1
|
Zhang JK, Alimadadi A, Abolfotoh M, Mercier P, Mattei TA. Development of a Modified Bayonet Forceps for Improving Steerability of Paddle Lead Electrodes During Spinal Cord Stimulator Surgery: A Technical Note. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown) 2023; 25:285-291. [PMID: 37366619 DOI: 10.1227/ons.0000000000000779] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2023] [Accepted: 03/29/2023] [Indexed: 06/28/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE Despite recent advancements in spinal cord stimulation (SCS) technology, the surgical instrumentation for placement of SCS paddle leads remains suboptimal. Therefore, we developed a novel instrument to improve the steerability of SCS paddle leads during surgical placement. METHODS A review of existing literature was performed to analyze workflow deficiencies in the standard instrumentation of SCS paddle lead placement. After a period of adaptation and iterative feedback with a medical instrument company, a new instrument was developed, tested at benchtop, and successfully incorporated into the surgical routine. RESULTS A standard bayonet forceps was modified to include hooked ends and a ribbed surface, providing the surgeon with greater control over the paddle lead. The new instrument also included bilateral metal tubes starting approximately 4 cm proximal from the edge of the forceps. The bilateral metal tubes, through which the SCS paddle lead wires are passed, serve as anchors to keep the wires away from the incision site. In addition, it permitted the paddle lead to assume a bent configuration, reducing its overall size and allowing it to be placed through a smaller incision and laminectomy. The modified bayonet forceps was successfully used intraoperatively for placement of SCS paddle lead electrodes in several surgeries. CONCLUSION The proposed modified bayonet forceps increased steerability of the paddle lead, facilitating optimal midline placement. The bent configuration of the device facilitated a more minimally invasive surgical approach. Future studies are needed to validate our single-provider experience and evaluate the impact of this new instrument on operating room efficiency.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Justin K Zhang
- Division of Neurological Surgery, Department of Neurosurgery, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Chakravarthy VB, Laufer I, Amin AG, Cohen MA, Reiner AS, Vuong C, Persaud PS, Ruppert LM, Puttanniah VG, Afonso AM, Tsui VS, Brallier JW, Malhotra VT, Bilsky MH, Barzilai O. Patient outcomes following implementation of an enhanced recovery after surgery pathway for patients with metastatic spine tumors. Cancer 2022; 128:4109-4118. [PMID: 36219485 PMCID: PMC10859187 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.34484] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2022] [Revised: 07/06/2022] [Accepted: 07/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Metastatic spine tumor surgery consists of palliative operations performed on frail patients with multiple medical comorbidities. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programs involve an evidence-based, multidisciplinary approach to improve perioperative outcomes. This study presents clinical outcomes of a metastatic spine tumor ERAS pathway implemented at a tertiary cancer center. METHODS The metastatic spine tumor ERAS program launched in April 2019, and data from January 2018 to May 2020 were reviewed. Measured outcomes included the following: hospital length of stay (LOS), time to ambulation, urinary catheter duration, time to resumption of diet, intraoperative fluid intake, estimated blood loss (EBL), and intraoperative and postoperative day 0-5 cumulative opioid use (morphine milligram equivalent [MME]). RESULTS A total of 390 patients were included in the final analysis: 177 consecutive patients undergoing metastatic spine tumor surgery enrolled in the ERAS program and 213 consecutive pre-ERAS patients. Although the mean case durations were similar in the ERAS and pre-ERAS cohorts (265 vs. 274 min; p = .22), the ERAS cohort had decreased EBL (157 vs. 215 ml; p = .003), decreased postoperative day 0-5 cumulative mean opioid use (178 vs. 396 MME; p < .0001), earlier ambulation (mean, 34 vs. 57 h; p = .0001), earlier discontinuation of urinary catheters (mean, 36 vs. 56 h; p < .001), and shorter LOS (5.4 vs. 7.5 days; p < .0001). CONCLUSIONS The implementation of a multidisciplinary ERAS program designed for metastatic spine tumor surgery led to improved clinical quality metrics, including shorter hospitalizations and significant reductions in opioid consumption.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vikram B. Chakravarthy
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Ilya Laufer
