Clinical factors associated with the development of postoperative atrial fibrillation in esophageal cancer patients receiving multimodality therapy before surgery

Incident Atrial Fibrillation and Survival Outcomes in Esophageal Cancer following Radiotherapy

PURPOSE

Radiation therapy (RT) associates with long-term cardiotoxicity. In preclinical models, RT exposure induces early cardiotoxic arrhythmias including atrial fibrillation (AF). Yet, whether this occurs in patients is unknown.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Leveraging a large cohort of consecutive patients with esophageal cancer treated with thoracic RT from 2007 to 2019, we assessed incidence and outcomes of incident AF. Secondary outcomes included major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), defined as AF, heart failure, ventricular arrhythmias, and sudden death, by cardiac RT dose. We also assessed the relationship between AF development and progression-free and overall survival. Observed incident AF rates were compared with Framingham predicted rates, and absolute excess risks were estimated. Multivariate regression was used to define the relationship between clinical and RT measures, and outcomes. Differences in outcomes, by AF status, were also evaluated via 30-day landmark analysis. Furthermore, we assessed the effect of cardiac substructure RT dose (eg, left atrium, LA) on the risk of post RT-related outcomes.

RESULTS

Overall, from 238 RT treated patients with esophageal cancer, 21.4% developed incident AF, and 33% developed MACE with the majority (84%) of events occurring ≤2 years of RT initiation (median time to AF, 4.1 months). Cumulative incidence of AF and MACE at 1 year was 19.5%, and 25.7%, respectively; translating into an observed incident AF rate of 824 per 10,000 person-years, compared with the Framingham predicted rate of 92 (relative risk, 8.96; P < .001, absolute excess risk 732). Increasing LA dose strongly associated with incident AF (P = .001); and those with AF saw worse disease progression (hazard ratio, 1.54; P = .03). In multivariate models, outside of traditional cancer-related factors, increasing RT dose to the LA remained associated with worse overall survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with esophageal cancer, radiation therapy increases AF risk, and associates with worse long-term outcomes.

Impact of pulmonary vein anatomy and left atrial size on postoperative atrial fibrillation after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to investigate the relationship between postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) after esophagectomy and pre-existing cardiac substrate.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 212 consecutive patients from between July 2010 and December 2022 who were scheduled to undergo esophagectomy for esophageal cancer without previous history of atrial fibrillation. All the patients underwent both echocardiography and contrast-enhanced multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT).

RESULTS

POAF occurred in 49 patients (23.1%). Multivariable logistic analysis demonstrated that independent predictors for POAF were age [OR; 1.06 (1.01-1.10), P < 0.01), three-field lymph node dissection [OR; 2.55 (1.25-5.23), P < 0.01), left atrial dilatation (> 35 mm) assessment by echocardiography [OR; 3.05 (1.49-6.25), P < 0.01) and common left pulmonary vein [OR; 3.03 (1.44-6.39), P < 0.01). The correlation coefficient was high for left atrial dimensions assessed by echocardiography and MDCT (r = 0.91, P < 0.01). Combination of left atrial dilatation by echocardiography and common left pulmonary vein had high odds ratio [OR; 8.10 (2.62-25.96), P < 0.01). Instead of echocardiographic assessment, combination of left atrial enlargement (> 35 mm) assessed by MDCT and common left pulmonary vein also showed high odds ratio for POAF [OR; 11.23 [2.19-57.63], P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Incidence of POAF after esophagectomy was related to both left atrial enlargement and common left pulmonary vein assessed by preoperative MDCT. Additional analysis of atrial size and pulmonary vein variation would facilitate preoperative assessment of the risk of POAF, but future studies must ascertain therapeutic strategy.

Risk factors for the development of postoperative atrial fibrillation after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer

Postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) is one of the most complications after esophagectomy. Thus, our study was conducted to explore risk factors that are associated with POAF following esophagectomy. In the current study, we retrospectively evaluated 511 patients with esophageal cancer who underwent esophagectomy at our center between May 2018 and December 2020. The incidence of POAF and clinical variables were collected and analyzed. POAF occurred in 62 (12.13%) of 511 patients. Increasing age (P = .004) and lower preoperative albumin level (P = .028) was significantly associated with POAF. The length of stay was significantly increased in patients with POAF when compared to patients without POAF (P = .003). Multivariate analysis suggested that age (odds ratio [OR] = 1.049, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.008-1.093, P = .020), hypertension (OR = 2.207, 95% CI = 1.221-3.987, P = .009), respiratory complications (OR = 2.015, 95% CI = 1.130-3.591, P = .018) and Ivor Lewis approach (OR = 3.001, 95% CI = 1.032-8.723, P = .044) were independent risk factors for POAF following esophagectomy. Increasing age, preoperative hypertension, respiratory complications and Ivor Lewis approach are independent risk factors for POAF after esophagectomy. POAF is associated with prolonged length of stay. This study suggests that older patients, patients with hypertension or patients underwent Ivor Lewis approach should be monitored more closely during the postoperative period.

