A Colombian experience involving SpineJack®, a consecutive series of patients experiencing spinal fractures, percutaneous approach and anatomical restoration 2016-2017

Surgical treatment of post-traumatic vertebral osteonecrosis including intravertebral expansive implants-clinical, functional and imaging outcomes and a center experience over 7 years

Background

The effective treatment of post-traumatic vertebral osteonecrosis continues to be an under discussion and controversial subject. Armed kyphoplasty with expansive intravertebral implants is an emerging procedure, which, in theory, allow for a more effective preservation of the restored vertebral height. The development of the indications for these recent devices has given rise to auspicious outcomes in vertebral non-union situations. The aim of this study is to evaluate the clinical, functional and imaging outcomes of the surgical treatment of situations of post-traumatic vertebral necrosis, following a therapeutic algorithm that includes armed kyphoplasty with intravertebral expansive implants and bridge pedicular stabilization, according to a predefined necrosis stage.

Methods

We present a retrospective observational study, in which 35 patients took part, including a total of 35 cases of post-traumatic vertebral osteonecrosis submitted to surgical treatment over 7 years (between 2016 and 2023) at the same center according to a defined therapeutic algorithm. The cases were staged according to vertebral morphology (non-plana or plana) and mobility (mobile or immobile)-stages 1m (mobile necrotic vertebra non-plana), 1i (immobile necrotic vertebra non-plana), 2m (mobile necrotic vertebra plana), and 2i (immobile necrotic vertebra plana)-and the following surgeries were performed: armed kyphoplasty with intravertebral expansive implants filled with bone cement, associated or not to adjacent pedicle instrumentation; or bridge pedicle fixation of the adjacent levels. Clinical results [Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)] as well as imaging outcomes (restoration and preservation of the heights of the vertebral body) were studied. The mean follow-up time corresponded to 3.17 years (range, 1-7.5 years).

Results

Most of the clinical-functional and imaging parameters showed important improvements after surgical treatment, with few complications. A statistically significant greater degree of functional improvement was found in plana vertebrae when compared to non-plana, which reflects that the first are quite symptomatic and disabling at the beginning and improve a lot with surgical treatment. Significant indirect correlations were found between the time from the initial fracture to surgical intervention after diagnosis of vertebral necrosis and the anterior sagittal height in the immediate postoperative time and at the ending of the follow-up. Also, a significant direct correlation was identified between this time and the VAS for pain at the end of the follow-up and the PGIC scale in the same period. It was also found that patients with surgical complications had a statistically significantly longer time between the initial fracture and surgery for post-traumatic necrosis.

Conclusions

We present the results of a surgical therapeutic algorithm that includes the use of recent expansive intravertebral implants at post-traumatic vertebral osteonecrosis, resulting in satisfactory clinical, functional and imaging results. This work shows a pioneering statistical demonstration of the clinical, functional and imaging importance of early detection of this condition (ideally in vertebrae non-plana morphology stages), so that there is still sufficient bone tissue in the vertebral body to permit the stabilization and restoration of its anatomy through a minimally invasive interior reconstruction, with percutaneous access and quicker convalescence, that is to say, armed kyphoplasty, avoiding the unwanted disease progression that will require more aggressive surgical solutions that doesn't allow anatomical restauration.

EFFECTIVENESS AND SAFETY OF SPINEJACK SYSTEM IN THE MANAGEMENT OF VERTEBRAL FRAGILITY FRACTURES: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW

Introduction: The SpineJackⓇ (SJ) system received FDA clearance in 2018, therefore this device is currently available to perform kyphoplasty in osteoporotic vertebral fractures. This study aims to assess the outcome of the SJ system in the management of vertebral fragility fractures (VFFs).

Evidence Acquisition and Synthesis: OVID-MEDLINEⓇ, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, SCOPUS, Springer Link, Web of Science, Google Scholar and PubMed were searched from January 2015 to November 2021 to identify relevant studies. The methodological qualities of the studies were evaluated, and relevant data were extracted.

