1
|
Oudin V, Salleron J, Marchesi V, Peiffert D, Khadige M, Faivre JC. CyberKnife ® stereotactic radiation therapy for stage I lung cancer and pulmonary oligometastases: is fiducial implantation still relevant?-a cohort study. J Thorac Dis 2023; 15:4636-4647. [PMID: 37868838 PMCID: PMC10586995 DOI: 10.21037/jtd-22-1245] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2022] [Accepted: 07/21/2023] [Indexed: 10/24/2023]
Abstract
Background Few studies have investigated whether there is a difference in local control or overall survival rates following treatment with robotic stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) with or without prior fiducial marker implantation. Our study aimed to investigate this in patients with primary or secondary lung tumors. Methods A retrospective study was conducted at the Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine of patients treated for primary lung cancer or pulmonary oligometastases with SBRT from January 2013 to July 2016. We included patients at least 18 years old who had stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) or lung metastases and a follow-up of at least 1 month. Results A total of 294 patients were included. Tumors included 122 lung metastases, 89 stage I NSCLC, and 83 non-histologically confirmed lung lesions. The tracking methods were Synchrony® in 191 cases (119 gold seeds and 72 coils) and Xsight® Spine with 4D computed tomography in 103 cases. Median follow-up was 31.6 months [interquartile range (IQR), 18.1-50.2 months]. The two- and five-year probability of local control were respectively 92.22% [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.89-0.95] and 85.35% (95% CI: 0.79-0.99). The two- and five-year probability of overall survival were respectively 87.46% and 72.77% (P=0.586). Local control rates did not significantly differ between techniques at 2 and 5 years (P=0.685) (gold seeds, coils or Xsight® Spine) within tumors grouped by location, gross tumor volume (GTV) (respectively P=0.9, P=0.7, and P=0.4), planning target volume (PTV) (respectively P=0.4, P=0.9, and P=0.7), or PTV/GTV ratio (respectively P=0.6, P=0.6, and P=0.5). Metastasis-free survival and Overall survival rates did not significantly differ between techniques at 2 and 5 years (P=0.664 and P=0.586, respectively). There were no grade 4 or 5 toxicities and only one grade 3 pneumonitis and one grade 3 pneumothorax. Conclusions Fiducial-less SBRT using Xsight® Spine is a safe alternative to Synchrony® using gold seeds or coils, with comparable local control and overall survival rates and a similar toxicity profile.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Victor Oudin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Georges François Leclerc Hospital, Dijon, France
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Lorraine Cancer Institute-Alexis-Vautrin, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France
| | - Julia Salleron
- Department of Data Management and Biostatistics, Lorraine Cancer Institute-Alexis-Vautrin, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France
| | - Vincent Marchesi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Georges François Leclerc Hospital, Dijon, France
| | - Didier Peiffert
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Georges François Leclerc Hospital, Dijon, France
- EA 4360 APEMAC, University of Lorraine, Nancy, France
| | - Myriam Khadige
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Georges François Leclerc Hospital, Dijon, France
- Gray Institute, Maubeuge, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Dong B, Chen R, Zhu X, Wu Q, Jin J, Wang W, Zhu Y, Jiang H, Bi N, Wang X, Xu X, Xu Y, Chen M. Comparison of stereotactic body radiation therapy versus surgery for multiple primary lung cancers after prior radical resection: A multicenter retrospective study. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2023; 40:100601. [PMID: 36936471 PMCID: PMC10020093 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2023.100601] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2022] [Revised: 01/26/2023] [Accepted: 02/13/2023] [Indexed: 02/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Patients who previously underwent surgical resection of initial primary lung cancer are at a high risk of developing multiple primary lung cancers (MPLCs). The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety between stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) and surgery for MPLCs patients after prior radical resection for the first lung cancers. Methods In this multicenter retrospective study, eligible MPLC patients with tumor diameter of 5.0 cm or less at N0M0 who underwent SBRT or reoperation between January 2013 and August 2020 were enrolled. The primary endpoint was the 3-year locoregional recurrence and treatment-related toxicity. Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate survival rates. The χ2 test was adapted to assess the difference of categorical variables between the two subgroup patients. Results A total of 203 (73 in the SBRT group and 130 in the surgery group) patients from three academic cancer centers were evaluated with a median follow-up of 38.3 months. The cumulative 1-, 2-, and 3-year incidences of locoregional recurrence were 5.6 %, 7.0 % and 13.1 % in the SBRT group versus 3.2 %, 4.8 % and 7.4 % in the surgery group, respectively [hazard ratio (HR), 1.97; 95 % confidence interval (CI), 0.74-5.24; P = 0.14]. The cancer-specific survival rates were 95.9 %, 94.5 % and 88.1 % versus 96.9 %, 94.6 % and 93.8 % in the SBRT and surgery groups respectively (HR, 1.72; 95 % CI, 0.67-4.44; P = 0.23). In the SBRT group, two patients (2.7 %) suffered from grade 3 radiation pneumonitis, while in the surgery group, grade 3 complications occurred in four (3.1 %) patients, and four cases were expired due to pneumonia or pulmonary heart disease within 90 days after surgery. Conclusions SBRT is an effective therapeutic option with limited toxicity compared to surgery for patients with MPLCs after prior radical surgical resection, and it could be considered as an alternative treatment for those patients.