Risk Factors and In-Hospital Outcomes of Perioperative Atrial Fibrillation for Patients with Cancer: A Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Perioperative atrial fibrillation is a common postoperative complication. Adverse consequences associated with POAF include hemodynamic instability, increased risk of stroke, extended hospital stays, and increased mortality.

METHODS

To determine the risk factors for POAF and to investigate the outcomes of POAF for patients with cancer, a systematic search of the PubMed and Cochrane Library databases was conducted from inception of the study to 1 September 2021. The inclusion criteria specified studies reporting the prevalence of POAF among patients with cancer. The study excluded articles not written in English, review articles, case reports, letters, commentaries, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and conference abstracts.

RESULTS

The search identified 49 studies with 201,081 patients, and the pooled prevalence of POAF was 13.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 11.6-15.7%). Meta-analyses showed that the incidence of POAF among patients with cancer was associated with age (mean difference [MD], 4.31; 95%CI, 3.16-5.47), male sex (odds ratio [OR], 1.39; 95% CI, 1.19-1.62), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (OR, 2.47; 95% CI, 1.71-3.56), hypertension (OR, 1.47; 95% CI, 1.23-1.75), intraoperative blood transfusion (OR, 4.58; 95% CI, 2.31-9.10), and open surgery (OR, 1.51; 95% CI, 1.26-1.81). Patients with POAF had significantly higher in-hospital mortality (OR, 4.25; 95% CI, 2.79-6.45), longer hospital stays (MD, 3.07; 95% CI, 1.63-4.51), and higher incidences of pneumonia (OR, 3.32; 95% CI, 2.85-3.86), stroke (OR, 6.57; 95% CI, 1.56-26.00), and myocardial infarction (OR, 3.00; 95% CI, 1.45-6.20) than those without POAF.

CONCLUSIONS

For patients with cancer, POAF is associated with an increased burden of comorbidities and worse outcomes.

Risk Factors for Chronic Atrial Fibrillation Development After Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer

BACKGROUND

This study investigates the prognosis of patients with postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF), aiming to elucidate predictors of occurrence of atrial fibrillation (AF) in the chronic phase after esophagectomy.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 415 consecutive patients between July 2010 and December 2021 who were scheduled to undergo esophagectomy for esophageal cancer and had no previous history of AF.

RESULTS

POAF occurred in 73 patients (18%). Their ages were higher than those without POAF (72 [66-77] vs 68 [62-75], P < 0.01). Three-field lymph node dissection was more frequent in patients with POAF (63% vs 50%, P = 0.04). Overall survival rates were not significantly different between those with and without POAF in patients with stage III/IV cancer (P = 0.37), but overall survival rate of patients with POAF was lower than in those without POAF in stage I/II cancer (P = 0.03). Seventeen patients (4.1%) had recurrence of AF or new onset 31 days after esophagectomy. POAF was the only independent predictor of AF development in the chronic phase (HR: 4.09, 95%CI: [1.42-11.74], P = 0.01). AF development in the chronic phase was observed in 8 patients (11.0%) with and 9 patients (2.6%) without POAF (P < 0.01). AF development rates were not significantly different in patients with stage III/IV cancer (P = 0.05), but there was significant difference in patients with stage I/II cancer (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

The occurrence of POAF after esophagectomy is related with future development of AF and overall survival prognosis. Future studies must ascertain optimal therapeutic strategy.

Atrial Fibrillation and Cancer Patients: Mechanisms and Management

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Cancer-related mortality has significantly declined over the past several decades as a result of improved screening, diagnostics, and therapeutics. Although cancer patients and survivors are living longer, there is increased risk of both short-term and long-term cardiovascular complications, including arrhythmia. In this review, we highlight the current evidence detailing the connections between atrial fibrillation and cancer, provide insight into the mechanisms driving this relationship, and share practical considerations for the management of atrial fibrillation in cancer patients and cancer survivors.

RECENT FINDINGS

Atrial fibrillation is an increasingly recognized condition among cancer patients, with epidemiological data showing increased incidence and worse outcomes in patients with cancer. Studies also describe a bidirectional relationship between cancer and atrial fibrillation, attributable in part to shared risk factors but also potentially due to shared biology. Cancer treatment-associated arrhythmia is an active area of investigation, with ongoing research to identify the mechanisms and pathophysiology behind this phenomenon. Furthermore, management of atrial fibrillation in patients with cancer presents unique challenges, particularly in management of anti-coagulation. Cancer patients have increased risk of developing atrial fibrillation due to the shared risk factors and biology of the two conditions. Moreover, various cancer therapeutics are known to be arrhythmogenic; however, mechanisms remain unclear. Further research is needed to better understand the pathophysiology of atrial fibrillation in cancer patient in order to establish prevention and treatment strategies specific to this population.