Seven clinical trials, recruiting 644 patients with 690 VFFs were included. Although PVP, balloon kyphoplast (BKP) and SJ showed comparable effectiveness in back pain relief in patients with VFFs, SJ showed a faster and higher pain relief and a better quality of life, compared with the other two augmentation techniques. Moreover, patients treated with SJ, compared with PVP and BKP, showed a better vertebral body height (VBH) restoration and kyphotic correction; these findings were confirmed also at long-term follow-up. Asymptomatic cement leakage and adjacent level fractures (ALFs) were observed in patients treated with SJ, but with a lower incidence compared with PVP and BKP.

Conclusions: This systematic review shows that SJ has an excellent risk/benefit profile and is more effective than the other augmentation techniques in VBH restoration and kyphotic correction. These findings correlate with a better postoperative quality of life.

EXPANDABLE INTRAVERTEBRAL IMPLANTS IN POST-TRAUMATIC VERTEBRAL NECROSIS - NEW CLASSIFICATION SUGGESTION

The progressive evolution of post-traumatic vertebral necrosis and consequent loss of structural integrity of the vertebral body along with neurological risk, makes it one of the most feared and unpredictable pathologies in spine traumatology. Several studies have addressed the role of vertebroplasty, kyphoplasty, and corpectomy in its treatment; however, it remains a controversial concept without a defined therapeutic algorithm. The recent emergence of expandable intravertebral implants, which allow, by a percutaneous transpedicular application, the capacity for intrasomatic filling and maintenance of the height of the vertebral body, makes them a viable option, not only in the treatment of acute vertebral fractures, but also in non-union cases. In this study, we present a review of the current evidence on the application of expandable intravertebral implants in cases of post-traumatic vertebral necrosis. Based on the available scientific literature, including previous classifications of post-traumatic necrosis, and on the mechanical characteristics of the main expandable intravertebral implants currently available, we propose a simplified classification of this pathology, considering parameters that influence surgical therapeutic guidance, the morphology and the dynamics of the necrotic vertebra's mobility. According to its stages and based on authors' experience and on the scarce literature, we propose an initial therapeutic algorithm and suggest preventive strategies for this disease, considering its main risk factors, that is, fracture comminution and impairment of vertebral vascularity. Therefore, expandable intravertebral implants have a promising role in this condition; however, large prospective studies are needed to confirm their efficacy, to clarify the indications of each of these devices, and to validate the algorithm suggestion regarding treatment and prevention of post-traumatic vertebral necrosis. Level of Evidence III, Systematic Review/Actualization.

Percutaneous Vertebral Reconstruction (PVR) Technique of Pathological Compression Fractures: An Innovative Combined Treatment of Microwave Ablation, Bilateral Expandable Titanium SpineJack Implants Followed by Vertebroplasty

(1) Background: to retrospectively evaluate safety and efficacy of combined microwave ablation (MWA) and bilateral expandable titanium SpineJack (SJ) implants followed by vertebroplasty (VP) for the treatment of painful thoracolumbar pathological vertebral compression fracture. (2) Methods: from July 2017 to October 2022, twenty-eight patients (13 women and 15 men; mean age 68 ± 11 years) with a history of primary neoplasm and thirty-six painful vertebral metastases with vertebral compression fracture underwent combined MWA and bilateral expandable titanium SpineJack implants with vertebroplasty. We analyzed safety through complications rate, and efficacy through vertebral height restoration and pain decrease, evaluated using a visual analogue scale (VAS), and Functional Mobility Scale (FMS), and local tumor control. Contrast-enhanced CT scans were performed at 1, 3, and 6 months and a contrast-enhanced spine MRI at 6 months after the procedure. (3) Results: Technical success rate was 100%. No procedure-related major complications or death occurred. Vertebral height restoration was observed in 22 levels (58%), with a mean anterior height restoration of 2.6 mm ± 0.6 and a mean middle height restoration of 4.4 mm ± 0.6 (p < 0.001). Mean VAS score of pain evaluation on the day before treatment was 6.3 ± 1.5 (range 4-9). At the 6-month evaluation, the median VAS score for pain was 0.4 ± 0.6 (range 0-2) with a mean reduction of 93.65% (6.8 ± 0.7 vs. 0.4 ± 0.6; p < 0.000) compared with baseline evaluation. Contrast-enhanced CT scans were performed at 1, 3, and 6 months and a contrast-enhanced spine MRI was performed at 6 months after the procedure, showing no local recurrence, implant displacement, or new fractures in the treated site. (4) Conclusions: combined microwave ablation and bilateral expandable titanium SpineJack implants with vertebroplasty is a safe and effective procedure for the treatment of pathological compressive vertebral fractures. The vertebral stabilization achieved early and persistent pain relief, increasing patient mobility, improving recovery of walking capacity, and providing local tumor control.