Collapse
Key Words
- BED, biological effective dose
- CCI, Charlson comorbidity index
- CSS, cancer-specific survival
- CT, computed tomography
- DM, distant metastasis
- FEV1, forced expiratory volume in the first second
- FVC, forced vital capacity
- ITV, internal target volume
- KPS, Karnofsky performance status
- LRR, locoregional recurrence
- Locoregional recurrence
- MPLC, multiple primary lung cancer
- Multiple primary lung cancers
- NSCLC, non-small cell lung cancer
- OS, overall survival
- PET/CT, positron emission tomography/computed tomography
- PTV, planning target volume
- Radical resection
- SBRT, stereotactic body radiation therapy
- Stereotactic body radiation therapy
- TTP, time to progression
- Toxicity
- VATS, video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Baiqiang Dong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
- Department of Thoracic Radiotherapy, The Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Institute of Basic Medicine and Cancer (IBMC), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Zhejiang Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Hangzhou, China
| | - Runzhe Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xuan Zhu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Qing Wu
- Department of Thoracic Radiotherapy, The Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Institute of Basic Medicine and Cancer (IBMC), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Zhejiang Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Hangzhou, China
- The Second Clinical Medical College of Zhejiang Chinese Medicine University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Jia'nan Jin
- Department of Thoracic Radiotherapy, The Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Institute of Basic Medicine and Cancer (IBMC), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Zhejiang Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Hangzhou, China
| | - Wenqing Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Yujia Zhu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Hui Jiang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Nan Bi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Xu Wang
- Department of Radiology, The Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Institute of Basic Medicine and Cancer (IBMC), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Zhejiang Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Hangzhou, China
| | - Xiaofang Xu
- Department of Thoracic Oncology Surgery, The Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Institute of Basic Medicine and Cancer (IBMC), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Zhejiang Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Hangzhou, China
| | - Yujin Xu
- Department of Thoracic Radiotherapy, The Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Institute of Basic Medicine and Cancer (IBMC), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Zhejiang Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Hangzhou, China
- Corresponding authors at: The Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), No. 1, East Banshan Road, Hangzhou 310022, China (Y. Zu) and Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, 651 East Dongfeng Road, Guangzhou 510060, China (M. Chen).
| | - Ming Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
- Department of Thoracic Radiotherapy, The Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Institute of Basic Medicine and Cancer (IBMC), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Zhejiang Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Hangzhou, China
- Corresponding authors at: The Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), No. 1, East Banshan Road, Hangzhou 310022, China (Y. Zu) and Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, 651 East Dongfeng Road, Guangzhou 510060, China (M. Chen).
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Daly ME, Beagen P, Madani MH. Nonsurgical Therapy for Early-Stage Lung Cancer. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am 2023; 37:499-512. [PMID: 37024386 DOI: 10.1016/j.hoc.2023.02.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/08/2023]
Abstract
Treatment options for medically inoperable, early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) include stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) and percutaneous image guided thermal ablation. SABR is delivered over 1-5 sessions of highly conformal ablative radiation with excellent tumor control. Toxicity is depending on tumor location and anatomy but is typically mild. Studies evaluating SABR in operable NSCLC are ongoing. Thermal ablation can be delivered via radiofrequency, microwave, or cryoablation, with promising results and modest toxicity. We review the data and outcomes for these approaches and discuss ongoing studies.
