1
|
Chiu AK, Amatya B, Amin I, Ratanpal AS, Lutz AB, Shear BM, Ye IB, Fencel R, Bivona LJ, Koh EY, Jauregui JJ, Ludwig SC, Cavanaugh DL. Superinfections of the Spine: A Single-Institution Experience. J Clin Med 2024; 13:2739. [PMID: 38792281 PMCID: PMC11122442 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13102739] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2024] [Revised: 04/23/2024] [Accepted: 04/30/2024] [Indexed: 05/26/2024] Open
Abstract
Background/Objectives: A superinfection occurs when a new, secondary organism colonizes an existing infection. Spine infections are associated with high patient morbidity and sometimes require multiple irrigations and debridements (I&Ds). When multiple I&Ds are required, the risk of complications increases. The purpose of this study was to report our experience with spine superinfections and determine which patients are typically affected. Methods: A retrospective case series of spine superinfections and a retrospective case-control analysis were conducted. Data were collected manually from electronic medical records. Spine I&Ds were identified. Groups were created for patients who had multiple I&Ds for (1) a recurrence of the same causative organism or (2) a superinfection with a novel organism. Preoperative demographic, clinical, and microbiologic data were compared between these two outcomes. A case series of superinfections with descriptive data was constructed. Lastly, two illustrative cases were provided in a narrative format. Results: A total of 92 patients were included in this analysis. Superinfections occurred after 6 out of the 92 (7%) initial I&Ds and were responsible for 6 out of the 24 (25%) repeat I&Ds. The preoperative erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C-reactive protein (CRP) of the patients with a superinfection were significantly lower than those in the control group (p = 0.022 and p = 0.032). Otherwise, the observed differences in the preoperative variables were not statistically different. In the six cases of superinfection, the presence of high-risk comorbidities, a history of substance abuse, or a lack of social support were commonly observed. The superinfecting organisms included Candida, Pseudomonas, Serratia, Klebsiella, Enterobacter, and Staphylococcus species. Conclusions: Superinfections are a devastating complication requiring reoperation after initial spine I&D. Awareness of the possibility of superinfection and common patient archetypes can be helpful for clinicians and care teams. Future work is needed to examine how to identify, help predict, and prevent spine superinfections.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Steven C. Ludwig
- Department of Orthopaedics, University of Maryland School of Medicine, 110 S. Paca Street, 6th Floor Suite 300, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Putzier M, Koehli P, Khakzad T. [Surgical treatment of high-grade spondylolisthesis]. OPERATIVE ORTHOPADIE UND TRAUMATOLOGIE 2024; 36:43-55. [PMID: 37815580 DOI: 10.1007/s00064-023-00830-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2022] [Revised: 02/21/2023] [Accepted: 03/02/2023] [Indexed: 10/11/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Establishment of a physiological profile of the spine via reduction of the kyphotic slipped vertebra in the transverse and sagittal planes. Achieving solid fusion. Improvement of preoperative pain symptoms and prevention or elimination of neurological deficits. INDICATIONS High-grade spondylolisthesis (Meyerding grade 3 and 4) as well as spondyloptosis after conservative treatment and corresponding symptoms. Serious neurological deficits, hip-lumbar extensor stiffness, are emergency indications. CONTRAINDICATIONS (CI) Individual risk assessment must be made. Absolute CI are infections with the exception of serious neurological deficits. Multiple abdominal operations or interventions on the large vessels can be a relative contraindication for ventral intervention. SURGICAL TECHNIQUE For spondylolistheses of grade 3 according to Meyerding, we recommend a one-stage dorso-ventro-dorsal procedure with radicular decompression, correction and fusion in the index segment. From grade 4 according to Meyerding, reduction of the fifth lumbar vertebral body in the index segment L5/S1 is preceded by resection of the sacral dome. In cases of spondyloptosis, a two-stage procedure is often indicated. In this case, a screw-rod system spanning the index segment is implanted in the first step, which is used to distract the index segment for several days. Ventrodorsal reduction is performed in the second step. POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT Axis-appropriate full mobilization from postoperative day 1. We recommend a light diet until the first defecation. Dorsal suture removal after 12 days if the wound is dry and free of irritation. Lifting and carrying heavy loads and also competitive or contact sports should be avoided for 12 weeks. RESULTS From January 2000 to December 2020, a total of 43 patients with high-grade spondylolisthesis were treated in our clinic in the manner described. The Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) improved significantly during the observation period of 3 months and 1 year. The 1‑year radiological data in 28 of the 36 patients showed complete reduction of the slipped vertebra, in 6 grade 1, and in 2 patients grade 2 according to Meyerding. Also, the kyphosis of the index vertebra was significantly corrected from a mean of 15° (0-52°) preoperatively to a lordotic profile of a mean of 4° (0-11°). No complications requiring revision were observed. One patient with preoperative cauda equina syndrome was left with right radicular sensorimotor S1 syndrome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Putzier
- Abteilung für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie, Centrum für Muskuloskeletale Chirurgie, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Luisenstr. 64, 10117, Berlin, Deutschland.