Re-expansion of vertebral compression fractures in patients with multiple myeloma with percutaneous vertebroplasty using spinejack implants: a preliminary and retrospective study

Objective

To retrospectively evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of vertebroplasty using Spinejack implantation for the treatment and stabilization of painful vertebral compression fractures, in patients diagnosed with Multiple Myeloma (MM), to allow both an effective pain reduction and a global structural spine stabilization.

Materials and Methods

From July 2017 and May 2022 thirty-nine patients diagnosed MM, with forty-nine vertebral compression fractures underwent percutaneous Vertebroplasty using Spinejack Implants. We analyzed the feasibility and complications of the procedure, the decrease in pain using visual analogue scale (VAS) and Functional Mobility Scale (FMS).

Results

The technical success rate was 100%. No procedure-related major complications or death occurred. In the 6-month follow-up, the mean VAS score decreased from 5.4 ± 1.0 to 0.2 ± 0.5 with a mean reduction of 96.3%. FMS decreased from 2.3 ± 0.5 vs. 1.2 ± 0.4 with a mean reduction of -47.8%. There were no major complications related to incorrect positioning of the Expandable Titanium SpineJack Implants. In five patients, a cement leak was observed with no associated clinical manifestations. The average length of hospital stay was 6-8 Hours6.6 ± 1.2 h. No new bone fractures or local disease recurrence occurred during a median contrast-enhanced CT follow-up of 6 months.

Conclusions

Our results suggest that vertebroplasty, using Spinejack implantation for the treatment and stabilization of painful vertebral compression fractures, secondary to Multiple Myeloma is a safe and effective procedure with long - term pain relief and restoration of vertebral height.

Is vertebral stenting kyphoplasty a good choice in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral fracture? A series of 47 patients (v2)

Background

The incidence of vertebral fragility fracture is increasing over last three decades with an essential impact on quality of life. Some devices were proposed to improve conventional kyphoplasty in the last five years, known as vertebral stenting kyphoplasty (VSK).

Materials and Methods

All osteoporotic vertebral fractures (OVF) treated with VSK, single-level fracture without neurological impairment, and with more than 24 months of follow-up were included in the study. We recorded fracture types according to DGOU classification, fracture level, regional kyphosis angle (RKA), Oswestry disability index (ODI), and complications.

Results

Forty-seven consecutive patients were included. RKA significantly improved from pre to postoperative values (p<0.000001) and to follow-up values (p<0.00001). A significant difference was found between preoperative RKA of (OF2+OF3) and OF4 (p<0.00001), confirmed immediately after surgery (p= 0.005425) and at last follow up (p= 0.000947). A significant difference was found in correction of RKA between (OF2+OF3) and OF4 at injury time and after treatment (p<0.00001), and it was confirmed at the last follow-up (p=0.000026). ODI showed a significant difference between (OF2+OF3) and OF4 type of fractures (p=0.038216). We recorded five complications: 2 cases of leakage without neurological impairment, two progressions of kyphosis, and one implant migration.

Conclusions

VSK is an excellent and reliable option in the treatment of OVF, with good clinical results and preservation of obtained RKA at the time of treatment. However, in case of vertebral collapse with the involvement of both vertebral plates, surgeons must be aware of possible implant failure or migration.

Level of Evidence

4.

Treatment of thoracolumbar burst fractures: SpineJack vs. posterior arthrodesis-comparison of clinical and radiological outcomes

BACKGROUND

Thoracolumbar fractures sometimes require anterior support and post-traumatic deformity correction. SpineJack proved favorable results in cadaveric and clinical studies, with satisfactory pain relief, vertebral height restoration, and low rates of above adjacent fractures, in neurologically intact fractures. We compared patients' clinical and radiological outcomes of thoracolumbar fractures treated either with posterior arthrodesis or SpineJack.