Collapse
|
4
|
Park HS, Detterbeck FC, Madoff DC, Bade BC, Kumbasar U, Mase VJ, Li AX, Blasberg JD, Woodard GA, Brandt WS, Decker RH. A guide for managing patients with stage I NSCLC: deciding between lobectomy, segmentectomy, wedge, SBRT and ablation-part 4: systematic review of evidence involving SBRT and ablation. J Thorac Dis 2022; 14:2412-2436. [PMID: 35813762 PMCID: PMC9264060 DOI: 10.21037/jtd-21-1826] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2021] [Accepted: 05/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Background Clinical decision-making for patients with stage I lung cancer is complex. It involves multiple options [lobectomy, segmentectomy, wedge, stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), thermal ablation], weighing multiple outcomes (e.g., short-, intermediate-, long-term) and multiple aspects of each (e.g., magnitude of a difference, the degree of confidence in the evidence, and the applicability to the patient and setting at hand). A structure is needed to summarize the relevant evidence for an individual patient and to identify which outcomes have the greatest impact on the decision-making. Methods A PubMed systematic review from 2000-2021 of outcomes after SBRT or thermal ablation vs. resection is the focus of this paper. Evidence was abstracted from randomized trials and non-randomized comparisons with at least some adjustment for confounders. The analysis involved careful assessment, including characteristics of patients, settings, residual confounding etc. to expose degrees of uncertainty and applicability to individual patients. Evidence is summarized that provides an at-a-glance overall impression as well as the ability to delve into layers of details of the patients, settings and treatments involved. Results Short-term outcomes are meaningfully better after SBRT than resection. SBRT doesn't affect quality-of-life (QOL), on average pulmonary function is not altered, but a minority of patients may experience gradual late toxicity. Adjusted non-randomized comparisons demonstrate a clinically relevant detriment in long-term outcomes after SBRT vs. surgery. The short-term benefits of SBRT over surgery are accentuated with increasing age and compromised patients, but the long-term detriment remains. Ablation is associated with a higher rate of complications than SBRT, but there is little intermediate-term impact on quality-of-life or pulmonary function tests. Adjusted comparisons show a meaningful detriment in long-term outcomes after ablation vs. surgery; there is less difference between ablation and SBRT. Conclusions A systematic, comprehensive summary of evidence regarding Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy or thermal ablation vs. resection with attention to aspects of applicability, uncertainty and effect modifiers provides a foundation for a framework for individualized decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Henry S. Park
- Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Frank C. Detterbeck
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - David C. Madoff
- Department of Radiology & Biomedical Imaging, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Brett C. Bade
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Ulas Kumbasar
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Hacettepe University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Vincent J. Mase
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Andrew X. Li
- Department of General Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Justin D. Blasberg
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Gavitt A. Woodard
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Whitney S. Brandt
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA
| | - Roy H. Decker
- Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Montagne F, Guisier F, Venissac N, Baste JM. The Role of Surgery in Lung Cancer Treatment: Present Indications and Future Perspectives-State of the Art. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:3711. [PMID: 34359612 PMCID: PMC8345199 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13153711] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2021] [Revised: 07/14/2021] [Accepted: 07/20/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC) are different today, due to the increased use of screening programs and of innovative systemic therapies, leading to the diagnosis of earlier and pre-invasive tumors, and of more advanced and controlled metastatic tumors. Surgery for NSCLC remains the cornerstone treatment when it can be performed. The role of surgery and surgeons has also evolved because surgeons not only perform the initial curative lung cancer resection but they also accompany and follow-up patients from pre-operative rehabilitation, to treatment for recurrences. Surgery is personalized, according to cancer characteristics, including cancer extensions, from pre-invasive and local tumors to locally advanced, metastatic disease, or residual disease after medical treatment, anticipating recurrences, and patients' characteristics. Surgical management is constantly evolving to offer the best oncologic resection adapted to each NSCLC stage. Today, NSCLC can be considered as a chronic disease and surgery is a valuable tool for the diagnosis and treatment of recurrences, and in palliative conditions to relieve dyspnea and improve patients' comfort.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- François Montagne
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Calmette Hospital, University Hospital of Lille, Boulevard du Pr. J Leclercq, F-59000 Lille, France; (F.M.); (N.V.)
| | - Florian Guisier
- Department of Pneumology, Rouen University Hospital, 1 rue de Germont, F-76000 Rouen, France;
- Clinical Investigation Center, Rouen University Hospital, CIC INSERM 1404, 1 rue de Germont, F-76000 Rouen, France
- Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy of Rouen, Normandie University, LITIS QuantIF EA4108, 22 Boulevard Gambetta, F-76183 Rouen, France
| | - Nicolas Venissac
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Calmette Hospital, University Hospital of Lille, Boulevard du Pr. J Leclercq, F-59000 Lille, France; (F.M.); (N.V.)
| | - Jean-Marc Baste
- Department of General and Thoracic Surgery, Rouen University Hospital, 1 rue de Germont, F-76000 Rouen, France
- Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy of Rouen (UNIROUEN), Normandie University, INSERM U1096, 22 Boulevard Gambetta, F-76000 Rouen, France
| |
Collapse
|