The evidence in a Bentall procedure with Valsalva graft: is this standard of care?

Modified Bentall procedure: A 15-year single-center clinical experience

OBJECTIVE

Bentall procedure is a standard technique for complete aortic root replacement but a huge challenge is postoperative bleeding. Many modifications have been proposed and the "button technique" is commonly used. With a 15-year experience, this study was to evaluate outcomes of this modified Bentall procedure.

METHODS

A retrospective study was performed with all patients who underwent the Bentall procedure with a button technique between 2005 and 2020. Commercially available composite grafts were used in 38 patients and self-assembled composite graft was used in 74 patients. Safety outcome was postoperative complications and long-term outcomes included overall and reoperation-free survivals.

RESULTS

Among 112 patients, the mean age was 46.3 years and 69.6% were men. Indications for the Bentall procedure were ascending aortic aneurysm and valve regurgitation (59.8%), aortic dissection (19.6%), Marfan syndrome (17%), and endocarditis (3.6%). Three patients (2.7%) died in hospital. During a median follow-up period of 42 months, 11 patients died and 7 patients required reoperation. Overall survival and reoperation-free survival were 86.1% and 83.4% at 5 years and 86.1% and 72.6% at 10 years, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The Bentall procedure with a button technique is safe and effective for aortic root replacement. Further investigations are required to improve the feasibility and effectiveness of the procedure.

Mid-term single-center outcomes of BioIntegral compared to Freestyle aortic conduit implantation

BACKGROUND

Full aortic root replacement with biological conduit has limited options. This non-randomized cohort study aims to compare mid-term clinical and hemodynamic results of the BioIntegral (BI) composite biological versus the stentless Freestyle (FS) conduits in patients undergoing full aortic root replacement.

METHODS

From February 2013 to July 2017, 265 patients underwent aortic root replacement at a single institution (202 BI, 65 FS). Preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative parameters, complications including stroke, myocardial infarction (MI), endocarditis and reoperation were studied. Hemodynamic performance of both conduits was analyzed by echocardiography. Target endpoints were 30-day mortality, two-year survival, two-year freedom from major adverse valve-related and cardiovascular events.

RESULTS

Wider BI conduits were used (BI 27±2 vs. FS 25±2 mm, P<0.0001). The BI group had shorter cardiopulmonary bypass (BI 165±67 vs. FS 200±78 min, P<0.0001) and cross-clamp (BI 102±36 vs. FS 122±40 min, P=0.001) times. Thirty-day mortality was similar in both groups. There were fewer conduit-related reoperations in the BI group (BI 0% vs. FS 3%, P=0.012) but higher postoperative atrial fibrillation (BI 31% vs. FS 17%, P=0.025). No significant differences were observed for stroke (BI 5% vs. FS 10%, P=0.947), MI (BI 3% vs. FS 4%, P=0.583), or infective endocarditis (BI 0% vs. FS 2%, P=0.077). No significant hemodynamic differences were evident on follow-up echocardiography while an improved overall survival trend was seen in the BI group (P=0.062).

CONCLUSIONS

FS and BI provide comparable clinical mid-term results and hemodynamic parameters. Simplified implantation technique providing shorter cardiopulmonary bypass and operation times are advantageous for BI.

In vitro evaluation of a new aortic valved conduit

BACKGROUND

This study examined whether the presence of a sinus of Valsalva equivalent in the KONECT RESILIA aortic valved conduit (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, Calif) improves valve hemodynamics, kinematics, and performance.

METHODS

A 28-mm KONECT RESILIA aortic valved conduit was used to create an in vitro flow test model, and the same aortic valved conduit model without a sinus section was used as a control. Particle image velocimetry and hydrodynamic characterization experiments were conducted in the vicinity of the valves in a validated left-heart simulator at 3 cardiac output levels. In addition, leaflet kinematics of the valves were determined through en face high-speed imaging.

RESULTS

The KONECT RESILIA aortic valved conduit model exhibited lower mean and peak transvalvular pressure gradients than the control model at all 3 cardiac outputs. In addition, its leaflets opened more fully than did those of the valved conduit without the sinuses, yielding greater effective and geometric orifice areas. It was found that the presence of the sinuses not only facilitated the development of larger and more stable vortices at the initial stages of the cardiac cycle but also helped to maintain these vortices during the late stages of the cardiac cycle, leading to smoother valve closure.

CONCLUSIONS

The KONECT RESILIA aortic valved conduit reproduces the bulged section of the aortic root corresponding to the sinuses of Valsalva. With this Valsalva-type conduit, larger orifice areas were observed, improving valve hemodynamics that may enhance performance.