- Neurological Surgery, New York University Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Anubhav G. Amin
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Marc A. Cohen
- Surgery (Head and Neck), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Anne S. Reiner
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Cindy Vuong
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Petal‐Ann S. Persaud
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Lisa M. Ruppert
- Rehabilitation Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Vinay G. Puttanniah
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Anoushka M. Afonso
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Van S. Tsui
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Jess W. Brallier
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Vivek T. Malhotra
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Mark H. Bilsky
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Ori Barzilai
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Application of enhanced recovery after surgery care protocol in the perioperative care of patients undergoing lumbar fusion and internal fixation. J Orthop Surg Res 2022; 17:240. [PMID: 35436890 PMCID: PMC9014593 DOI: 10.1186/s13018-022-03099-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2022] [Accepted: 03/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background To explore the effects and deficiencies of the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) care protocol on patients undergoing lumbar fusion and internal fixation in perioperative care. Methods A total of 166 patients with lumbar fusion and internal fixation were collected and divided into two groups, among which 86 patients received ERAS care protocol were attributed into ERAS group, while the other 80 patients received traditional perioperative care protocol were assigned to control group. Then, the degree of pain, self-care ability and the degree of recovery were assessed using the visual analogue scale (VAS), Barthel index (BI) rating scale and the Sino-version Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) questionnaire, respectively. Moreover, further analysis was performed based on patients’ different age, gender, body mass index (BMI) and education of patients in ERAS group. Results The hospitalization time and the incidence of complication in the ERAS group were obviously lower than those in control group (both, P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in hospitalization expenses between the two groups (P > 0.05). The BI score of the ERAS group was higher than that of the control group (P < 0.05), and the percentage of ODI score in ERAS group was significantly downregulated in comparison with that in control group (P < 0.05). Intra-group analysis in ERAS showed that, compared with older patients, younger patients had higher BI scores (P < 0.05) and lower ODI scores (P < 0.05); meanwhile, overweight patients had lower BI scores (P < 0.05), and the ODI score decreased with the increase in education level of the patients. Conclusions ERAS care protocol can significantly shorten the hospitalization time and reduce the occurrence of postoperative complications of patients, significantly enhance the self-care ability of patients after discharge and promote the rapid recovery of patients after surgery. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13018-022-03099-0.
Collapse
|
4
|
Kim CW. MIS TLIF, EndoTLIF, and the Ability of Navigation/Robotics to Enable Spinal Surgery in an Ambulatory Care Setting. Global Spine J 2022; 12:34S-39S. [PMID: 35393877 PMCID: PMC8998480 DOI: 10.1177/21925682221074667] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Technical Report. OBJECTIVE Performing surgeries in the ambulatory surgery center affords improved efficiencies in terms of cost and speed. However, ambulatory surgery is only successful if complications, re-admissions, and re-operations are avoided. This report describes the San Diego Outpatient Lumbar Fusion Program, a culmination of cumulative incremental improvements in patient selection and patient education, meticulous peri-operative management, minimally invasive techniques together with navigation/robotics. METHODS Retrospective review of prospectively collected data on 1-2 level minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusions (MIS TLIF). RESULTS Healthy patients (age 72 years old or less, BMI less than 50, ASA 1 or 2) with good social support and reasonable pre-operative function (ODI 50 or less) treated with the MIS TLIF technique can be discharged home in less than 1 midnight with good clinical results. CONCLUSIONS Relatively young, healthy patients can safely and effectively undergo 1-2 level lumbar fusion surgery in the ASC setting when using contemporary minimally invasive techniques and computer-assisted navigation/robotics.
