1
|
Chalfant H, Bonds M, Scott K, Condacse A, Dennahy IS, Martin WT, Little C, Edil BH, McNally LR, Jain A. Innovative Imaging Techniques Used to Evaluate Borderline-Resectable Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma. J Surg Res 2023; 284:42-53. [PMID: 36535118 PMCID: PMC10131671 DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2022.10.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2022] [Revised: 09/15/2022] [Accepted: 10/11/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
A diagnosis of pancreatic cancer carries a 5-y survival rate of less than 10%. Furthermore, the detection of pancreatic cancer occurs most often in later stages of the disease due to its location in the retroperitoneum and lack of symptoms (in most cases) until tumors become more advanced. Once diagnosed, cross-sectional imaging techniques are heavily utilized to determine the tumor stage and the potential for surgical resection. However, a major determinant of resectability is the extent of local vascular involvement of the mesenteric vessels and critical tributaries; current imaging techniques have limited capacity to accurately determine vascular involvement. Surrounding inflammation and fibrosis can be difficult to discriminate from viable tumor, making determination of the degree of vascular involvement unreliable. New innovations in fluorescence and optoacoustic imaging techniques may overcome these limitations and make determination of resectability more accurate. These imaging modalities are able to more clearly discern between viable tumor tissue and non-neoplastic inflammation or desmoplasia, allowing clinicians to more reliably characterize vascular involvement and develop individualized treatment plans for patients. This review will discuss the current imaging techniques used to diagnose pancreatic cancer, the barriers that current techniques raise to accurate staging, and novel fluorescence and optoacoustic imaging techniques that may provide more accurate clinical staging of pancreatic cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hunter Chalfant
- Department of Surgery, University of Oklahoma Health Science Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
| | - Morgan Bonds
- Department of Surgery, University of Oklahoma Health Science Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
| | - Kristina Scott
- Department of Surgery, University of Oklahoma Health Science Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
| | - Anna Condacse
- Department of Surgery, University of Oklahoma Health Science Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
| | - Isabel S Dennahy
- Department of Surgery, University of Oklahoma Health Science Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
| | - W Taylor Martin
- Department of Surgery, University of Oklahoma Health Science Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
| | - Cooper Little
- Department of Surgery, University of Oklahoma Health Science Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
| | - Barish H Edil
- Department of Surgery, University of Oklahoma Health Science Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
| | - Lacey R McNally
- Department of Surgery, University of Oklahoma Health Science Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma.
| | - Ajay Jain
- Department of Surgery, University of Oklahoma Health Science Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Magnetic Fields and Cancer: Epidemiology, Cellular Biology, and Theranostics. Int J Mol Sci 2022; 23:ijms23031339. [PMID: 35163262 PMCID: PMC8835851 DOI: 10.3390/ijms23031339] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2021] [Revised: 01/22/2022] [Accepted: 01/22/2022] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Humans are exposed to a complex mix of man-made electric and magnetic fields (MFs) at many different frequencies, at home and at work. Epidemiological studies indicate that there is a positive relationship between residential/domestic and occupational exposure to extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields and some types of cancer, although some other studies indicate no relationship. In this review, after an introduction on the MF definition and a description of natural/anthropogenic sources, the epidemiology of residential/domestic and occupational exposure to MFs and cancer is reviewed, with reference to leukemia, brain, and breast cancer. The in vivo and in vitro effects of MFs on cancer are reviewed considering both human and animal cells, with particular reference to the involvement of reactive oxygen species (ROS). MF application on cancer diagnostic and therapy (theranostic) are also reviewed by describing the use of different magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) applications for the detection of several cancers. Finally, the use of magnetic nanoparticles is described in terms of treatment of cancer by nanomedical applications for the precise delivery of anticancer drugs, nanosurgery by magnetomechanic methods, and selective killing of cancer cells by magnetic hyperthermia. The supplementary tables provide quantitative data and methodologies in epidemiological and cell biology studies. Although scientists do not generally agree that there is a cause-effect relationship between exposure to MF and cancer, MFs might not be the direct cause of cancer but may contribute to produce ROS and generate oxidative stress, which could trigger or enhance the expression of oncogenes.
Collapse
|
3
|
PET imaging of pancreatic cancer. Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-822960-6.00207-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
|