Femoral artery cannulation as a safe alternative for aortic dissection arch repair in the era of axillary artery cannulation

Right axillary artery cannulation in acute type A aortic dissection with involvement of the right axillary artery

OBJECTIVE

The right axillary artery is currently recommended for arterial cannulation in surgery for acute type A aortic dissection. However, the feasibility of cannulation on a dissected right axillary artery remains undetermined. The objective was to examine the feasibility of cannulation on a dissected right axillary artery.

METHODS

From 2016 to 2020, 835 patients who underwent acute type A aortic dissection repair were included in this study. Cannulation strategy and perioperative outcomes of patients who did and did not have right axillary artery dissection were compared. Propensity score matching and logistic regression were applied.

RESULTS

A total of 124 patients had right axillary artery dissection, and 711 patients did not. Direct right axillary artery cannulation was used for cardiopulmonary bypass in the majority of patients, but with a lower rate in patients with right axillary artery dissection (n = 88 [71.0%] vs n = 579 [81.4%], P = .007). Right axillary artery cannulation failure (n = 3 [2.4%] vs n = 5 [0.7%], P = .102) and related complications (n = 1 [0.8%] vs n = 6 [0.8%], P = 1.000) were rare in both groups. In-hospital mortality (n = 18 [14.5%] vs n = 59 [8.3%], P = .027) and stroke (n = 14 [11.3%] vs n = 42 [5.9%], P = .027) were significantly higher in the right axillary artery dissection group, but after propensity score matching, in-hospital outcomes were comparable. Right axillary artery dissection was not a risk factor for mortality, stroke, right axillary artery cannulation not performed, or right axillary artery cannulation failure.

CONCLUSIONS

Direct right axillary artery cannulation is feasible for most patients with acute type A aortic dissection with right axillary artery dissection.

Neuroprotection in aortic arch surgery: untold flaws and future directions

The current paradigm of brain protection in aortic surgery falls short of delivering good outcomes with minimal complications. A renewed understanding of neuroprotective methods and biomarkers to predict brain injury and aortic disease are crucial towards the development of more effective clinical management strategies. A review of current literature was carried out to identify current flaws in our approach to neuroprotection in aortic surgery. Emerging evidence surrounding neuroprotective strategies, biomarkers for brain injury, and biomarkers for predicting aortic disease are evaluated in terms of their impact for future therapeutic approaches. Current literature suggests that the prevailing methods of neuroprotection need renewal. Clinical outcomes associated with deep hypothermic circulatory arrest remain varied. Branch-first and endovascular approaches to aortic repair are particularly promising alternatives. The use of biomarkers to identify and manage brain injury, as well as to diagnose aortic disease in the nonacute and acute settings, would further help to improve our overall paradigm of neuroprotection in aortic surgery. Though much prospective research is still required, the outlook for neuroprotection in aortic surgery is promising. Adopting alternative surgical techniques and exploiting predictive novel biomarkers will help us to gradually eliminate the risk of brain damage in aortic surgery.

Erratum to femoral artery cannulation as a safe alternative for aortic dissection arch repair in the era of axillary artery cannulation

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.21037/jtd-20-2113.].