METHODS

We prospectively collected A2 split and A3, and A4 burst fractures between 2017 and 2021. Patients were stratified in posterior arthrodesis (PA group) and SpineJack (SJ group) and included if age ≥18 years, T11-L3 level, emergent or elective surgery, single or multiple, and neurologically intact. Age, sex, type and level, pain, operative and discharge time, vertebral body heights (VBH), posterior wall retropulsion (PWR), vertebral kyphosis (VK) and local kyphosis (LK) angles, vertebral body (VB) volume, and complications were collected. We then compared clinical-radiographic outcomes between the two groups.

RESULTS

We found no significant differences in median postoperative pain while operative time and discharge time were shorter for SJ patients than PA ones (P<0.001). Mean anterior VBH increase was 20.7%, mid-VBH was 25.5%, and posterior VBH was 8.8%, while increase in VB volume was 26.2%. SJ patients had non-inferior VK e LK angles correction to PA ones. Mean PWR value between pre and post SJ implantation was 0.15±0.65 mm, and no adjacent above-level fractures occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

We showed satisfactory outcomes in a selected range of neurologically intact thoracolumbar split or burst fractures. SJ leads to shorter operative and discharge time and good VB angles and diameters restoration.

Does intraoperative 3D navigation improve SpineJack vertebral augmentation in thoracic and lumbar compression fracture?

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the effect of navigation on the positioning of the SpineJack implant in the treatment of thoracic and lumbar compression fractures.

METHODS

Between January 2018 and December 2019, all patients operated on for thoracic or lumbar fracture using the SpineJack device in stand-alone were included in this single-center study. The positioning of the SpineJack implant was analyzed on axial CT views by measuring the angle between the axis of the pedicle and the axis of the final implant. The relationships between implant positioning and the use of navigation or fluoroscopy, pedicle dimensions and levels of injury were analyzed. Surgical time, radiation exposure, radiological findings and complications were assessed.

RESULTS

One hundred patients were included, for 103 fractured vertebrae and a total of 205 implants, 148 placed under standard fluoroscopy and 57 with the Surgivisio navigation system. For pedicle diameters≥5mm (165 implants), the positioning of the implant relative to the axis of the pedicle was significantly better in the navigation group: 2°±1.4° (range, 0-7°) in the fluoroscopy group versus 1.2°±1.1° (range, 0-5°) in the navigation group (p=0.04). There were no significant differences in reduction of vertebral kyphosis angle or mean operating time. Dose area product (DAP) was significantly higher with navigation: 4.43Gy.cm² versus 0.47Gy.cm² (p<0.001) and dose to the surgeon significantly lower: 0.5 versus 1.6μSv (p<0.001). No difference was found regarding complications. Subgroup analysis showed significantly greater operative time and patient irradiation in the fluoroscopy group when pedicle diameter was less than 5mm.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates the interest of navigation for positioning the SpineJack implant with respect to the pedicle axis in vertebrae with pedicle diameter≥5mm. This study also confirmed the reliability of navigation and lower radiation dose to the surgeon, regardless of the fracture level. Navigation reduced operating time and patient irradiation for vertebrae with pedicle diameter<5mm.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV; retrospective study.

Expandable Intravertebral Implants: A Narrative Review on the Concept, Biomechanics, and Outcomes in Traumatology

Expandable intravertebral implants are self-expanding devices applied percutaneously by the posterior transpedicular approach. These devices introduce the concept of anatomical restoration of vertebral body endplates and direct anatomical reduction performed from the interior of the vertebral body with a compression fracture. This paper aims to provide a narrative review on the concept, indications, biomechanical characteristics, as well as functional and radiographic outcomes of the main expandable intravertebral implants currently available, in terms of their application to thoracolumbar spine traumatology. To this end, we performed a search in July 2021 on the MEDLINE/PubMed platform with the words "expandable intravertebral implant", "armed kyphoplasty", "Vertebral Body Stenting" or "stentoplasty" and "SpineJack". The search yielded 144 papers, and of those, we included 15 in this review. We concluded that percutaneous transpedicular posterior access, the ability to reduce vertebral body fractures, particularly of the vertebral endplates and to maintain the vertebral body height, makes the application of expandable intravertebral implants an attractive option in the treatment of thoracolumbar vertebral compression fractures. However, more prospective, randomized, and large-scale blinded studies are still warranted, especially comparative studies between treatments and about the preferential use of an expansive implant over others, in order to gain definitive insights into the effectiveness and indications of each of these devices.