Technological aids in uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery

Efficacy of uniportal versus multiportal video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer: A retrospective analysis

Objective

To compare the uniportal and multiportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Methods

Medical records of 128 patients with NSCLC who underwent surgical treatment in the First School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University from August 2020 to February 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. There were 60 patients who underwent uniportal VATS (UVATS group) and 68 patients underwent multiportal VATS (MVATS group). The relevant indexes, complications, postoperative pain levels and quality of life, recurrence, metastases and survival between the two groups were compared.

Results

UVATS was associated with longer operation time and higher intraoperative blood loss compared to MVATS (P<0.05). The postoperative drainage volume, and the visual analogue scale (VAS) scores at 24 and 72 hours were lower in the UVATS group compared to the MVATS group, while the chest tube retention time and hospitalization time were shorter than those in the MVATS group (P<0.05). The quality of life at six months after surgery in the UVATS group was significantly higher than that in the MVATS group (P<0.05).

Conclusions

UVATS and MVATS have similar outcomes in patients with NSCLC. Although UVATS surgery takes longer and is associated with more interoperative bleeding, it can reduce postoperative pain, shorten postoperative recovery time, and help further improve the quality of life of patients after surgery.

Comparative clinical experience of subcostal VATS versus conventional uniportal lateral VATS approach

INTRODUCTION

The present study reports the first clinical experience with subcostal uniportal VATS (suVATS) compared with the conventional lateral uniportal VATS (luVATS) approach.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

All patients who underwent suVATS between January 2019 and April 2020 were included. Patients who had undergone luVATS for similar indications were included as the control group. The data were prospectively and retrospectively analysed.

RESULTS

The suVATS group included 38 patients with a mean age of 61 (30-83) years. The luVATS group included 33 patients (mean age, 69 years; range: 46-89 years). An intercostal block was performed intraoperatively in the luVATS group. Local infiltration under anaesthesia was performed around the incision in the suVATS group. The duration of the surgery was significantly longer in the suVATS group. However, the chest tube treatment and hospital stay duration were significantly shorter in the suVATS group. The routinely recorded Visual Analogue Scale scores on the first post-operative day and the day of discharge were significantly lower in the suVATS group.

CONCLUSION

Subcostal uniportal VATS enables a shorter drainage treatment duration and hospital stay and significantly reduces post-operative pain. Thus, a faster patient recovery can be achieved.