| | - P Koehli
- Abteilung für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie, Centrum für Muskuloskeletale Chirurgie, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Luisenstr. 64, 10117, Berlin, Deutschland
| | - T Khakzad
- Abteilung für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie, Centrum für Muskuloskeletale Chirurgie, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Luisenstr. 64, 10117, Berlin, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Haddad N, Ajaz J, Mansour L, Kasemodel R, Jarvis J, Jarad J, Gorski H, Carr M. A Review of the Clinical Utilization of Oral Antibacterial Therapy in the Treatment of Bone Infections in Adults. Antibiotics (Basel) 2023; 13:4. [PMID: 38275315 PMCID: PMC10812599 DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics13010004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2023] [Revised: 12/12/2023] [Accepted: 12/14/2023] [Indexed: 01/27/2024] Open
Abstract
Chronic osteomyelitis in adults is managed with prolonged courses of intravenous antibiotics in conjunction with surgical debridement of necrotic bone. Over the past 40 years, there has been no paradigm shift in this approach, as randomized controlled trials of this standard of care compared to alternatives such as prolonged oral antibiotics are scarce. However, there have been many small trials, case reports, and review papers evaluating the effectiveness of oral treatment for chronic osteomyelitis. The oral route for infections requiring prolonged treatment is intuitively and practically more favorable due to several advantages, the most important of which is the avoidance of long-term IV antimicrobial therapy with its complications, inconvenience, and cost. In this paper, we review the literature evaluating oral antibiotic therapy in the management of chronic bone infections since 1975. The majority of osteomyelitis infections are caused by Staphylococcus aureus, hence we focus on its treatment using oral antibiotics; however, we also emphasize subpopulations of patients with diabetes, implanted hardware, and with less common bacterial organisms. The primary objective of this review is to promulgate clinical recommendations on the use of oral antibiotics in bone infections in the context of initial therapy, transition from intravenous therapy, and the role of chronic suppression. The secondary objective is to summarize current knowledge of the specific oral antimicrobial agents that are commonly utilized, together with a synopsis of the available literature pertaining to their pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic properties and duration of therapy in bone infection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas Haddad
- College of Medicine, Central Michigan University, 1632 Stone St., Saginaw, MI 48603, USA
- CMU Medical Education Partners, Internal Medicine Residency Program, Central Michigan University, 1000 Houghton Ave., Saginaw, MI 48602, USA; (J.A.); (R.K.); (J.J.)
| | - Jibran Ajaz
- CMU Medical Education Partners, Internal Medicine Residency Program, Central Michigan University, 1000 Houghton Ave., Saginaw, MI 48602, USA; (J.A.); (R.K.); (J.J.)
| | - Lina Mansour
- Covenant HealthCare, 1447 N. Harrison St., Saginaw, MI 48602, USA; (L.M.); (M.C.)
| | - Robert Kasemodel
- CMU Medical Education Partners, Internal Medicine Residency Program, Central Michigan University, 1000 Houghton Ave., Saginaw, MI 48602, USA; (J.A.); (R.K.); (J.J.)
| | - Jennifer Jarvis
- Ascension St. Mary’s Hospital, 800 S. Washington Ave., Saginaw, MI 48601, USA;
| | - John Jarad
- CMU Medical Education Partners, Internal Medicine Residency Program, Central Michigan University, 1000 Houghton Ave., Saginaw, MI 48602, USA; (J.A.); (R.K.); (J.J.)
| | - Haley Gorski
- McLaren Bay Region, 1900 Columbus Ave., Bay City, MI 48708, USA;
| | - Maddie Carr
- Covenant HealthCare, 1447 N. Harrison St., Saginaw, MI 48602, USA; (L.M.); (M.C.)
