = 467). Based on multi-omics data analysis and the CRISPR library screen, we reported that lack of gene mutation, hypomethylation in ADCY4 promoter region, activation of WNT-PCP pathway and SIAH2-GPX3 axis were potential mechanisms responsible for the chemoresistance of patients within high-SIIS group. Our findings demonstrated that SIIS provide an important reference for those making treatment decisions for such special patients.

ZC3H13-mediated N6-methyladenosine modification of PHF10 is impaired by fisetin which inhibits the DNA damage response in pancreatic cancer

DNA damage repair is a major barrier for chemotherapy efficacy of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), including the efficacy of platinum-based and gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel treatments. N6-methyladenosine modifications (m6A) have recently been reported to play a role in homologous recombination (HR) repair of DNA double strand breaks (DSBs); however, the mechanism of action remains unknown. Our previous work indicated that fisetin may be a promising anti-tumour agent that induces DNA damage. In this study, we reported that fisetin induced DSBs and suppressed HR repair through m6A modification in PDAC cells. The m6A writer ZC3H13 and PHF10, which is a subunit of the PBAF chromatin remodelling complex, were identified as the main molecules affected by fisetin treatment. To our knowledge, it's the first time that PHF10 was found and involved in the DNA damage response. PHF10 loss-of-function resulted in elevated recruitment of γH2AX, RAD51, and 53BP1 to DSB sites and decreased HR repair efficiency. Moreover, ZC3H13 knockdown downregulated the m6A methylation of PHF10 and decreased PHF10 translation in a YTHDF1-dependent manner. In conclusion, our study demonstrates that fisetin enhanced DSBs via ZC3Hl3-mediated m6A modification of PHF10, which may provide insight into novel therapeutic approaches for PDAC.

Modulation of pancreatic cancer cell sensitivity to FOLFIRINOX through microRNA-mediated regulation of DNA damage

FOLFIRINOX, a combination of chemotherapy drugs (Fluorouracil, Oxaliplatin, Irinotecan -FOI), provides the best clinical benefit in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) patients. In this study we explore the role of miRNAs (MIR) as modulators of chemosensitivity to identify potential biomarkers of response. We find that 41 and 84 microRNA inhibitors enhance the sensitivity of Capan1 and MiaPaCa2 PDAC cells respectively. These include a MIR1307-inhibitor that we validate in further PDAC cell lines. Chemotherapy-induced apoptosis and DNA damage accumulation are higher in MIR1307 knock-out (MIR1307KO) versus control PDAC cells, while re-expression of MIR1307 in MIR1307KO cells rescues these effects. We identify binding of MIR1307 to CLIC5 mRNA through covalent ligation of endogenous Argonaute-bound RNAs cross-linking immunoprecipitation assay. We validate these findings in an in vivo model with MIR1307 disruption. In a pilot cohort of PDAC patients undergoing FOLFIRONX chemotherapy, circulating MIR1307 correlates with clinical outcome.

Mutations in key driver genes of pancreatic cancer: molecularly targeted therapies and other clinical implications

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is one of the most lethal cancers, with a minimal difference between its incidence rate and mortality rate. Advances in oncology over the past several decades have dramatically improved the overall survival of patients with multiple cancers due to the implementation of new techniques in early diagnosis, therapeutic drugs, and personalized therapy. However, pancreatic cancers remain recalcitrant, with a 5-year relative survival rate of <9%. The lack of measures for early diagnosis, strong resistance to chemotherapy, ineffective adjuvant chemotherapy and the unavailability of molecularly targeted therapy are responsible for the high mortality rate of this notorious disease. Genetically, PDAC progresses as a complex result of the activation of oncogenes and inactivation of tumor suppressors. Although next-generation sequencing has identified numerous new genetic alterations, their clinical implications remain unknown. Classically, oncogenic mutations in genes such as KRAS and loss-of-function mutations in tumor suppressors, such as TP53, CDNK2A, DPC4/SMAD4, and BRCA2, are frequently observed in PDAC. Currently, research on these key driver genes is still the main focus. Therefore, studies assessing the functions of these genes and their potential clinical implications are of paramount importance. In this review, we summarize the biological function of key driver genes and pharmaceutical targets in PDAC. In addition, we conclude the results of molecularly targeted therapies in clinical trials and discuss how to utilize these genetic alterations in further clinical practice.

DNA Damage Repair Deficiency in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: Preclinical Models and Clinical Perspectives

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is one of the most lethal cancers worldwide, and survival rates have barely improved in decades. In the era of precision medicine, treatment strategies tailored to disease mutations have revolutionized cancer therapy. Next generation sequencing has found that up to a third of all PDAC tumors contain deleterious mutations in DNA damage repair (DDR) genes, highlighting the importance of these genes in PDAC. The mechanisms by which DDR gene mutations promote tumorigenesis, therapeutic response, and subsequent resistance are still not fully understood. Therefore, an opportunity exists to elucidate these processes and to uncover relevant therapeutic drug combinations and strategies to target DDR deficiency in PDAC. However, a constraint to preclinical research is due to limitations in appropriate laboratory experimental models. Models that effectively recapitulate their original cancer tend to provide high levels of predictivity and effective translation of preclinical findings to the clinic. In this review, we outline the occurrence and role of DDR deficiency in PDAC and provide an overview of clinical trials that target these pathways and the preclinical models such as 2D cell lines, 3D organoids and mouse models [genetically engineered mouse model (GEMM), and patient-derived xenograft (PDX)] used in PDAC DDR deficiency research.

