Complication avoidance in minimally invasive spinal surgery

Full-endoscopic versus microscopic spinal decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic review & meta-analysis

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis is routinely treated with spinal decompression surgery, with an increasing trend towards minimally invasive techniques. Endoscopic decompression has emerged as a technique which minimizes approach-related morbidity while achieving similar clinical outcomes to conventional open or microscopic approaches.

PURPOSE

To assess the safety and efficacy of endoscopic versus microscopic decompression for treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

METHODS

A systematic review on randomized and nonrandomized studies comparing endoscopic versus microscopic decompression was conducted, in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Treatment effects were computed using pairwise random-effects meta-analysis. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk-of-bias and ROBINS-I tools for randomized and nonrandomized trials respectively. Quality of the overall body of evidence was appraised using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system.

RESULTS

A total of 19 primary references comprising 1,997 patients and 2,132 spinal levels were included. Endoscopic decompression was associated with significantly reduced intraoperative blood-loss (weighted mean differences [WMD]=-33.29 mL, 95% CI:-51.80 to -14.78, p=.0032), shorter duration of hospital stay (WMD=-1.79 days, 95% CI: -2.63 to 0.95, p=.001), rates of incidental durotomy (RR = 0.63, 95% CI: 0.43 to 0.91, p=.0184) and surgical site infections (RR=0.23, 95% CI: 0.10 to-0.51, p=.001), and a nonsignificant trend towards less back pain, leg pain, and better functional outcomes compared to its microscopic counterpart up to 2-year follow up.

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopic and microscopic decompression are safe and effective techniques for treatment of symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis. Prospective studies of larger power considering medium to long-term outcomes and rates of iatrogenic instability are warranted to compare potential alignment changes and destabilization from either techniques.

Understanding the Future Prospects of Synergizing Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Surgery with Ceramics and Regenerative Cellular Therapies

Transforaminal lumber interbody fusion (TLIF) is the last resort to address the lumber degenerative disorders such as spondylolisthesis, causing lower back pain. The current surgical intervention for these abnormalities includes open TLIF. However, in recent years, minimally invasive TLIF (MIS-TLIF) has gained a high momentum, as it could minimize the risk of infection, blood loss, and post-operative complications pertaining to fusion surgery. Further advancement in visualizing and guiding techniques along with grafting cage and materials are continuously improving the safety and efficacy of MIS-TLIF. These assistive techniques are also playing a crucial role to increase and improve the learning curve of surgeons. However, achieving an appropriate output through TLIF still remains a challenge, which might be synergized through 3D-printing and tissue engineering-based regenerative therapy. Owing to their differentiation potential, biomaterials such as stem/progenitor cells may contribute to restructuring lost or damaged tissues during MIS-TLIF, and this therapeutic efficacy could be further supplemented by platelet-derived biomaterials, leading to improved clinical outcomes. Thus, based on the above-mentioned strategies, we have comprehensively summarized recent developments in MIS-TLIF and its possible combinatorial regenerative therapies for rapid and long-term relief.

Long-length tomosynthesis and 3D-2D registration for intraoperative assessment of spine instrumentation

PURPOSE

A system for long-length intraoperative imaging is reported based on longitudinal motion of an O-arm gantry featuring a multi-slot collimator. We assess the utility of long-length tomosynthesis and the geometric accuracy of 3D image registration for surgical guidance and evaluation of long spinal constructs.

METHODS

A multi-slot collimator with tilted apertures was integrated into an O-arm system for long-length imaging. The multi-slot projective geometry leads to slight view disparity in both long-length projection images (referred to as 'line scans') and tomosynthesis 'slot reconstructions' produced using a weighted-backprojection method. The radiation dose for long-length imaging was measured, and the utility of long-length, intraoperative tomosynthesis was evaluated in phantom and cadaver studies. Leveraging the depth resolution provided by parallax views, an algorithm for 3D-2D registration of the patient and surgical devices was adapted for registration with line scans and slot reconstructions. Registration performance using single-plane or dual-plane long-length images was evaluated and compared to registration accuracy achieved using standard dual-plane radiographs.

RESULTS

Longitudinal coverage of ∼50-64 cm was achieved with a single long-length slot scan, providing a field-of-view (FOV) up to (40 × 64) cm², depending on patient positioning. The dose-area product (reference point air kerma × x-ray field area) for a slot scan ranged from ∼702-1757 mGy·cm², equivalent to ∼2.5 s of fluoroscopy and comparable to other long-length imaging systems. Long-length scanning produced high-resolution tomosynthesis reconstructions, covering ∼12-16 vertebral levels. 3D image registration using dual-plane slot reconstructions achieved median target registration error (TRE) of 1.2 mm and 0.6° in cadaver studies, outperforming registration to dual-plane line scans (TRE = 2.8 mm and 2.2°) and radiographs (TRE = 2.5 mm and 1.1°). 3D registration using single-plane slot reconstructions leveraged the ∼7-14° angular separation between slots to achieve median TRE ∼2 mm and <2° from a single scan.

CONCLUSION

The multi-slot configuration provided intraoperative visualization of long spine segments, facilitating target localization, assessment of global spinal alignment, and evaluation of long surgical constructs. 3D-2D registration to long-length tomosynthesis reconstructions yielded a promising means of guidance and verification with accuracy exceeding that of 3D-2D registration to conventional radiographs.

Thoracic Endoscopic Spine Surgery: A Comprehensive Review

BACKGROUND

From the 1990s, there has been growth in the literature demonstrating the feasibility of minimally invasive approaches for treating diverse spinal disorders. There is still much work to be done in circumnavigating the technical challenges and elucidating relative advantages of endoscopic techniques in spine surgery. In this comprehensive literature review, we discuss the history, advantages, disadvantages, approaches, and technology of, and critically examine peer-reviewed studies specifically addressing, endoscopic thoracic spinal surgery.

METHODS

Literature review was conducted with the key words "endoscopic," "minimally invasive," and "thoracic spinal surgery," using PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar.

RESULTS

Review of 241 thorascopic procedures showed a success rate of 98% to 100%, low morbidity, and favorable complication profile. Review of 115 thoracic fixation procedures demonstrated high success rate, and 87% of screw positions were rated "good." Review of 55 full endoscopic uniportal decompressions showed sufficient decompression in most patients. Match pair analysis of 34 patients comparing video-assisted thoracoscopy surgery (VATS) or posterior spinal fusion reported the VATS group had increased operative duration but reduced blood loss.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on our literature review, there is a high rate of positive outcomes with endoscopic thoracic spine surgery, which reduces tissue dissection, intraoperative blood loss, and epidural fibrosis. However, the technical challenge highlights the importance of further training and innovation in this rapidly evolving field.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

There is growing evidence demonstrating the success of endoscopic thoracic spinal surgery. Populations that could be helped include the elderly and immunocompromised, who would benefit from decreased hospital stay and enhanced recovery time.