Thymic minimally invasive surgery: state of the art across the world-Europe

Short-term and sustained clinical response following thymectomy in patients with myasthenia gravis

OBJECTIVE

To investigate short- and long-term outcome following thymectomy in patients with acetylcholine-receptor-antibody (AchR-Ab) positive myasthenia gravis (MG).

METHODS

Rates of clinical response (defined as minimal manifestation, pharmacological or complete stable remission) lasting for at least one year were retrospectively analyzed using Cox proportional hazard models. The occurrence of relapses was recorded during follow-up. Clinical factors associated with achieving an initial or a sustained response were analyzed.

RESULTS

94 patients with a median age of 33 years (IQR 22-51), 68% with non-thymomatous MG and 32% with thymoma-associated MG were included. An initial clinical response was reached in 72% (68/94). Neither sex, age at onset, thymus histology, delay to surgery after disease onset, surgical approach, corticosteroid treatment nor clinical severity before thymectomy were significantly associated with achieving this endpoint. During long-term follow-up (median 89.5 months; IQR 46-189.5) only half of the patients with an initial response (34/68) had a sustained response without relapses. No clinical factors predicted if the response would become sustained. In patients without immunosuppressive treatment before thymectomy (n=24), a high AChR-Ab levels reduction rate after thymectomy was associated with a higher likelihood of achieving an initial response (p=0.03).

CONCLUSION

Sustained long-term clinical response of MG patients after thymectomy is significantly lower than the initial response rates would suggest. The observation that none of the evaluated clinical factors was associated with a worse outcome supports the current clinical practice of patient selection for thymectomy. The relative decline of AchR-antibodies after surgery appears to be a promising prognostic marker.

Validation of Training and Acquisition of Surgical Skills in Veterinary Laparoscopic Surgery: A Review

At present, veterinary laparoscopic surgery training is lacking in experiences that provide a controlled and safe environment where surgeons can practice specific techniques while receiving experts' feedback. Surgical skills acquired using simulators must be certified and transferable to the operating room. Most models for practicing laparoscopic skills in veterinary minimally invasive surgery are general task trainers and consist of boxes (simulators) designed for training human surgery. These simulators exhibit several limitations, including anatomic species and procedural differences, as well as general psychomotor training rather than in vivo skill recreation. In this paper, we review the existing methods of training, evaluation, and validation of technical skills in veterinary laparoscopic surgery. Content includes global and specific scales, and the conditions a structured curriculum should meet for improving the performance of novice surgeons during and after training. A focus on trainee-specific assessment and tailored-technical instruction should influence training programs. We provide a comprehensive analysis of current theories and concepts related to the evaluation and validation of simulators for training laparoscopic surgery in small animal surgery. We also highlight the need to develop new training models and complementary evaluation scales for the validation of training and acquisition of basic and advanced skills in veterinary laparoscopic surgery.