Genomic alterations in tumor tissue and ctDNA from Chinese pancreatic cancer patients

Though the genomic feature of pancreatic cancer has been comprehensively studied in western patients, the genetic feature of Chinese patients is poorly clarified. In this study, a total of 225 pancreatic cancer patients were enrolled, mainly pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC, 97.33%). 140 patients (62.22%) provided sufficient tumor tissues for genomic analysis, and the rest (37.78%) were provided serum instead. Utilizing target next-generation sequencing (NGS), we analyzed genomic alterations of 618 selected genes. Corresponding data in the TCGA database were also analyzed here. In total, 26 (11.61%) patients had pathogenic or likely pathogenic germline variants, mainly (84.62%) involved genes in the DNA damage repair (DDR) pathway. The mean and median counts of somatic alterations per sample were 6.28 and 5, respectively. The most frequently mutated genes in our cohort were KRAS, TP53, CDKN2A, SMAD4, FBXW7 and ARID1A, revealing a significantly different prevalence of genes including KRAS, CDKN2A, ARID1A, NOTCH1, ARID1B than the corresponding data in the TCGA database. 39.11% of patients were identified with actionable alteration and the ratio was not significantly different between tissue and serum samples. 22.67% of patients harbored DDR gene alterations, which were associated with a higher tumor mutation burden. We also found that all the DDR alterations were not correlated with the overall survival and immune and stroma score, but the changes in NK cells and follicular T cells were identified in samples with DDR changes according to TCGA database. In summary, we identified a distinct genomic feature of Chinese pancreatic cancer patients by comparing with the data in TCGA database, and suggested the role for genetic testing using tissue or ctDNA samples in decision-making process. DDR alterations were associated with a higher tumor mutation burden and the significantly higher counts of NK cells in DDR altered samples may raise the attention in future related drugs development.

Precision Medicine and Pancreatic Cancer

For several decades, cytotoxic chemotherapy was the mainstay of treatment for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Advances in molecular profiling have identified predictive genomic alterations in PDAC-the germline and somatic genome are now routinely interrogated in patients with PDAC because of their therapeutic relevance. The composite role of the epithelial cell compartment and the tumor microenvironment in defining PDAC biology needs further elucidation to deconvolute the spatiotemporal heterogeneity appreciated in this disease. Novel clinical trial approaches leveraging signal seeking, adaptive statistical designs, and master protocols using several candidate drugs that target relevant therapeutic targets are are essential to unlocking the potential of precision medicine in PDAC.

Excision Repair Cross-Complementation Group 6 Gene Polymorphism Is Associated with the Response to FOLFIRINOX Chemotherapy in Asian Patients with Pancreatic Cancer

Simple Summary

FOLFIRINOX is a platinum-based chemotherapy regimen for patients with pancreatic cancer and is known to be more effective in the presence of the BRCA mutation, one of the DNA damage repair (DDR) gene mutations. However, BRCA mutations are less common in pancreatic cancer patients, accounting for only about 5% of cases worldwide, and are known to be even rarer in Asians. Therefore, this study aimed to uncover new genetic variants of DDR genes related to the response of FOLFIRINOX by analyzing variants of DDR genes using whole exome sequencing. Multivariable Cox regression analysis adjusted for clinical variables showed that a single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) of the ERCC6 gene is an independent predictor for progression-free survival. If validated, the ERCC6 SNP found in this study could be used as a biomarker to predict responses to FOLFIRINOX.

Abstract

FOLFIRINOX is currently one of the standard chemotherapy regimens for pancreatic cancer patients, but little is known about the factors that can predict a response to it. We performed a study to discover novel DNA damage repair (DDR) gene variants associated with the response to FOLFIRINOX chemotherapy in patients with pancreatic cancer. We queried a cohort of pancreatic cancer patients who received FOLFIRINOX chemotherapy as the first treatment and who had tissue obtained through an endoscopic ultrasound-guided biopsy that was suitable for DNA sequencing. We explored variants of 148 DDR genes based on whole exome sequencing and performed multivariate Cox regression to find genetic variants associated with progression-free survival (PFS). Overall, 103 patients were included. Among 2384 variants of 141 DDR genes, 612 non-synonymous variants of 123 genes were selected for Cox regression analysis. The multivariate Cox model showed that rs2228528 in ERCC6 was significantly associated with improved PFS (hazard ratio 0.54, p = 0.001). The median PFS was significantly longer in patients with rs2228528 genotype AA vs. genotype GA and GG (23.5 vs. 16.2 and 8.6 months; log-rank p < 0.001). This study suggests that rs2228528 in ERCC6 could be a potential predictor of response to FOLFIRINOX chemotherapy in patients with pancreatic cancer.