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Pluemer J, Freyvert Y, Pratt N, Robinson JE, Cooke JA, Tataryn ZL, Godolias P, Daher ZA, Oskouian RJ, Chapman JR. An Assessment of the Safety of Surgery and Hardware Placement in de-novo Spinal Infections. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Literature. Global Spine J 2023; 13:1418-1428. [PMID: 36510352 PMCID: PMC10416600 DOI: 10.1177/21925682221145603] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Primary objectives were outcomes comparison of instrumented surgery used for de-novo spinal infections in terms of infection recurrence, reoperations, primary failure, mortality, and length of stay relative to non-instrumented surgery. Secondary objectives were outcomes for surgical and non-surgical treatment of de-novo spinal infections regarding recurrence of infection, mortality, quality of life, and length-of-stay. METHODS A systematic literature review was performed using the PubMed database. Studies comparing outcome variables of patients with de-novo spinal infections (DNSI) treated with and without instrumentation and surgical versus non-surgical treatment were included. Studies primarily focusing on epidural abscesses or non-de-novo infections were excluded. A meta-analysis was performed for infection recurrence, reoperation, primary treatment failure, mortality, and quality-of-life parameters. RESULTS A total of 17 retrospective studies with 2.069 patients met the inclusion criteria. 1.378 patients received surgical treatment with or without instrumentation; 676 patients were treated non-surgically. For the comparison of instrumented to non-instrumented surgery Odds-Ratios were .98 (P = .95) for infection recurrence, .83 (P = .92) for primary failure, .53 (P = .02) for mortality and .32 (P = .05) for reoperation. For the comparison of non-surgical to surgical treatment, Odds-Ratios were .98 (P = .95) for infection recurrence, and 1.05 (P = .89) for mortality. CONCLUSION Available data support that instrumented surgery can be performed safely without higher rates of infection recurrence or primary failure and lower reoperation and mortality rates compared to nonsurgical treatment for DNSI. Furthermore, spine surgical treatment may generally be performed without higher risk of infection recurrence and mortality and better quality-of-life outcomes compared to generic non-surgical treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan Pluemer
- Swedish Neuroscience Institute, Swedish Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA
- Seattle Science Foundation, Seattle, WA, USA
- Department of Trauma Surgery, BG University Hospital Bergmannsheil, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - Yevgeniy Freyvert
- Swedish Neuroscience Institute, Swedish Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA
- Seattle Science Foundation, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Nathan Pratt
- Swedish Neuroscience Institute, Swedish Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA
- Seattle Science Foundation, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Jerry E Robinson
- Swedish Neuroscience Institute, Swedish Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA
- Seattle Science Foundation, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Jared A Cooke
- Swedish Neuroscience Institute, Swedish Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA
- Seattle Science Foundation, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Zachary L Tataryn
- Swedish Neuroscience Institute, Swedish Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA
- Seattle Science Foundation, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Periklis Godolias
- Swedish Neuroscience Institute, Swedish Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA
- Seattle Science Foundation, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Zeyad A Daher
- Swedish Neuroscience Institute, Swedish Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Rod J. Oskouian
- Swedish Neuroscience Institute, Swedish Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA
- Seattle Science Foundation, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Jens R. Chapman
- Swedish Neuroscience Institute, Swedish Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA
- Seattle Science Foundation, Seattle, WA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Prost M, Röckner ME, Flüh G, Windolf J, Konieczny MR. Surgical Site Infection After Posterior Stabilization of the Spine - When do we Have to Remove the Implants? Clin Spine Surg 2023; 36:E135-E138. [PMID: 36097338 DOI: 10.1097/bsd.0000000000001388] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2022] [Accepted: 08/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Retrospective data analysis. OBJECTION The primary objective of this investigation was to analyze if treatment of Postoperative surgical site infections (PSSI) after posterior stabilization of the spine (PS) without radiological signs of screw loosening (RSL) shows a sufficient success rate without implant removal and if there was any difference between early and late PSSI. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA PSSI after PS are usually treated by implant removal and reinstrumentation if loosening of one of more screws is detected. There is presently no conclusive data that shows the success rate of the treatment of PSSI after PS without implant removal if no RSL are perceived. MATERIALS AND METHODS All patients who were treated for a PSSI after PS without RSL in a single spine center from 12/2009 to 03/2020 were enrolled in a retrospective analysis. Patients were treated by revision surgery with debridement and irrigation and subsequent antibiotic therapy. Implant removal was performed if the initial treatment did not lead to an improvement in wound healing and normalization of laboratory values. Statistical analysis was performed by Statistical Package for the Social Sciences 25. Descriptive data are given as mean and standard error of mean, a χ 2 test was performed. RESULTS Of the 32 enrolled patients, 17 had an early PSSI, 15 a late PSSI. In 71.9% (23/32), the PSSI was treated without implant removal: 12/17 in early PSSI, 11/15 in late PSSI. The difference was not significant ( P >0.05). One patient died, all other patients were discharged from the hospital with no remaining laboratory signs of the infection and with closed soft tissues. CONCLUSIONS In our group of patients, the success rate of irrigation and debridement without implant removal was 71.9%. In the light of this data, performing at least two irrigations and debridement before implant removal seems to be a valid treatment option in PSSI after PS if there are no RSL in early and late PSSI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Max Prost
- Department of Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Melanie Elisabeth Röckner
- Department of Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Greta Flüh
- Institute of Medical Microbiology and Hospital Hygiene, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Germany
- Labor Dr. Wisplinghoff, Cologne, Germany
| | - Joachim Windolf
- Department of Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Markus Rafael Konieczny
- Department of Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Germany
- ATOS Viktoriaklinik, Bochum, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Garcia DR, Vishwanath N, Minnah A, Allu S, Whitaker CD, Stone BK, Berns EM, Spake CSL, Dockery DM, Barrett CC, Mette M, Connolly W, Clippert D, Antoci V, Born CT. Silver Carboxylate-Eluting Titanium-Dioxide Polydimethylsiloxane Coating Inhibits Multi-Drug-Resistant Acinetobacterium baumannii and Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcus faecalis Adherence and Proliferation on Orthopedic Trauma Fixation and Spinal Fusion Materials. Surg Infect (Larchmt) 2022; 23:924-932. [PMID: 36413347 DOI: 10.1089/sur.2022.279] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecalis and multi-drug-resistant (MDR) Acinetobacter baumannii are rising contributors to spinal fusion and fracture-associated infections (FAI), respectively. These MDR bacteria can form protective biofilms, complicating traditional antibiotic treatment. This study explores the effects of the antibiotic-independent antimicrobial silver carboxylate (AgCar)-doped coating on the adherence sand proliferation of these pathogens on orthopedic implant materials utilized in spinal fusion and orthopedic trauma fixation. Methods: Multi-drug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecalis were inoculated on five common implant materials: cobalt chromium, titanium, titanium alloy, polyether ether ketone, and stainless steel. Dose response curves were generated to assess antimicrobial potency. Scanning electron microscopy and confocal laser scanning microscopy were utilized to characterize and quantify growth and adherence on each material. Results: The optimal AgCar concentration was a 95% titanium dioxide (TiO2)-5% polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) matrix combined with 10 × silver carboxylate, which inhibited bacterial proliferation by 89.40% (p = 0.001) for MDR Acinetobacter baumannii and 84.02% (p = 0.001) for vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecalis compared with uncoated implants. A 95% TiO2-5% PDMS matrix combined with 10 × AgCar was equally effective at inhibiting bacterial proliferation across all implant materials for MDR Acinetobacter baumannii (p = 0.19) and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecalis (p = 0.07). A 95% TiO2-5% PDMS matrix with 10 × AgCar is effective at decreasing bacterial adherence of both MDR Acinetobacter baumannii and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecalis on implant materials. Conclusions: Application of this antibiotic-independent coating for surgery in which these implant materials might be used may prevent adherence, biofilm formation, spinal infections, and FAI by MDR Acinetobacter baumannii and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecalis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dioscaris R Garcia
- Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.,Weiss Center for Orthopaedic Trauma Research, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.,Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.,Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Neel Vishwanath
- Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.,Weiss Center for Orthopaedic Trauma Research, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | | | - Sai Allu
- Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.,Weiss Center for Orthopaedic Trauma Research, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Colin D Whitaker
- Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.,Weiss Center for Orthopaedic Trauma Research, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Benjamin K Stone
- Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.,Weiss Center for Orthopaedic Trauma Research, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Ellis M Berns
- Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.,Weiss Center for Orthopaedic Trauma Research, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Carole S L Spake
- Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.,Weiss Center for Orthopaedic Trauma Research, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Dominique M Dockery
- Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.,Weiss Center for Orthopaedic Trauma Research, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Caitlin C Barrett
- Weiss Center for Orthopaedic Trauma Research, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.,Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Makena Mette
- Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.,Weiss Center for Orthopaedic Trauma Research, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - William Connolly
- Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.,Weiss Center for Orthopaedic Trauma Research, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Drew Clippert
- Weiss Center for Orthopaedic Trauma Research, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.,Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Valentin Antoci
- Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.,Weiss Center for Orthopaedic Trauma Research, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.,Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.,Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Christopher T Born
- Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.,Weiss Center for Orthopaedic Trauma Research, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.,Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.,Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Margaryan D, Renz N, Bervar M, Zahn R, Onken J, Putzier M, Vajkoczy P, Trampuz A. Spinal implant-associated infections: a prospective multicentre cohort study. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2020; 56:106116. [PMID: 32726675 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2020.106116] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2020] [Revised: 05/19/2020] [Accepted: 07/21/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
This study evaluated the clinical, laboratory, microbiological, radiological and treatment characteristics of patients with early-onset and late-onset spinal implant-associated infections. Patients diagnosed with spinal implant-associated infection between 2015-2019 were prospectively included and treated according to a standardised algorithm. Infections were classified as early-onset (≤6 weeks) and late-onset (>6 weeks). Among 250 patients, 152 (61%) had early-onset and 98 (39%) had late-onset infection. Local inflammatory signs was the most common manifestation in early-onset infections (84%), whereas late-onset infections presented mainly with persisting or increasing local pain (71%). Sonication fluid was more often positive than peri-implant tissue samples (90% vs. 79%; P = 0.016), particularly in late-onset infections (92% vs. 75%; P = 0.005). Predominant pathogens were coagulase-negative staphylococci, Staphylococcus aureus and Cutibacterium spp. Debridement and implant retention was the most common surgical approach in early-onset infections (85%), whereas partial or complete implant exchange was mainly performed in late-onset infections (62%). Of the 250 patients, 220 (88%) received biofilm-active antibiotics, and median treatment duration was 11.7 weeks. Moreover, 49 patients (20%) needed more than one revision for infection and six patients (2.4%) died during hospital stay. Concluding, most spinal implant-associated infections were acquired during surgery and presented within 6 weeks of surgery. Infections presented mainly with local inflammatory signs in early-onset and with persisting or increasing pain in late-onset infections. Sonication was the most sensitive microbiological method, particularly in late-onset infections. Debridement and implant retention was used in well-integrated implants without loosening, independent of the time of infection onset.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Donara Margaryan
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery (CMSC), Berlin, Germany
| | - Nora Renz
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery (CMSC), Berlin, Germany
| | - Maja Bervar
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery (CMSC), Berlin, Germany
| | - Robert Zahn
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery (CMSC), Berlin, Germany
| | - Julia Onken
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Department of Neurosurgery, Berlin, Germany
| | - Michael Putzier
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery (CMSC), Berlin, Germany
| | - Peter Vajkoczy
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Department of Neurosurgery, Berlin, Germany
| | - Andrej Trampuz
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery (CMSC), Berlin, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|