Implications for diagnosis and treatment of peri-spinal implant infections from experiences in periprosthetic joint infections-a literature comparison and review

Clinical Trial for the Safety and Feasibility of Pedicle Screws Coated with a Fibroblast Growth Factor-2-Apatite Composite Layer for Posterior Cervical Fusion Surgery

To solve the instrument loosening problem, we developed a fibroblast growth factor-2-calcium phosphate composite layer as a novel coating material to improve screw fixation strength. The primary aim of the present study was to demonstrate the safety and feasibility of screws coated with the FGF-2-calcium phosphate composite layer for posterior instrumented surgery of the cervical spine. The trial design was a single-arm, open-label, safety and feasibility study. Patients receiving fusion of the cervical spine from C2 (or C3) to C7 (or T1) were recruited. The primary endpoint to confirm safety was any screw-related adverse events. Seven patients who underwent posterior fusion surgery of the cervical spine were enrolled in the present study. The coated pedicle screws were inserted bilaterally into the lowest instrumented vertebrae. There was only one severe adverse event unrelated with the coated screw. Three out of the fourteen coated screws showed loosening. The present results prove the safety and feasibility of pedicle screws coated with the FGF-2-calcium phosphate composite layer for fusion surgery in the cervical spine. This is the first step to apply this novel surface coating in the field of spine surgery.

Does Postoperative Spine Infection Bacterial Gram Type Affect Surgical Debridement or Antibiotic Duration?

STUDY DESIGN

This is a retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE

The aim was to evaluate differences in readmission rates, number of debridements, and length of antibiotic therapy when comparing bacterial gram type following lumbar spinal fusion infections.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Surgical site infections (SSIs) after spinal fusion serve as a significant source of patient morbidity. It remains to be elucidated how bacterial classification of the infecting organism affects the management of postoperative spinal SSI.

METHODS

Patients who underwent spinal fusion with a subsequent diagnosis of SSI between 2013 and 2019 were retrospectively identified. Patients were grouped based on bacterial infection type (gram-positive, gram-negative, or mixed infections). Poisson regressions analyzed the relationship between the type of bacterial infection and the number of irrigation and debridement (I&D) reoperations, and the duration of intravenous (IV) antibiotic therapy. Significance was set at P <0.05.

RESULTS

Of 190 patients, 92 had gram-positive (G+) infections, 57 had gram-negative (G-) infections, and 33 had mixed (M) infections. There was no difference in 30 or 90-day readmissions for infection between groups (both P =0.051). Patients in the M group had longer durations of IV antibiotic treatment (G+: 46.4 vs. G-: 41.0 vs. M: 55.9 d, P =0.002). Regression analysis demonstrated mixed infections were 46% more likely to require a greater number of debridements ( P =0.001) and 18% more likely to require an increased duration of IV antibiotic therapy ( P <0.001), while gram-negative infections were 10% less likely to require an increased duration of IV antibiotic therapy ( P <0.001) when compared with G- infections.

CONCLUSION

Spinal SSI due to a mixed bacterial gram type results in an increased number of debridements and a longer duration of IV antibiotics required to resolve the infection compared with gram-negative or gram-positive infections.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Postoperative Spinal Implant Infections (PSII)-A Systematic Review: What Do We Know So Far and What is Critical About It?

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review.

OBJECTIVES

Postoperative spinal implant infections (PSII) are an increasing challenge in the daily clinical routine. This review summarizes existing knowledge in the field of PSII, including definitions, epidemiology, classifications, risk factors, pathogenesis, symptoms, diagnosis, and treatment.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed using a structured PubMed analysis, based on the PRISMA criteria. The search terminology was set as: "spinal implant associated infection OR spinal implant infection OR spinal instrumentation infection OR peri spinal implant infection." PubMed search was limited to the categories randomized controlled trials (RCT), clinical trials, meta-analysis and (systematic) reviews, whereas case reports were excluded. Studies from January 2000 to December 2020 were considered eligible. A total of 572 studies were identified, 82 references included for qualitative synthesis, and 19 for detailed sub analysis (12 meta-analysis, 7 prospective RCT).

RESULTS

Structural problems in the field of PSII were revealed, including (1) limited level of evidence in clinical studies (missing prospective RCT, metanalyzes), (2) small patient numbers, (3) missing standardized definitions, (4) heterogeneity in patient groups, and (5) redundancy in cited literature.

CONCLUSION

Evidence-based knowledge about spinal implant-associated infections is lacking. All involved medical fields should come together to define the term PSII and to combine their approaches toward research, training, and patient care.