DNA damage repair as a target in pancreatic cancer: state-of-the-art and future perspectives

Complex rearrangement patterns and mitotic errors are hallmarks of most pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDAC), a disease with dismal prognosis despite some therapeutic advances in recent years. DNA double-strand breaks (DSB) bear the greatest risk of provoking genomic instability, and DNA damage repair (DDR) pathways are crucial in preserving genomic integrity following a plethora of damage types. Two major repair pathways dominate DSB repair for safeguarding the genome integrity: non-homologous end joining and homologous recombination (HR). Defective HR, but also alterations in other DDR pathways, such as BRCA1, BRCA2, ATM and PALB2, occur frequently in both inherited and sporadic PDAC. Personalised treatment of pancreatic cancer is still in its infancy and predictive biomarkers are lacking. DDR deficiency might render a PDAC vulnerable to a potential new therapeutic intervention that increases the DNA damage load beyond a tolerable threshold, as for example, induced by poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors. The Pancreas Cancer Olaparib Ongoing (POLO) trial, in which olaparib as a maintenance treatment improved progression-free survival compared with placebo after platinum-based induction chemotherapy in patients with PDAC and germline BRCA1/2 mutations, raised great hopes of a substantially improved outcome for this patient subgroup. This review summarises the relationship between DDR and PDAC, the prevalence and characteristics of DNA repair mutations and options for the clinical management of patients with PDAC and DNA repair deficiency.

Update on the Role of Poly (ADP-Ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors in the DNA Repair-Deficient Pancreatic Cancers: A Narrative Review

Purpose: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is the most common cancer found in the pancreas. It has a dismal prognosis and current therapeutic options, including surgical resection, provide only a temporary or limited response due to the development of treatment resistance. Methods: A narrative review of studies investigating poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) pathway inhibitors in metastatic PDAC to highlight recent advances. Results: Mutations in BRCA genes confer a higher risk of PDAC, while germ line mutations are found in 4-7% of individuals harboring pancreatic cancer. Although solid tumors with defective DNA damage repair defect (DDR) genes such as BRCA show heightened sensitivity to platinum agents, tumors can exploit the PARP pathway as salvage pathways. Therefore, blocking this pathway will trigger cell death in vulnerable tumor cells with BRCA/DNA repair deficiency. Several drugs with inhibitory activity on the PARP pathway have been approved for breast and ovarian tumors harboring germ line or somatic BRCA mutations. Based on these results, the phase III POLO study showed a significant improvement in progression-free survival compared with placebo in BRCA mutant pancreatic tumors and highlighted the importance of germ line testing in everyone diagnosed with pancreatic cancer. In addition, expansion of the PARP inhibitor indication beyond BRCA mutations to other genes involved in DDR such as ATM and PALB2 merits attention. Conclusion: PARP inhibitors represent a safe and efficacious treatment for a subset of PDAC patients with BRCA mutations. Ongoing trials are evaluating PARP inhibitors in PDAC patients with non-BRCA DDR gene deficiencies as well as PARP inhibitors in combination with other agents, notably immune checkpoint inhibitors to expand the group of patients that derive benefit from this treatment.

Prognostic prediction of a 12-methylation gene-based risk score system on pancreatic adenocarcinoma

Pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PAAD) accounts for ~85% of all pancreatic cancer cases and is associated with a less favorable prognosis. Aberrant DNA methylation may influence the progression of PAAD by inducing abnormal gene expression. Methylation data of PAAD samples with prognosis information were obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas (training set) and European Bioinformatics Institute Array Express databases (validation sets). Using the limma package, the differentially methylated genes in the training dataset were screened. Combined with the Weighted Gene Co-expression Network Analysis package, the co-methylated genes in key modules were identified. Then, a cor.test function in R software was applied to explore the functions of key the methylated genes. Correlation analyses of the expression levels and methylation levels of key methylated genes were performed, followed by identification of methylated genes associated with prognosis using Univariate Cox regression analysis. The optimal combination of prognosis related methylated genes was determined using a Cox-Proportional Hazards (Cox-PH) model. Subsequently, the risk score prognostic prediction system was constructed by combining the Cox-PH prognosis coefficients of the selected optimized genes. Based on the constructed risk score system, samples in all datasets were divided into high and low risk samples and the survival status was compared using survival curves. Furthermore, the correlation between independent prognostic factors and the risk score system was determined using the survival package. A total of 50 genes associated with prognosis of PAAD and a 12-gene optimal combination were obtained, including: CCAAT/enhancer binding protein α, histone cluster 1 H4E, STAM binding protein-like 1, phospholipase D3, centrosomal protein 55, ssDNA binding protein 4, glutamate AMPA receptor subunit 1, switch-associated protein 70, adenylate-cyclase activating polypeptide 1 receptor 1, yippee-like 3, homeobox C4 and insulin-like growth factor binding protein 1. Subsequently, a risk score prognostic prediction system of these 12 genes was constructed and validated. In addition, pathological N category, radiotherapy and risk status were identified as independent prognostic factors. Overall, the risk score prognostic prediction system constructed in the present study may be effective for predicting the prognosis of patients with PAAD.