Collapse
|
5
|
Agarwal P, Frid I, Singer J, Zalatimo O, Schirmer CM, Kimmell KT, Agarwal N. Neurosurgery perception of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols. J Clin Neurosci 2021; 92:110-114. [PMID: 34509236 DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2021.07.044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2021] [Revised: 06/08/2021] [Accepted: 07/25/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols are widespread in several fields, particularly general surgery, and attempt to deliver surgical care at a lower cost while also improving patient outcomes. However, few institutions have implemented ERAS protocols in neurosurgery. As such, a survey of neurosurgeons on the current state of ERAS in neurosurgery was conducted to provide insight on scaling the practice nationally. A 15-question survey was designed to assess the implementation of andsatisfaction with ERAS protocols at individual institutions. A total of 39 responses were collected from 38 unique institutions. 58.9%(N = 23) reported implementation of neurosurgical ERAS protocols. 52.1% (N = 12) of the responses were neurosurgeons at academic institutions withneurosurgical residency programs. Most neurosurgeons used ERAS protocolsfor spine cases (N = 23), with only 17.3% (N = 4) employing ERAS protocolsfor cranial cases. 69.5% (N = 16) of survey participants reported that thedesign and implementation of ERAS was a multidisciplinary effort acrossmany departments, including neurosurgery, anesthesia, and pharmacy.Decreased costs and intensive care unit (ICU) admission were reported tobe unanticipated benefits of ERAS implementation. Unanticipated challenges to implementation of new protocols included difficulties withelectronic medical record (EMR) integration, agreement of protocoldetails amongst stakeholders, uniform implementation of protocols by allneurosurgeons, and lack of adaptability by multidisciplinary staff. Meandepartment satisfaction with ERAS protocol implementation was 4.00 +/- 0.81 (N = 22) on a 5-point Likert scale.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Prateek Agarwal
- University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Pittsburgh, PA, United States
| | - Ilya Frid
- Department of Neurosurgery and Neuroscience Institute, Geisinger Health System and Geisinger Commonwealth School of Medicine, Wilkes-Barre, PA, United States
| | - Justin Singer
- Spectrum Health Medical Group, Department of Neurosurgery, Grand Rapids, MI, United States
| | - Omar Zalatimo
- Lifebridge Health, Department of Neurosurgery, The Sandra and Malcolm Berman Brain & Spine Institute, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Clemens M Schirmer
- Department of Neurosurgery and Neuroscience Institute, Geisinger Health System and Geisinger Commonwealth School of Medicine, Wilkes-Barre, PA, United States; Lifebridge Health, Department of Neurosurgery, The Sandra and Malcolm Berman Brain & Spine Institute, Baltimore, MD, United States; Research Institute of Neurointervention, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Kristopher T Kimmell
- Rochester Regional Health, Department of Neurosurgery, Rochester, NY, United States
| | - Nitin Agarwal
- University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Dowling Á, Lewandrowski KU. Endoscopic Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion With a Single Oblique PEEK Cage and Posterior Supplemental Fixation. Int J Spine Surg 2020; 14:S45-S55. [PMID: 33122187 DOI: 10.14444/7126] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To demonstrate the feasibility of an endoscopically assisted minimally invasive surgery transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) and to study clinical outcomes with the use of a static oblique bullet-shaped cannulated poly-ether-ether-ketone (PEEK) lumbar interbody fusion cage in conjunction with platelet enriched plasma infused allograft cancellous chips and posterior supplemental fixation. METHODS In this retrospective study of 43 patients who underwent endoscopically assisted MIS-TLIF for spondylolisthesis (53.5%) and stenosis (46.3%), the Oswestry Disability Index, the visual analog scale (VAS) for back and leg pain, and the modified Macnab criteria were used as primary clinical outcome measures. Clinical outcomes were cross-tabulated against fusion grade using the Bridwell classification of interbody fusion. RESULTS The majority of patients (90.7%) had excellent (8/43; 18.6%) and good (31/43; 72.1%) Macnab outcomes. There were significant VAS back score reductions from an average preoperative values of 8.9070 to a postoperative VAS score of 3.8605, and a score of 2.7674 at final follow-up (P < .0001). The reductions in the VAS leg scores were also significant from preoperative score of 5.58 to a postoperative value of 2.16, and a final follow-up score of 1.67 (P < .0001); the Oswestry Disability Index score went from a preoperative value of 54.4 to 23.3 postoperatively and 18.5 at the final follow-up (P < .0001). The vast majority of patients (92.9%) with Bridwell grade I fusion had excellent and good Macnab outcomes (P = .027). CONCLUSIONS The authors recommend the use of an endoscope as an adjunct to MIS-TLIF, a minimally invasive spinal surgery technique in which many surgeons may be well versed and have a great deal of experience. Clinical outcomes with the endoscopic interbody fusion procedure with a static PEEK cage in conjunction with platelet-enriched bone allograft were favorable. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 3. CLINICAL RELEVANCE Feasibility study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Álvaro Dowling
- Endoscopic Spine Clinic, Santiago, Chile, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, USP, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil
| | - Kai-Uwe Lewandrowski
- Center for Advanced Spine Care of Southern Arizona and Surgical Institute of Tucson, Tucson, Arizona, Department Neurosurgery, UNIRIO, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, Department of Orthopaedics, Fundación Universitaria Sanitas, Bogotá, DC, Colombia
| |
Collapse
|