Writing the paper “Unveiling artificial intelligence: an insight into ethics and applications in anesthesia” implementing the large language model ChatGPT: a qualitative study

Between human and AI: assessing the reliability of AI text detection tools

OBJECTIVE

Large language models (LLMs) such as ChatGPT-4 have raised critical questions regarding their distinguishability from human-generated content. In this research, we evaluated the effectiveness of online detection tools in identifying ChatGPT-4 vs human-written text.

METHODS

A two texts produced by ChatGPT-4 using differing prompts and one text created by a human author were analytically assessed using the following online detection tools: GPTZero, ZeroGPT, Writer ACD, and Originality.

RESULTS

The findings revealed a notable variance in the detection capabilities of the employed detection tools. GPTZero and ZeroGPT exhibited inconsistent assessments regarding the AI-origin of the texts. Writer ACD predominantly identified texts as human-written, whereas Originality consistently recognized the AI-generated content in both samples from ChatGPT-4. This highlights Originality's enhanced sensitivity to patterns characteristic of AI-generated text.

CONCLUSION

The study demonstrates that while automatic detection tools may discern texts generated by ChatGPT-4 significant variability exists in their accuracy. Undoubtedly, there is an urgent need for advanced detection tools to ensure the authenticity and integrity of content, especially in scientific and academic research. However, our findings underscore an urgent need for more refined detection methodologies to prevent the misdetection of human-written content as AI-generated and vice versa.

ChatGPT utilization within the building blocks of the healthcare services: A mixed-methods study

Introduction

ChatGPT, as an AI tool, has been introduced in healthcare for various purposes. The objective of the study was to investigate the principal benefits of ChatGPT utilization in healthcare services and to identify potential domains for its expansion within the building blocks of the healthcare industry.

Methods

A comprehensive three-phase study was conducted employing mixed methods. The initial phase comprised a systematic review and thematic analysis of the data. In the subsequent phases, a questionnaire, developed based on the findings from the first phase, was distributed to a sample of eight experts. The objective was to prioritize the benefits and potential expansion domains of ChatGPT in healthcare building blocks, utilizing gray SWARA (Stepwise Weight Assessment Ratio Analysis) and gray MABAC (Multi-Attributive Border Approximation Area Comparison), respectively.

Results

The systematic review yielded 74 studies. A thematic analysis of the data from these studies identified 11 unique themes. In the second phase, employing the gray SWARA method, clinical decision-making (weight: 0.135), medical diagnosis (weight: 0.098), medical procedures (weight: 0.070), and patient-centered care (weight: 0.053) emerged as the most significant benefit of ChatGPT in the healthcare sector. Subsequently, it was determined that ChatGPT demonstrated the highest level of usefulness in the information and infrastructure, information and communication technologies blocks.

Conclusion

The study concluded that, despite the significant benefits of ChatGPT in the clinical domains of healthcare, it exhibits a more pronounced potential for growth within the informational domains of the healthcare industry's building blocks, rather than within the domains of intervention and clinical services.